Yikes
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
Did anyone else see a certain trombone player's racist remarks getting spread around FB? I'll be decent (deserved or not) and leave their name out, but the employing orchestra posted that they are at least aware of the situation. I wonder what course of action they will decide to take.
In looking at the person's Twitter account it seems not very surprising they would hold such ignorant views. From what others have posted it appears that those who knew her were not surprised, with some claiming this was not the first 'questionable' thing she has posted.
While this country may be a breeding ground for that kind of behavior, it is still very upsetting and surprising to see that there are artists who express these kinds of views. How can you even be a member of an orchestra (or a musician/artist in general) if you believe (the collective) we are on different teams?
Such a shame.
In looking at the person's Twitter account it seems not very surprising they would hold such ignorant views. From what others have posted it appears that those who knew her were not surprised, with some claiming this was not the first 'questionable' thing she has posted.
While this country may be a breeding ground for that kind of behavior, it is still very upsetting and surprising to see that there are artists who express these kinds of views. How can you even be a member of an orchestra (or a musician/artist in general) if you believe (the collective) we are on different teams?
Such a shame.
- Doug_Elliott
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
Did she just get kicked off of Facebook? I figured out who it is and found screenshots, but a search for her name doesn't go anywhere.
Almost nothing surprises me anymore.
Almost nothing surprises me anymore.
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
[quote="Doug Elliott"]Did she just get kicked off of Facebook? I figured out who it is and found screenshots, but a search for her name doesn't go anywhere.
Almost nothing surprises me anymore.[/quote]
I believe either her account was taken down, or she deleted it/locked it down after facing backlash. The post with screenshots got lots of attention and many people wrote to the employing orchestra demanding action.
Play stupid games... Win stupid prizes.
Almost nothing surprises me anymore.[/quote]
I believe either her account was taken down, or she deleted it/locked it down after facing backlash. The post with screenshots got lots of attention and many people wrote to the employing orchestra demanding action.
Play stupid games... Win stupid prizes.
- Gary
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Jan 11, 2019
Well you realize that, for many of us, we have no idea what you are talkin about. So, unless you just like to hear yourself talk (meant nicely, not disingenuously), without a link you can't get much of a dialogue going.
p.s. the people involved that can take action against her certainly know about the situation. In that case, while being considerate of her by not giving any details, you are not really protecting her.,
p.s. the people involved that can take action against her certainly know about the situation. In that case, while being considerate of her by not giving any details, you are not really protecting her.,
- Kdanielsen
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Jul 28, 2019
Who said what?
I’m ok with outing people for racism...
I’m ok with outing people for racism...
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
Here was the orchestra's response, which was posted actually very quickly (matter of a couple hours). I am not the type of person to put her name down here (whether she deserves it or not), but it won't take a Sherlock to figure out who she is.
<FACEBOOK id="10163287817685212" type="p" user="99396525211"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.facebook.com/99396525211/po ... 817685212/">https://www.facebook.com/99396525211/posts/10163287817685212/</LINK_TEXT></FACEBOOK>
<FACEBOOK id="10163287817685212" type="p" user="99396525211"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.facebook.com/99396525211/po ... 817685212/">https://www.facebook.com/99396525211/posts/10163287817685212/</LINK_TEXT></FACEBOOK>
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
Are these views (or worse) not held by approximately 1/3 of Americans?
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="Kdanielsen"]Who said what?
I’m ok with outing people for racism...[/quote]
<FACEBOOK id="10221421415980185" type="p" user="ryan.johnstone.14"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.facebook.com/ryan.johnstone ... cation=ufi">https://www.facebook.com/ryan.johnstone.14/posts/10221421415980185?hc_location=ufi</LINK_TEXT></FACEBOOK>
Click on individual panels to enlarge comments. The person who reposted the these stated they were posted on Saturday evening. I don't see dates. Some of the feedback on the Austin Symphony FB page suggests there may have been other comments as well. I don't participate in FB and have no way to verify.
I’m ok with outing people for racism...[/quote]
<FACEBOOK id="10221421415980185" type="p" user="ryan.johnstone.14"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.facebook.com/ryan.johnstone ... cation=ufi">https://www.facebook.com/ryan.johnstone.14/posts/10221421415980185?hc_location=ufi</LINK_TEXT></FACEBOOK>
Click on individual panels to enlarge comments. The person who reposted the these stated they were posted on Saturday evening. I don't see dates. Some of the feedback on the Austin Symphony FB page suggests there may have been other comments as well. I don't participate in FB and have no way to verify.
- Kdanielsen
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Jul 28, 2019
Brenda Sansig Salas of the Austin Symphony.
Shame on you. People are being murdered.
Shame on you. People are being murdered.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Joseph Alessi: Whoever Brenda is, she should be reprimanded by the orchestra and perhaps fired for these comments. I certainly would be fired if I made these statements. What on earth is wrong with people? We should respect all races, all religions, and shut the hell up. This country is in big trouble because our leaders don't seem to care. Anyone connected with Brenda should tell her to apologize for these comments.
- Kdanielsen
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Jul 28, 2019
[quote="slipperyjoe"]Joseph Alessi: Whoever Brenda is, she should be reprimanded by the orchestra and perhaps fired for these comments. I certainly would be fired if I made these statements. What on earth is wrong with people? We should respect all races, all religions, and shut the hell up. This country is in big trouble because our leaders don't seem to care. Anyone connected with Brenda should tell her to apologize for these comments.[/quote]
Go Joe!
Go Joe!
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="Bach5G"]Are these views (or worse) not held by approximately 1/3 of Americans?[/quote]
I don't know, but where do you get your approximation from?
I don't know, but where do you get your approximation from?
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Her link/page was removed from the Austin Symphony web site.
https://austinsymphony.org/about/musicians/
It was there within the past hour. Hopefully they were terminated. Hopefully they will lose any teaching gigs as well.
https://austinsymphony.org/about/musicians/
It was there within the past hour. Hopefully they were terminated. Hopefully they will lose any teaching gigs as well.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
Immediate termination from all jobs? Where's the chance for redemption? I read her posts and I think her views are abhorrent, but does that instantly lead to termination and disgrace?
If a man or a woman commits horrible crimes in their youth and pay for their crimes and turn their lives around we celebrate that redemption, we welcome them back into society. I just hope that we give this woman the same chance out of simple love and respect for another human being. Perhaps that's more than she deserves, I don't know the woman so I can't say. I would want to be given a chance if I was in a similar situation.
If a man or a woman commits horrible crimes in their youth and pay for their crimes and turn their lives around we celebrate that redemption, we welcome them back into society. I just hope that we give this woman the same chance out of simple love and respect for another human being. Perhaps that's more than she deserves, I don't know the woman so I can't say. I would want to be given a chance if I was in a similar situation.
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
While she is ultimately to blame for her own views, I believe that it is true that punishing her will not actually solve much. We need to reform the way POC are portrayed by the media and the inherent differences in the way different races are treated differently for the same things.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="norbie2018"]Immediate termination from all jobs? Where's the chance for redemption? I read her posts and I think her views are abhorrent, but does that instantly lead to termination and disgrace?[/quote]
[quote="Mv2541"]While she is ultimately to blame for her own views, I believe that it is true that punishing her will not actually solve much. We need to reform the way POC are portrayed by the media and the inherent differences in the way different races are treated differently for the same things.[/quote]
Yes, termination and disgrace. Zero tolerance.
It will give them time to consider how their racism impacts people of color, including those with whom their children interact.
They can work their way back after overcoming their ignorance.
[quote="Mv2541"]While she is ultimately to blame for her own views, I believe that it is true that punishing her will not actually solve much. We need to reform the way POC are portrayed by the media and the inherent differences in the way different races are treated differently for the same things.[/quote]
Yes, termination and disgrace. Zero tolerance.
It will give them time to consider how their racism impacts people of color, including those with whom their children interact.
They can work their way back after overcoming their ignorance.
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="Bach5G" post_id="114892" time="1590941608" user_id="2999">
Are these views (or worse) not held by approximately 1/3 of Americans?[/quote]
I don't know, but where do you get your approximation from?
</QUOTE>
Am I too low?
Isn’t firing someone for expressing their views contrary to American values?
Are these views (or worse) not held by approximately 1/3 of Americans?[/quote]
I don't know, but where do you get your approximation from?
</QUOTE>
Am I too low?
Isn’t firing someone for expressing their views contrary to American values?
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
Not to minimize the offensive remarks, but we have had demonstrations that were far from peaceful about this apparent murder of a black person.
I think the action of the Minnesota policeman was unpardonable. There have been more than a few cases where POC are not treated the same as whites and are often maltreated because of it.
But the solution is not to burn down police stations or loot stores. This is even worse than an armed invasion of a State House demanding haircuts.
To quote Walt Kelly's Pogo: "We has met the enemy, and he is us."
I think the action of the Minnesota policeman was unpardonable. There have been more than a few cases where POC are not treated the same as whites and are often maltreated because of it.
But the solution is not to burn down police stations or loot stores. This is even worse than an armed invasion of a State House demanding haircuts.
To quote Walt Kelly's Pogo: "We has met the enemy, and he is us."
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
I guess there’s gonna be a new post on the music business forum.
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
Her name has been removed from the Austin Symphony Orchestra's website, which likely means she has been terminated.
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
I'm not going to get too deep into this, I think everyone should be aware that the overwhelming majority of violence has been directly incited by either the police or less commonly, unaffiliated white supremacist groups. Public media will not show you this, because it will get them shut down.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="slipperyjoe"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="114904" time="1590947088" user_id="2978">
Immediate termination from all jobs? Where's the chance for redemption? I read her posts and I think her views are abhorrent, but does that instantly lead to termination and disgrace?[/quote]
[quote="Mv2541"]While she is ultimately to blame for her own views, I believe that it is true that punishing her will not actually solve much. We need to reform the way POC are portrayed by the media and the inherent differences in the way different races are treated differently for the same things.[/quote]
Yes, termination and disgrace. Zero tolerance.
It will give them time to consider how their racism impacts people of color, including those with whom their children interact.
They can work their way back after overcoming their ignorance.
</QUOTE>
You might Ascertain from my previous post that you quoted that I disagree with your view. There are other ways of punishing a person like this, for instance suspension and sending her to the appropriate classes. I didn't say she shouldn't be punished for her views, I just don't think it should be that severe. Remember, you have to give room for Redemption.
Immediate termination from all jobs? Where's the chance for redemption? I read her posts and I think her views are abhorrent, but does that instantly lead to termination and disgrace?[/quote]
[quote="Mv2541"]While she is ultimately to blame for her own views, I believe that it is true that punishing her will not actually solve much. We need to reform the way POC are portrayed by the media and the inherent differences in the way different races are treated differently for the same things.[/quote]
Yes, termination and disgrace. Zero tolerance.
It will give them time to consider how their racism impacts people of color, including those with whom their children interact.
They can work their way back after overcoming their ignorance.
</QUOTE>
You might Ascertain from my previous post that you quoted that I disagree with your view. There are other ways of punishing a person like this, for instance suspension and sending her to the appropriate classes. I didn't say she shouldn't be punished for her views, I just don't think it should be that severe. Remember, you have to give room for Redemption.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="Bach5G"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="114899" time="1590945917" user_id="2978">
I don't know, but where do you get your approximation from?[/quote]
Am I too low?
Isn’t firing someone for expressing their views contrary to American values?
</QUOTE>
I don't know the percentage, but it seems as if you do. I would like you to site where you got that figure from. Or is it just the best guess?
I don't know, but where do you get your approximation from?[/quote]
Am I too low?
Isn’t firing someone for expressing their views contrary to American values?
</QUOTE>
I don't know the percentage, but it seems as if you do. I would like you to site where you got that figure from. Or is it just the best guess?
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="BurckhardtS"]I'm not going to get too deep into this, I think everyone should be aware that the overwhelming majority of violence has been directly incited by either the police or less commonly, unaffiliated white supremacist groups. Public media will not show you this, because it will get them shut down.[/quote]
The vast majority of police forces are made up of people who want to serve other people. They're made of white, black, and brown people. The vast majority of police officers do not go out of their way to incite violence. If you have research or other scientific data which shows differently I'd be happy to read it. What that dude in Minnesota did and the police officers that stood by watching it is Despicable but not representative of the vast majority of police forces in America.
The vast majority of police forces are made up of people who want to serve other people. They're made of white, black, and brown people. The vast majority of police officers do not go out of their way to incite violence. If you have research or other scientific data which shows differently I'd be happy to read it. What that dude in Minnesota did and the police officers that stood by watching it is Despicable but not representative of the vast majority of police forces in America.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="slipperyjoe" post_id="114910" time="1590949960" user_id="9188">
Yes, termination and disgrace. Zero tolerance.
It will give them time to consider how their racism impacts people of color, including those with whom their children interact.
They can work their way back after overcoming their ignorance.[/quote]
You might Ascertain from my previous post that you quoted that I disagree with your view. There are other ways of punishing a person like this, for instance suspension and sending her to the appropriate classes. I didn't say she shouldn't be punished for her views, I just don't think it should be that severe. Remember, you have to give room for Redemption.
</QUOTE>
There’s other jobs. If she made one small comment then it could’ve been an accident. But no, she repeatedly stated her racist opinions and made the choice of posting. That’s her own ignorance. She should’ve known the consequences of her actions before posting something that would obviously hurt her image. I feel the symphony did the right choice, if she wants redemption then she can work her way up again. You need to learn to think about what you’re posting before you post it. Not to mention how bad this must look for the rest of the group
Yes, termination and disgrace. Zero tolerance.
It will give them time to consider how their racism impacts people of color, including those with whom their children interact.
