How to improve my resume so it doesn't get tossed?
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
Numerous pro players have told me my resume doesn't matter as long as I can play. Well, what I've been finding out lately is that auditions for jobs I know I can do always seem to start out with a resume-only round. This inevitably leads to mine getting tossed. I'm trying to figure out how to beef up my resume so I can actually get offered an audition so the committees can at least hear me play. It's the vicious chicken and the egg scenario where I need experience to get jobs that give me the experience to get the jobs that give me the experience ... etc. etc.
My perception of what's wrong with my resume is two primary things: 1.) I have a large gap since I last played professionally, even though I have been playing with community groups for 15+ years and freelancing; and 2.) My musical education is from a school that apparently has a poor reputation among some professional players.
I sub regularly with a regional orchestra and I have an audition for the sub list for another orchestra next month. I figure these might give me a shot at a core player spot if one eventually comes open. I also just sat in as a ringer for a youth orchestra show.
I welcome any advice you folks might have that will help me get over the initial resume hurdle and actually start booking some auditions. Thanks.
My perception of what's wrong with my resume is two primary things: 1.) I have a large gap since I last played professionally, even though I have been playing with community groups for 15+ years and freelancing; and 2.) My musical education is from a school that apparently has a poor reputation among some professional players.
I sub regularly with a regional orchestra and I have an audition for the sub list for another orchestra next month. I figure these might give me a shot at a core player spot if one eventually comes open. I also just sat in as a ringer for a youth orchestra show.
I welcome any advice you folks might have that will help me get over the initial resume hurdle and actually start booking some auditions. Thanks.
- WilliamLang
- Posts: 636
- Joined: Nov 22, 2019
take some lessons with members of the target orchestras you are looking at, or any place within traveling distance.
I also don't recommend taking creative shortcuts on your resume. keep networking, taking gigs as they come up, and be willing to take any audition you can afford to go to (whether it's a full time or part time orchestra, they are all super competitive now, due to the overall lack of jobs compared to amount of decent players.)
I also don't recommend taking creative shortcuts on your resume. keep networking, taking gigs as they come up, and be willing to take any audition you can afford to go to (whether it's a full time or part time orchestra, they are all super competitive now, due to the overall lack of jobs compared to amount of decent players.)
- MTbassbone
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Apr 21, 2018
If you do not get invited to an audition after the resume round offer to send a recording.
- Richard3rd
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Dec 12, 2020
I have a large gap since I last played professionally, even though I have been playing with community groups for 15+ years and freelancing;
I would guess this is the reason.
- TromboneTallie
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Apr 17, 2022
I would think the best way these days to build your resume is to create or record new music, make it available for critique online, and then point to that. Musicians make music, not resumes. Resumes sort of have to make themselves.
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
[quote="TromboneTallie"]I would think the best way these days to build your resume is to create or record new music, make it available for critique online, and then point to that. Musicians make music, not resumes. Resumes sort of have to make themselves.[/quote]
But how do I reflect these things on my resume when people want to see a resume first? I'm not sure "plays music on Youtube" is going to cut it.
But how do I reflect these things on my resume when people want to see a resume first? I'm not sure "plays music on Youtube" is going to cut it.
- TromboneTallie
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Apr 17, 2022
[quote="TexasTBone"]<QUOTE author="TromboneTallie" post_id="177015" time="1650684045" user_id="15116">
I would think the best way these days to build your resume is to create or record new music, make it available for critique online, and then point to that. Musicians make music, not resumes. Resumes sort of have to make themselves.[/quote]
But how do I reflect these things on my resume when people want to see a resume first? I'm not sure "plays music on Youtube" is going to cut it.
</QUOTE>
^^
I would definitely start here. This is a good place to start. There's a lot you can unpack. You're 100% right -- putting that on a resume would be a mistake. That doesn't mean social media is unimportant or that there isn't a better way to have it on your resume.
If the music world is so cutthroat, not having a website, music streams, portfolio, etc, linked directly under your name and email / phone number, maybe with a QR code, puts you at a disadvantage from the getgo.
People often do more than that for resumes in career fields that are less competative. Don't forget that it is statistically easier to get in the NFL than make a living as a performing trombonist.
I would think the best way these days to build your resume is to create or record new music, make it available for critique online, and then point to that. Musicians make music, not resumes. Resumes sort of have to make themselves.[/quote]
But how do I reflect these things on my resume when people want to see a resume first? I'm not sure "plays music on Youtube" is going to cut it.
</QUOTE>
^^
I would definitely start here. This is a good place to start. There's a lot you can unpack. You're 100% right -- putting that on a resume would be a mistake. That doesn't mean social media is unimportant or that there isn't a better way to have it on your resume.
If the music world is so cutthroat, not having a website, music streams, portfolio, etc, linked directly under your name and email / phone number, maybe with a QR code, puts you at a disadvantage from the getgo.
People often do more than that for resumes in career fields that are less competative. Don't forget that it is statistically easier to get in the NFL than make a living as a performing trombonist.
- GabrielRice
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="WilliamLang"]take some lessons with members of the target orchestras you are looking at, or any place within traveling distance.[/quote]
This. If your resume is not strong enough on it's own YET, people need to know you and have heard you play.
Don't "make s##t up." I'm sure that was written in jest, but people have done it. It will bite you later.
And sorry everyone, but your youtube channel is not going to cut it. That's not to say it's not a good thing to do; social media presence is fantastic for building a teaching studio, promoting your creative work, etc. But for the resume screening of an orchestral audition? Nope.
This. If your resume is not strong enough on it's own YET, people need to know you and have heard you play.
Don't "make s##t up." I'm sure that was written in jest, but people have done it. It will bite you later.
And sorry everyone, but your youtube channel is not going to cut it. That's not to say it's not a good thing to do; social media presence is fantastic for building a teaching studio, promoting your creative work, etc. But for the resume screening of an orchestral audition? Nope.
- TromboneTallie
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Apr 17, 2022
[quote="GabrielRice"]<QUOTE author="WilliamLang" post_id="177008" time="1650668395" user_id="8089">
take some lessons with members of the target orchestras you are looking at, or any place within traveling distance.[/quote]
And sorry everyone, but your youtube channel is not going to cut it. That's not to say it's not a good thing to do; social media presence is fantastic for building a teaching studio, promoting your creative work, etc. But for the resume screening of an orchestral audition? Nope.
</QUOTE>
Bummer. I guess the OP is out of luck unless they want to bribe and schmooze their way in outside of the audition.
It makes a lot of sense, in a "one of the good old boys" sort of way.
take some lessons with members of the target orchestras you are looking at, or any place within traveling distance.[/quote]
And sorry everyone, but your youtube channel is not going to cut it. That's not to say it's not a good thing to do; social media presence is fantastic for building a teaching studio, promoting your creative work, etc. But for the resume screening of an orchestral audition? Nope.
</QUOTE>
Bummer. I guess the OP is out of luck unless they want to bribe and schmooze their way in outside of the audition.
It makes a lot of sense, in a "one of the good old boys" sort of way.
- GabrielRice
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="TromboneTallie"][Bummer. I guess the OP is out of luck unless they want to bribe and schmooze their way in outside of the audition.
It makes a lot of sense, in a "one of the good old boys" sort of way.[/quote]
That's one way of looking at it, for sure.
Another way is that whatever you've learned in school, however much you've practiced your fundamentals, your solo playing, and your excerpts, feedback from the people out doing the performing work is incredibly valuable. If you want to work with them you need to know what their expectations are, what they need to hear in a colleague's playing. Which is likely not exactly what you were taught in school.
This will not only help you get an audition in the first place, it will help you in the audition itself. And not in the "one of the good old boys" way, in the blind audition "that was a player with their s##t together" way.
It makes a lot of sense, in a "one of the good old boys" sort of way.[/quote]
That's one way of looking at it, for sure.
Another way is that whatever you've learned in school, however much you've practiced your fundamentals, your solo playing, and your excerpts, feedback from the people out doing the performing work is incredibly valuable. If you want to work with them you need to know what their expectations are, what they need to hear in a colleague's playing. Which is likely not exactly what you were taught in school.
This will not only help you get an audition in the first place, it will help you in the audition itself. And not in the "one of the good old boys" way, in the blind audition "that was a player with their s##t together" way.
- Kdanielsen
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Jul 28, 2019
OP: are you including your sub work with pro groups on your resume?
Gabe is right, btw.
Gabe is right, btw.
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
[quote="Kdanielsen"]OP: are you including your sub work with pro groups on your resume?
Gabe is right, btw.[/quote]
Yes. Right now I'm concentrating on trying to get on sub lists in the hope a core player vacancy happens or it helps me get some contract work for shows.
Gabe is right, btw.[/quote]
Yes. Right now I'm concentrating on trying to get on sub lists in the hope a core player vacancy happens or it helps me get some contract work for shows.
- Matt_K
- Posts: 4809
- Joined: Mar 21, 2018
I have a big ol box of music for duets through various trombone ensembles for this occasion. If I were in your shoes, I'd get a lesson or ask a local university professor (or several); depending on how busy they seem to be/caliber of networking you're trying to get into. I've done a decent amount of networking of playing trios/quartets with a professor and grad/dma students they have. You get on someones sub list probably. Especially students because they have exams and stuff frequently so they can't say yes to everything. If the professor was invited but had other obligations so they passed it onto a student, then the student passes on to you... maybe you meet someone there, etc.
At the end of the day, if you want to play music you probably shouldn't look at such networking cynically... you meet people who also like playing music and make music with them. It's a lot easier imo than networking in my world (programming/IT) because a lot of people in this profession are "9-5 please for the love of God don't talk about work to me outside of my work hours". But in music, typically people enjoy making music with other musicians provided they have the time or they're already setup to give people lessons.
At the end of the day, if you want to play music you probably shouldn't look at such networking cynically... you meet people who also like playing music and make music with them. It's a lot easier imo than networking in my world (programming/IT) because a lot of people in this profession are "9-5 please for the love of God don't talk about work to me outside of my work hours". But in music, typically people enjoy making music with other musicians provided they have the time or they're already setup to give people lessons.
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
It's not that I'm cynical about networking, it's that the people everyone tells me to talk to don't seem to be interested in talking to me.
- Matt_K
- Posts: 4809
- Joined: Mar 21, 2018
Totally fair. We are living in timeswhere networking might be harder if people are being cautious about limiting interactions. Having just gone through Covid, I certainly understand that perspective. Getting your foot in the door can be a tough nut to crack.
