W
WilliamLang
Posts: 636
Joined: Nov 22, 2019

by WilliamLang »

Hey friends,

Got a contact with a horn - interesting neck on it, definitely a King/White horn. Any other info from y'all? <ATTACHMENT filename="LjAgpLlR.jpg-small.jpeg" index="0">[attachment=0]LjAgpLlR.jpg-small.jpeg</ATTACHMENT><ATTACHMENT filename="4ECyZLJU.jpg-small.jpeg" index="1">[attachment=1]4ECyZLJU.jpg-small.jpeg</ATTACHMENT>
B
BGuttman
Posts: 7368
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by BGuttman »

Looks like an older Symphony. It should be dual bore: 0.536/0.547 (inches) and take a small shank mouthpiece.
J
JohnL
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by JohnL »

Based on the valve orientation and the wrap, I'm thinking late 1940's into the 1950's.
B
Burgerbob
Posts: 6327
Joined: Apr 23, 2018

by Burgerbob »

[quote="BGuttman"]Looks like an older Symphony. It should be dual bore: 0.536/0.547 (inches) and take a small shank mouthpiece.[/quote]

The one I've played was large shank.
A
afugate
Posts: 671
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by afugate »

[quote="BGuttman"]Looks like an older Symphony. It should be dual bore: 0.536/0.547 (inches) and take a small shank mouthpiece.[/quote]

That was my initial thought as well. It looks like my 0.536/0.547 bore Symphony.

--Andy in OKC
B
BGuttman
Posts: 7368
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by BGuttman »

[quote="Burgerbob"]<QUOTE author="BGuttman" post_id="174572" time="1648099837" user_id="53">
Looks like an older Symphony. It should be dual bore: 0.536/0.547 (inches) and take a small shank mouthpiece.[/quote]

The one I've played was large shank.
</QUOTE>

I played one in High School that took a small shank. Also had the valve mounted "upside down" with the mechanism against my chin.
W
WilliamLang
Posts: 636
Joined: Nov 22, 2019

by WilliamLang »

thanks all! learned a bunch here and much appreciated
F
Finetales
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by Finetales »

Looks just like the 1480 Symphony I used to own. Large shank...actually maybe a bit larger than large shank as my large shank pieces went very far in, like my Remington-shank Conns. Really a small bass, despite what the bore size would seem to indicate. Mine had a 9" bell, what's the diameter on this one?
G
greenbean
Posts: 1958
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by greenbean » (edited 2022-03-24 9:33 p.m.)

The wrap on this one is also different than other 1480's. King used at least two styles of wrap. I think King was experimenting a lot during these years. Maybe they weren't satisfied with this model. They were several variants of this horn.

The one above appears to have been re-lacquered at some point.
G
greenbean
Posts: 1958
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by greenbean »

In fact, I am remembering just now that the first 1480 I picked up about 5 years ago had a *small shank* mouthpiece receiver! It had been a school horn and I assumed that it was a customization, but perhaps it was a factory option. Though I would be surprised if that were the case.

I might still have that slide. It was pretty trashed and I think I saved it for parts.
J
JohnL
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by JohnL »

Absent the silver bell, it looks to be a twin to my late 1940's 1485. .536"/.546" slide with a King large shank receiver (neither standard Morse nor Conn-Remington). 9" bell with a large throat; the f-attachment bore is around .562". It has a tenon nut but not a slide lock.

I've seen an earlier version with the valve flipped the other way 'round and no tenon nut, and a later version with a slightly different wrap and a slide lock.e

Despite any superficial resemblance, it's a very different horn from the 4BF and the 4B-based 5B.