They can work their way back after overcoming their ignorance.[/quote]
You might Ascertain from my previous post that you quoted that I disagree with your view. There are other ways of punishing a person like this, for instance suspension and sending her to the appropriate classes. I didn't say she shouldn't be punished for her views, I just don't think it should be that severe. Remember, you have to give room for Redemption.
</QUOTE>
There’s other jobs. If she made one small comment then it could’ve been an accident. But no, she repeatedly stated her racist opinions and made the choice of posting. That’s her own ignorance. She should’ve known the consequences of her actions before posting something that would obviously hurt her image. I feel the symphony did the right choice, if she wants redemption then she can work her way up again. You need to learn to think about what you’re posting before you post it. Not to mention how bad this must look for the rest of the group
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
I completely agree that person should have thought about what they were posting before they posted it. But does that really matter? Racism just would have been hidden instead of put on full display for the whole world to see.
I've done some really stupid things in my life and was given a second chance and took advantage of that second chance to build a new life for myself and my family. I'm just hoping that she gets the same chance. I don't know this woman, but she's a fellow human being and I have compassion for her and Hope that whatever makes her feel so hateful inside can be healed.
I've done some really stupid things in my life and was given a second chance and took advantage of that second chance to build a new life for myself and my family. I'm just hoping that she gets the same chance. I don't know this woman, but she's a fellow human being and I have compassion for her and Hope that whatever makes her feel so hateful inside can be healed.
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]
The vast majority of police forces are made up of people who want to serve other people. They're made of white, black, and brown people. The vast majority of police officers do not go out of their way to incite violence. If you have research or other scientific data which shows differently I'd be happy to read it. What that dude in Minnesota did and the police officers that stood by watching it is Despicable but not representative of the vast majority of police forces in America.[/quote]
I can't give you 'scientific data' but I'm not sure what kind of 'scientific data' you are going to expect from riots and protests. That seems like flawed logic.
I wrote a huge post on FB about this, but I'll do it again because I believe the conversation is worth having:
Watch this video:
<FACEBOOK id="1115609038807106" type="v" user="chris.sawyer.142240"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.facebook.com/chris.sawyer.1 ... 038807106/">https://www.facebook.com/chris.sawyer.142240/videos/1115609038807106/</LINK_TEXT></FACEBOOK>
I'm going to be a bit extreme and say even if this disturbs you, you have a responsibility to watch it all the way through. And this is maybe HALF of the cases that occurred YESTERDAY.
Do you see the body language here? These are children having temper tantrums. Even in situations where use of force may have been necessary to regain control, they ACTIVELY chased down citizens and continued to injure others, even if they have acquired complete control over the situation. The officers standing by watching this happen are complicit in their activities.
All of these cases have exposed that our police force is as a general rule undertrained, not qualified, and not mentally sound enough to be doing the duties that they are.
There is a video that is left out of the Minnesota State Patrol shooting paint rounds at citizens on their own property. Yes, they were outdoors past curfew, but the curfew law specifically states that they are allowed to be outside on their own property.
Except they didn't know that. Let that sink in. The police officers whose job it is to uphold the law didn't know the law. You can hear one of the officers yell "light 'em up" almost as if it is a game to them. Does that not disturb you? There were at least 20+ fully armed troopers in full riot gear, and they decided that it was necessary to open fire on 4 people standing on their own porch.
If this doesn't convince you that there needs to be major criminal justice reform, I'm not sure what will. And I think it will take everyone coming to the table to learn what it it takes to proceed.
The vast majority of police forces are made up of people who want to serve other people. They're made of white, black, and brown people. The vast majority of police officers do not go out of their way to incite violence. If you have research or other scientific data which shows differently I'd be happy to read it. What that dude in Minnesota did and the police officers that stood by watching it is Despicable but not representative of the vast majority of police forces in America.[/quote]
I can't give you 'scientific data' but I'm not sure what kind of 'scientific data' you are going to expect from riots and protests. That seems like flawed logic.
I wrote a huge post on FB about this, but I'll do it again because I believe the conversation is worth having:
Watch this video:
<FACEBOOK id="1115609038807106" type="v" user="chris.sawyer.142240"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.facebook.com/chris.sawyer.1 ... 038807106/">https://www.facebook.com/chris.sawyer.142240/videos/1115609038807106/</LINK_TEXT></FACEBOOK>
I'm going to be a bit extreme and say even if this disturbs you, you have a responsibility to watch it all the way through. And this is maybe HALF of the cases that occurred YESTERDAY.
Do you see the body language here? These are children having temper tantrums. Even in situations where use of force may have been necessary to regain control, they ACTIVELY chased down citizens and continued to injure others, even if they have acquired complete control over the situation. The officers standing by watching this happen are complicit in their activities.
All of these cases have exposed that our police force is as a general rule undertrained, not qualified, and not mentally sound enough to be doing the duties that they are.
There is a video that is left out of the Minnesota State Patrol shooting paint rounds at citizens on their own property. Yes, they were outdoors past curfew, but the curfew law specifically states that they are allowed to be outside on their own property.
Except they didn't know that. Let that sink in. The police officers whose job it is to uphold the law didn't know the law. You can hear one of the officers yell "light 'em up" almost as if it is a game to them. Does that not disturb you? There were at least 20+ fully armed troopers in full riot gear, and they decided that it was necessary to open fire on 4 people standing on their own porch.
If this doesn't convince you that there needs to be major criminal justice reform, I'm not sure what will. And I think it will take everyone coming to the table to learn what it it takes to proceed.
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]I completely agree that person should have thought about what they were posting before they posted it. But does that really matter? Racism just would have been hidden instead of put on full display for the whole world to see.
I've done some really stupid things in my life and was given a second chance and took advantage of that second chance to build a new life for myself and my family. I'm just hoping that she gets the same chance. I don't know this woman, but she's a fellow human being and I have compassion for her and Hope that whatever makes her feel so hateful inside can be healed.[/quote]
You should consider yourself extremely lucky then. You have to learn at some point that your actions have consequences. No one is entitled to a second chance, but you can learn from your mistakes, move forward, and do the best you can.
I've done some really stupid things in my life and was given a second chance and took advantage of that second chance to build a new life for myself and my family. I'm just hoping that she gets the same chance. I don't know this woman, but she's a fellow human being and I have compassion for her and Hope that whatever makes her feel so hateful inside can be healed.[/quote]
You should consider yourself extremely lucky then. You have to learn at some point that your actions have consequences. No one is entitled to a second chance, but you can learn from your mistakes, move forward, and do the best you can.
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
In employment law, there is the concept of progressive discipline. Something like warning, suspension, termination.
Cooler heads might have agreed that a suspension and ‘sensitivity training’ (although I once heard a prof explain that sensitivity training made most situations worse by reinforcing already deeply engrained attitudes) might have been appropriate.
Termination creates a martyr?
Cooler heads might have agreed that a suspension and ‘sensitivity training’ (although I once heard a prof explain that sensitivity training made most situations worse by reinforcing already deeply engrained attitudes) might have been appropriate.
Termination creates a martyr?
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="Bach5G"]In employment law, there is the concept of progressive discipline. Something like warning, suspension, termination.
Cooler heads might have agreed that a suspension and ‘sensitivity training’ (although I once heard a prof explain that sensitivity training made most situations worse by reinforcing already deeply engrained attitudes) might have been appropriate.
Termination creates a martyr?[/quote]
It may depend on the circumstances, e.g., public vs. private employer, unionized or not, terms agreed upon at the commencement of employment, etc. At-will employment can provide for immediate dismissal without cause, as long as labor laws have not been violated.
In my workplace (K-12 school), we participated in many years of regular and very carefully coordinated community and inclusion work and barely scratched the surface. There is just so much to learn. And, perhaps more importantly, to unlearn. It's really a lifetime of work, especially for white people. We are all really very clueless.
The person who is subject of this discussion is well beyond the reach of any 'sensitivity' training, whatever that is, that might allow them to return to the workplace. They have a load of baggage that could take the rest of their life to undo.
I suspect any martyrdom won't pay the bills.
Cooler heads might have agreed that a suspension and ‘sensitivity training’ (although I once heard a prof explain that sensitivity training made most situations worse by reinforcing already deeply engrained attitudes) might have been appropriate.
Termination creates a martyr?[/quote]
It may depend on the circumstances, e.g., public vs. private employer, unionized or not, terms agreed upon at the commencement of employment, etc. At-will employment can provide for immediate dismissal without cause, as long as labor laws have not been violated.
In my workplace (K-12 school), we participated in many years of regular and very carefully coordinated community and inclusion work and barely scratched the surface. There is just so much to learn. And, perhaps more importantly, to unlearn. It's really a lifetime of work, especially for white people. We are all really very clueless.
The person who is subject of this discussion is well beyond the reach of any 'sensitivity' training, whatever that is, that might allow them to return to the workplace. They have a load of baggage that could take the rest of their life to undo.
I suspect any martyrdom won't pay the bills.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="BGuttman"]Not to minimize the offensive remarks, but we have had demonstrations that were far from peaceful about this apparent murder of a black person.
I think the action of the Minnesota policeman was unpardonable. There have been more than a few cases where POC are not treated the same as whites and are often maltreated because of it.
But the solution is not to burn down police stations or loot stores. This is even worse than an armed invasion of a State House demanding haircuts.
To quote Walt Kelly's Pogo: "We has met the enemy, and he is us."[/quote]
I agree re: destruction. I do, however, find it ironic that we decry destruction at home while we (the United States) have spent my entire lifetime raining destruction down on people of color around the world in order to benefit the white, U.S. corporate establishment.
I think the action of the Minnesota policeman was unpardonable. There have been more than a few cases where POC are not treated the same as whites and are often maltreated because of it.
But the solution is not to burn down police stations or loot stores. This is even worse than an armed invasion of a State House demanding haircuts.
To quote Walt Kelly's Pogo: "We has met the enemy, and he is us."[/quote]
I agree re: destruction. I do, however, find it ironic that we decry destruction at home while we (the United States) have spent my entire lifetime raining destruction down on people of color around the world in order to benefit the white, U.S. corporate establishment.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
[quote="slipperyjoe"]
I agree re: destruction. I do, however, find it ironic that we decry destruction at home while we (the United States) have spent my entire lifetime raining destruction down on people of color around the world in order to benefit the white, U.S. corporate establishment.[/quote]
I don't agree with our raining destruction on POC in other countries either, unless they have done something to deserve it. I realize our hands are not clean.
I agree re: destruction. I do, however, find it ironic that we decry destruction at home while we (the United States) have spent my entire lifetime raining destruction down on people of color around the world in order to benefit the white, U.S. corporate establishment.[/quote]
I don't agree with our raining destruction on POC in other countries either, unless they have done something to deserve it. I realize our hands are not clean.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="BurckhardtS"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="114923" time="1590956313" user_id="2978">
The vast majority of police forces are made up of people who want to serve other people. They're made of white, black, and brown people. The vast majority of police officers do not go out of their way to incite violence. If you have research or other scientific data which shows differently I'd be happy to read it. What that dude in Minnesota did and the police officers that stood by watching it is Despicable but not representative of the vast majority of police forces in America.[/quote]
I can't give you 'scientific data' but I'm not sure what kind of 'scientific data' you are going to expect from riots and protests. That seems like flawed logic.
I wrote a huge post on FB about this, but I'll do it again because I believe the conversation is worth having:
Watch this video:
<FACEBOOK id="1115609038807106" type="v" user="chris.sawyer.142240"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.facebook.com/chris.sawyer.1 ... 038807106/">https://www.facebook.com/chris.sawyer.142240/videos/1115609038807106/</LINK_TEXT></FACEBOOK>
I'm going to be a bit extreme and say even if this disturbs you, you have a responsibility to watch it all the way through. And this is maybe HALF of the cases that occurred YESTERDAY.
Do you see the body language here? These are children having temper tantrums. Even in situations where use of force may have been necessary to regain control, they ACTIVELY chased down citizens and continued to injure others, even if they have acquired complete control over the situation. The officers standing by watching this happen are complicit in their activities.
All of these cases have exposed that our police force is as a general rule undertrained, not qualified, and not mentally sound enough to be doing the duties that they are.
There is a video that is left out of the Minnesota State Patrol shooting paint rounds at citizens on their own property. Yes, they were outdoors past curfew, but the curfew law specifically states that they are allowed to be outside on their own property.
Except they didn't know that. Let that sink in. The police officers whose job it is to uphold the law didn't know the law. You can hear one of the officers yell "light 'em up" almost as if it is a game to them. Does that not disturb you? There were at least 20+ fully armed troopers in full riot gear, and they decided that it was necessary to open fire on 4 people standing on their own porch.
If this doesn't convince you that there needs to be major criminal justice reform, I'm not sure what will. And I think it will take everyone coming to the table to learn what it it takes to proceed.
</QUOTE>
Thank you for posting that Facebook link because those videos are a source of data. Where is all of this taking place? Are these clips from Minnesota, or is this from across the nation? There really has to be context here. Do some police officers commit acts of violence that are outside the realm of their job? I'd say yes. But that doesn't mean all police officers do this or that all police departments use violence as a tool against protesters. We need better data to know the full story.
I stand by my conviction that the majority of officers want to do the right thing and serve other people. I appreciate departments that have moved to community policing. If there are departments that use violence first obviously they have to retrain their officers, because the use of violence as a first tactic comes from training and from the culture of a police department.
I also appreciate the intelligent discussion that is being had. The subject brings out a lot of emotion in people, and rightly so. But we'll never going to find Solutions screaming past each other or by name-calling. It will only come from individuals working with other individuals for change.