- BrianJohnston
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Jul 11, 2020
Resume & the hang are equally important. Hard work is the answer to both of those.
- VJOFan
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Apr 06, 2018
Just make it clear why there is a break in your professional career and show what you have done recently to maintain/rebuild your playing to the calibre it was when you last had a gig.
Start with that:
-Principle trombone, Blah Blah SO, 2002-2007
-Left orchestra to concentrate on ______________
-Highlight of recent freelance work include
-Blah
-Blah
-Blah
After that include your musical training to show your pedigree
A short statement of purpose at the top just below your personal information, to show that you aren't just messing around, and really want to get a gig would help too.
Start with that:
-Principle trombone, Blah Blah SO, 2002-2007
-Left orchestra to concentrate on ______________
-Highlight of recent freelance work include
-Blah
-Blah
-Blah
After that include your musical training to show your pedigree
A short statement of purpose at the top just below your personal information, to show that you aren't just messing around, and really want to get a gig would help too.
- CalgaryTbone
- Posts: 1460
- Joined: May 10, 2018
One difficulty for the OP is that most orchestras and other classical organizations that are hiring specify 1-page resumes. Those organizations are looking for "just the facts" with - where you have played, in what capacity, and when did you do it? A bit about your studies (where/when and what teacher(s) ). Depending on where the opening is and how prestigious the position is, there are anywhere from 50 applicants to hundreds. The reason that some places "screen" applicants is that there are only so many hours that can be devoted to hearing auditions for the job, so they are going to prioritize people with a track record.
My suggestions: start making some recordings of standard audition material. Good practice, and you might have enough material saved that you can put a tape together from that saved stuff. If not, you will still be further along in your preparation.
Also, get some lessons with well-known performers/players (live or over Zoom). Get honest feedback, and if they are encouraging about how you are playing, see if they would be willing to be a reference next time you are applying somewhere.
If your resume is turned down by an orchestra or some other group, a call or email to the contact person that was listed, asking if they would consider either a recording or a reference (or both) may get you another chance to be considered. I would advise against sending anything unsolicited - it would probably not get noticed.
There are occasionally instances where someone without much experience in this type of situation gets heard based on a recording or recommendation, and wins the job, or at least makes a very good showing. If that happens, add that to the resume (semi-finalist for ...orchestra ?/2022). That will make your resume stand out more for the next time.
Jim Scott
My suggestions: start making some recordings of standard audition material. Good practice, and you might have enough material saved that you can put a tape together from that saved stuff. If not, you will still be further along in your preparation.
Also, get some lessons with well-known performers/players (live or over Zoom). Get honest feedback, and if they are encouraging about how you are playing, see if they would be willing to be a reference next time you are applying somewhere.
If your resume is turned down by an orchestra or some other group, a call or email to the contact person that was listed, asking if they would consider either a recording or a reference (or both) may get you another chance to be considered. I would advise against sending anything unsolicited - it would probably not get noticed.
There are occasionally instances where someone without much experience in this type of situation gets heard based on a recording or recommendation, and wins the job, or at least makes a very good showing. If that happens, add that to the resume (semi-finalist for ...orchestra ?/2022). That will make your resume stand out more for the next time.
Jim Scott
- Ozzlefinch
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Jan 15, 2022
I know that when I screen resumes for my industry, I don't look for skills. Everybody applying has roughly the same skills, that doesn't separate a candidate out from the crowd. I want to know WHO you are, not WHAT you are. I look for somebody who will be a good fit personality and work ethic wise. I can train anybody for skill, but not for attitude. And if you were an Eagle Scout, fly that flag proudly on your resume- you will be surprised how much weight that actually carries.
And don't be generic with your skills. Instead of writing "Played 2nd 'bone in community theater" write "Received 4 star reviews from Local Post newspaper for work in XYZ Little Theater". As an interviewer and resume screener, that answer actually gives me something to work with and something to talk to you about. It's my "in" to your personality and paints and clearer picture of your potential skill set. Remember, working with a TEAM is as important as your individual skills. Give the employer a REASON to talk to YOU instead of the other 400 trombone players that can also play scales. You are an individual human person, not an algorithm.
Try writing your resume around your PASSION for wanting the job more so than your generic skill set. Make the employer WANT you on their team. Give them something interesting that separates you out from all the other trombone players, something unique to you and something you can speak about with PASSION.
And don't be generic with your skills. Instead of writing "Played 2nd 'bone in community theater" write "Received 4 star reviews from Local Post newspaper for work in XYZ Little Theater". As an interviewer and resume screener, that answer actually gives me something to work with and something to talk to you about. It's my "in" to your personality and paints and clearer picture of your potential skill set. Remember, working with a TEAM is as important as your individual skills. Give the employer a REASON to talk to YOU instead of the other 400 trombone players that can also play scales. You are an individual human person, not an algorithm.
Try writing your resume around your PASSION for wanting the job more so than your generic skill set. Make the employer WANT you on their team. Give them something interesting that separates you out from all the other trombone players, something unique to you and something you can speak about with PASSION.
- WGWTR180
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
[quote="Ozzlefinch"]I know that when I screen resumes for my industry, I don't look for skills. Everybody applying has roughly the same skills, that doesn't separate a candidate out from the crowd. I want to know WHO you are, not WHAT you are. I look for somebody who will be a good fit personality and work ethic wise. I can train anybody for skill, but not for attitude. And if you were an Eagle Scout, fly that flag proudly on your resume- you will be surprised how much weight that actually carries.
And don't be generic with your skills. Instead of writing "Played 2nd 'bone in community theater" write "Received 4 star reviews from Local Post newspaper for work in XYZ Little Theater". As an interviewer and resume screener, that answer actually gives me something to work with and something to talk to you about. It's my "in" to your personality and paints and clearer picture of your potential skill set. Remember, working with a TEAM is as important as your individual skills. Give the employer a REASON to talk to YOU instead of the other 400 trombone players that can also play scales. You are an individual human person, not an algorithm.
Try writing your resume around your PASSION for wanting the job more so than your generic skill set. Make the employer WANT you on their team. Give them something interesting that separates you out from all the other trombone players, something unique to you and something you can speak about with PASSION.[/quote]
Curious as to what "industry" you work in. In the music field there are various degrees of efficiency and everyone is definitely NOT at an equal level of professionalism. One can sit down with a teacher and play at a good level through some duets but functioning with other musicians can be challenging. As a contractor I could care less if someone is an Eagle Scout(BTW I am also an Eagle Scout)when it comes to hiring for a particular job. Everyone wants THE job. Unfortunately there are fewer jobs to be had and PASSION isn't going to cut it.
And don't be generic with your skills. Instead of writing "Played 2nd 'bone in community theater" write "Received 4 star reviews from Local Post newspaper for work in XYZ Little Theater". As an interviewer and resume screener, that answer actually gives me something to work with and something to talk to you about. It's my "in" to your personality and paints and clearer picture of your potential skill set. Remember, working with a TEAM is as important as your individual skills. Give the employer a REASON to talk to YOU instead of the other 400 trombone players that can also play scales. You are an individual human person, not an algorithm.
Try writing your resume around your PASSION for wanting the job more so than your generic skill set. Make the employer WANT you on their team. Give them something interesting that separates you out from all the other trombone players, something unique to you and something you can speak about with PASSION.[/quote]
Curious as to what "industry" you work in. In the music field there are various degrees of efficiency and everyone is definitely NOT at an equal level of professionalism. One can sit down with a teacher and play at a good level through some duets but functioning with other musicians can be challenging. As a contractor I could care less if someone is an Eagle Scout(BTW I am also an Eagle Scout)when it comes to hiring for a particular job. Everyone wants THE job. Unfortunately there are fewer jobs to be had and PASSION isn't going to cut it.
- Matt_K
- Posts: 4809
- Joined: Mar 21, 2018
I agree. I’ve done some hiring in tech and if I was someone with “Eagle Scout” written I’d probably not even notice it. My opinion isn’t necessarily correct, but I’m not an Eagle Scout. I suspect most people who have a resume cross their desk only know the smallest amount or nothing about the scouts so you’d have to take up valuable space to demonstrate why it’s relevant. Since space is so limited, I’d there’s something more job related it would be better to use that space - or leave the space empty to make it easier to read your resume imo. But that’s for my industry.
When I was reviewing resumes, I would spend about 15 seconds on each resume initially. Maybe less. You tend to get lots of resumes in the tech world from people who have zero skill in what you actually need, so I first look for keywords, primarily the languages we use and skills that we need (e.g., Python, SQL, Dimensional Modeling, etc.). Then if they have those I look at more peripheral things: their information points for what they did at the job and any measurable impact their work had (eg improved performance by x%, reduced time to deliver by y%). Then I’d probably take a call with them and do a more thorough review on the phone with them. The easier the resume is to parse to get to the phone call, the better your chances are. I’ve seen lots of resumes that were insanely dense that are almost immediate rejections because it takes so much effort to parse what’s there. Interestingly enough, there is a divided opinion on whether one should even put certifications on your resume in tech. I’ve personally never made a hire where it made a difference but I tend to think they’re worth putting there if it’s from a well known entity (Amazon, Microsoft, etc).
Not related to what’s specifically in question in this thread; just confirming that different industries have wildly different recommendations. Seems to vary a lot on the person who sees the resume too
When I was reviewing resumes, I would spend about 15 seconds on each resume initially. Maybe less. You tend to get lots of resumes in the tech world from people who have zero skill in what you actually need, so I first look for keywords, primarily the languages we use and skills that we need (e.g., Python, SQL, Dimensional Modeling, etc.). Then if they have those I look at more peripheral things: their information points for what they did at the job and any measurable impact their work had (eg improved performance by x%, reduced time to deliver by y%). Then I’d probably take a call with them and do a more thorough review on the phone with them. The easier the resume is to parse to get to the phone call, the better your chances are. I’ve seen lots of resumes that were insanely dense that are almost immediate rejections because it takes so much effort to parse what’s there. Interestingly enough, there is a divided opinion on whether one should even put certifications on your resume in tech. I’ve personally never made a hire where it made a difference but I tend to think they’re worth putting there if it’s from a well known entity (Amazon, Microsoft, etc).
