Holton small and medium bore trombones

B
Bach5G
Posts: 2874
Joined: Apr 07, 2018

by Bach5G » (edited 2024-03-07 8:57 p.m.)

I don’t know much about Holton small/medium bore trombones. What models pre- and post- the LeBlanc purchase were similar in size to 2Bs and 3Bs? Maybe something like the Martin Urbie Green? Small bore Holtons get virtually no love whatsoever on this site.
B
BGuttman
Posts: 7368
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by BGuttman »

As I understand them, the 65, 67, and 69 are all small bores.

I own a 67, also called Stratodyne. I'd call it equivalent to a Conn 48H. Great horn for big band. Great horn for Dixieland. Mine came from the estate of a guy who used it in both.
O
officermayo
Posts: 654
Joined: Jun 09, 2021

by officermayo »

My 1966 Special is .500.
D
Doug_Elliott
Posts: 4155
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by Doug_Elliott »

I have one of these, which seems to be .500/.508 but I don't know if it had a model name or when it was from.

Should be around 1940, their movie Saps at Sea

User image
F
Finetales
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by Finetales » (edited 2024-03-08 2:42 p.m.)

As far as I know:

62 = ?

63 = .480-.495"/7.5"

64 Resotone = ?

65 = .485"/7" or 7.5" rose brass

66 Galaxy = .485-.500"/7" (67 mandrel) all nickel

67 Stratodyne = .485"/7" rose brass

69 = .485"/8" rose brass - [color=red].481-.491

TR-100 Virtuoso = .500"/8" rose brass

TR-101 = .485/7.5" - [color=red].509"

TR-102 = .485"/7" - [color=red].485-.509"/8" or 7.75"

TR-401N Galaxy = .485-.500"/7 3/8"

TR-501 Special = .500"/8"

TR-602 = .500"/8" (student model)
I
ithinknot
Posts: 1339
Joined: Jul 24, 2020

by ithinknot »

Some of that isn't right...

My 69 is a .481-.491 dual; in the 2B manner, the stockings match so you can't tell just from flipping the outer slide.

TR-101 was a straight .509/7.5" yellow

TR-102 was a dual .495-.509/supposedly 8" yellow; the bell was obviously shared with the Martin Urbie, and the one I had, like some Urbies, was actually 7 3/4"

Both are super rare - I've only ever seen one of each for sale, and the TR-102 was mine... it was the first horn my parents bought for me.
F
Finetales
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by Finetales »

Corrections noted. This is just what I've been able to find out of the sparse information on the Internet.
D
dcslideman
Posts: 134
Joined: Mar 23, 2022

by dcslideman »

I have a 1965 model 65 which I think I saw somewhere was the last year it was made. It was advertised as a Buddy Morrow endorsee. I can confirm .485" bore, bell just a shade under 7 1/2". Depending on semantics it has gold/rose bell. It plays big, much bigger than .485 would indicate, and can make a lot of volume if you want.
C
chromebone
Posts: 454
Joined: Apr 08, 2018

by chromebone »

The only pro-level medium bore they made that I’m aware of was the TR-161, which was made in the 90’s-early 2000’s.
D
dzdz
Posts: 3
Joined: Aug 09, 2023

by dzdz »

I use a TR-161. Nice .525 medium bore trombone.
D
DaveAshley
Posts: 240
Joined: Aug 01, 2018

by DaveAshley »

Martin Urbie Green horns were all built by Holton, and have Holton serial numbers.
C
cb56
Posts: 155
Joined: Sep 17, 2023

by cb56 »

Anyone know what mouthpiece was shipped with the 67 stratodyne? My dad had one and I think the marking on the mouthpiece said Holton 48 but not sure.
D
dcslideman
Posts: 134
Joined: Mar 23, 2022

by dcslideman »

I have been meaning to post these pictures for awhile. I have heard there were 2 versions of the model 65. According to these two framed advertising pages I have, the redesign was in 1957 since it is "new". I have heard it ran until 1965(but can't confirm) and mine is a 1965 according to the serial number.<ATTACHMENT filename="IMG_20240607_183724907.jpg" index="3">[attachment=3]IMG_20240607_183724907.jpg</ATTACHMENT><ATTACHMENT filename="IMG_20240607_183812481.jpg" index="2">[attachment=2]IMG_20240607_183812481.jpg</ATTACHMENT><ATTACHMENT filename="IMG_20240607_183836894.jpg" index="1">[attachment=1]IMG_20240607_183836894.jpg</ATTACHMENT><ATTACHMENT filename="IMG_20240607_183851917.jpg" index="0">[attachment=0]IMG_20240607_183851917.jpg</ATTACHMENT>
A
atopper333
Posts: 377
Joined: Mar 09, 2022

by atopper333 »