The vast majority of police forces are made up of people who want to serve other people. They're made of white, black, and brown people. The vast majority of police officers do not go out of their way to incite violence. If you have research or other scientific data which shows differently I'd be happy to read it. What that dude in Minnesota did and the police officers that stood by watching it is Despicable but not representative of the vast majority of police forces in America.[/quote]
I can't give you 'scientific data' but I'm not sure what kind of 'scientific data' you are going to expect from riots and protests. That seems like flawed logic.
I wrote a huge post on FB about this, but I'll do it again because I believe the conversation is worth having:
Watch this video:
<FACEBOOK id="1115609038807106" type="v" user="chris.sawyer.142240"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.facebook.com/chris.sawyer.1 ... 038807106/">https://www.facebook.com/chris.sawyer.142240/videos/1115609038807106/</LINK_TEXT></FACEBOOK>
I'm going to be a bit extreme and say even if this disturbs you, you have a responsibility to watch it all the way through. And this is maybe HALF of the cases that occurred YESTERDAY.
Do you see the body language here? These are children having temper tantrums. Even in situations where use of force may have been necessary to regain control, they ACTIVELY chased down citizens and continued to injure others, even if they have acquired complete control over the situation. The officers standing by watching this happen are complicit in their activities.
All of these cases have exposed that our police force is as a general rule undertrained, not qualified, and not mentally sound enough to be doing the duties that they are.
There is a video that is left out of the Minnesota State Patrol shooting paint rounds at citizens on their own property. Yes, they were outdoors past curfew, but the curfew law specifically states that they are allowed to be outside on their own property.
Except they didn't know that. Let that sink in. The police officers whose job it is to uphold the law didn't know the law. You can hear one of the officers yell "light 'em up" almost as if it is a game to them. Does that not disturb you? There were at least 20+ fully armed troopers in full riot gear, and they decided that it was necessary to open fire on 4 people standing on their own porch.
If this doesn't convince you that there needs to be major criminal justice reform, I'm not sure what will. And I think it will take everyone coming to the table to learn what it it takes to proceed.
</QUOTE>
Thank you for posting that Facebook link because those videos are a source of data. Where is all of this taking place? Are these clips from Minnesota, or is this from across the nation? There really has to be context here. Do some police officers commit acts of violence that are outside the realm of their job? I'd say yes. But that doesn't mean all police officers do this or that all police departments use violence as a tool against protesters. We need better data to know the full story.
I stand by my conviction that the majority of officers want to do the right thing and serve other people. I appreciate departments that have moved to community policing. If there are departments that use violence first obviously they have to retrain their officers, because the use of violence as a first tactic comes from training and from the culture of a police department.
I also appreciate the intelligent discussion that is being had. The subject brings out a lot of emotion in people, and rightly so. But we'll never going to find Solutions screaming past each other or by name-calling. It will only come from individuals working with other individuals for change.
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
This is across the country. Many of the incidents have even happened in extremely progressive areas such as Portland or Seattle (in Seattle a 9 year old was pepper sprayed). I found a list of all of these videos and where they occurred earlier today, but I can't seem to find it.
I think I would agree with you that the majority of officers want to do the right thing. In fact, here is a video of a Flint, Michigan Sheriff rallying with the protesters in a positive way.
<FACEBOOK id="3486864431342904" type="v" user="avissword"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.facebook.com/avissword/vide ... 431342904/">https://www.facebook.com/avissword/videos/3486864431342904/</LINK_TEXT></FACEBOOK>
However, I don't think we can say that this issue is not systemic across our nation, and in fact the evidence points that it is, and that it has been going on for a very long time.
I think I would agree with you that the majority of officers want to do the right thing. In fact, here is a video of a Flint, Michigan Sheriff rallying with the protesters in a positive way.
<FACEBOOK id="3486864431342904" type="v" user="avissword"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.facebook.com/avissword/vide ... 431342904/">https://www.facebook.com/avissword/videos/3486864431342904/</LINK_TEXT></FACEBOOK>
However, I don't think we can say that this issue is not systemic across our nation, and in fact the evidence points that it is, and that it has been going on for a very long time.
- GabrielRice
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
A message from Austin Symphony Orchestra Executive Director, Anthony Corroa
“We would like to thank the community and let you know that your voice was heard. As previously stated, we were made aware of offensive posts that were shared on social media by one of our musicians late last night. Once alerted, we were appalled by the comments as they are clearly not reflective of who we are as an organization. We began to work quickly and closely with the American Federation of Musicians, our Orchestra Committee, staff and other key members. At this time we can state that the musician is no longer employed by the ASO for there is no place for hate within our organization. Thank you for your patience while we navigated through the necessary channels.”
“We would like to thank the community and let you know that your voice was heard. As previously stated, we were made aware of offensive posts that were shared on social media by one of our musicians late last night. Once alerted, we were appalled by the comments as they are clearly not reflective of who we are as an organization. We began to work quickly and closely with the American Federation of Musicians, our Orchestra Committee, staff and other key members. At this time we can state that the musician is no longer employed by the ASO for there is no place for hate within our organization. Thank you for your patience while we navigated through the necessary channels.”
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Good riddance.
- hyperbolica
- Posts: 3990
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
Wow. Accused. Tried. Convicted. Executed. By a mob. In an afternoon. Congratulations.
The mob mentality is exactly what we are reacting against, but we are doing it by perpetuating the mob mentality.
There has to be a better way than public lynchings. Haven't we learned anything from the mistakes of the past?
The mob mentality is exactly what we are reacting against, but we are doing it by perpetuating the mob mentality.
There has to be a better way than public lynchings. Haven't we learned anything from the mistakes of the past?
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
I would be careful about using the term 'lynching' to describe that particular situation.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
One irrational post is a mistake. Several evokes a bias. I would think that the AFM and the Orchestra Management had a lot more than just somebody mouthing off once.
Hyperbolia, are you going to excuse Massimo LaRosa and James Levine for sexual misconduct also?
Note: I had put Daniel Morandini in here by mistake. I apologize to Mr. Morandini, who is innocent.
Hyperbolia, are you going to excuse Massimo LaRosa and James Levine for sexual misconduct also?
Note: I had put Daniel Morandini in here by mistake. I apologize to Mr. Morandini, who is innocent.
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
Jeez 2020 has been shitty and we’re not even into June yet.
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
[quote="hyperbolica"]Wow. Accused. Tried. Convicted. Executed. By a mob. In an afternoon. Congratulations.
The mob mentality is exactly what we are reacting against, but we are doing it by perpetuating the mob mentality.
There has to be a better way than public lynchings. Haven't we learned anything from the mistakes of the past?[/quote]
First off, there really wasn't an accusation; she wrote and published the words herself with her own (racist) brain to a public place for everyone to see. If you are found to have cancer, the doctors aim to remove it quickly and entirely before it spreads. There is no room for that kind of person in a professional environment, and she dug her own grave.
Your use of the word 'lynching' is also inappropriate at best. I would advise you, most respectfully, to check yourself and your privilege. She lost her job for spewing filth on her personal Facebook account; innocent people were lynched in America for merely being born people of color. They are not at all related.
The mob mentality is exactly what we are reacting against, but we are doing it by perpetuating the mob mentality.
There has to be a better way than public lynchings. Haven't we learned anything from the mistakes of the past?[/quote]
First off, there really wasn't an accusation; she wrote and published the words herself with her own (racist) brain to a public place for everyone to see. If you are found to have cancer, the doctors aim to remove it quickly and entirely before it spreads. There is no room for that kind of person in a professional environment, and she dug her own grave.
Your use of the word 'lynching' is also inappropriate at best. I would advise you, most respectfully, to check yourself and your privilege. She lost her job for spewing filth on her personal Facebook account; innocent people were lynched in America for merely being born people of color. They are not at all related.
- hyperbolica
- Posts: 3990
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="BGuttman"]...
Hyperbolia, are you going to excuse Daniel Morandini and James Levine for sexual misconduct also?[/quote]
You've done it again. I didn't excuse anyone. Failure to jump on the wagon is not the same as excusing. I just think a civilized country has due process specifically to avoid mob judgment.
And the word "lynching" was chosen specifically to link the hypocrisy of mob rule to mete out punishment to all previous connotations of the word. .
The reason racism is perpetuating in this country is that the cure is made of the same stuff as the disease: Intolerance. If you accept any form of intolerance you embrace violence. If you reject intolerance, you have to get comfortable coexisting with people who are different and think differently, but that's the definitionof tolerance and the essence of civilization. You can't have it both ways. Our history proves it.
Hyperbolia, are you going to excuse Daniel Morandini and James Levine for sexual misconduct also?[/quote]
You've done it again. I didn't excuse anyone. Failure to jump on the wagon is not the same as excusing. I just think a civilized country has due process specifically to avoid mob judgment.
And the word "lynching" was chosen specifically to link the hypocrisy of mob rule to mete out punishment to all previous connotations of the word. .
The reason racism is perpetuating in this country is that the cure is made of the same stuff as the disease: Intolerance. If you accept any form of intolerance you embrace violence. If you reject intolerance, you have to get comfortable coexisting with people who are different and think differently, but that's the definitionof tolerance and the essence of civilization. You can't have it both ways. Our history proves it.
- Kdanielsen
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Jul 28, 2019
[quote="hyperbolica"]<QUOTE author="BGuttman" post_id="114955" time="1590974258" user_id="53">
...
Hyperbolia, are you going to excuse Daniel Morandini and James Levine for sexual misconduct also?[/quote]
You've done it again. I didn't excuse anyone. Failure to jump on the wagon is not the same as excusing. I just think a civilized country has due process specifically to avoid mob judgment.
And the word "lynching" was chosen specifically to link the hypocrisy of mob rule to mete out punishment to all previous connotations of the word. .
The reason racism is perpetuating in this country is that the cure is made of the same stuff as the disease: Intolerance. If you accept any form of intolerance you embrace violence. If you reject intolerance, you have to get comfortable coexisting with people who are different and think differently, but that's the definitionof tolerance and the essence of civilization. You can't have it both ways. Our history proves it.
</QUOTE>
So you are suggesting that, while people are being murdered by the police, the solution is to tolerate racism?
...
Hyperbolia, are you going to excuse Daniel Morandini and James Levine for sexual misconduct also?[/quote]
You've done it again. I didn't excuse anyone. Failure to jump on the wagon is not the same as excusing. I just think a civilized country has due process specifically to avoid mob judgment.
And the word "lynching" was chosen specifically to link the hypocrisy of mob rule to mete out punishment to all previous connotations of the word. .
The reason racism is perpetuating in this country is that the cure is made of the same stuff as the disease: Intolerance. If you accept any form of intolerance you embrace violence. If you reject intolerance, you have to get comfortable coexisting with people who are different and think differently, but that's the definitionof tolerance and the essence of civilization. You can't have it both ways. Our history proves it.
</QUOTE>
So you are suggesting that, while people are being murdered by the police, the solution is to tolerate racism?
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="Mv2541"]First off, there really wasn't an accusation; she wrote and published the words herself with her own (racist) brain to a public place for everyone to see. If you are found to have cancer, the doctors aim to remove it quickly and entirely before it spreads. There is no room for that kind of person in a professional environment, and she dug her own grave.
Your use of the word 'lynching' is also inappropriate at best. I would advise you, most respectfully, to check yourself and your privilege. She lost her job for spewing filth on her personal Facebook account; innocent people were lynched in America for merely being born people of color. They are not at all related.[/quote]
Well said. Thank you.
Your use of the word 'lynching' is also inappropriate at best. I would advise you, most respectfully, to check yourself and your privilege. She lost her job for spewing filth on her personal Facebook account; innocent people were lynched in America for merely being born people of color. They are not at all related.[/quote]
Well said. Thank you.
- hyperbolica
- Posts: 3990
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="Kdanielsen"]So you are suggesting that, while people are being murdered by the police, the solution is to tolerate racism?[/quote]
I'm saying use due process to judge people by their actions. Not who they are (race), not what they think (racist) , or what they say (sticks and stones... ) . Cops killing people is wrong (still deserve due process), setting buildings on fire is also wrong.
Yes, you have to learn to tolerate people who think things you don't like. You can't defeat racism without tolerating it. What are you going to do? Kill all the racists? You know what that sounds like?
You can't fix what people think, but even people who think bad things can avoid bad actions. That's the only way to judge them. There are plenty of racists who don't allow bad thoughts to turn into bad actions.
.
I'm saying use due process to judge people by their actions. Not who they are (race), not what they think (racist) , or what they say (sticks and stones... ) . Cops killing people is wrong (still deserve due process), setting buildings on fire is also wrong.
Yes, you have to learn to tolerate people who think things you don't like. You can't defeat racism without tolerating it. What are you going to do? Kill all the racists? You know what that sounds like?
You can't fix what people think, but even people who think bad things can avoid bad actions. That's the only way to judge them. There are plenty of racists who don't allow bad thoughts to turn into bad actions.
.
- CalgaryTbone
- Posts: 1460
- Joined: May 10, 2018
[quote="BGuttman"]One irrational post is a mistake. Several evokes a bias. I would think that the AFM and the Orchestra Management had a lot more than just somebody mouthing off once.
Hyperbolia, are you going to excuse Daniel Morandini and James Levine for sexual misconduct also?[/quote]
Just to keep this from derailing - I think that you meant Massimo LaRosa, not Daniel Morandini. I'm not aware of any misconduct complaints against Daniel, while Massimo is no longer with the Cleveland Orchestra. We don't need to have a different Italian trombonist have his reputation sullied by an identity mistake. On the other hand, I'm fine with people being held responsible for their actions, including firing.
Orchestras reserve the right to fire employees for the behaviour that was demonstrated in this Facebook post. Like it or not, you are a representative of the organization, and the public doesn't always differentiate between personal and professional statements.