Not related to what’s specifically in question in this thread; just confirming that different industries have wildly different recommendations. Seems to vary a lot on the person who sees the resume too
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
[quote="WGWTR180"]
Curious as to what "industry" you work in. In the music field there are various degrees of efficiency and everyone is definitely NOT at an equal level of professionalism. One can sit down with a teacher and play at a good level through some duets but functioning with other musicians can be challenging. As a contractor I could care less if someone is an Eagle Scout(BTW I am also an Eagle Scout)when it comes to hiring for a particular job. Everyone wants THE job. Unfortunately there are fewer jobs to be had and PASSION isn't going to cut it.[/quote]
Unfortunately even good ability isn't enough either. There are too few jobs and too many candidates. I know a LOT of music school graduates who are working in other fields because they couldn't land jobs as a professional musician.
And contractors can be a problem as well. I had a gig playing in the orchestra with a chorus. The chorus liked me, the conductor liked me, but he took on a contractor who didn't like me. Maybe the contractor had a friend who he wanted to hire, maybe he didn't like the fact that I didn't graduate from a music school but went to engineering school instead. Dunno. But suddenly I was out of that job. Not that it mattered that much to me -- I was working full time as an engineer and this one was for only a couple of services a year.
Curious as to what "industry" you work in. In the music field there are various degrees of efficiency and everyone is definitely NOT at an equal level of professionalism. One can sit down with a teacher and play at a good level through some duets but functioning with other musicians can be challenging. As a contractor I could care less if someone is an Eagle Scout(BTW I am also an Eagle Scout)when it comes to hiring for a particular job. Everyone wants THE job. Unfortunately there are fewer jobs to be had and PASSION isn't going to cut it.[/quote]
Unfortunately even good ability isn't enough either. There are too few jobs and too many candidates. I know a LOT of music school graduates who are working in other fields because they couldn't land jobs as a professional musician.
And contractors can be a problem as well. I had a gig playing in the orchestra with a chorus. The chorus liked me, the conductor liked me, but he took on a contractor who didn't like me. Maybe the contractor had a friend who he wanted to hire, maybe he didn't like the fact that I didn't graduate from a music school but went to engineering school instead. Dunno. But suddenly I was out of that job. Not that it mattered that much to me -- I was working full time as an engineer and this one was for only a couple of services a year.
- GabrielRice
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="BGuttman"]And contractors can be a problem as well. I had a gig playing in the orchestra with a chorus. The chorus liked me, the conductor liked me, but he took on a contractor who didn't like me. Maybe the contractor had a friend who he wanted to hire, maybe he didn't like the fact that I didn't graduate from a music school but went to engineering school instead. Dunno. But suddenly I was out of that job. Not that it mattered that much to me -- I was working full time as an engineer and this one was for only a couple of services a year.[/quote]
Maybe the contractor wanted to hire someone for whom it mattered - that is, a full-time musician or someone trying to be one.
Maybe the contractor wanted to hire someone for whom it mattered - that is, a full-time musician or someone trying to be one.
- WGWTR180
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
[quote="GabrielRice"]<QUOTE author="BGuttman" post_id="177837" time="1651668376" user_id="53">
And contractors can be a problem as well. I had a gig playing in the orchestra with a chorus. The chorus liked me, the conductor liked me, but he took on a contractor who didn't like me. Maybe the contractor had a friend who he wanted to hire, maybe he didn't like the fact that I didn't graduate from a music school but went to engineering school instead. Dunno. But suddenly I was out of that job. Not that it mattered that much to me -- I was working full time as an engineer and this one was for only a couple of services a year.[/quote]
Maybe the contractor wanted to hire someone for whom it mattered - that is, a full-time musician or someone trying to be one.
</QUOTE>
BOOM!
And contractors can be a problem as well. I had a gig playing in the orchestra with a chorus. The chorus liked me, the conductor liked me, but he took on a contractor who didn't like me. Maybe the contractor had a friend who he wanted to hire, maybe he didn't like the fact that I didn't graduate from a music school but went to engineering school instead. Dunno. But suddenly I was out of that job. Not that it mattered that much to me -- I was working full time as an engineer and this one was for only a couple of services a year.[/quote]
Maybe the contractor wanted to hire someone for whom it mattered - that is, a full-time musician or someone trying to be one.
</QUOTE>
BOOM!
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
[quote="GabrielRice"]<QUOTE author="BGuttman" post_id="177837" time="1651668376" user_id="53">
And contractors can be a problem as well. I had a gig playing in the orchestra with a chorus. The chorus liked me, the conductor liked me, but he took on a contractor who didn't like me. Maybe the contractor had a friend who he wanted to hire, maybe he didn't like the fact that I didn't graduate from a music school but went to engineering school instead. Dunno. But suddenly I was out of that job. Not that it mattered that much to me -- I was working full time as an engineer and this one was for only a couple of services a year.[/quote]
Maybe the contractor wanted to hire someone for whom it mattered - that is, a full-time musician or someone trying to be one.
</QUOTE>
Well, the job mattered to me as an attempt to improve my musicianship. For somebody trying to make a living as a musician it would be a joke. It barely even supplanted the income from teaching lessons. A lot of the rest of the orchestra were local music teachers.
And contractors can be a problem as well. I had a gig playing in the orchestra with a chorus. The chorus liked me, the conductor liked me, but he took on a contractor who didn't like me. Maybe the contractor had a friend who he wanted to hire, maybe he didn't like the fact that I didn't graduate from a music school but went to engineering school instead. Dunno. But suddenly I was out of that job. Not that it mattered that much to me -- I was working full time as an engineer and this one was for only a couple of services a year.[/quote]
Maybe the contractor wanted to hire someone for whom it mattered - that is, a full-time musician or someone trying to be one.
</QUOTE>
Well, the job mattered to me as an attempt to improve my musicianship. For somebody trying to make a living as a musician it would be a joke. It barely even supplanted the income from teaching lessons. A lot of the rest of the orchestra were local music teachers.
- GabrielRice
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="BGuttman"]Well, the job mattered to me as an attempt to improve my musicianship. For somebody trying to make a living as a musician it would be a joke. It barely even supplanted the income from teaching lessons. A lot of the rest of the orchestra were local music teachers.[/quote]
Well...I don't really want to argue a lot about this, but no gig is a joke to someone trying to make a living as a professional musician.
I'm almost back to my pre-covid schedule of working somewhere pretty much every week. In a span of four weeks last fall I was an emergency sub for the Boston Symphony, then a week with the Hartford Symphony, then a week with the Rhode Island Philharmonic, then a week as a ringer with the RI College Wind Ensemble. No single one of those jobs could sustain me, but I had a steady stream of income. There are employers I work for about once a month and employers I work for two or three times a year. I need and value all of them.
When I had covid a couple of weeks ago I had to sub out three different gigs. It was no joke.
Finally, I consider music teachers to be professional musicians. It's very rare that they're making much money from their teaching day jobs, and performing regularly is an important part of what they bring to teaching. I make between 1/3 and 1/2 of my own income from private teaching.
Well...I don't really want to argue a lot about this, but no gig is a joke to someone trying to make a living as a professional musician.
I'm almost back to my pre-covid schedule of working somewhere pretty much every week. In a span of four weeks last fall I was an emergency sub for the Boston Symphony, then a week with the Hartford Symphony, then a week with the Rhode Island Philharmonic, then a week as a ringer with the RI College Wind Ensemble. No single one of those jobs could sustain me, but I had a steady stream of income. There are employers I work for about once a month and employers I work for two or three times a year. I need and value all of them.
When I had covid a couple of weeks ago I had to sub out three different gigs. It was no joke.
Finally, I consider music teachers to be professional musicians. It's very rare that they're making much money from their teaching day jobs, and performing regularly is an important part of what they bring to teaching. I make between 1/3 and 1/2 of my own income from private teaching.
- Kdanielsen
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Jul 28, 2019
[quote="GabrielRice"]<QUOTE author="BGuttman" post_id="177848" time="1651674810" user_id="53">
Well, the job mattered to me as an attempt to improve my musicianship. For somebody trying to make a living as a musician it would be a joke. It barely even supplanted the income from teaching lessons. A lot of the rest of the orchestra were local music teachers.[/quote]
Well...I don't really want to argue a lot about this, but no gig is a joke to someone trying to make a living as a professional musician.
I'm almost back to my pre-covid schedule of working somewhere pretty much every week. In a span of four weeks last fall I was an emergency sub for the Boston Symphony, then a week with the Hartford Symphony, then a week with the Rhode Island Philharmonic, then a week as a ringer with the RI College Wind Ensemble. No single one of those jobs could sustain me, but I had a steady stream of income. There are employers I work for about once a month and employers I work for two or three times a year. I need and value all of them.
When I had covid a couple of weeks ago I had to sub out three different gigs. It was no joke.
Finally, I consider music teachers to be professional musicians. It's very rare that they're making much money from their teaching day jobs, and performing regularly is an important part of what they bring to teaching. I make between 1/3 and 1/2 of my own income from private teaching.
</QUOTE>
Preach!!
I’ll be shocked if this doesn’t degenerate into an argument (and I don’t want to have it either…), but Gabe is right. This job can be so hard, and I just don’t care if someone with a steady day job losses a gig. They don’t rely on that gig to feed themselves or their family.
Well, the job mattered to me as an attempt to improve my musicianship. For somebody trying to make a living as a musician it would be a joke. It barely even supplanted the income from teaching lessons. A lot of the rest of the orchestra were local music teachers.[/quote]
Well...I don't really want to argue a lot about this, but no gig is a joke to someone trying to make a living as a professional musician.
I'm almost back to my pre-covid schedule of working somewhere pretty much every week. In a span of four weeks last fall I was an emergency sub for the Boston Symphony, then a week with the Hartford Symphony, then a week with the Rhode Island Philharmonic, then a week as a ringer with the RI College Wind Ensemble. No single one of those jobs could sustain me, but I had a steady stream of income. There are employers I work for about once a month and employers I work for two or three times a year. I need and value all of them.
When I had covid a couple of weeks ago I had to sub out three different gigs. It was no joke.
Finally, I consider music teachers to be professional musicians. It's very rare that they're making much money from their teaching day jobs, and performing regularly is an important part of what they bring to teaching. I make between 1/3 and 1/2 of my own income from private teaching.
</QUOTE>
Preach!!
I’ll be shocked if this doesn’t degenerate into an argument (and I don’t want to have it either…), but Gabe is right. This job can be so hard, and I just don’t care if someone with a steady day job losses a gig. They don’t rely on that gig to feed themselves or their family.
