1938 Holton Symphony Model

I
ithinknot
Posts: 1339
Joined: Jul 24, 2020

by ithinknot »

Thought others might find this interesting - from <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.jlandressbrass.com/shop/Tro ... 379320.htm">https://www.jlandressbrass.com/shop/Trombones/p/1938-Holton-Symphony-Model-Trombone---Used-x62379320.htm</LINK_TEXT>

.525" slide

.575" rotor with spring linkage

8 1/4" yellow brass bell

It's fun to discover that the distinctive post-valve offset on the TR181 was part of the Holton design vocabulary at least 40 years earlier.

And that bell taper!

<ATTACHMENT filename="1938 Holton Symphony Model.jpg" index="0">[attachment=0]1938 Holton Symphony Model.jpg</ATTACHMENT>
H
harrisonreed
Posts: 6479
Joined: Aug 17, 2018

by harrisonreed »

That trigger mechanism is a head scratcher
J
JohnL
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by JohnL »

[quote="harrisonreed"]That trigger mechanism is a head scratcher[/quote]
It looks like there's some sort of gear linkage in there.

It would probably have a feel similar to a yo-yo style valve - which is probably what the original owner was playing before buying this horn.
I
ithinknot
Posts: 1339
Joined: Jul 24, 2020

by ithinknot »

[quote="JohnL"]It would probably have a feel similar to a yo-yo style valve - which is probably what the original owner was playing before buying this horn.[/quote]

That's what I figured - an (over-)engineered version of the old German system
R
robcat2075
Posts: 1867
Joined: Sep 03, 2018

by robcat2075 »

Does the offset have any meaning or intention?
I
ithinknot
Posts: 1339
Joined: Jul 24, 2020

by ithinknot »

[quote="robcat2075"]Does the offset have any meaning or intention?[/quote]

I mean, obviously it allows a wider attachment wrap than the span of a (presumably preexisting) main tuning slide bow would otherwise accommodate.

From a manufacturing perspective, it's complicated. Making a wider TS bow seems like it would be easy... just hand bend around a wider form... except the bow length would also increase, so you'd need to design a new taper, and that is trickier, because it will affect intonation and, well, everything.

My guess is that the extra manufacturing effort of the offset was considered less risky than interfering with a TS/bell taper pairing that was already known to work. It's a funny part; if it's tapered in the way of a normal neckpipe, then either it needs to be hydroformed, which isn't cheap, or it was hand bent and might not be particularly round or consistent. If it's not tapered, however, it can be balled-out like any other cylindrical part, and it might have been borrowed from a baritone or something else Holton was already making.

Just a guess.
R
robcat2075
Posts: 1867
Joined: Sep 03, 2018

by robcat2075 »

If the tuning slide bow was pre-existing.... does that mean they had a trombone without the offset, placing the slide that much closer to the bell?

Is the offset something that happened when bells got larger?
K
Kbiggs
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mar 24, 2018

by Kbiggs »

[quote="JohnL"]<QUOTE author="harrisonreed" post_id="175085" time="1648594989" user_id="3642">
That trigger mechanism is a head scratcher[/quote]
It looks like there's some sort of gear linkage in there.

It would probably have a feel similar to a yo-yo style valve - which is probably what the original owner was playing before buying this horn.
</QUOTE>

Yo-yo style valve? Not familiar with those. Many older German brass instruments had clockwork springs (or flat springs wound in a spiral) attached to the rotor spindle with a string linkage attached to a leather thong for the thumb.

It looks like a spring-activated system with a spring similar to a trumpet valve spring. The tube covers the spring and linkage, and a rod with a ring actuates the valve. I’m not saying I’m right, just what it looks like…
J
JohnL
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by JohnL »

[quote="Kbiggs"]...string linkage attached to a leather thong for the thumb.[/quote]
That'd be a yo-yo.
I
ithinknot
Posts: 1339
Joined: Jul 24, 2020

by ithinknot »

[quote="robcat2075"]If the tuning slide bow was pre-existing.... does that mean they had a trombone without the offset, placing the slide that much closer to the bell?

Is the offset something that happened when bells got larger?[/quote]

All possible, though the distance would also be tweakable with the angling of the slide receiver, even with a straight-ish neckpipe. Certainly they ended up with plenty of finger room in this case. This bell flare doesn't seem especially pronounced relative to the (seemingly very large) throat, so it's hard to know how much smaller any earlier relatives might have been if they were based on the same taper.