Jim Scott
Hyperbolia, are you going to excuse Daniel Morandini and James Levine for sexual misconduct also?[/quote]
Just to keep this from derailing - I think that you meant Massimo LaRosa, not Daniel Morandini. I'm not aware of any misconduct complaints against Daniel, while Massimo is no longer with the Cleveland Orchestra. We don't need to have a different Italian trombonist have his reputation sullied by an identity mistake. On the other hand, I'm fine with people being held responsible for their actions, including firing.
Orchestras reserve the right to fire employees for the behaviour that was demonstrated in this Facebook post. Like it or not, you are a representative of the organization, and the public doesn't always differentiate between personal and professional statements.
Jim Scott
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
[quote="CalgaryTbone"]<QUOTE author="BGuttman" post_id="114955" time="1590974258" user_id="53">
One irrational post is a mistake. Several evokes a bias. I would think that the AFM and the Orchestra Management had a lot more than just somebody mouthing off once.
Hyperbolia, are you going to excuse Daniel Morandini and James Levine for sexual misconduct also?[/quote]
Just to keep this from derailing - I think that you meant Massimo LaRosa, not Daniel Morandini. I'm not aware of any misconduct complaints against Daniel, while Massimo is no longer with the Cleveland Orchestra. We don't need to have a different Italian trombonist have his reputation sullied by an identity mistake. On the other hand, I'm fine with people being held responsible for their actions, including firing.
Orchestras reserve the right to fire employees for the behaviour that was demonstrated in this Facebook post. Like it or not, you are a representative of the organization, and the public doesn't always differentiate between personal and professional statements.
Jim Scott
</QUOTE>
I already corrected my original post to change Morandini to LaRosa. I apologize for that error.
One irrational post is a mistake. Several evokes a bias. I would think that the AFM and the Orchestra Management had a lot more than just somebody mouthing off once.
Hyperbolia, are you going to excuse Daniel Morandini and James Levine for sexual misconduct also?[/quote]
Just to keep this from derailing - I think that you meant Massimo LaRosa, not Daniel Morandini. I'm not aware of any misconduct complaints against Daniel, while Massimo is no longer with the Cleveland Orchestra. We don't need to have a different Italian trombonist have his reputation sullied by an identity mistake. On the other hand, I'm fine with people being held responsible for their actions, including firing.
Orchestras reserve the right to fire employees for the behaviour that was demonstrated in this Facebook post. Like it or not, you are a representative of the organization, and the public doesn't always differentiate between personal and professional statements.
Jim Scott
</QUOTE>
I already corrected my original post to change Morandini to LaRosa. I apologize for that error.
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
[/quote]
The reason racism is perpetuating in this country is that the cure is made of the same stuff as the disease: Intolerance. If you accept any form of intolerance you embrace violence. If you reject intolerance, you have to get comfortable coexisting with people who are different and think differently, but that's the definitionof tolerance and the essence of civilization. You can't have it both ways. Our history proves it.
[/quote]
Of course this is simply an opinion, but I believe racism stems from ignorance, not that the cure is made of the same stuff as the disease (not even mentioning the fact that have claimed to both know the cure for racism and understand the essence of civilization). Also I do not think life (nor intolerance) works like an on-off switch. We can choose to tolerate something while not tolerating something else, and this is a sliding scale. Why does being intolerant on matters of a racist person in what should be a safe workspace mean that we have to embrace violence?
The reason racism is perpetuating in this country is that the cure is made of the same stuff as the disease: Intolerance. If you accept any form of intolerance you embrace violence. If you reject intolerance, you have to get comfortable coexisting with people who are different and think differently, but that's the definitionof tolerance and the essence of civilization. You can't have it both ways. Our history proves it.
[/quote]
Of course this is simply an opinion, but I believe racism stems from ignorance, not that the cure is made of the same stuff as the disease (not even mentioning the fact that have claimed to both know the cure for racism and understand the essence of civilization). Also I do not think life (nor intolerance) works like an on-off switch. We can choose to tolerate something while not tolerating something else, and this is a sliding scale. Why does being intolerant on matters of a racist person in what should be a safe workspace mean that we have to embrace violence?
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
[quote="hyperbolica"]<QUOTE author="Kdanielsen" post_id="114964" time="1590976814" user_id="7231">
So you are suggesting that, while people are being murdered by the police, the solution is to tolerate racism?[/quote]
I'm saying use due process to judge people by their actions. Not who they are (race), not what they think (racist) , or what they say (sticks and stones... ) . Cops killing people is wrong (still deserve due process), setting buildings on fire is also wrong.
Yes, you have to learn to tolerate people who think things you don't like. You can't defeat racism without tolerating it. What are you going to do? Kill all the racists? You know what that sounds like?
You can't fix what people think, but even people who think bad things can avoid bad actions. That's the only way to judge them. There are plenty of racists who don't allow bad thoughts to turn into bad actions.
.
</QUOTE>
I don't totally disagree with this, but you are making very polarizing statements, which don't really get anyone anywhere.
Again, no one is really entitled to second chances. Does she deserve due process? Sure. She can clean up her act and audition for another orchestra, and maybe she'll get re-hired if she makes a compelling case.
However, if the orchestra sets the public precedent wrong, they (and other orchestras) could have easily collapsed from loss of donors, loss of ticket sales, etc. Now you are talking about hundreds without work.
Orchestras are non-profit cultural organizations, not businesses. They hardly stay afloat most of the time, and have to do massive public outreach to stay there. It just boils down to realizing your actions have consequences. We've all done/said stupid things before that maybe we regret later, and some times you end up on the losing end of it.
So you are suggesting that, while people are being murdered by the police, the solution is to tolerate racism?[/quote]
I'm saying use due process to judge people by their actions. Not who they are (race), not what they think (racist) , or what they say (sticks and stones... ) . Cops killing people is wrong (still deserve due process), setting buildings on fire is also wrong.
Yes, you have to learn to tolerate people who think things you don't like. You can't defeat racism without tolerating it. What are you going to do? Kill all the racists? You know what that sounds like?
You can't fix what people think, but even people who think bad things can avoid bad actions. That's the only way to judge them. There are plenty of racists who don't allow bad thoughts to turn into bad actions.
.
</QUOTE>
I don't totally disagree with this, but you are making very polarizing statements, which don't really get anyone anywhere.
Again, no one is really entitled to second chances. Does she deserve due process? Sure. She can clean up her act and audition for another orchestra, and maybe she'll get re-hired if she makes a compelling case.
However, if the orchestra sets the public precedent wrong, they (and other orchestras) could have easily collapsed from loss of donors, loss of ticket sales, etc. Now you are talking about hundreds without work.
Orchestras are non-profit cultural organizations, not businesses. They hardly stay afloat most of the time, and have to do massive public outreach to stay there. It just boils down to realizing your actions have consequences. We've all done/said stupid things before that maybe we regret later, and some times you end up on the losing end of it.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="hyperbolica"]Wow. Accused. Tried. Convicted. Executed. By a mob. In an afternoon. Congratulations.
The mob mentality is exactly what we are reacting against, but we are doing it by perpetuating the mob mentality.
There has to be a better way than public lynchings. Haven't we learned anything from the mistakes of the past?[/quote]
Here's the real yikes today, everyone.
The mob mentality is exactly what we are reacting against, but we are doing it by perpetuating the mob mentality.
There has to be a better way than public lynchings. Haven't we learned anything from the mistakes of the past?[/quote]
Here's the real yikes today, everyone.
- Kdanielsen
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Jul 28, 2019
[quote="hyperbolica"]<QUOTE author="Kdanielsen" post_id="114964" time="1590976814" user_id="7231">
So you are suggesting that, while people are being murdered by the police, the solution is to tolerate racism?[/quote]
I'm saying use due process to judge people by their actions. Not who they are (race), not what they think (racist) , or what they say (sticks and stones... ) . Cops killing people is wrong (still deserve due process), setting buildings on fire is also wrong.
Yes, you have to learn to tolerate people who think things you don't like. You can't defeat racism without tolerating it. What are you going to do? Kill all the racists? You know what that sounds like?
You can't fix what people think, but even people who think bad things can avoid bad actions. That's the only way to judge them. There are plenty of racists who don't allow bad thoughts to turn into bad actions.
.
</QUOTE>
I used to think that way.
Then I realized that my privilege as a white person, my assumption that due process and law will work for everyone equally, was the reason that idea was so easy to embrace. When I get pulled over, or see a police officer, my assumption is that I’m not going to be murdered. People of color can’t make that assumption. That’s privilege. Same thing with the legal system. Same thing with employment. Same thing across society.
We need to be better allies.
Protecting oppressors only hurts victims. Tolerating public racist rants only gives racist violence a backdrop that normalizes it.
And being fired from an orchestra isnt in the same universe as being murdered at a traffic stop.
Im done intellectualizing this because for the victims of racism (and sexism, and homophobia, and transphobia, etc etc etc) it isn’t an intellectual issue. It’s a matter of life and death. It’s an everyday issue of fear and oppression.
So you are suggesting that, while people are being murdered by the police, the solution is to tolerate racism?[/quote]
I'm saying use due process to judge people by their actions. Not who they are (race), not what they think (racist) , or what they say (sticks and stones... ) . Cops killing people is wrong (still deserve due process), setting buildings on fire is also wrong.
Yes, you have to learn to tolerate people who think things you don't like. You can't defeat racism without tolerating it. What are you going to do? Kill all the racists? You know what that sounds like?
You can't fix what people think, but even people who think bad things can avoid bad actions. That's the only way to judge them. There are plenty of racists who don't allow bad thoughts to turn into bad actions.
.
</QUOTE>
I used to think that way.
Then I realized that my privilege as a white person, my assumption that due process and law will work for everyone equally, was the reason that idea was so easy to embrace. When I get pulled over, or see a police officer, my assumption is that I’m not going to be murdered. People of color can’t make that assumption. That’s privilege. Same thing with the legal system. Same thing with employment. Same thing across society.
We need to be better allies.
Protecting oppressors only hurts victims. Tolerating public racist rants only gives racist violence a backdrop that normalizes it.
And being fired from an orchestra isnt in the same universe as being murdered at a traffic stop.
Im done intellectualizing this because for the victims of racism (and sexism, and homophobia, and transphobia, etc etc etc) it isn’t an intellectual issue. It’s a matter of life and death. It’s an everyday issue of fear and oppression.
- GabrielRice
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
Yes, Kris. Well said.
Her facebook account was removed before I had a chance to look at it; I did see some of her twitter feed. This is not new behavior from her. Her published racist opinions create a hostile workplace environment, which is a fireable offense in any field. There have to be consequences.
From an ACLU lawyer:
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.talksonlaw.com/briefs/can-y ... F5XEdvhcS0">https://www.talksonlaw.com/briefs/can-you-be-fired-for-speech-outside-the-office?fbclid=IwAR2ccvRlWyRlgNF9gLTx_XZ9hBzMNjcjWOeQoRlw1Sex6seQTF5XEdvhcS0</LINK_TEXT>
From the Society for Human Resource Management:
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-m ... krHKqqEeQw">https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/0918/pages/firing-for-online-behavior-.aspx?fbclid=IwAR2Lx--X1RyZ7C7ZTZfRnWVihjIyp56Oyk-30t5kxgQk8ESlvkrHKqqEeQw</LINK_TEXT>
"...five states—California, Colorado, Louisiana, New York and North Dakota—protect employees from retaliation for engaging in lawful off-duty conduct and political activities, no matter how distasteful their colleagues may consider their affiliations...Workers can, however, be axed for engaging in hate speech and making disparaging comments about protected categories of race, religion and gender."
Her facebook account was removed before I had a chance to look at it; I did see some of her twitter feed. This is not new behavior from her. Her published racist opinions create a hostile workplace environment, which is a fireable offense in any field. There have to be consequences.
From an ACLU lawyer:
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.talksonlaw.com/briefs/can-y ... F5XEdvhcS0">https://www.talksonlaw.com/briefs/can-you-be-fired-for-speech-outside-the-office?fbclid=IwAR2ccvRlWyRlgNF9gLTx_XZ9hBzMNjcjWOeQoRlw1Sex6seQTF5XEdvhcS0</LINK_TEXT>
From the Society for Human Resource Management:
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-m ... krHKqqEeQw">https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/0918/pages/firing-for-online-behavior-.aspx?fbclid=IwAR2Lx--X1RyZ7C7ZTZfRnWVihjIyp56Oyk-30t5kxgQk8ESlvkrHKqqEeQw</LINK_TEXT>
"...five states—California, Colorado, Louisiana, New York and North Dakota—protect employees from retaliation for engaging in lawful off-duty conduct and political activities, no matter how distasteful their colleagues may consider their affiliations...Workers can, however, be axed for engaging in hate speech and making disparaging comments about protected categories of race, religion and gender."
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="Kdanielsen"]<QUOTE author="hyperbolica" post_id="114970" time="1590980765" user_id="104">
I'm saying use due process to judge people by their actions. Not who they are (race), not what they think (racist) , or what they say (sticks and stones... ) . Cops killing people is wrong (still deserve due process), setting buildings on fire is also wrong.
Yes, you have to learn to tolerate people who think things you don't like. You can't defeat racism without tolerating it. What are you going to do? Kill all the racists? You know what that sounds like?
You can't fix what people think, but even people who think bad things can avoid bad actions. That's the only way to judge them. There are plenty of racists who don't allow bad thoughts to turn into bad actions.
.[/quote]
I used to think that way.
Then I realized that my privilege as a white person, my assumption that due process and law will work for everyone equally, was the reason that idea was so easy to embrace. When I get pulled over, or see a police officer, my assumption is that I’m not going to be murdered. People of color can’t make that assumption. That’s privilege. Same thing with the legal system. Same thing with employment. Same thing across society.