- WGWTR180
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
[quote="Kdanielsen"]<QUOTE author="GabrielRice" post_id="177856" time="1651677668" user_id="102">
Well...I don't really want to argue a lot about this, but no gig is a joke to someone trying to make a living as a professional musician.
I'm almost back to my pre-covid schedule of working somewhere pretty much every week. In a span of four weeks last fall I was an emergency sub for the Boston Symphony, then a week with the Hartford Symphony, then a week with the Rhode Island Philharmonic, then a week as a ringer with the RI College Wind Ensemble. No single one of those jobs could sustain me, but I had a steady stream of income. There are employers I work for about once a month and employers I work for two or three times a year. I need and value all of them.
When I had covid a couple of weeks ago I had to sub out three different gigs. It was no joke.
Finally, I consider music teachers to be professional musicians. It's very rare that they're making much money from their teaching day jobs, and performing regularly is an important part of what they bring to teaching. I make between 1/3 and 1/2 of my own income from private teaching.[/quote]
Preach!!
I’ll be shocked if this doesn’t degenerate into an argument (and I don’t want to have it either…), but Gabe is right. This job can be so hard, and I just don’t care if someone with a steady day job losses a gig. They don’t rely on that gig to feed themselves or their family.
</QUOTE>
Well to a degree you're correct but since no one here will "open up their books" to financial scrutiny one should NEVER assume what someone else's financial situation is. I do know people with full time jobs and free lance music jobs who need all that income. But don't flatter yourself. I'm not arguing. Just making a true and valid point.
Well...I don't really want to argue a lot about this, but no gig is a joke to someone trying to make a living as a professional musician.
I'm almost back to my pre-covid schedule of working somewhere pretty much every week. In a span of four weeks last fall I was an emergency sub for the Boston Symphony, then a week with the Hartford Symphony, then a week with the Rhode Island Philharmonic, then a week as a ringer with the RI College Wind Ensemble. No single one of those jobs could sustain me, but I had a steady stream of income. There are employers I work for about once a month and employers I work for two or three times a year. I need and value all of them.
When I had covid a couple of weeks ago I had to sub out three different gigs. It was no joke.
Finally, I consider music teachers to be professional musicians. It's very rare that they're making much money from their teaching day jobs, and performing regularly is an important part of what they bring to teaching. I make between 1/3 and 1/2 of my own income from private teaching.[/quote]
Preach!!
I’ll be shocked if this doesn’t degenerate into an argument (and I don’t want to have it either…), but Gabe is right. This job can be so hard, and I just don’t care if someone with a steady day job losses a gig. They don’t rely on that gig to feed themselves or their family.
</QUOTE>
Well to a degree you're correct but since no one here will "open up their books" to financial scrutiny one should NEVER assume what someone else's financial situation is. I do know people with full time jobs and free lance music jobs who need all that income. But don't flatter yourself. I'm not arguing. Just making a true and valid point.
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
One of the things I've made a point to do on my resume is to list my other non-musical degrees as a subtle way of explaining the gap without getting into the weeds of "life got in the way." I totally understand that some people will look at someone like me who has a full-time job and give a job to someone who needs the money more than I do, but ultimately, I want to be able to transition to being a full-time musician within the next six years. That's not a long time.
- Ozzlefinch
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Jan 15, 2022
[quote="WGWTR180"]<QUOTE author="Ozzlefinch" post_id="177638" time="1651441473" user_id="14653">
I know that when I screen resumes for my industry, I don't look for skills. Everybody applying has roughly the same skills, that doesn't separate a candidate out from the crowd. I want to know WHO you are, not WHAT you are. I look for somebody who will be a good fit personality and work ethic wise. I can train anybody for skill, but not for attitude. And if you were an Eagle Scout, fly that flag proudly on your resume- you will be surprised how much weight that actually carries.
And don't be generic with your skills. Instead of writing "Played 2nd 'bone in community theater" write "Received 4 star reviews from Local Post newspaper for work in XYZ Little Theater". As an interviewer and resume screener, that answer actually gives me something to work with and something to talk to you about. It's my "in" to your personality and paints and clearer picture of your potential skill set. Remember, working with a TEAM is as important as your individual skills. Give the employer a REASON to talk to YOU instead of the other 400 trombone players that can also play scales. You are an individual human person, not an algorithm.
Try writing your resume around your PASSION for wanting the job more so than your generic skill set. Make the employer WANT you on their team. Give them something interesting that separates you out from all the other trombone players, something unique to you and something you can speak about with PASSION.[/quote]
Curious as to what "industry" you work in. In the music field there are various degrees of efficiency and everyone is definitely NOT at an equal level of professionalism. One can sit down with a teacher and play at a good level through some duets but functioning with other musicians can be challenging. As a contractor I could care less if someone is an Eagle Scout(BTW I am also an Eagle Scout)when it comes to hiring for a particular job. Everyone wants THE job. Unfortunately there are fewer jobs to be had and PASSION isn't going to cut it.
</QUOTE>
Fair enough. I understand. Perhaps continuing to do things the way they have always been done will yield a different result this time. If my advice is not applicable, then ignore it.
I know that when I screen resumes for my industry, I don't look for skills. Everybody applying has roughly the same skills, that doesn't separate a candidate out from the crowd. I want to know WHO you are, not WHAT you are. I look for somebody who will be a good fit personality and work ethic wise. I can train anybody for skill, but not for attitude. And if you were an Eagle Scout, fly that flag proudly on your resume- you will be surprised how much weight that actually carries.
And don't be generic with your skills. Instead of writing "Played 2nd 'bone in community theater" write "Received 4 star reviews from Local Post newspaper for work in XYZ Little Theater". As an interviewer and resume screener, that answer actually gives me something to work with and something to talk to you about. It's my "in" to your personality and paints and clearer picture of your potential skill set. Remember, working with a TEAM is as important as your individual skills. Give the employer a REASON to talk to YOU instead of the other 400 trombone players that can also play scales. You are an individual human person, not an algorithm.
Try writing your resume around your PASSION for wanting the job more so than your generic skill set. Make the employer WANT you on their team. Give them something interesting that separates you out from all the other trombone players, something unique to you and something you can speak about with PASSION.[/quote]
Curious as to what "industry" you work in. In the music field there are various degrees of efficiency and everyone is definitely NOT at an equal level of professionalism. One can sit down with a teacher and play at a good level through some duets but functioning with other musicians can be challenging. As a contractor I could care less if someone is an Eagle Scout(BTW I am also an Eagle Scout)when it comes to hiring for a particular job. Everyone wants THE job. Unfortunately there are fewer jobs to be had and PASSION isn't going to cut it.
</QUOTE>
Fair enough. I understand. Perhaps continuing to do things the way they have always been done will yield a different result this time. If my advice is not applicable, then ignore it.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
The system for finding jobs is broken and nobody seems to know how to fix it.
First, there are often too many applicants for a job and weeding out the pile of resumes is a huge pile of work. So we use "buzz word finders" to try to find applicants who are most in sync with the job requirements. That seems good, except that two people may use different terms for the same thing. Computers aren't smart enough to realize that, for example, "programming" is the same as "coding" or "code writing" so a good candidate may be rejected simply because they didn't know the right buzz words. On the other side of the coin are resume services who know all the buzz words but don't necessarily know when to apply them correctly so an incompetent candidate shows up with a resume that the computer likes.
Second, there is the problem of defining the job requirements. Often this is left to the prospective supervisor, who may or may not know exactly what is needed. Too much emphasis may be placed on tasks that the manager sees and not enough on tasks that might be invisible to Management but vital to the success of the job. Sometimes the open position is to replace someone who left or has died and the Manager just wants another "Bob" just like the one he lost. That is a true needle in a haystack kind of search and people who could easily replace Bob are overlooked just because they need to learn a few skills.
I feel for the OP. It's a difficult task to fit your skills to a job that might be a 75% match when the hiring manager demands 110%.
First, there are often too many applicants for a job and weeding out the pile of resumes is a huge pile of work. So we use "buzz word finders" to try to find applicants who are most in sync with the job requirements. That seems good, except that two people may use different terms for the same thing. Computers aren't smart enough to realize that, for example, "programming" is the same as "coding" or "code writing" so a good candidate may be rejected simply because they didn't know the right buzz words. On the other side of the coin are resume services who know all the buzz words but don't necessarily know when to apply them correctly so an incompetent candidate shows up with a resume that the computer likes.
Second, there is the problem of defining the job requirements. Often this is left to the prospective supervisor, who may or may not know exactly what is needed. Too much emphasis may be placed on tasks that the manager sees and not enough on tasks that might be invisible to Management but vital to the success of the job. Sometimes the open position is to replace someone who left or has died and the Manager just wants another "Bob" just like the one he lost. That is a true needle in a haystack kind of search and people who could easily replace Bob are overlooked just because they need to learn a few skills.
I feel for the OP. It's a difficult task to fit your skills to a job that might be a 75% match when the hiring manager demands 110%.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
Again... "normal" business practice with resumes doesn't really apply here. This is a different world.
For orchestral auditions, identifying information is scrubbed and a small team (ideally, sometimes just one person) will go over the resumes. They are going quickly, just looking to maintain the standards for the audition- this can vary widely, from trying to boil it down to just a few ultra-qualified candidates for a top principal position, or just making sure every candidate has a pulse and has held an instrument in the last 5 years.
You don't know what those people are looking for, though. Sometimes the little orchestras are being very picky. Sometimes it's a cattle call audition and the resume round is to weed out... people that don't send in resumes.
For orchestral auditions, the big thing is just having some orchestral experience. Again, the standards for that vary pretty widely, but that's what they want to see. Good schools are a plus, but are secondary to experience.
For orchestral auditions, identifying information is scrubbed and a small team (ideally, sometimes just one person) will go over the resumes. They are going quickly, just looking to maintain the standards for the audition- this can vary widely, from trying to boil it down to just a few ultra-qualified candidates for a top principal position, or just making sure every candidate has a pulse and has held an instrument in the last 5 years.
You don't know what those people are looking for, though. Sometimes the little orchestras are being very picky. Sometimes it's a cattle call audition and the resume round is to weed out... people that don't send in resumes.
For orchestral auditions, the big thing is just having some orchestral experience. Again, the standards for that vary pretty widely, but that's what they want to see. Good schools are a plus, but are secondary to experience.
- robcat2075
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Sep 03, 2018
When I worked at Nortel, résumés were something they collected to be able to say a talent search had been done before they hired the person they wanted to hire all along.