There was also the Tr-602F

8 inch yellow bell at a .525 bore…
D
dbwhitaker
Posts: 196
Joined: May 16, 2019

by dbwhitaker »

The 1956 Holton catalog lists these trombones:

65 - .485 bore, 7.5 bell

63 - duo-bore .480 and .495, 7.5 bell

160 - bore not given, 7.5 bell, "moderate priced...tone a bit lighter than 63 or 65"

168 - bass trombone with F attachment, 8.5 bell

166 - same as 168 but without F attachment

There is an extensive (but not complete) collection of Holton catalogs and online available here: <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.saxophone.org/museum/public ... seumType/1">https://www.saxophone.org/museum/publications/manufacturer/54/museumType/1</LINK_TEXT>

The dates of publication range from 1904 until 1982. Some of the catalogs have detailed information about the trombone models. Unfortunately the saxophone.org site makes it very difficult to look through the publications because each page is a separate file, and the initial view of each page is only a thumbnail size. But there is a lot of information if you're interested.

For example, the 1965 catalog lists a TR-301 with a duo-bore slide and 8 inch bell ... and "nickel-silver Micro-Taper leader pipe". That catalog also describes a TR-201, TR-302, TR-401, TR-501, TR-602.
R
rzeilinger
Posts: 36
Joined: Apr 04, 2022

by rzeilinger »

I am in possession of 2. Holton TR-501 Specials

Neither are a .500 bore.

Both of mine are .480 bore.

Those of you who claim yours is a .500 bore, would you take out your calipers and measure the inside of both of your inner tubes.

Thanks,

Ron
P
Posaunus
Posts: 5018
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by Posaunus »

[quote="rzeilinger"]I am in possession of 2. Holton TR-501 Specials

Neither are a .500 bore.

Both of mine are .480 bore.

Those of you who claim yours is a .500 bore, would you take out your calipers and measure the inside of both of your inner tubes.[/quote]

I expect that they are actually 0.485" (nominal) bore, since this was a standard tube size for Holton.
S
Stan72
Posts: 5
Joined: Mar 06, 2021

by Stan72 »

[quote="cb56"]Anyone know what mouthpiece was shipped with the 67 stratodyne? My dad had one and I think the marking on the mouthpiece said Holton 48 but not sure.[/quote]

May 30 2025

Hello,

I own Holton Stratodyne 67, manufactured and purchased by my dad in mid 1950. It came with a Holton Model 82 mouthpiece.

Mouthpiece options from the 1950's Holton catalog:

Model 80: For high register, shallow cup, regular rim, smaller throat bore, extremely easy response in high register.

Model 81: Same as above with cushion rim for player comfort.

Model 82: Medium depth cup, regular rim, medium bore throat, powerful, full tone, easy response in all registers.

Model 82: Same as No. 92 with comfortable cushion rim.

All models were available in silver plating (standard) and gold plating (optional). I have the silver plated model.

This is a fantastic "dance band" and jazz horn! A pleasure to play!

Stan Dederich
A
AstralAria
Posts: 3
Joined: May 24, 2025

by AstralAria »

[quote="atopper333"]There was also the Tr-602F

8 inch yellow bell at a .525 bore…[/quote]

Oh wow, I think I have one of these, though it's been sitting in my parents' garage for 10+ years. I can't remember how it played though, now I'm wondering if I should go get it.
A
atopper333
Posts: 377
Joined: Mar 09, 2022

by atopper333 »

[quote="AstralAria"]<QUOTE author="atopper333" post_id="244748" time="1717814933" user_id="15001">
There was also the Tr-602F

8 inch yellow bell at a .525 bore…[/quote]

Oh wow, I think I have one of these, though it's been sitting in my parents' garage for 10+ years. I can't remember how it played though, now I'm wondering if I should go get it.
</QUOTE>

I thought it was a great intermediate horn. Had a good sound and was very bright to my ear. Not to constricted by very much closer to a 607F than Bach .525 horns without the valve. Could definitely get some power out of it. I thought the valve a little stuffy below the staff, but that might have been me more then the horn!