We need to be better allies.
Protecting oppressors only hurts victims. Tolerating public racist rants only gives racist violence a backdrop that normalizes it.
And being fired from an orchestra isnt in the same universe as being murdered at a traffic stop.
Im done intellectualizing this because for the victims of racism (and sexism, and homophobia, and transphobia, etc etc etc) it isn’t an intellectual issue. It’s a matter of life and death. It’s an everyday issue of fear and oppression.
</QUOTE>
Where's your data that due process does not work for individuals of color? How can you state that people of color do not have the same economic equality when Asian Americans earn more than white Americans? Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting.
I'm saying use due process to judge people by their actions. Not who they are (race), not what they think (racist) , or what they say (sticks and stones... ) . Cops killing people is wrong (still deserve due process), setting buildings on fire is also wrong.
Yes, you have to learn to tolerate people who think things you don't like. You can't defeat racism without tolerating it. What are you going to do? Kill all the racists? You know what that sounds like?
You can't fix what people think, but even people who think bad things can avoid bad actions. That's the only way to judge them. There are plenty of racists who don't allow bad thoughts to turn into bad actions.
.[/quote]
I used to think that way.
Then I realized that my privilege as a white person, my assumption that due process and law will work for everyone equally, was the reason that idea was so easy to embrace. When I get pulled over, or see a police officer, my assumption is that I’m not going to be murdered. People of color can’t make that assumption. That’s privilege. Same thing with the legal system. Same thing with employment. Same thing across society.
We need to be better allies.
Protecting oppressors only hurts victims. Tolerating public racist rants only gives racist violence a backdrop that normalizes it.
And being fired from an orchestra isnt in the same universe as being murdered at a traffic stop.
Im done intellectualizing this because for the victims of racism (and sexism, and homophobia, and transphobia, etc etc etc) it isn’t an intellectual issue. It’s a matter of life and death. It’s an everyday issue of fear and oppression.
</QUOTE>
Where's your data that due process does not work for individuals of color? How can you state that people of color do not have the same economic equality when Asian Americans earn more than white Americans? Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="norbie2018"]Where's your data that due process does not work for individuals of color? How can you state that people of color do not have the same economic equality when Asian Americans earn more than white Americans? Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting.[/quote]
Wow. Just wow.
Please read (carefully):
Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People:
https://tinyurl.com/y79dnoc8
White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism:
https://tinyurl.com/ybnbt84a
So You Want to Talk About Race:
https://tinyurl.com/yde7bkjc
(read this one twice)
You'll then be able to just barely wrap your head about having a meaningful conversation about systemic racism and how it impacts the lives of people of color every single day. You won't be good at it. None of us are. But it will be a start.
Wow. Just wow.
Please read (carefully):
Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People:
https://tinyurl.com/y79dnoc8
White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism:
https://tinyurl.com/ybnbt84a
So You Want to Talk About Race:
https://tinyurl.com/yde7bkjc
(read this one twice)
You'll then be able to just barely wrap your head about having a meaningful conversation about systemic racism and how it impacts the lives of people of color every single day. You won't be good at it. None of us are. But it will be a start.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="slipperyjoe"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115012" time="1591019048" user_id="2978">
Where's your data that due process does not work for individuals of color? How can you state that people of color do not have the same economic equality when Asian Americans earn more than white Americans? Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting.[/quote]
Wow. Just wow.
Please read (carefully):
Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People:
https://tinyurl.com/y79dnoc8
White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism:
https://tinyurl.com/ybnbt84a
So You Want to Talk About Race:
https://tinyurl.com/yde7bkjc
Then we can talk.
</QUOTE>
Wow to facts? I wish you would address the points I made instead of sending me to articles. The only way we can progress in a conversation about such a sensitive issue is to address the facts. In the U.S., based on "Median houseland income in the past 12 months (in 2014 inflation-adjusted dollars)". American Community Survey. United States Census Bureau. 2014., out of the top 10 wage earners 6 are of Asian or South African descent. Now, South Africa could mean white or black, so we can ignore the for the moment if you'd like. This would support the view that certain ethnic minorities are doing quite well economically.
I also wrote "Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting." Why not address that directly? I am of the view that most people can succeed in spite of some morons out there, and that people are inherently good and want to do the right thing.
Where's your data that due process does not work for individuals of color? How can you state that people of color do not have the same economic equality when Asian Americans earn more than white Americans? Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting.[/quote]
Wow. Just wow.
Please read (carefully):
Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People:
https://tinyurl.com/y79dnoc8
White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism:
https://tinyurl.com/ybnbt84a
So You Want to Talk About Race:
https://tinyurl.com/yde7bkjc
Then we can talk.
</QUOTE>
Wow to facts? I wish you would address the points I made instead of sending me to articles. The only way we can progress in a conversation about such a sensitive issue is to address the facts. In the U.S., based on "Median houseland income in the past 12 months (in 2014 inflation-adjusted dollars)". American Community Survey. United States Census Bureau. 2014., out of the top 10 wage earners 6 are of Asian or South African descent. Now, South Africa could mean white or black, so we can ignore the for the moment if you'd like. This would support the view that certain ethnic minorities are doing quite well economically.
I also wrote "Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting." Why not address that directly? I am of the view that most people can succeed in spite of some morons out there, and that people are inherently good and want to do the right thing.
- Kdanielsen
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Jul 28, 2019
It does not boil down to individual choice or luck. Thats the point.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
We'll have to differ in opinions then, because in my eyes it is absolutely a factor. I did not mean to imply it is the only one, but it is a powerful influence.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="norbie2018"]Wow to facts? I wish you would address the points I made instead of sending me to articles. The only way we can progress in a conversation about such a sensitive issue is to address the facts. In the U.S., based on "Median houseland income in the past 12 months (in 2014 inflation-adjusted dollars)". American Community Survey. United States Census Bureau. 2014., out of the top 10 wage earners 6 are of Asian or South African descent. Now, South Africa could mean white or black, so we can ignore the for the moment if you'd like. This would support the view that certain ethnic minorities are doing quite well economically.
I also wrote "Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting." Why not address that directly? I am of the view that most people can succeed in spite of some morons out there, and that people are inherently good and want to do the right thing.[/quote]
You would benefit from an education about systemic racism from points of view of people of color. Good luck with your research.
I also wrote "Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting." Why not address that directly? I am of the view that most people can succeed in spite of some morons out there, and that people are inherently good and want to do the right thing.[/quote]
You would benefit from an education about systemic racism from points of view of people of color. Good luck with your research.
- Gary
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Jan 11, 2019
Whoa! Don't most African and Indian immigrants represent the more educated to begin with? Also, I can't see how there's any comparison between them and African-Americans, because what it doesn't say is that, no matter how successful they might be, they're just another inferior colored person to some cracker.
In a matter of months, an African-American woman was blown away by cops and she was just sitting, peacefully, in her own home: an African-American man just jogging down the street, gets assaulted and murdered by a bunch of vigilantes; now this latest death at the hands of law enforcement. Actions speak louder than words.
If I were black, I would be sick. This has been going on for centuries, things explode and lip service says there will be action to right the wrongs, and hen practically nothing is changed. Business as usual.
If I were black, I would be wary every time I left the house.
In a matter of months, an African-American woman was blown away by cops and she was just sitting, peacefully, in her own home: an African-American man just jogging down the street, gets assaulted and murdered by a bunch of vigilantes; now this latest death at the hands of law enforcement. Actions speak louder than words.
If I were black, I would be sick. This has been going on for centuries, things explode and lip service says there will be action to right the wrongs, and hen practically nothing is changed. Business as usual.
If I were black, I would be wary every time I left the house.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="slipperyjoe"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115016" time="1591020531" user_id="2978">
Wow to facts? I wish you would address the points I made instead of sending me to articles. The only way we can progress in a conversation about such a sensitive issue is to address the facts. In the U.S., based on "Median houseland income in the past 12 months (in 2014 inflation-adjusted dollars)". American Community Survey. United States Census Bureau. 2014., out of the top 10 wage earners 6 are of Asian or South African descent. Now, South Africa could mean white or black, so we can ignore the for the moment if you'd like. This would support the view that certain ethnic minorities are doing quite well economically.
I also wrote "Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting." Why not address that directly? I am of the view that most people can succeed in spite of some morons out there, and that people are inherently good and want to do the right thing.[/quote]
You would benefit from an education about systemic racism from points of view of people of color. Good luck with your research.
</QUOTE>
Not willing to address facts? That's the only way we can come to a rationale conclusion. You may be right, I may be right, but out of that we come to the truth.
Wow to facts? I wish you would address the points I made instead of sending me to articles. The only way we can progress in a conversation about such a sensitive issue is to address the facts. In the U.S., based on "Median houseland income in the past 12 months (in 2014 inflation-adjusted dollars)". American Community Survey. United States Census Bureau. 2014., out of the top 10 wage earners 6 are of Asian or South African descent. Now, South Africa could mean white or black, so we can ignore the for the moment if you'd like. This would support the view that certain ethnic minorities are doing quite well economically.
I also wrote "Does it not boil down to individual choices and a bit of luck when it comes to success, in spite of the actions of a few racist individuals? Injustices exist but it is not as grim a picture as you are painting." Why not address that directly? I am of the view that most people can succeed in spite of some morons out there, and that people are inherently good and want to do the right thing.[/quote]
You would benefit from an education about systemic racism from points of view of people of color. Good luck with your research.
</QUOTE>
Not willing to address facts? That's the only way we can come to a rationale conclusion. You may be right, I may be right, but out of that we come to the truth.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="Gary"]Whoa! Don't most African and Indian immigrants represent the more educated to begin with? Also, I can't see how there's any comparison between them and African-Americans, because what it doesn't say is that, no matter how successful they might be, they're just another inferior colored person to some cracker.
In a matter of months, an African-American woman was blown away by cops and she was just sitting, peacefully, in her own home: an African-American man just jogging down the street, gets assaulted and murdered by a bunch of vigilantes; now this latest death at the hands of law enforcement. Actions speak louder than words.
If I were black, I would be sick. This has been going on for centuries, things explode and lip service says there will be action to right the wrongs, and hen practically nothing is changed. Business as usual.
If I were black, I would be wary every time I left the house.[/quote]
This is an excellent website regarding officer involved shootings: <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics ... ings-2019/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/police-shootings-2019/</LINK_TEXT>
In a matter of months, an African-American woman was blown away by cops and she was just sitting, peacefully, in her own home: an African-American man just jogging down the street, gets assaulted and murdered by a bunch of vigilantes; now this latest death at the hands of law enforcement. Actions speak louder than words.
If I were black, I would be sick. This has been going on for centuries, things explode and lip service says there will be action to right the wrongs, and hen practically nothing is changed. Business as usual.
If I were black, I would be wary every time I left the house.[/quote]
This is an excellent website regarding officer involved shootings: <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics ... ings-2019/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/police-shootings-2019/</LINK_TEXT>
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
I don't support racism but Why should you private doings on social media affect your professional life?
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]I don't support racism but Why should you private doings on social media affect your professional life?[/quote]
How would you like it if someone you worked with had views against you? Would you feel safe in that kind of environment, especially considering she did not exactly keep her views quiet?
How would you like it if someone you worked with had views against you? Would you feel safe in that kind of environment, especially considering she did not exactly keep her views quiet?
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Mv2541"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115040" time="1591041392" user_id="3494">
I don't support racism but Why should you private doings on social media affect your professional life?[/quote]
How would you like it if someone you worked with had views against you? Would you feel safe in that kind of environment, especially considering she did not exactly keep her views quiet?
</QUOTE>
was she making racist comments to on the job?
Otherwise, I don't think your employer should fore you based on what you wriye on facebook
I don't support racism but Why should you private doings on social media affect your professional life?[/quote]
How would you like it if someone you worked with had views against you? Would you feel safe in that kind of environment, especially considering she did not exactly keep her views quiet?
</QUOTE>
was she making racist comments to on the job?
Otherwise, I don't think your employer should fore you based on what you wriye on facebook
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="Mv2541"]<LINK_TEXT text="https://theviolinchannel.com/austin-sym ... -comments/">https://theviolinchannel.com/austin-symphony-orchestra-trombonist-brenda-sansig-salas-fired-racist-comments/</LINK_TEXT>[/quote]
I'm glad this is getting press. Hopefully her private lesson referrals from schools will also dry up.
I'm glad this is getting press. Hopefully her private lesson referrals from schools will also dry up.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
8Park, what you say on a public forum can reflect on your employer. It is implied that if they hired you they agreed with you. The comments posted on the Violin Channel seem to indicate that this person is a Trumpian with a tin ear toward African-Americans. Given this was broadcast, the Orchestra needed to distance itself from her in order to avoid offending African-American subscribers and patrons.
If she just expressed these feelings to herself or her close friends this might not have been so offensive.
If she just expressed these feelings to herself or her close friends this might not have been so offensive.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="BGuttman"]8Park, what you say on a public forum can reflect on your employer. It is implied that if they hired you they agreed with you. The comments posted on the Violin Channel seem to indicate that this person is a Trumpian with a tin ear toward African-Americans. Given this was broadcast, the Orchestra needed to distance itself from her in order to avoid offending African-American subscribers and patrons.
If she just expressed these feelings to herself or her close friends this might not have been so offensive.[/quote]
I see your point and definetly in todays world firing her would be neccesary but maybe we should learn to be more tolerant of others views and seperate the artist from the person.
If she just expressed these feelings to herself or her close friends this might not have been so offensive.[/quote]
I see your point and definetly in todays world firing her would be neccesary but maybe we should learn to be more tolerant of others views and seperate the artist from the person.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
Someone already wrote about intolerance on both sides of the issue in this thread. I wrote about redemption.