I presume that situation will exist for most highly-sought-after jobs, especially in the arts. The deciders already know numerous people who can do the job and who are or could become available.
I presume that situation will exist for most highly-sought-after jobs, especially in the arts. The deciders already know numerous people who can do the job and who are or could become available.
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Apr 11, 2018
[quote="Burgerbob"]
For orchestral auditions, identifying information is scrubbed and a small team (ideally, sometimes just one person) will go over the resumes. They are going quickly, just looking to maintain the standards for the audition- this can vary widely, from trying to boil it down to just a few ultra-qualified candidates for a top principal position, or just making sure every candidate has a pulse and has held an instrument in the last 5 years.
[/quote]
I'm not actively looking for an orchestra job, but always keeping an eye around for a position that would be compatible with what I do. I've noticed that more and more orchestras in the Germanic world now require not only a resume, but a motivation letter as well in the resume round, which I found a bit surprising!
For orchestral auditions, identifying information is scrubbed and a small team (ideally, sometimes just one person) will go over the resumes. They are going quickly, just looking to maintain the standards for the audition- this can vary widely, from trying to boil it down to just a few ultra-qualified candidates for a top principal position, or just making sure every candidate has a pulse and has held an instrument in the last 5 years.
[/quote]
I'm not actively looking for an orchestra job, but always keeping an eye around for a position that would be compatible with what I do. I've noticed that more and more orchestras in the Germanic world now require not only a resume, but a motivation letter as well in the resume round, which I found a bit surprising!
- Ozzlefinch
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Jan 15, 2022
[quote="LeTromboniste"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="177934" time="1651765399" user_id="3131">
For orchestral auditions, identifying information is scrubbed and a small team (ideally, sometimes just one person) will go over the resumes. They are going quickly, just looking to maintain the standards for the audition- this can vary widely, from trying to boil it down to just a few ultra-qualified candidates for a top principal position, or just making sure every candidate has a pulse and has held an instrument in the last 5 years.
[/quote]
I'm not actively looking for an orchestra job, but always keeping an eye around for a position that would be compatible with what I do. I've noticed that more and more orchestras in the Germanic world now require not only a resume, but a motivation letter as well in the resume round, which I found a bit surprising!
</QUOTE>
Interesting they would require a motivation letter. It's almost like they are searching for a human person with the right motivations and passion for the job instead of simply checking the boxes for technical competencies. That is very similar to what I would do to help me sort through hundreds of resume's that all look exactly the same. But what do I know anyways? It's better to just do things the way they have always been done and expect a different results. Changing your approach to help you stand out from the crowd is stupid. Certainly no place in the music industry for being different. We must conform always to tradition.
For orchestral auditions, identifying information is scrubbed and a small team (ideally, sometimes just one person) will go over the resumes. They are going quickly, just looking to maintain the standards for the audition- this can vary widely, from trying to boil it down to just a few ultra-qualified candidates for a top principal position, or just making sure every candidate has a pulse and has held an instrument in the last 5 years.
[/quote]
I'm not actively looking for an orchestra job, but always keeping an eye around for a position that would be compatible with what I do. I've noticed that more and more orchestras in the Germanic world now require not only a resume, but a motivation letter as well in the resume round, which I found a bit surprising!
</QUOTE>
Interesting they would require a motivation letter. It's almost like they are searching for a human person with the right motivations and passion for the job instead of simply checking the boxes for technical competencies. That is very similar to what I would do to help me sort through hundreds of resume's that all look exactly the same. But what do I know anyways? It's better to just do things the way they have always been done and expect a different results. Changing your approach to help you stand out from the crowd is stupid. Certainly no place in the music industry for being different. We must conform always to tradition.
- WGWTR180
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
[quote="Ozzlefinch"]<QUOTE author="LeTromboniste" post_id="177992" time="1651823686" user_id="3038">
I'm not actively looking for an orchestra job, but always keeping an eye around for a position that would be compatible with what I do. I've noticed that more and more orchestras in the Germanic world now require not only a resume, but a motivation letter as well in the resume round, which I found a bit surprising![/quote]
Interesting they would require a motivation letter. It's almost like they are searching for a human person with the right motivations and passion for the job instead of simply checking the boxes for technical competencies. That is very similar to what I would do to help me sort through hundreds of resume's that all look exactly the same. But what do I know anyways? It's better to just do things the way they have always been done and expect a different results. Changing your approach to help you stand out from the crowd is stupid. Certainly no place in the music industry for being different. We must conform always to tradition.
</QUOTE>
Love the sarcasm.
I'm not actively looking for an orchestra job, but always keeping an eye around for a position that would be compatible with what I do. I've noticed that more and more orchestras in the Germanic world now require not only a resume, but a motivation letter as well in the resume round, which I found a bit surprising![/quote]
Interesting they would require a motivation letter. It's almost like they are searching for a human person with the right motivations and passion for the job instead of simply checking the boxes for technical competencies. That is very similar to what I would do to help me sort through hundreds of resume's that all look exactly the same. But what do I know anyways? It's better to just do things the way they have always been done and expect a different results. Changing your approach to help you stand out from the crowd is stupid. Certainly no place in the music industry for being different. We must conform always to tradition.
</QUOTE>
Love the sarcasm.
- brtnats
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Apr 26, 2018
I wasn’t going to comment until some of the actual professional gigging musicians in this thread tipped their hands into what I’d consider rude and demeaning territory.
First off, THAT’S the OP’s target audience: Professionals who don’t “care” if someone loses a gig because someone else “needed” it more, who will talk out of both sides of their mouth about having the skills, but then playing realpolitik with actual people because they themselves are a couple of bad weeks to starvation. It is a cutthroat world in the music business, and unless you’re willing to play hardball with a knife between your teeth, you’re not going to make it. You’re going to get passed over or fired for someone who “needs the gig more.”
@TexasTBone: The most valuable information you’re going to get has already been given. If your credentials can’t stand on their own, you have to do the legwork to get somebody else to vouch for you. Take lessons with “name” players who have jobs like the ones you want to have. Multiple lessons via any means necessary. These will not be the kind of players who post in this forum. Talk to them about your specific job goals, get THEIR input, and if your playing is good enough that they’d reference you. If they won’t, take that to heart.
Find “the best” players in your area that have stable, full time jobs. This is important because you don’t want to look like a threat to their livelihood. It’s usually professors. Do the same thing as above, and ask to be included in any pro opportunities that come their way. You’ve got to pay for this privilege, so be ready to cough it up.
Teach private students in any capacity that you can. This gets you an income stream, a professional position to lean on and network with, and hopefully hooks you into the local scene of studio teachers who can introduce you to contractors.
Set benchmark goals for your 6 years. If you don’t make your goals, take that to heart. It’s not good enough to be good enough. You’ve got to play the game better than everyone else who is good enough.
First off, THAT’S the OP’s target audience: Professionals who don’t “care” if someone loses a gig because someone else “needed” it more, who will talk out of both sides of their mouth about having the skills, but then playing realpolitik with actual people because they themselves are a couple of bad weeks to starvation. It is a cutthroat world in the music business, and unless you’re willing to play hardball with a knife between your teeth, you’re not going to make it. You’re going to get passed over or fired for someone who “needs the gig more.”
@TexasTBone: The most valuable information you’re going to get has already been given. If your credentials can’t stand on their own, you have to do the legwork to get somebody else to vouch for you. Take lessons with “name” players who have jobs like the ones you want to have. Multiple lessons via any means necessary. These will not be the kind of players who post in this forum. Talk to them about your specific job goals, get THEIR input, and if your playing is good enough that they’d reference you. If they won’t, take that to heart.
Find “the best” players in your area that have stable, full time jobs. This is important because you don’t want to look like a threat to their livelihood. It’s usually professors. Do the same thing as above, and ask to be included in any pro opportunities that come their way. You’ve got to pay for this privilege, so be ready to cough it up.
Teach private students in any capacity that you can. This gets you an income stream, a professional position to lean on and network with, and hopefully hooks you into the local scene of studio teachers who can introduce you to contractors.
Set benchmark goals for your 6 years. If you don’t make your goals, take that to heart. It’s not good enough to be good enough. You’ve got to play the game better than everyone else who is good enough.
- Matt_K
- Posts: 4809
- Joined: Mar 21, 2018
That might be an American vs European thing. I've never received a cover letter (and I've never asked for one). Again, different industries though. But my experience has been more in line with not doing cover letters etc. That type of thing, in my opinion, can much more easily be ascertained on a call in a few minutes. No sense in making candidates spend a similar amount of time fretting over the formatting of a document, making sure it perfectly aligns with what HR wrote (probably not perfectly). But typically, I'm looking for people who may or may not be able to hit the ground running. Someone who has experience - even not directly applicable - to the work that we do. In the orchestral world, in particular, you're expected to have at least a master's degree and years of experience in doing exactly the type of work they're looking for so it might make sense for hiring committees to ask candidates that are otherwise probably quite similar to differentiate themselves. And you can selectively pull from a much smaller pool of people with X amount of years experience at a similar institution.
- Ozzlefinch
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Jan 15, 2022
[quote="WGWTR180"]<QUOTE author="Ozzlefinch" post_id="177994" time="1651826395" user_id="14653">
Interesting they would require a motivation letter. It's almost like they are searching for a human person with the right motivations and passion for the job instead of simply checking the boxes for technical competencies. That is very similar to what I would do to help me sort through hundreds of resume's that all look exactly the same. But what do I know anyways? It's better to just do things the way they have always been done and expect a different results. Changing your approach to help you stand out from the crowd is stupid. Certainly no place in the music industry for being different. We must conform always to tradition.[/quote]
Love the sarcasm.
</QUOTE>
Yes, and with that, I will bow out of this conversation
Interesting they would require a motivation letter. It's almost like they are searching for a human person with the right motivations and passion for the job instead of simply checking the boxes for technical competencies. That is very similar to what I would do to help me sort through hundreds of resume's that all look exactly the same. But what do I know anyways? It's better to just do things the way they have always been done and expect a different results. Changing your approach to help you stand out from the crowd is stupid. Certainly no place in the music industry for being different. We must conform always to tradition.[/quote]
Love the sarcasm.
</QUOTE>
Yes, and with that, I will bow out of this conversation
- GabrielRice
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
I think I've been accused of being rude and demeaning. And then the person who accused me reiterated my advice, along with some valuable additions. Thank you for that.
