Mystery straight F bass trombone

F
Finetales
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by Finetales »

I recently snagged a genuine F bass trombone on eBay. (NEVER thought that would happen!) While the maker (Jul. Rudolph-Gotha) and year (1937) are not a mystery as they're stamped on the bell, everything else about this is. I'm wondering if any historians on here know a little bit more about this instrument.

The specs are as follows: full-length F slide (missing the handle), .510-.590" (13-15mm) slide bore, 10" bell, receiver that swallows bass shank mouthpieces and is big enough to take a tuba mouthpiece, and a weight of about 658 tons. (Seriously, this horn is SO heavy! Even without adding any valves you'd need an Ergobone to play it for long periods.)

User image

User image

User image

User image

User image

The slide works well and the horn is very playable - moreso than most F contras that I've played. It also has an enormous sound with seemingly infinite core. Using my bass trombone mouthpiece (which barely fits), it sounds as big and powerful as a contra to me. Pedal notes are explosive and eat my modern bass trombone for lunch. But it also has a usable high register and doesn't feel like trying to turn a container ship. I think I love it.

But, what was it made for? Military use? 1937 seems pretty late to be making an F bass trombone.
M
MStarke
Posts: 1031
Joined: Jan 01, 2019

by MStarke »

What a cool horn, lucky you! and it seems to be in a pretty good state!

My best guess is that is was intended for military use or use in a protestant Posaunenchor (basically a church trombone and/or other brass choir).

Pretty sure that it was not intended for opera or symphony Orchestra. At that time people were using B flat basses and F contras I think, but not F bass trombones anymore.
D
Doug_Elliott
Posts: 4155
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by Doug_Elliott »

Interesting info on the company here, but you probably already found it:

<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.horn-u-copia.net/Reference/ ... hisrec=643">https://www.horn-u-copia.net/Reference/display.php?thisrec=643</LINK_TEXT>

Very cool horn.

I should get back to learning my F alto.

So is that actually the same length as an F horn?
B
bitbckt
Posts: 298
Joined: Aug 19, 2020

by bitbckt »

Piling on: wow, that is cool. I'm looking forward to hearing it featured in your next multitrack! ;)
E
EdwardSolomon
Posts: 130
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by EdwardSolomon »

It is undoubtedly a Kirchenposaune. I have one from around a decade later, made in the German Democratic Republic. The Kirchenposaune (lit. "church trombone") was a 19th century development, in which the various sizes of trombone continued to be manufactured for the Protestant Posaunenchor in smaller bore sizes compared to orchestral and military band instruments. The bore of my instrument is 0.525".

User image
T
Tbarh
Posts: 505
Joined: Aug 16, 2018

by Tbarh »

Looks nickel plated ..Which would explain some of the heavy weight ..<EMOJI seq="1f609" tseq="1f609">😉</EMOJI>
E
elmsandr
Posts: 1373
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by elmsandr »

Oh, I am insanely jealous now.

Beautiful horn, I look forward to hearing it do something fun in one of your arrangements.

Cheers,

Andy
J
jonathanharker
Posts: 139
Joined: Aug 14, 2022

by jonathanharker »

[quote="EdwardSolomon"]The Kirchenposaune (lit. "church trombone") was a 19th century development, in which the various sizes of trombone continued to be manufactured for the Protestant Posaunenchor in smaller bore sizes compared to orchestral and military band instruments. The bore of my instrument is 0.525".[/quote]

Did (bass in F) Kirchenposaunen ever have valve attachments, or was Dehmel's design for opera pits the first?
E
EdwardSolomon
Posts: 130
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by EdwardSolomon »

[quote="jonathanharker"]Did (bass in F) Kirchenposaunen ever have valve attachments, or was Dehmel's design for opera pits the first?[/quote]

No, Dehmel based his design on the large bore military band F bass trombone.

The Kirchenposaune was a narrower bore instrument than the orchestral instrument, which was narrower in turn than the military band instrument.

The first iteration of the military band F bass trombone as a contrabass trombone was the application of a B flat valve, so Dehmel was adapting an existing design, much as did Sattler before him with the B flat Tenorbaßposaune. The F/BB flat contrabass trombone existed as a Kruspe model around the turn of the 20th century, but clearly didn't really catch on. The instrument that Dehmel designed was played by him in the Bayreuther Festspielorchester and left to the orchestra when he left in 1924.
K
Kbiggs
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mar 24, 2018

by Kbiggs »

The bell section diameter and expansion almost looks like the bugle of a euphonium!
F
Finetales
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by Finetales »

[quote="Doug Elliott"]So is that actually the same length as an F horn?[/quote]

Yep! Same as F tuba or F contrabass trombone.

[quote="EdwardSolomon"]It is undoubtedly a Kirchenposaune. I have one from around a decade later, made in the German Democratic Republic. The Kirchenposaune (lit. "church trombone") was a 19th century development, in which the various sizes of trombone continued to be manufactured for the Protestant Posaunenchor in smaller bore sizes compared to orchestral and military band instruments. The bore of my instrument is 0.525".[/quote]

Great info, thanks!

I will say, even though it starts at .510", the lower tube being .590" seems exceptionally large. A .08" difference is big even for German dual bore standards. (For reference, there is also a .08" difference between .467" and .547", which would be an absurd combination!) A .590" slide tube is comfortably in contra bore territory. And since the receiver is so large (I suspect there is no leadpipe), the whole instrument feels huge.

[quote="Kbiggs"]The bell section diameter and expansion almost looks like the bugle of a euphonium![/quote]

Yes, the throat is massive! I'd love to compare measurements with a contra throat.
C
Chronos91
Posts: 64
Joined: Jul 10, 2022

by Chronos91 »

That's another really cool instrument you've got. Those slide measurements are insane, 0.510 to 0.590? I wonder what the valve register would be like if it had them. Especially with how you describe the pedal register.