When a person attributes certain negative stereotypes to an entire race it is difficult to tolerate, which is what she did in those posts of hers. She might be a terrific artist and person outside these views but, as at least a couple of posters pointed out, in the end it is about keeping subscribers and it is hard to do so when a person goes so public with her views. I get your view point but the reality in this situation outstrips the ideal.
When a person attributes certain negative stereotypes to an entire race it is difficult to tolerate, which is what she did in those posts of hers. She might be a terrific artist and person outside these views but, as at least a couple of posters pointed out, in the end it is about keeping subscribers and it is hard to do so when a person goes so public with her views. I get your view point but the reality in this situation outstrips the ideal.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
:space4: [quote="norbie2018"]Someone already wrote about intolerance on both sides of the issue in this thread. I wrote about redemption.
When a person attributes certain negative stereotypes to an entire race it is difficult to tolerate, which is what she did in those posts of hers. She might be a terrific artist and person outside these views but, as at least a couple of posters pointed out, in the end it is about keeping subscribers and it is hard to do so when a person goes so public with her views. I get your view point but the reality in this situation outstrips the ideal.[/quote]
I agree 100%
When a person attributes certain negative stereotypes to an entire race it is difficult to tolerate, which is what she did in those posts of hers. She might be a terrific artist and person outside these views but, as at least a couple of posters pointed out, in the end it is about keeping subscribers and it is hard to do so when a person goes so public with her views. I get your view point but the reality in this situation outstrips the ideal.[/quote]
I agree 100%
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Racism is a heinous system of institutionalized subjugation, exploitation, marginalization and violence.
Why should it be tolerated in any way, shape or form?
Why should it be tolerated in any way, shape or form?
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="slipperyjoe"]Racism is a heinous system of institutionalized subjugation, exploitation, marginalization and violence.
Why should it be tolerated in any way, shape or form?[/quote]
Because freedom of speech is a thing.
It would be different if she was going around her place of work and makind rude comments but no, she posted them on her private facebook account which has no affiliation to her employer.
Why should it be tolerated in any way, shape or form?[/quote]
Because freedom of speech is a thing.
It would be different if she was going around her place of work and makind rude comments but no, she posted them on her private facebook account which has no affiliation to her employer.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
Also it's important to remember than fear of someone different than you is a natural human instinct. It's not easy to cleanse yourself of it. Especially of you were raised in a more racist enviornment.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
I will agree that it should not be tolerated, but do you have no compassion for the person with those views, or are you willing to simply cast their entire being aside as trash? We're talking about human beings on both sides here, who by the very nature of being alive deserve compassion and empathy and love. Something makes a person have hateful views and until we talk about those views under the light of reason with that person we have no chance of changing views and attitudes.
You may know the story of the musician Daryl Davis who actively seeks out Klan members and convinces those who will listen to him to change. To me, that's the only way we're going to change a person's hatred to love, by one person talking with another person, human to human. <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
You may know the story of the musician Daryl Davis who actively seeks out Klan members and convinces those who will listen to him to change. To me, that's the only way we're going to change a person's hatred to love, by one person talking with another person, human to human. <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]I will agree that it should not be tolerated, but do you have no compassion for the person with those views, or are you willing to simply cast their entire being aside as trash? We're talking about human beings on both sides here, who by the very nature of being alive deserve compassion and empathy and love. Something makes a person have hateful views and until we talk about those views under the light of reason with that person we have no chance of changing views and attitudes.
You may know the story of the musician Daryl Davis who actively seeks out Klan members and convinces those who will listen to him to change. To me, that's the only way we're going to change a person's hatred to love, by one person talking with another person, human to human. <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>[/quote]
yes
I just want to put this into persepctive here. She made a bad choice and posted some slightly innapropiate comments on facebook and as a result her life is basicaly ruined. She was fired from all her jobs and internationally humiliated. I'm sure every trombonist in the and probably most classical musicians and many non musicians are aware of this story, probably due to the current events causing people to overdramatise. The story has even made it to many major news outlets. She prbably won't ever be able to get a decent job again and alot of people are going to leave her. Her life is ruined. I'm not saying racism is ok but the the response is major overkill.
You may know the story of the musician Daryl Davis who actively seeks out Klan members and convinces those who will listen to him to change. To me, that's the only way we're going to change a person's hatred to love, by one person talking with another person, human to human. <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>[/quote]
yes
I just want to put this into persepctive here. She made a bad choice and posted some slightly innapropiate comments on facebook and as a result her life is basicaly ruined. She was fired from all her jobs and internationally humiliated. I'm sure every trombonist in the and probably most classical musicians and many non musicians are aware of this story, probably due to the current events causing people to overdramatise. The story has even made it to many major news outlets. She prbably won't ever be able to get a decent job again and alot of people are going to leave her. Her life is ruined. I'm not saying racism is ok but the the response is major overkill.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115057" time="1591045861" user_id="2978">
I will agree that it should not be tolerated, but do you have no compassion for the person with those views, or are you willing to simply cast their entire being aside as trash? We're talking about human beings on both sides here, who by the very nature of being alive deserve compassion and empathy and love. Something makes a person have hateful views and until we talk about those views under the light of reason with that person we have no chance of changing views and attitudes.
You may know the story of the musician Daryl Davis who actively seeks out Klan members and convinces those who will listen to him to change. To me, that's the only way we're going to change a person's hatred to love, by one person talking with another person, human to human. <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>[/quote]
yes
I just want to put this into persepctive here. She made a bad choice and posted some slightly innapropiate comments on facebook and as a result her life is basicaly ruined. She was fired from all her jobs and internationally humiliated. I'm sure every trombonist in the and probably most classical musicians and many non musicians are aware of this story, probably due to the current events causing people to overdramatise. The story has even made it to many major news outlets. She prbably won't ever be able to get a decent job again and alot of people are going to leave her. Her life is ruined. I'm not saying racism is ok but the the response is major overkill.
</QUOTE>
Hopefully it will keep other idiot’s mouths shut. You know people are literally dying, and you’re concerned about her not going to be able to play professionally. There’s always a dollar general she can work at, suits her better anyways.
I will agree that it should not be tolerated, but do you have no compassion for the person with those views, or are you willing to simply cast their entire being aside as trash? We're talking about human beings on both sides here, who by the very nature of being alive deserve compassion and empathy and love. Something makes a person have hateful views and until we talk about those views under the light of reason with that person we have no chance of changing views and attitudes.
You may know the story of the musician Daryl Davis who actively seeks out Klan members and convinces those who will listen to him to change. To me, that's the only way we're going to change a person's hatred to love, by one person talking with another person, human to human. <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>[/quote]
yes
I just want to put this into persepctive here. She made a bad choice and posted some slightly innapropiate comments on facebook and as a result her life is basicaly ruined. She was fired from all her jobs and internationally humiliated. I'm sure every trombonist in the and probably most classical musicians and many non musicians are aware of this story, probably due to the current events causing people to overdramatise. The story has even made it to many major news outlets. She prbably won't ever be able to get a decent job again and alot of people are going to leave her. Her life is ruined. I'm not saying racism is ok but the the response is major overkill.
</QUOTE>
Hopefully it will keep other idiot’s mouths shut. You know people are literally dying, and you’re concerned about her not going to be able to play professionally. There’s always a dollar general she can work at, suits her better anyways.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Elow"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115059" time="1591046784" user_id="3494">
yes
I just want to put this into persepctive here. She made a bad choice and posted some slightly innapropiate comments on facebook and as a result her life is basicaly ruined. She was fired from all her jobs and internationally humiliated. I'm sure every trombonist in the and probably most classical musicians and many non musicians are aware of this story, probably due to the current events causing people to overdramatise. The story has even made it to many major news outlets. She prbably won't ever be able to get a decent job again and alot of people are going to leave her. Her life is ruined. I'm not saying racism is ok but the the response is major overkill.[/quote]
Hopefully it will keep other idiot’s mouths shut.
You know people are literally dying, and you’re concerned about her not going to be able to play professionally. There’s always a dollar general she can work at, suits her better anyways.
</QUOTE>
then why are making such a big deal out of this in the first place?
yes
I just want to put this into persepctive here. She made a bad choice and posted some slightly innapropiate comments on facebook and as a result her life is basicaly ruined. She was fired from all her jobs and internationally humiliated. I'm sure every trombonist in the and probably most classical musicians and many non musicians are aware of this story, probably due to the current events causing people to overdramatise. The story has even made it to many major news outlets. She prbably won't ever be able to get a decent job again and alot of people are going to leave her. Her life is ruined. I'm not saying racism is ok but the the response is major overkill.[/quote]
Hopefully it will keep other idiot’s mouths shut.
You know people are literally dying, and you’re concerned about her not going to be able to play professionally. There’s always a dollar general she can work at, suits her better anyways.
</QUOTE>
then why are making such a big deal out of this in the first place?
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
And anyway, fear mongering is not going to solve the racism problem in any shape or form. Just silence it
- Gary
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Jan 11, 2019
First, I think what was posted is abhorrent. I find it, personally, repugnant.
Second, a right that distinguishes democracies like our own is freedom of speech, a precious right. It is permissible as long as it is not against the law. I am not aware of any law these comments violate.
Regarding comments reflecting poorly on an employer, she was acting solely in a personal manner and not as a representative of the organization of which she is a member. Nor did she express her opinion on any official company media.
Silencing opposing opinion, even when you find it ugly, is a right that must continue to be protected. One man's offensive post today is another one's tomorrow. You have to be careful what you wish for.
Second, a right that distinguishes democracies like our own is freedom of speech, a precious right. It is permissible as long as it is not against the law. I am not aware of any law these comments violate.
Regarding comments reflecting poorly on an employer, she was acting solely in a personal manner and not as a representative of the organization of which she is a member. Nor did she express her opinion on any official company media.
Silencing opposing opinion, even when you find it ugly, is a right that must continue to be protected. One man's offensive post today is another one's tomorrow. You have to be careful what you wish for.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Gary"]First, I think what was posted is abhorrent. I find it, personally, repugnant.
Second, a right that distinguishes democracies like our own is freedom of speech, a precious right. It is permissible as long as it is not against the law. I am not aware of any law these comments violate.
Regarding comments reflecting poorly on an employer, she was acting solely in a personal manner and not as a representative of the organization of which she is a member. Nor did she express her opinion on any official company media.
Silencing opposing opinion, even when you find it ugly, is a right that must continue to be protected. One man's offensive post today is another one's tomorrow. You have to be careful what you wish for.[/quote]
precisely
Second, a right that distinguishes democracies like our own is freedom of speech, a precious right. It is permissible as long as it is not against the law. I am not aware of any law these comments violate.
Regarding comments reflecting poorly on an employer, she was acting solely in a personal manner and not as a representative of the organization of which she is a member. Nor did she express her opinion on any official company media.
Silencing opposing opinion, even when you find it ugly, is a right that must continue to be protected. One man's offensive post today is another one's tomorrow. You have to be careful what you wish for.[/quote]
precisely
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Gary" post_id="115066" time="1591049184" user_id="4286">
First, I think what was posted is abhorrent. I find it, personally, repugnant.
Second, a right that distinguishes democracies like our own is freedom of speech, a precious right. It is permissible as long as it is not against the law. I am not aware of any law these comments violate.
Regarding comments reflecting poorly on an employer, she was acting solely in a personal manner and not as a representative of the organization of which she is a member. Nor did she express her opinion on any official company media.
Silencing opposing opinion, even when you find it ugly, is a right that must continue to be protected. One man's offensive post today is another one's tomorrow. You have to be careful what you wish for.[/quote]
precisely
</QUOTE>
And what really disturbs me is that I'm sure not that many people are looking at her facebook page and here we have people purpousfully sharing these posts just to they will be well known enough that they can report her, ban her from facebook, and in the end: get her fired.
First, I think what was posted is abhorrent. I find it, personally, repugnant.
Second, a right that distinguishes democracies like our own is freedom of speech, a precious right. It is permissible as long as it is not against the law. I am not aware of any law these comments violate.
Regarding comments reflecting poorly on an employer, she was acting solely in a personal manner and not as a representative of the organization of which she is a member. Nor did she express her opinion on any official company media.
Silencing opposing opinion, even when you find it ugly, is a right that must continue to be protected. One man's offensive post today is another one's tomorrow. You have to be careful what you wish for.[/quote]
precisely
</QUOTE>
And what really disturbs me is that I'm sure not that many people are looking at her facebook page and here we have people purpousfully sharing these posts just to they will be well known enough that they can report her, ban her from facebook, and in the end: get her fired.
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
This person created a hostile environment for their section, orchestra colleagues, and ticket holders. Words like theirs are not harmless, and while they are protected from prosecution by the first amendment (subject to certain limits), nobody should expect their employer to tolerate hate speech, on or off the clock. Forgiveness requires that the offender recognize their wrongdoing, apologize for it, and atone for it. So far none of this has happened. Forgiveness also does not imply that there can be no consequences for actions.
At some point, we have to be pragmatic. Yes, it's worth celebrating when a racist is redeemed. That's not what is happening here. If that person wants to set that goal for themself after losing their career, and being publicly shamed after making public racist comments, then good for them. That does not erase what they did, and I'd argue it wouldn't even make it right. This bell cannot be un-rung.
If I wanted to forgive someone I sat next to for being a terrible person, I would go to church.
I don't go to church.
At some point, we have to be pragmatic. Yes, it's worth celebrating when a racist is redeemed. That's not what is happening here. If that person wants to set that goal for themself after losing their career, and being publicly shamed after making public racist comments, then good for them. That does not erase what they did, and I'd argue it wouldn't even make it right. This bell cannot be un-rung.