People who know me know that I am generally a pretty positive and encouraging guy, and I'm one of the people young trombonists come to around here when they want to make contacts in the classical music freelance world. I take issue with the characterization of that as some sort of cutthroat game. People make music with other people, and it only makes sense to cultivate good relationships with the people you want to work with.
In fact, there are three young trombonists working this weekend in one of my orchestras because of my recommendations. Only one of them was one of my students.
I make no apologies for prioritizing professional musicians for professional gigs. That said, most professional musicians I know have spent at least part of their adult life working a day job, sometimes in an unrelated field, to make ends meet. I certainly did. That is different from being a music hobbyist - however high level - whose career lies elsewhere. I don't think there is anything rude or demeaning about making that distinction when it comes time to hire for a gig.
People who know me know that I am generally a pretty positive and encouraging guy, and I'm one of the people young trombonists come to around here when they want to make contacts in the classical music freelance world. I take issue with the characterization of that as some sort of cutthroat game. People make music with other people, and it only makes sense to cultivate good relationships with the people you want to work with.
In fact, there are three young trombonists working this weekend in one of my orchestras because of my recommendations. Only one of them was one of my students.
I make no apologies for prioritizing professional musicians for professional gigs. That said, most professional musicians I know have spent at least part of their adult life working a day job, sometimes in an unrelated field, to make ends meet. I certainly did. That is different from being a music hobbyist - however high level - whose career lies elsewhere. I don't think there is anything rude or demeaning about making that distinction when it comes time to hire for a gig.
- WGWTR180
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
[quote="Ozzlefinch"]<QUOTE author="WGWTR180" post_id="178002" time="1651837214" user_id="7573">
Love the sarcasm.[/quote]
Yes, and with that, I will bow out of this conversation
</QUOTE>
Well you can take your toys and go home OR you can share what industry you are in that would benefit from what you are proposing. But to come on here are state twice that doing the same thing will lead to the same results and how people should not be different in the Music business is being sarcastic on your part. Sorry but that's the facts.
Love the sarcasm.[/quote]
Yes, and with that, I will bow out of this conversation
</QUOTE>
Well you can take your toys and go home OR you can share what industry you are in that would benefit from what you are proposing. But to come on here are state twice that doing the same thing will lead to the same results and how people should not be different in the Music business is being sarcastic on your part. Sorry but that's the facts.
- Ozzlefinch
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Jan 15, 2022
True, but at the same time everybody is saying that they are experts in the field and the advice is to follow tradition and do the same thing that has always been done. The "respect" road works both ways. I have given my input which is to change tactics if you want different results. If my advice goes against the establishment experts, then simply ignore what I have said and to what the experts tell you to do.
What I am hearing is that you cannot get a job in the music industry without a resume that shows you have significant experience in the music industry, but you can't get experience if you can't get a job. My point of view is that to get a job, you have to stand out in some what apart from experience. But that is my personal opinion and it's unsolicited and therefore worth next to nothing. Take it or leave it, it's all the same to me.
I am the senior training manager for a global company associated with the railroad industry. My job is to hire people from around the world, train them to be trainers in a niche industry, then sell and manage training courses to railroads on a global level. I am also responsible for forecasting the training needs of the industry and developing the training programs. Our next project is to move into Bosnia. I am currently in Germany now working with the team to construct the parameters for what we need in a recruit so we can train them to work for us. 0% of applicants will have any background in this particular field, so I have to look for things other than extensive experience.
What I am hearing is that you cannot get a job in the music industry without a resume that shows you have significant experience in the music industry, but you can't get experience if you can't get a job. My point of view is that to get a job, you have to stand out in some what apart from experience. But that is my personal opinion and it's unsolicited and therefore worth next to nothing. Take it or leave it, it's all the same to me.
I am the senior training manager for a global company associated with the railroad industry. My job is to hire people from around the world, train them to be trainers in a niche industry, then sell and manage training courses to railroads on a global level. I am also responsible for forecasting the training needs of the industry and developing the training programs. Our next project is to move into Bosnia. I am currently in Germany now working with the team to construct the parameters for what we need in a recruit so we can train them to work for us. 0% of applicants will have any background in this particular field, so I have to look for things other than extensive experience.
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Apr 11, 2018
[quote="Ozzlefinch"]True, but at the same time everybody is saying that they are experts in the field and the advice is to follow tradition and do the same thing that has always been done. The "respect" road works both ways. I have given my input which is to change tactics if you want different results. If my advice goes against the establishment experts, then simply ignore what I have said and to what the experts tell you to do.
What I am hearing is that you cannot get a job in the music industry without a resume that shows you have significant experience in the music industry, but you can't get experience if you can't get a job. My point of view is that to get a job, you have to stand out in some what apart from experience. But that is my personal opinion and it's unsolicited and therefore worth next to nothing. Take it or leave it, it's all the same to me.[/quote]
The reality is the orchestral scene wants you to stand out in only a very specific way, that is, being better than every other candidate at doing the same thing every other candidate does well. It's a very small box you have to fit in. In most cases they absolutely do not want people who stand out because they're outside of that box. They're looking for something that is both very specific and not particularly rare (there are way more competent, qualified orchestral trombone players than there are orchestra jobs), so there is little incentive for them to look for something different. I think you're confusing "orchestral trombone playing" with "music industry". There are many, many paths to success in the music industry. There are jobs in the music industry where your perspective on resumes and standing out would totally be applicable. Orchestral auditions are for the most part just not among them.
What I am hearing is that you cannot get a job in the music industry without a resume that shows you have significant experience in the music industry, but you can't get experience if you can't get a job. My point of view is that to get a job, you have to stand out in some what apart from experience. But that is my personal opinion and it's unsolicited and therefore worth next to nothing. Take it or leave it, it's all the same to me.[/quote]
The reality is the orchestral scene wants you to stand out in only a very specific way, that is, being better than every other candidate at doing the same thing every other candidate does well. It's a very small box you have to fit in. In most cases they absolutely do not want people who stand out because they're outside of that box. They're looking for something that is both very specific and not particularly rare (there are way more competent, qualified orchestral trombone players than there are orchestra jobs), so there is little incentive for them to look for something different. I think you're confusing "orchestral trombone playing" with "music industry". There are many, many paths to success in the music industry. There are jobs in the music industry where your perspective on resumes and standing out would totally be applicable. Orchestral auditions are for the most part just not among them.
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
Wow ... I didn't mean to stir up some shit here. And in defense of Gabe Rice, he provided me with some very thoughtful and valuable advice after I sent him my resume. He's someone I've always respected and if he tells me I should do something, I'll do my best to do it.
I'm smart enough and humble enough to know and admit I'm not the best trombone player out there. Even though I've been playing for 30+ years, I don't have a performance degree. So ... I went back to school to get one. I'm two piano classes short of my AAM and am looking to get a Bachelors and then a Masters if I can find programs that work for me. Some trombone professors have been honest enough to tell me not to bother applying because either they aren't setup for non-traditional folks like me or they don't want to invest in someone who doesn't have 50 years of performing ahead of them. It sucks, but that's life and it means some people will look down their noses at me and I have to work twice as hard to prove myself.
Some of my current professors really want me to come teach with them because of my existing skills, but I can't because I don't have the piece of paper that allows me to (I can still teach government if I want). This shows the two different sides of the coin - the side where no one cares what paper you have as long as you can perform, and the side where no one cares if you can perform if you don't have the paper.
All I can do at this point is work hard and play as many places as I can, even if I'm not getting paid, and work on my other musical endeavors like arranging and publishing. I start composition lessons in the Fall and I'll see how that goes.
I'm smart enough and humble enough to know and admit I'm not the best trombone player out there. Even though I've been playing for 30+ years, I don't have a performance degree. So ... I went back to school to get one. I'm two piano classes short of my AAM and am looking to get a Bachelors and then a Masters if I can find programs that work for me. Some trombone professors have been honest enough to tell me not to bother applying because either they aren't setup for non-traditional folks like me or they don't want to invest in someone who doesn't have 50 years of performing ahead of them. It sucks, but that's life and it means some people will look down their noses at me and I have to work twice as hard to prove myself.
Some of my current professors really want me to come teach with them because of my existing skills, but I can't because I don't have the piece of paper that allows me to (I can still teach government if I want). This shows the two different sides of the coin - the side where no one cares what paper you have as long as you can perform, and the side where no one cares if you can perform if you don't have the paper.
All I can do at this point is work hard and play as many places as I can, even if I'm not getting paid, and work on my other musical endeavors like arranging and publishing. I start composition lessons in the Fall and I'll see how that goes.
- WilliamLang
- Posts: 636
- Joined: Nov 22, 2019
the level of playing and specialization in professional orchestras is such that you cannot train on the job. so it doesn't really compare to many other industries, where people skills and acquiring new skills over time can hold you over. in a full time orchestra 98% or more of the skills you will need need to be locked in before you arrive to play (the other 2% are stuff like section balancing, style within the orchestra, leadership if you are new to the principal trombone in a professional orchestra game.)
the amount of people who already posses most of these traits is high enough that almost every orchestra that pays anything can be picky and fill themselves with high level professional players with years or decades or training already under their belts. it ends up feeling more like the olympics than like a traditional job application.
the amount of people who already posses most of these traits is high enough that almost every orchestra that pays anything can be picky and fill themselves with high level professional players with years or decades or training already under their belts. it ends up feeling more like the olympics than like a traditional job application.
- WilliamLang
- Posts: 636
- Joined: Nov 22, 2019
[quote="TexasTBone"]
All I can do at this point is work hard and play as many places as I can, even if I'm not getting paid, and work on my other musical endeavors like arranging and publishing. I start composition lessons in the Fall and I'll see how that goes.[/quote]
best of luck with the work and lessons!
All I can do at this point is work hard and play as many places as I can, even if I'm not getting paid, and work on my other musical endeavors like arranging and publishing. I start composition lessons in the Fall and I'll see how that goes.[/quote]
best of luck with the work and lessons!
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
[quote="WilliamLang"]the amount of people who already posses most of these traits is high enough that almost every orchestra that pays anything can be picky and fill themselves with high level professional players with years or decades or training already under their belts. it ends up feeling more like the olympics than like a traditional job application.[/quote]
Maybe I should have included that my intentions right now aren't to seek a core player position in a major orchestra. That's not a realistic goal for me where I'm at right now, given the plethora of higher level players competing for those positions.
Maybe I should have included that my intentions right now aren't to seek a core player position in a major orchestra. That's not a realistic goal for me where I'm at right now, given the plethora of higher level players competing for those positions.
