Rifling on Conn 3?

P
paysonmcc
Posts: 71
Joined: May 21, 2019

by paysonmcc »

I was going through some mouthpieces for students to use and found a Conn 3 in the pile. I checked to see if it was clean enough to play and found something really cool in the throat of the mouthpiece: rifling! Has anyone seen this on any other mouthpieces?
G
ghmerrill
Posts: 2193
Joined: Apr 02, 2018

by ghmerrill »

O
Olofson
Posts: 92
Joined: Apr 15, 2023

by Olofson » (edited 2024-04-13 5:49 a.m.)

Glenn Zottola mouthpieces hade riffled backbore. Some of us tried them in the 60s.

Yes that´s right JohnL, not riffled. stepped.
H
harrisonreed
Posts: 6479
Joined: Aug 17, 2018

by harrisonreed »

Best Brass also has mouthpieces like this.
J
JohnL
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by JohnL »

That's a really tight twist.

[quote="harrisonreed"]Best Brass also has mouthpieces like this.[/quote]
Are those cut in a spiral? It looks more like they're simple circumferential grooves.

[quote="Olofson"]Glenn Zottola mouthpieces hade riffled backbore. Some of us tried them in the 60s.[/quote]
I thought Zottola used a stepped backbore. That's certainly what the patent says.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US2798402A
C
Crazy4Tbone86
Posts: 1654
Joined: Jan 14, 2020

by Crazy4Tbone86 »

At one time, I had a lot of the Elkhart Conn mouthpieces. I don’t remember “rifling” marks like that in any of those. Perhaps someone made some aftermarket modifications with a reamer or a drill bit?
B
BGuttman
Posts: 7368
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by BGuttman »

I'm certain it was aftermarket. My Conn 3 has no rifling in the aperture (or anywhere else on the piece).
T
tbonesullivan
Posts: 1959
Joined: Jul 02, 2019

by tbonesullivan »

That really looks like a failed attempt at reaming out the throat. Maybe they used a cylindrical file?
J
JohnL
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by JohnL »

[quote="Crazy4Tbone86"]At one time, I had a lot of the Elkhart Conn mouthpieces. I don’t remember “rifling” marks like that in any of those. Perhaps someone made some aftermarket modifications with a reamer or a drill bit?[/quote]
I'm thinking maybe a tap?
T
timothy42b
Posts: 1812
Joined: Mar 27, 2018

by timothy42b »

Off topic a bit, but a tap and die set can be useful.

I just helped assemble a handicapped ramp for a neighbor who'd had surgery. It's an assortment of pieces to be used temporarily so gets moved fairly often. The crew ran a tap down every threaded hole and a die across every threaded piece before assembling. That avoided a lot of frustration over munged up or just dirty threads.
P
paysonmcc
Posts: 71
Joined: May 21, 2019

by paysonmcc »

I was able to take a look at the throat in a little better light. The sliver plating is only missing in the throat, so it is definitely modified. To me it looks like the throat was first drilled out and then "tapped".

One thing that is hard to see from the picture is that the total length of these marks are about 0.5 inches long, and are very uniform. It really looks like an attempt to try a new modification, and not a slipped bit.

I'll plug it in my Bach 36 later and see how playable it is.
C
CharlieB
Posts: 434
Joined: Mar 29, 2018

by CharlieB »

Not threads.

Definitely rifling.

Done with a broach.

One out of hundreds of experimental trombone mouthpiece designs.

Curious to learn how it plays.
J
JohnL
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by JohnL »

[quote="CharlieB"]Not threads.

Definitely rifling.

Done with a broach.[/quote]
Honestly, I don't think it was a thread tap or a rifling broach (at least not anything standard).

Consider:

If it's a thread, it's a very coarse pitch (I count five threads per 1/2").

If it's rifling, that's a lot of grooves (I count at least eight and we can't see them all) and a fast twist (the grooved section is about 1/2" long and the grooves go more than a quarter of the way around - that's a twist rate of 1 turn in less than 2").

Do the grooves extend all the way through the throat (i.e., can you see them at the very bottom of the cup)?
H
harrisonreed
Posts: 6479
Joined: Aug 17, 2018

by harrisonreed »

It's not rifling. Those grooves are too deep (for that bore size) and the twist rate is too fast.

It's like cannon sized grooves on a .22 bore.

Also you can see the job wasn't done right near the backbore / throat mating point. The grooves skip, almost like they tried coming in from the other end.