Which Bass Trombone would you buy?

Y
YooperHorn
Posts: 11
Joined: Mar 11, 2022

by YooperHorn »

Facts: I am a 63 y.o. Bass Trombonist that plays in a couple of Community Bands, a community orchestra and a Big Band. I'm a hobbyist not a professional. I have a Getzen 1062FD (dependent trigger) and i like it but I'd like to have an independent trigger and I"m not wild about the dual bore slide that comes with the 1062.

Consideration: My lungs are still really good, but not what they were (in terms of air capacity) when I was 20. So I think I'd rather stay with standard rotors and I don't think I can justify an 8k "boutique" horn given my age and years of playing left. So, given this...here's what I'm looking at:

Rath R900 $3200 (new)

Shires TBQ36YR $3200 (used but mint)

Getzen 1052 ($2400 used in good conditon/ $3300 mint used)

Bach 50B30 ($2900 open box)

So given my criteria, which horn would you pick and why? Thanks so much for any comments you have.

YooperHorn
B
Burgerbob
Posts: 6327
Joined: Apr 23, 2018

by Burgerbob »

Out of those, probably the Shires Q (or if you can find it for cheaper, Eastman equivalent is very good).
M
Matt_K
Posts: 4809
Joined: Mar 21, 2018

by Matt_K »

I really like the 1052s, personally. I had one and probably would if I hadn't lucked into a great Shires. Especially at that price point. The Q series would be great too probably.
H
hyperbolica
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by hyperbolica »

I'd probably look to get a new Conn 62h first. After that the Bach, and I'd see if I could try the 1052. Rath and Then Shires.

Conns are just more colorful, even now. Bachs have a familiar feel when they're right. Getzen make some really nice stuff. Shires to me are boring and heavy. Rath is one of my favorites, but the Chinese horn isn't what I like about Rath

i agree with your complaint about the 1062 dual bore. But don't discount dependent setups unless you're really going to use the second valve by itself (mostly 5th position notes).
F
Finetales
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by Finetales »

My opinion, having tried all of them and owned a 1052 for quite a few years: Shires Q > Eastman ETB-848 > Rath R900 > Getzen 1052 > Bach 50B3O.
S
sirisobhakya
Posts: 445
Joined: Jun 11, 2018

by sirisobhakya »

I would go with the Shires.
J
Jameseuph642
Posts: 14
Joined: Aug 05, 2019

by Jameseuph642 »

Shires Q or the Eastman for the win.
D
dukesboneman
Posts: 935
Joined: Apr 02, 2018

by dukesboneman »

Depends on the sound and response you want. I love my Bach 50b3 but it took a while to adjust after coming from a Yamaha 321

But a Yamaha will speak quicker

The Conn 62H are great horns
B
Blabberbucket
Posts: 305
Joined: Oct 09, 2022

by Blabberbucket »

If it were me, I would avoid a new Bach or Conn instrument. I've seen lots of build and fit/finish issues with their recent instruments. Your experience may vary.

I can't speak to the Rath as I'm not familiar with their instruments.

You'd do well by either the Q or the Getzen. Personal preference for.me would be the Getzen - I played one for many years in college and after before switching to another instrument. They're fairly well built instruments and the price point is excellent.
Y
YooperHorn
Posts: 11
Joined: Mar 11, 2022

by YooperHorn »

Many thanks to all of you for the great comments and suggestions. It really helped. I ordered a Shires Q bass bone today. Now comes the Celebrity Death Match: Getzen 1062 vs. Shires Q...may the best horn win.