- Posaunus
- Posts: 5018
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="TexasTBone"]All I can do at this point is work hard and play as many places as I can, even if I'm not getting paid, and work on my other musical endeavors like arranging and publishing.[/quote]
Good luck, TBone. I admire your passion and dedication.
Good luck, TBone. I admire your passion and dedication.
- WilliamLang
- Posts: 636
- Joined: Nov 22, 2019
[quote="TexasTBone"]Maybe I should have included that my intentions right now aren't to seek a core player position in a major orchestra. That's not a realistic goal for me where I'm at right now, given the plethora of higher level players competing for those positions.[/quote]
totally understood! this was just adding to other parts of the conversation w/r/t comparing industries. fun story, i remember the last time i auditioned for Princeton Symphony, which is a small per-service orchestra that doesn't work a ton. there were like about 36 people auditioning, some high level freelancers from the tri-state area, students at Juilliard/Curtis etc. and a few people who had already won full-time jobs. no one advanced out of the first round. :idk:
if more of these jobs hired people every time there was an audition, there'd be more work to go around.
totally understood! this was just adding to other parts of the conversation w/r/t comparing industries. fun story, i remember the last time i auditioned for Princeton Symphony, which is a small per-service orchestra that doesn't work a ton. there were like about 36 people auditioning, some high level freelancers from the tri-state area, students at Juilliard/Curtis etc. and a few people who had already won full-time jobs. no one advanced out of the first round. :idk:
if more of these jobs hired people every time there was an audition, there'd be more work to go around.
- robcat2075
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Sep 03, 2018
[quote="TexasTBone"]...Some trombone professors have been honest enough to tell me not to bother applying because either they aren't setup for non-traditional folks like me or they don't want to invest in someone who doesn't have 50 years of performing ahead of them...[/quote]
That is an interesting (although unsurprising) conceit for them to harbor since it is a rare university professor whose pay or job security is at all affected by the post-graduation attainments by their former students in the targeted job market.
Just about every teacher in the arts or humanities would be SOL if they ever had to show that even a notable fraction of their protégés were gainfully employed in their field.
The difference in career outcome between you and most of the 20-somethings they want to take instead is so small it's probably imaginary.
"...aren't setup for non-traditional folks..."
Other than age, what is that?
Are you in an iron lung? Is there an assistance animal involved? Do you emit strange radiation because our Sun is different from that of your home world? :idk:
You will show up for the same lessons, practice the same etudes, rehearse in the same ensembles, play the same recital as the other students and if you can't manage that they can cast you off like any other student.
If they are just trying to diplomatically avert your interest without telling you they think you aren't up to it, they ought to tell you straight, but "non-traditional" is a manufactured concern.
That is an interesting (although unsurprising) conceit for them to harbor since it is a rare university professor whose pay or job security is at all affected by the post-graduation attainments by their former students in the targeted job market.
Just about every teacher in the arts or humanities would be SOL if they ever had to show that even a notable fraction of their protégés were gainfully employed in their field.
The difference in career outcome between you and most of the 20-somethings they want to take instead is so small it's probably imaginary.
"...aren't setup for non-traditional folks..."
Other than age, what is that?
Are you in an iron lung? Is there an assistance animal involved? Do you emit strange radiation because our Sun is different from that of your home world? :idk:
You will show up for the same lessons, practice the same etudes, rehearse in the same ensembles, play the same recital as the other students and if you can't manage that they can cast you off like any other student.
If they are just trying to diplomatically avert your interest without telling you they think you aren't up to it, they ought to tell you straight, but "non-traditional" is a manufactured concern.
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
[quote="robcat2075"]"...aren't setup for non-traditional folks..."
Other than age, what is that?[/quote]
People with full-time jobs, families, and other more significant life obligations that 18-25 year old college students don't typically have to deal with. This is why my formal music education is an AA, not a BA. All but one of my classes have been in the evening. It's not until you get to a Masters program that the programs are designed to work around professional obligations.
Other than age, what is that?[/quote]
People with full-time jobs, families, and other more significant life obligations that 18-25 year old college students don't typically have to deal with. This is why my formal music education is an AA, not a BA. All but one of my classes have been in the evening. It's not until you get to a Masters program that the programs are designed to work around professional obligations.
- robcat2075
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Sep 03, 2018
[quote="TexasTBone"]<QUOTE author="robcat2075" post_id="178037" time="1651863370" user_id="3697">
"...aren't setup for non-traditional folks..."
Other than age, what is that?[/quote]
People with full-time jobs, families, and other more significant life obligations that 18-25 year old college students don't typically have to deal with...
</QUOTE>
It's true that those are not the college students that we traditionally see in the movies wearing the raccoon coats, but they are the more common ones today.
[url=https://www.npr.org/2010/08/24/129402669/typical-college-student-no-longer-so-typical]Typical College Student No Longer So Typical
The traditional student is probably still the norm at expensive private schools. But everywhere else?
"...aren't setup for non-traditional folks..."
Other than age, what is that?[/quote]
People with full-time jobs, families, and other more significant life obligations that 18-25 year old college students don't typically have to deal with...
</QUOTE>
It's true that those are not the college students that we traditionally see in the movies wearing the raccoon coats, but they are the more common ones today.
This past weekend, dorms across the country started to fill up with new students, fresh out of high school, ready to start their four years of college, which is how most of us might describe the typical freshman.
But it's been nearly a decade since the National Center for Education Statistics announced that 73 percent of all undergraduates don't fit that mold.
In fact, the typical college student in America has a job, a family, is enrolled part-time or some combination of all three. So how do those students change the face of higher education?
The traditional student is probably still the norm at expensive private schools. But everywhere else?
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
[quote="robcat2075"]The traditional student is probably still the norm at expensive private schools. But everywhere else?[/quote]
Things like distance courses and evening or weekend classes are exceedingly rare in undergraduate music programs. And then there are the programs that require stuff like four semesters of marching band and four semesters of basketball band as a degree requirement.
Things like distance courses and evening or weekend classes are exceedingly rare in undergraduate music programs. And then there are the programs that require stuff like four semesters of marching band and four semesters of basketball band as a degree requirement.
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Apr 11, 2018
[quote="robcat2075"]<QUOTE author="TexasTBone" post_id="178038" time="1651864183" user_id="12811">
People with full-time jobs, families, and other more significant life obligations that 18-25 year old college students don't typically have to deal with...[/quote]
It's true that those are not the college students that we traditionally see in the movies wearing the raccoon coats, but they are the more common ones today.
[url=https://www.npr.org/2010/08/24/129402669/typical-college-student-no-longer-so-typical]Typical College Student No Longer So Typical
The traditional student is probably still the norm at expensive private schools. But everywhere else?
</QUOTE>
Like some of the resume advice discussed above, maybe applicable in some fields, not in music.
Music programmes are overwhelmingly full of young students in their 20s. It's not at all uncommon for conservatories to have a policy of limiting the age to under 30 or so, especially for undergrad programs (or at least, favouring the younger applicant when two or more competing for the same spot have comparable level). Obviously more common for grad studies, especially doctorate level. In my 10+ years studying or taking "continuing education" at 4 different music universities, I can probably count on one hand the people I've met who were doing undergrad past 30, and I think only one of them was performance major. Music programs are extremely expensive for universities, enrollment is limited, and course selection is not like in any other field, with fewer choices and more classes that need to be taken in sequence. Where 3-credit classes are the norm on every other field, they usually aren't at music schools; you typically have quite a few 1 and 2 credit courses as well, so more classes per semester. Very few evening classes, lots of early morning and mid-afternoon classes. Often big gaps in your days that are not long enough to take off and go work. Lots of practical performance classes (ensembles and such) that are mandatory but offered only at very specific times. Oh, and the expectation that you'll practice your instrument 20+ hours per week on top of classes, time spent studying and completing assignments, and practicing your secondary instrument...So very difficult if not virtually impossible to combine with a full-time job, family obligations, etc. Plus, half the point of attending music school is becoming part of the community, meeting people, making contacts for the future. That doesn't happen if you have to run off to attend other obligations as soon as your classes are over.
People with full-time jobs, families, and other more significant life obligations that 18-25 year old college students don't typically have to deal with...[/quote]
It's true that those are not the college students that we traditionally see in the movies wearing the raccoon coats, but they are the more common ones today.
This past weekend, dorms across the country started to fill up with new students, fresh out of high school, ready to start their four years of college, which is how most of us might describe the typical freshman.
But it's been nearly a decade since the National Center for Education Statistics announced that 73 percent of all undergraduates don't fit that mold.
In fact, the typical college student in America has a job, a family, is enrolled part-time or some combination of all three. So how do those students change the face of higher education?
The traditional student is probably still the norm at expensive private schools. But everywhere else?
</QUOTE>
Like some of the resume advice discussed above, maybe applicable in some fields, not in music.
Music programmes are overwhelmingly full of young students in their 20s. It's not at all uncommon for conservatories to have a policy of limiting the age to under 30 or so, especially for undergrad programs (or at least, favouring the younger applicant when two or more competing for the same spot have comparable level). Obviously more common for grad studies, especially doctorate level. In my 10+ years studying or taking "continuing education" at 4 different music universities, I can probably count on one hand the people I've met who were doing undergrad past 30, and I think only one of them was performance major. Music programs are extremely expensive for universities, enrollment is limited, and course selection is not like in any other field, with fewer choices and more classes that need to be taken in sequence. Where 3-credit classes are the norm on every other field, they usually aren't at music schools; you typically have quite a few 1 and 2 credit courses as well, so more classes per semester. Very few evening classes, lots of early morning and mid-afternoon classes. Often big gaps in your days that are not long enough to take off and go work. Lots of practical performance classes (ensembles and such) that are mandatory but offered only at very specific times. Oh, and the expectation that you'll practice your instrument 20+ hours per week on top of classes, time spent studying and completing assignments, and practicing your secondary instrument...So very difficult if not virtually impossible to combine with a full-time job, family obligations, etc. Plus, half the point of attending music school is becoming part of the community, meeting people, making contacts for the future. That doesn't happen if you have to run off to attend other obligations as soon as your classes are over.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
This is probably a good thing, Maximilien. Unfortunately there are so few jobs in the Music field that you have to weed out a lot of the "pretty good" candidates because they will be doomed to a life of failure as a professional musician. Many more can find work in teaching (which really eats into your playing time as an adult). There will be some with dedication and ability above most who can and should pursue music, but for the rest of us a better option is to find an amateur situation and keep music as an avocation. But we should attend concerts to continue to support those who are actually trying to make a living at it.