If I wanted to forgive someone I sat next to for being a terrible person, I would go to church.
I don't go to church.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="paulyg"]This person created a hostile environment for their section, orchestra colleagues, and ticket holders. Words like theirs are not harmless, and while they are protected from prosecution by the first amendment (subject to certain limits), nobody should expect their employer to tolerate hate speech, on or off the clock. Forgiveness requires that the offender recognize their wrongdoing, apologize for it, and atone for it. So far none of this has happened. Forgiveness also does not imply that there can be no consequences for actions.
At some point, we have to be pragmatic. Yes, it's worth celebrating when a racist is redeemed. That's not what is happening here. If that person wants to set that goal for themself after losing their career, and being publicly shamed after making public racist comments, then good for them. That does not erase what they did, and I'd argue it wouldn't even make it right. This bell cannot be un-rung.
If I wanted to forgive someone I sat next to for being a terrible person, I would go to church.
I don't go to church.[/quote]
I still don't understand how expressing your opinions in a private forum should cause you to get fired and internationally humiliated?
At some point, we have to be pragmatic. Yes, it's worth celebrating when a racist is redeemed. That's not what is happening here. If that person wants to set that goal for themself after losing their career, and being publicly shamed after making public racist comments, then good for them. That does not erase what they did, and I'd argue it wouldn't even make it right. This bell cannot be un-rung.
If I wanted to forgive someone I sat next to for being a terrible person, I would go to church.
I don't go to church.[/quote]
I still don't understand how expressing your opinions in a private forum should cause you to get fired and internationally humiliated?
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="paulyg" post_id="115069" time="1591049493" user_id="3299">
This person created a hostile environment for their section, orchestra colleagues, and ticket holders. Words like theirs are not harmless, and while they are protected from prosecution by the first amendment (subject to certain limits), nobody should expect their employer to tolerate hate speech, on or off the clock. Forgiveness requires that the offender recognize their wrongdoing, apologize for it, and atone for it. So far none of this has happened. Forgiveness also does not imply that there can be no consequences for actions.
At some point, we have to be pragmatic. Yes, it's worth celebrating when a racist is redeemed. That's not what is happening here. If that person wants to set that goal for themself after losing their career, and being publicly shamed after making public racist comments, then good for them. That does not erase what they did, and I'd argue it wouldn't even make it right. This bell cannot be un-rung.
If I wanted to forgive someone I sat next to for being a terrible person, I would go to church.
I don't go to church.[/quote]
I still don't understand how expressing your opinions in a private forum should cause you to get fired and internationally humiliated?
</QUOTE>
Since when is Facebook a private forum?
If you humiliate and embarrass yourself on something that clearly was NOT a private forum, why wouldn't your employer take action? It's no different than if a police officer did the same on their FB account, or if someone who worked at whole foods was supporting extremist environmental terrorism on their account. If you do that in a way that gathers attention, which this has, you've already embarrassed and humiliated YOURSELF, and all that's left is for your employer to fire you for the legitimate reason of bringing bad press and putting the company in a bad light.
That's how the world works outside of student land.
This person created a hostile environment for their section, orchestra colleagues, and ticket holders. Words like theirs are not harmless, and while they are protected from prosecution by the first amendment (subject to certain limits), nobody should expect their employer to tolerate hate speech, on or off the clock. Forgiveness requires that the offender recognize their wrongdoing, apologize for it, and atone for it. So far none of this has happened. Forgiveness also does not imply that there can be no consequences for actions.
At some point, we have to be pragmatic. Yes, it's worth celebrating when a racist is redeemed. That's not what is happening here. If that person wants to set that goal for themself after losing their career, and being publicly shamed after making public racist comments, then good for them. That does not erase what they did, and I'd argue it wouldn't even make it right. This bell cannot be un-rung.
If I wanted to forgive someone I sat next to for being a terrible person, I would go to church.
I don't go to church.[/quote]
I still don't understand how expressing your opinions in a private forum should cause you to get fired and internationally humiliated?
</QUOTE>
Since when is Facebook a private forum?
If you humiliate and embarrass yourself on something that clearly was NOT a private forum, why wouldn't your employer take action? It's no different than if a police officer did the same on their FB account, or if someone who worked at whole foods was supporting extremist environmental terrorism on their account. If you do that in a way that gathers attention, which this has, you've already embarrassed and humiliated YOURSELF, and all that's left is for your employer to fire you for the legitimate reason of bringing bad press and putting the company in a bad light.
That's how the world works outside of student land.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="Gary"]First, I think what was posted is abhorrent. I find it, personally, repugnant.
Second, a right that distinguishes democracies like our own is freedom of speech, a precious right. It is permissible as long as it is not against the law. I am not aware of any law these comments violate.
Regarding comments reflecting poorly on an employer, she was acting solely in a personal manner and not as a representative of the organization of which she is a member. Nor did she express her opinion on any official company media.
Silencing opposing opinion, even when you find it ugly, is a right that must continue to be protected. One man's offensive post today is another one's tomorrow. You have to be careful what you wish for.[/quote]
Id rather her keep her opinion to herself than to go out of her way to spread hate multiple times. Music is all about coming together to create something special with others She did not deserve her job and i am personally glad with the outcome of this situation.
Second, a right that distinguishes democracies like our own is freedom of speech, a precious right. It is permissible as long as it is not against the law. I am not aware of any law these comments violate.
Regarding comments reflecting poorly on an employer, she was acting solely in a personal manner and not as a representative of the organization of which she is a member. Nor did she express her opinion on any official company media.
Silencing opposing opinion, even when you find it ugly, is a right that must continue to be protected. One man's offensive post today is another one's tomorrow. You have to be careful what you wish for.[/quote]
Id rather her keep her opinion to herself than to go out of her way to spread hate multiple times. Music is all about coming together to create something special with others She did not deserve her job and i am personally glad with the outcome of this situation.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="paulyg"]This person created a hostile environment for their section, orchestra colleagues, and ticket holders. Words like theirs are not harmless, and while they are protected from prosecution by the first amendment (subject to certain limits), nobody should expect their employer to tolerate hate speech, on or off the clock. Forgiveness requires that the offender recognize their wrongdoing, apologize for it, and atone for it. So far none of this has happened. Forgiveness also does not imply that there can be no consequences for actions.
At some point, we have to be pragmatic. Yes, it's worth celebrating when a racist is redeemed. That's not what is happening here. If that person wants to set that goal for themself after losing their career, and being publicly shamed after making public racist comments, then good for them. That does not erase what they did, and I'd argue it wouldn't even make it right. This bell cannot be un-rung.
If I wanted to forgive someone I sat next to for being a terrible person, I would go to church.
I don't go to church.[/quote]
Sums it up nicely. Thanks.
At some point, we have to be pragmatic. Yes, it's worth celebrating when a racist is redeemed. That's not what is happening here. If that person wants to set that goal for themself after losing their career, and being publicly shamed after making public racist comments, then good for them. That does not erase what they did, and I'd argue it wouldn't even make it right. This bell cannot be un-rung.
If I wanted to forgive someone I sat next to for being a terrible person, I would go to church.
I don't go to church.[/quote]
Sums it up nicely. Thanks.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="harrisonreed"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115070" time="1591050025" user_id="3494">
I still don't understand how expressing your opinions in a private forum should cause you to get fired and internationally humiliated?[/quote]
Since when is Facebook a private forum?
</QUOTE>
Can FB posting be done privately? Are there private chat rooms? Is these something the trombonist in question could have taken advantage of in order to discuss her racist views with like-minded people?
I still don't understand how expressing your opinions in a private forum should cause you to get fired and internationally humiliated?[/quote]
Since when is Facebook a private forum?
</QUOTE>
Can FB posting be done privately? Are there private chat rooms? Is these something the trombonist in question could have taken advantage of in order to discuss her racist views with like-minded people?
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
I guess it depends on how much you think your professional/study life and personal life should be intertwined. Personally I like to keep my study life and personal life as far apart as possible And in tge end of the day a professional comes into work to do the the job that need to be done. Whats happens putside of the workplace, in my opinion, should stay outside and the music industry is no exception. People like to say it's special and different but it really isn't.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="slipperyjoe"]<QUOTE author="harrisonreed" post_id="115071" time="1591050280" user_id="3642">
Since when is Facebook a private forum?[/quote]
Can FB posting be done privately? Is this something the trombonist in question could have activated to discuss racist views with like-minded people?
</QUOTE>
yes
Since when is Facebook a private forum?[/quote]
Can FB posting be done privately? Is this something the trombonist in question could have activated to discuss racist views with like-minded people?
</QUOTE>
yes
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
I'd like to remind everyone, because it seems we are horrifically not even to this point yet: blatant racism is in 99% of contracts a reason for a no-questions-asked termination. It's up there with sexual harassment and pedophilia. I'm surprised there are people who don't see it this way.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="harrisonreed"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115070" time="1591050025" user_id="3494">
I still don't understand how expressing your opinions in a private forum should cause you to get fired and internationally humiliated?[/quote]
Since when is Facebook a private forum?
If you humiliate and embarrass yourself on something that clearly was NOT a private forum, why wouldn't your employer take action? It's no different than if a police officer did the same on their FB account, or if someone who worked at whole foods was supporting extremist environmental terrorism on their account. If you do that in a way that gathers attention, which this has, you've already embarrassed and humiliated YOURSELF, and all that's left is for your employer to fire you for the legitimate reason of bringing bad press and putting the company in a bad light.
That's how the world works outside of student land.
</QUOTE>
except terrorism is illegal.
I still don't understand how expressing your opinions in a private forum should cause you to get fired and internationally humiliated?[/quote]
Since when is Facebook a private forum?
If you humiliate and embarrass yourself on something that clearly was NOT a private forum, why wouldn't your employer take action? It's no different than if a police officer did the same on their FB account, or if someone who worked at whole foods was supporting extremist environmental terrorism on their account. If you do that in a way that gathers attention, which this has, you've already embarrassed and humiliated YOURSELF, and all that's left is for your employer to fire you for the legitimate reason of bringing bad press and putting the company in a bad light.
That's how the world works outside of student land.
</QUOTE>
except terrorism is illegal.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]I guess it depends on how much you think your professional/study life and personal life should be intertwined. Personally I like to keep my study life and personal life as far apart as possible And in tge end of the day a professional comes into work to do the the job that need to be done. Whats happens putside of the workplace, in my opinion, should stay outside and the music industry is no exception. People like to say it's special and different but it really isn't.[/quote]
This is a naive view. Musicians are the very face of their organization. The public that supports the orchestra will know if a member of that orchestra was posting racist comments publicly, which is the case here. There may even have been a clause in her contact that forbids her from expressing certain views or opinions publicly, or putting the company in a bad light. In either case, the employer has every right to cut dead weight out from their organization, especially when times are already so hard for orchestras.
This is a naive view. Musicians are the very face of their organization. The public that supports the orchestra will know if a member of that orchestra was posting racist comments publicly, which is the case here. There may even have been a clause in her contact that forbids her from expressing certain views or opinions publicly, or putting the company in a bad light. In either case, the employer has every right to cut dead weight out from their organization, especially when times are already so hard for orchestras.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="slipperyjoe" post_id="115074" time="1591050522" user_id="9188">
Can FB posting be done privately? Is this something the trombonist in question could have activated to discuss racist views with like-minded people?[/quote]
yes
</QUOTE>
Hmmmm. Is it then reasonable to assume that a educated person with a somewhat public profile would know to discuss views to which an employer might object privately?
Can FB posting be done privately? Is this something the trombonist in question could have activated to discuss racist views with like-minded people?[/quote]
yes
</QUOTE>
Hmmmm. Is it then reasonable to assume that a educated person with a somewhat public profile would know to discuss views to which an employer might object privately?
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]I guess it depends on how much you think your professional/study life and personal life should be intertwined. Personally I like to keep my study life and personal life as far apart as possible And in tge end of the day a professional comes into work to do the the job that need to be done. Whats happens putside of the workplace, in my opinion, should stay outside and the music industry is no exception. People like to say it's special and different but it really isn't.[/quote]
You are 14. I doubt you know much about playing in an orchestra, or working for that matter.
A little hypocritical for me to be saying that but still needed to make that point
You are 14. I doubt you know much about playing in an orchestra, or working for that matter.
A little hypocritical for me to be saying that but still needed to make that point
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="harrisonreed" post_id="115071" time="1591050280" user_id="3642">
Since when is Facebook a private forum?
If you humiliate and embarrass yourself on something that clearly was NOT a private forum, why wouldn't your employer take action? It's no different than if a police officer did the same on their FB account, or if someone who worked at whole foods was supporting extremist environmental terrorism on their account. If you do that in a way that gathers attention, which this has, you've already embarrassed and humiliated YOURSELF, and all that's left is for your employer to fire you for the legitimate reason of bringing bad press and putting the company in a bad light.
That's how the world works outside of student land.[/quote]
except terrorism is illegal.
</QUOTE>
I don't think you've got a leg to stand on, and I don't think you actually know what you're talking about. Expressing support for eco-terrorism is actually NOT illegal either, but gets you fired (and put on watch-lists). You're just living in an idealised world, but your perspective will be different when you get hired by someone willing to shell out for what you have to offer. Worry about these things in eight years, after you've experienced more things, graduated, and had to work a little.
Since when is Facebook a private forum?
If you humiliate and embarrass yourself on something that clearly was NOT a private forum, why wouldn't your employer take action? It's no different than if a police officer did the same on their FB account, or if someone who worked at whole foods was supporting extremist environmental terrorism on their account. If you do that in a way that gathers attention, which this has, you've already embarrassed and humiliated YOURSELF, and all that's left is for your employer to fire you for the legitimate reason of bringing bad press and putting the company in a bad light.
