Ergonomic neckpipes?

J
jorymil
Posts: 304
Joined: Oct 26, 2019

by jorymil »

Is there anyone besides Jupiter out there making horns with curved neck pipes? For all the scorn placed upon Jupiter, they tried something different with the JSL-438.
I
ithinknot
Posts: 1339
Joined: Jul 24, 2020

by ithinknot »

[quote="jorymil"]For all the scorn placed upon Jupiter, they tried something different with the JSL-438.[/quote]

Nice that they were thinking in that direction, to be sure, but possibly not the most efficient solution, unless you're a [url=https://justhistoryposts.com/2020/04/22/mythical-creatures-the-headless-blemmyes/]blemmy... For a start, I doubt most people's contact with the neckpipe coincides exactly with the centerpoint of its length, so the amount of useful offset may be far less than the engineering would imply. Wider slides, or altering the receiver angle, would have a more universal effect for less effort, I'd have thought.

Some implementations of the Davis Shuman angular trombone include this; not so much in [url=https://patents.google.com/patent/US2669152A/en]the patent, but see the second photo [url=http://patentsonthesolesofyourshoes.blogspot.com/2014/04/oh-patents-davis-shuman-angular-trombone.html]here. Does anyone around here have one of these?

([url=https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/11325]Shuman is a really interesting figure, and his legacy in repertoire and as a teacher (Dave Taylor!) is significant, but the playing... Certainly it represents a stylistic path not subsequently taken (heavy vib, small bore, etc), but it's also just [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y32iWNzjn-k]Not Very Good. If you ignore the entire non-classical world, the 'pioneering recitalist' angle is noteworthy, but that Haydn transcription was recorded in the same year and city as [url=https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_mHyL2dBqNVBcGJlVuVRk14QabpOC-zNro]this.)
D
Doug_Elliott
Posts: 4155
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by Doug_Elliott »

I have one and I was just looking at it yesterday when this post came up. I'll post pictures later.
C
Crazy4Tbone86
Posts: 1654
Joined: Jan 14, 2020

by Crazy4Tbone86 »

Back to the original topic. Davis Shuman is an interesting person and is trombones were very unique, but we can discuss that on a different thread.

I don’t think the offset gooseneck is needed because the problem of the gooseneck hitting a player’s neck can be solved with a simpler change…..play with a slide that has a wider crook! I have repaired quite a few of those Jupiters with the “detoured” gooseneck and they were a pain for dent removal. I think it was more that Jupiter didn’t anneal the metal on that part (also a problem with the King 606 models). I haven’t seen a Jupiter with one of those offset goosenecks in about 11 years. Maybe they have changed something and the metal is not as hard now.
D
Doug_Elliott
Posts: 4155
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by Doug_Elliott »

This is the Davis Shuman trombone.

It also came with a small bent receiver, exactly like a sousaphone bit but small shank size. The intent was to play with the bell facing forward but the slide angled to your right. On videos of the Spike Jones band you can see the trombone player using one, but playing straight ahead with the bell up.

<GOOGLEDRIVE id="1QhMKlFgYyn6uegZdWBVxRJJ6tcGgCrea">[media]<LINK_TEXT text="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QhMKlF ... sp=sharing">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QhMKlFgYyn6uegZdWBVxRJJ6tcGgCrea/view?usp=sharing</LINK_TEXT></GOOGLEDRIVE>

<GOOGLEDRIVE id="1QduAUpxRBgoVKkh_7qMIcITwsgmcZhVy">[media]<LINK_TEXT text="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QduAUp ... sp=sharing">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QduAUpxRBgoVKkh_7qMIcITwsgmcZhVy/view?usp=sharing</LINK_TEXT></GOOGLEDRIVE>

<YOUTUBE id="Be7O9g2sphw">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Be7O9g2sphw</YOUTUBE>
C
Crazy4Tbone86
Posts: 1654
Joined: Jan 14, 2020

by Crazy4Tbone86 »

Well…..did he really play it? Looks like it was a sacrificial prop for the firecracker routine.

I wonder if there are any videos of Davis playing his unique instrument. The ergonomics make sense.
I
ithinknot
Posts: 1339
Joined: Jul 24, 2020

by ithinknot »

Thanks Doug. Very interesting.

Do you know who manufactured this one?

Is there a larger taper or screw collar at the end of the sousa bit, or is there a small shank taper in the normal receiver position too? In this other version, you've got no choice, so the leadpipe situation is slightly less mysterious http://www.chadarnow.com/-shuman-ds128.html
D
Doug_Elliott
Posts: 4155
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by Doug_Elliott »

There were at least two companies that made them. I think mine is a Reynolds, .485 bore. I've never seen that other version. The "sousa" bit is small shank to small shank with a bend. It can be played with or without it.

The one in the Spike Jones video was cut in the middle of the tuning slide, with a small piece of rubber hose so it was flexible, and the bell braces were unsoldered so it could flop around. He's actually playing it but it doesn't sound too good.

I've never taken mine on a gig. Don't give me any ideas ...

Maybe I should have brought it today on my Easter gig?
B
BGuttman
Posts: 7368
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by BGuttman »

I'm pretty sure the other maker of the Shuman trombone was Holton.

Doug Yeo published a way to see how it works. You sit 45 degrees to the left and turn your head back so you are facing forward relative to the chair. You now have your right arm operating approximately like the Shuman trombone. I've tried it and it does give you a little extra reach down the slide. Never really saw the speed improvement, though.
C
ChadA
Posts: 150
Joined: Dec 04, 2018

by ChadA »

Not to derail into Shuman land, but there were at least 2 different models. Mine looks different, though the neckpipe is still bent. The mouthpiece receiver is, too. My repair tech thought he recognized some Martin parts on it.

A little more info and a few more pics of mine can be found here: http://www.chadarnow.com/-shuman-ds128.html