That's the reason I became an engineer and kept the music as a side line. More opportunities to succeed as an engineer than as a musician. Even more so now than when I was in college.
To TexasTBone, distance education is a difficult thing to do in highly cooperative fields. You can't play distance football (either kind) or play in a distance ensemble. While you could take distance courses in some background things like music theory and ear training (I am actually taking one now) much of the performance aspects have to be done in groups. There are even limits to what can be done by private lessons remotely. Sometimes you just have to be observed live.
That's the reason I became an engineer and kept the music as a side line. More opportunities to succeed as an engineer than as a musician. Even more so now than when I was in college.
To TexasTBone, distance education is a difficult thing to do in highly cooperative fields. You can't play distance football (either kind) or play in a distance ensemble. While you could take distance courses in some background things like music theory and ear training (I am actually taking one now) much of the performance aspects have to be done in groups. There are even limits to what can be done by private lessons remotely. Sometimes you just have to be observed live.
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Apr 11, 2018
[quote="BGuttman"]This is probably a good thing, Maximilien.[/quote]
Yes, I agree, just pointing out that it's not like most college programs.
[quote="BGuttman"]To TexasTBone, distance education is a difficult thing to do in highly cooperative fields. You can't play distance football (either kind) or play in a distance ensemble. While you could take distance courses in some background things like music theory and ear training (I am actually taking one now) much of the performance aspects have to be done in groups. There are even limits to what can be done by private lessons remotely. Sometimes you just have to be observed live.[/quote]
Even for ear training, physical presence highly increases the value and how much you learn (and how much the teacher can tell what the students need).
For private lessons, there are many things you can still teach online, but fully distance learning is not viable.
Yes, I agree, just pointing out that it's not like most college programs.
[quote="BGuttman"]To TexasTBone, distance education is a difficult thing to do in highly cooperative fields. You can't play distance football (either kind) or play in a distance ensemble. While you could take distance courses in some background things like music theory and ear training (I am actually taking one now) much of the performance aspects have to be done in groups. There are even limits to what can be done by private lessons remotely. Sometimes you just have to be observed live.[/quote]
Even for ear training, physical presence highly increases the value and how much you learn (and how much the teacher can tell what the students need).
For private lessons, there are many things you can still teach online, but fully distance learning is not viable.
- timothy42b
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Mar 27, 2018
[quote="Ozzlefinch"]
I am the senior training manager for a global company associated with the railroad industry. My job is to hire people from around the world, train them to be trainers in a niche industry, then sell and manage training courses to railroads on a global level. I am also responsible for forecasting the training needs of the industry and developing the training programs. Our next project is to move into Bosnia. I am currently in Germany now working with the team to construct the parameters for what we need in a recruit so we can train them to work for us. 0% of applicants will have any background in this particular field, so I have to look for things other than extensive experience.[/quote]
A little off topic but this was interesting to me.
I've recently retired as a manager and hiring people was one of my frustrations. Our personnel department operated on a highly restrictive 30 year old paradigm that said you must match the qualifications of the individual very very precisely to the presumed skills on the job description or you are rejected as unqualified. That didn't meet my needs in an engineering field that was changing rapidly - I needed an adaptable motivated generalist, but personnel would only give me candidates who were deeply specialized (and who wouldn't consider what I could pay).
See also:
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.amazon.com/Range-Generalist ... 4676&psc=1">https://www.amazon.com/Range-Generalists-Triumph-Specialized-World/dp/0735214506/ref=asc_df_0735214506/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=509159807707&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=10834306481575831748&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9008593&hvtargid=pla-1188229854676&psc=1</LINK_TEXT>
I am the senior training manager for a global company associated with the railroad industry. My job is to hire people from around the world, train them to be trainers in a niche industry, then sell and manage training courses to railroads on a global level. I am also responsible for forecasting the training needs of the industry and developing the training programs. Our next project is to move into Bosnia. I am currently in Germany now working with the team to construct the parameters for what we need in a recruit so we can train them to work for us. 0% of applicants will have any background in this particular field, so I have to look for things other than extensive experience.[/quote]
A little off topic but this was interesting to me.
I've recently retired as a manager and hiring people was one of my frustrations. Our personnel department operated on a highly restrictive 30 year old paradigm that said you must match the qualifications of the individual very very precisely to the presumed skills on the job description or you are rejected as unqualified. That didn't meet my needs in an engineering field that was changing rapidly - I needed an adaptable motivated generalist, but personnel would only give me candidates who were deeply specialized (and who wouldn't consider what I could pay).
See also:
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.amazon.com/Range-Generalist ... 4676&psc=1">https://www.amazon.com/Range-Generalists-Triumph-Specialized-World/dp/0735214506/ref=asc_df_0735214506/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=509159807707&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=10834306481575831748&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9008593&hvtargid=pla-1188229854676&psc=1</LINK_TEXT>
- WGWTR180
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
[quote="Ozzlefinch"]True, but at the same time everybody is saying that they are experts in the field and the advice is to follow tradition and do the same thing that has always been done. The "respect" road works both ways. I have given my input which is to change tactics if you want different results. If my advice goes against the establishment experts, then simply ignore what I have said and to what the experts tell you to do.
What I am hearing is that you cannot get a job in the music industry without a resume that shows you have significant experience in the music industry, but you can't get experience if you can't get a job. My point of view is that to get a job, you have to stand out in some what apart from experience. But that is my personal opinion and it's unsolicited and therefore worth next to nothing. Take it or leave it, it's all the same to me.
I am the senior training manager for a global company associated with the railroad industry. My job is to hire people from around the world, train them to be trainers in a niche industry, then sell and manage training courses to railroads on a global level. I am also responsible for forecasting the training needs of the industry and developing the training programs. Our next project is to move into Bosnia. I am currently in Germany now working with the team to construct the parameters for what we need in a recruit so we can train them to work for us. 0% of applicants will have any background in this particular field, so I have to look for things other than extensive experience.[/quote]
Sounds like you have a very interesting job- I can see where your ideas for recruiting and resume sorting would be helpful. I've been fortunate to have worked in the music business for over 30 years. There are a number of different levels of proficiency in our industry. For any major symphony orchestra position that does not invite everyone to the audition then you will need some experience to be invited. But for many others it's just getting known by the musician pool in your area. If you want to to break in to the recording scene in L.A. GOOD LUCK. No resume will really get you into that small and very established group of musicians! That's just one example and there are so many more. But if I were a contractor who received a resume from a musician who was planning on really having time for an already crowded market in 6 years I'm definitely not paying any attention to it. Come to me when you're ready-there's no real "apprentice program" for musicians or hopeful musicians wanting to work down the road.
So in short it's all very complicated when it comes to our business. And these days age, gender, and race/ethnic background play a big factor in the hiring process, especially in New York City where most of my works exists. Thanks for sharing.
What I am hearing is that you cannot get a job in the music industry without a resume that shows you have significant experience in the music industry, but you can't get experience if you can't get a job. My point of view is that to get a job, you have to stand out in some what apart from experience. But that is my personal opinion and it's unsolicited and therefore worth next to nothing. Take it or leave it, it's all the same to me.
I am the senior training manager for a global company associated with the railroad industry. My job is to hire people from around the world, train them to be trainers in a niche industry, then sell and manage training courses to railroads on a global level. I am also responsible for forecasting the training needs of the industry and developing the training programs. Our next project is to move into Bosnia. I am currently in Germany now working with the team to construct the parameters for what we need in a recruit so we can train them to work for us. 0% of applicants will have any background in this particular field, so I have to look for things other than extensive experience.[/quote]
Sounds like you have a very interesting job- I can see where your ideas for recruiting and resume sorting would be helpful. I've been fortunate to have worked in the music business for over 30 years. There are a number of different levels of proficiency in our industry. For any major symphony orchestra position that does not invite everyone to the audition then you will need some experience to be invited. But for many others it's just getting known by the musician pool in your area. If you want to to break in to the recording scene in L.A. GOOD LUCK. No resume will really get you into that small and very established group of musicians! That's just one example and there are so many more. But if I were a contractor who received a resume from a musician who was planning on really having time for an already crowded market in 6 years I'm definitely not paying any attention to it. Come to me when you're ready-there's no real "apprentice program" for musicians or hopeful musicians wanting to work down the road.
So in short it's all very complicated when it comes to our business. And these days age, gender, and race/ethnic background play a big factor in the hiring process, especially in New York City where most of my works exists. Thanks for sharing.
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
[quote="WGWTR180"]But if I were a contractor who received a resume from a musician who was planning on really having time for an already crowded market in 6 years I'm definitely not paying any attention to it. Come to me when you're ready-there's no real "apprentice program" for musicians or hopeful musicians wanting to work down the road.[/quote]
Six years is when I'm eligible to start collecting my pension. It has nothing to do with my skills as a trombonist.
Six years is when I'm eligible to start collecting my pension. It has nothing to do with my skills as a trombonist.
- WGWTR180
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
[quote="TexasTBone"]<QUOTE author="WGWTR180" post_id="178115" time="1652024393" user_id="7573">
But if I were a contractor who received a resume from a musician who was planning on really having time for an already crowded market in 6 years I'm definitely not paying any attention to it. Come to me when you're ready-there's no real "apprentice program" for musicians or hopeful musicians wanting to work down the road.[/quote]
Six years is when I'm eligible to start collecting my pension. It has nothing to do with my skills as a trombonist.
</QUOTE>
Look if you're an excellent trombonist and colleague you'll work if there is work. But many will just want to hire players who've "paid their dues" and worked their way in. Time will tell. Good luck.
But if I were a contractor who received a resume from a musician who was planning on really having time for an already crowded market in 6 years I'm definitely not paying any attention to it. Come to me when you're ready-there's no real "apprentice program" for musicians or hopeful musicians wanting to work down the road.[/quote]
Six years is when I'm eligible to start collecting my pension. It has nothing to do with my skills as a trombonist.
</QUOTE>
Look if you're an excellent trombonist and colleague you'll work if there is work. But many will just want to hire players who've "paid their dues" and worked their way in. Time will tell. Good luck.
- TexasTBone
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
Wanted to stop in and tell everyone thanks for the advice and encouragement. I had an audition tonight for the sub roster of a regional orchestra. I landed a spot subbing on bass and tenor and will be playing their next concert.