That's how the world works outside of student land.[/quote]
except terrorism is illegal.
</QUOTE>
I don't think you've got a leg to stand on, and I don't think you actually know what you're talking about. Expressing support for eco-terrorism is actually NOT illegal either, but gets you fired (and put on watch-lists). You're just living in an idealised world, but your perspective will be different when you get hired by someone willing to shell out for what you have to offer. Worry about these things in eight years, after you've experienced more things, graduated, and had to work a little.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="harrisonreed"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115075" time="1591050637" user_id="3494">
I guess it depends on how much you think your professional/study life and personal life should be intertwined. Personally I like to keep my study life and personal life as far apart as possible And in tge end of the day a professional comes into work to do the the job that need to be done. Whats happens putside of the workplace, in my opinion, should stay outside and the music industry is no exception. People like to say it's special and different but it really isn't.
This is a naive view. Musicians are the very face of their organization. The public that supports the orchestra will know if a member of that orchestra was posting racist comments publicly, which is the case here. There may even have been a clause in her contact that forbids her from expressing certain views or opinions publicly, or putting the company in a bad light. In either case, the employer has every right to cut dead weight out from their organization, especially when times are already so hard for orchestras.[/quote]
I understand and I never said she was in the right. I just think that the response was overkill. Of course though that also reflects our current time and events.</QUOTE>
I guess it depends on how much you think your professional/study life and personal life should be intertwined. Personally I like to keep my study life and personal life as far apart as possible And in tge end of the day a professional comes into work to do the the job that need to be done. Whats happens putside of the workplace, in my opinion, should stay outside and the music industry is no exception. People like to say it's special and different but it really isn't.
This is a naive view. Musicians are the very face of their organization. The public that supports the orchestra will know if a member of that orchestra was posting racist comments publicly, which is the case here. There may even have been a clause in her contact that forbids her from expressing certain views or opinions publicly, or putting the company in a bad light. In either case, the employer has every right to cut dead weight out from their organization, especially when times are already so hard for orchestras.[/quote]
I understand and I never said she was in the right. I just think that the response was overkill. Of course though that also reflects our current time and events.</QUOTE>
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="slipperyjoe" post_id="115053" time="1591044927" user_id="9188">
Racism is a heinous system of institutionalized subjugation, exploitation, marginalization and violence.
Why should it be tolerated in any way, shape or form?[/quote]
Because freedom of speech is a thing.
It would be different if she was going around her place of work and makind rude comments but no, she posted them on her private facebook account which has no affiliation to her employer.
</QUOTE>
US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said that Freedom of Speech does not permit you to shout "Fire" in a crowded theater when there is no fire.
We also have carveouts in Protected Speech to disallow hate speech. You are not permitted to say things to incite hatred against any group. Thus antisemitic speech as presented by Hitler in the period between the two World Wars would be disallowed in the US.
8Park, you are in Israel. Do you think it is in anybody's best interest to denigrate Palestinian viewpoints or for the Arabs to want to "Push the Jews Into the Sea"? These points of view have just served to continue an abrasive situation for the last 72 years.
Racism is a heinous system of institutionalized subjugation, exploitation, marginalization and violence.
Why should it be tolerated in any way, shape or form?[/quote]
Because freedom of speech is a thing.
It would be different if she was going around her place of work and makind rude comments but no, she posted them on her private facebook account which has no affiliation to her employer.
</QUOTE>
US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said that Freedom of Speech does not permit you to shout "Fire" in a crowded theater when there is no fire.
We also have carveouts in Protected Speech to disallow hate speech. You are not permitted to say things to incite hatred against any group. Thus antisemitic speech as presented by Hitler in the period between the two World Wars would be disallowed in the US.
8Park, you are in Israel. Do you think it is in anybody's best interest to denigrate Palestinian viewpoints or for the Arabs to want to "Push the Jews Into the Sea"? These points of view have just served to continue an abrasive situation for the last 72 years.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]
I understand and I never said she was in the right. I just think that the response was overkill. Of course though that also reflects our current time and events.[/quote]
Putting aside right and wrong, for a minute, if the contract said "you will not express racist or extremist views contrary to the ideals of the orchestra publicly", then what would you think?
I understand and I never said she was in the right. I just think that the response was overkill. Of course though that also reflects our current time and events.[/quote]
Putting aside right and wrong, for a minute, if the contract said "you will not express racist or extremist views contrary to the ideals of the orchestra publicly", then what would you think?
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="Elow"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115075" time="1591050637" user_id="3494">
I guess it depends on how much you think your professional/study life and personal life should be intertwined. Personally I like to keep my study life and personal life as far apart as possible And in tge end of the day a professional comes into work to do the the job that need to be done. Whats happens putside of the workplace, in my opinion, should stay outside and the music industry is no exception. People like to say it's special and different but it really isn't.[/quote]
You are 14. I doubt you know much about playing in an orchestra, or working for that matter.
A little hypocritical for me to be saying that but still needed to make that point
</QUOTE>
Don't worry, Elow. It doesn't take advanced age to recognize another person's naiveté. Good work!
I guess it depends on how much you think your professional/study life and personal life should be intertwined. Personally I like to keep my study life and personal life as far apart as possible And in tge end of the day a professional comes into work to do the the job that need to be done. Whats happens putside of the workplace, in my opinion, should stay outside and the music industry is no exception. People like to say it's special and different but it really isn't.[/quote]
You are 14. I doubt you know much about playing in an orchestra, or working for that matter.
A little hypocritical for me to be saying that but still needed to make that point
</QUOTE>
Don't worry, Elow. It doesn't take advanced age to recognize another person's naiveté. Good work!
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="harrisonreed"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115085" time="1591051408" user_id="3494">
I understand and I never said she was in the right. I just think that the response was overkill. Of course though that also reflects our current time and events.[/quote]
Putting aside right and wrong, for a minute, if the contract said "you will not express racist or extremist views contrary to the ideals of the orchestra publicly", then what would you think?
</QUOTE>
If that is what the contract says then yes.
I understand and I never said she was in the right. I just think that the response was overkill. Of course though that also reflects our current time and events.[/quote]
Putting aside right and wrong, for a minute, if the contract said "you will not express racist or extremist views contrary to the ideals of the orchestra publicly", then what would you think?
</QUOTE>
If that is what the contract says then yes.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="BGuttman"]US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said that Freedom of Speech does not permit you to shout "Fire" in a crowded theater when there is no fire.[/quote]
Steve Martin (ca. mid-70s) had a bit where he asked if it was o.k. to yell 'movie' in a crowded firehouse. That always made me laugh.
Steve Martin (ca. mid-70s) had a bit where he asked if it was o.k. to yell 'movie' in a crowded firehouse. That always made me laugh.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
I see this argument is moving nowhere so lets agree to disagree
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="slipperyjoe"]<QUOTE author="BGuttman" post_id="115086" time="1591051569" user_id="53">
US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said that Freedom of Speech does not permit you to shout "Fire" in a crowded theater when there is no fire.[/quote]
Steve Martin (ca. mid-70s) had a bit where he asked if it was o.k. to yell 'movie' in a crowded firehouse. That always made me laugh.
</QUOTE>
:lol:
US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said that Freedom of Speech does not permit you to shout "Fire" in a crowded theater when there is no fire.[/quote]
Steve Martin (ca. mid-70s) had a bit where he asked if it was o.k. to yell 'movie' in a crowded firehouse. That always made me laugh.
</QUOTE>
:lol:
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="slipperyjoe"]<QUOTE author="Elow" post_id="115082" time="1591051031" user_id="8680">
You are 14. I doubt you know much about playing in an orchestra, or working for that matter.
A little hypocritical for me to be saying that but still needed to make that point[/quote]
Don't worry, Elow. It doesn't take advanced age to recognize another person's naiveté. Good work!
</QUOTE>
Just because he does not agree with your intolerance does not make him naive. Sometimes we can learn a lot if we just put our egos aside.
You are 14. I doubt you know much about playing in an orchestra, or working for that matter.
A little hypocritical for me to be saying that but still needed to make that point[/quote]
Don't worry, Elow. It doesn't take advanced age to recognize another person's naiveté. Good work!
</QUOTE>
Just because he does not agree with your intolerance does not make him naive. Sometimes we can learn a lot if we just put our egos aside.
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="paulyg" post_id="115069" time="1591049493" user_id="3299">
... nobody should expect their employer to tolerate hate speech, on or off the clock. ...[/quote]
I still don't understand how expressing your opinions in a private forum should cause you to get fired and internationally humiliated?
</QUOTE>
"Private" how? "Private" like hanging out in your basement and talking with a few buddies? Or "private" like nobody is going to find out, so it should be OK? Facebook is not private.
How about the woman who called the police on a birdwatcher in central park? She was fired and internationally humiliated, and she didn't post anything on social media. It was her hateful actions that destroyed her career and life. Don't conflate the relative anonymity and remote nature of online interactions with any sort of abstraction- hate is hate, whether it's expressed in private or in public, in person or from a distance, and it's the hate that's the issue here, not how it was expressed.
... nobody should expect their employer to tolerate hate speech, on or off the clock. ...[/quote]
I still don't understand how expressing your opinions in a private forum should cause you to get fired and internationally humiliated?
</QUOTE>
"Private" how? "Private" like hanging out in your basement and talking with a few buddies? Or "private" like nobody is going to find out, so it should be OK? Facebook is not private.
How about the woman who called the police on a birdwatcher in central park? She was fired and internationally humiliated, and she didn't post anything on social media. It was her hateful actions that destroyed her career and life. Don't conflate the relative anonymity and remote nature of online interactions with any sort of abstraction- hate is hate, whether it's expressed in private or in public, in person or from a distance, and it's the hate that's the issue here, not how it was expressed.
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
[quote="BurckhardtS"]I'd like to remind everyone, because it seems we are horrifically not even to this point yet: blatant racism is in 99% of contracts a reason for a no-questions-asked termination. It's up there with sexual harassment and pedophilia. I'm surprised there are people who don't see it this way.[/quote]
I really don't understand how some people in this threat are implying that a racist woman losing a job is overkill while POC are actually being killed.
I really don't understand how some people in this threat are implying that a racist woman losing a job is overkill while POC are actually being killed.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
I meant private as in private life that isn't related to the professional life.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="Mv2541"]<QUOTE author="BurckhardtS" post_id="115078" time="1591050851" user_id="190">
I'd like to remind everyone, because it seems we are horrifically not even to this point yet: blatant racism is in 99% of contracts a reason for a no-questions-asked termination. It's up there with sexual harassment and pedophilia. I'm surprised there are people who don't see it this way.[/quote]
I really don't understand how some people in this threat are implying that a racist woman losing a job is overkill while POC are actually being killed.
</QUOTE>
EXACTLY. She is not the victim
I'd like to remind everyone, because it seems we are horrifically not even to this point yet: blatant racism is in 99% of contracts a reason for a no-questions-asked termination. It's up there with sexual harassment and pedophilia. I'm surprised there are people who don't see it this way.[/quote]
I really don't understand how some people in this threat are implying that a racist woman losing a job is overkill while POC are actually being killed.
</QUOTE>
EXACTLY. She is not the victim
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
[/quote]
Because freedom of speech is a thing.
It would be different if she was going around her place of work and makind rude comments but no, she posted them on her private facebook account which has no affiliation to her employer.
[/quote]
She does have the freedom to say those things. That freedom protects you from facing legal trouble (and not in every case). The amendments do not ensure that you stay employed. If I was a teacher and brought a weapon to my classroom the second amendment wouldn't save me from being fired (nor would it save you from being arrested in this case).
Because freedom of speech is a thing.
It would be different if she was going around her place of work and makind rude comments but no, she posted them on her private facebook account which has no affiliation to her employer.
[/quote]
She does have the freedom to say those things. That freedom protects you from facing legal trouble (and not in every case). The amendments do not ensure that you stay employed. If I was a teacher and brought a weapon to my classroom the second amendment wouldn't save me from being fired (nor would it save you from being arrested in this case).
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]I meant private as in private life that isn't related to the professional life.[/quote]
I feel that I've pretty clearly outlined how this person's actions bleed over from "private" into "public/professional" life. People don't usually lead multiple lives, there's just the one- with private and professional facets. The level of compartmentalization you are implying is a complete fabrication.
I feel that I've pretty clearly outlined how this person's actions bleed over from "private" into "public/professional" life. People don't usually lead multiple lives, there's just the one- with private and professional facets. The level of compartmentalization you are implying is a complete fabrication.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Mv2541"]<QUOTE author="BurckhardtS" post_id="115078" time="1591050851" user_id="190">
I'd like to remind everyone, because it seems we are horrifically not even to this point yet: blatant racism is in 99% of contracts a reason for a no-questions-asked termination. It's up there with sexual harassment and pedophilia. I'm surprised there are people who don't see it this way.[/quote]
I really don't understand how some people in this threat are implying that a racist woman losing a job is overkill while POC are actually being killed.
</QUOTE>
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.
I'd like to remind everyone, because it seems we are horrifically not even to this point yet: blatant racism is in 99% of contracts a reason for a no-questions-asked termination. It's up there with sexual harassment and pedophilia. I'm surprised there are people who don't see it this way.[/quote]
I really don't understand how some people in this threat are implying that a racist woman losing a job is overkill while POC are actually being killed.
</QUOTE>
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Mv2541" post_id="115099" time="1591052583" user_id="247">
I really don't understand how some people in this threat are implying that a racist woman losing a job is overkill while POC are actually being killed.[/quote]
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.
</QUOTE>
Wait. That was exactly the opposite of your point, in opposition to your point....
I really don't understand how some people in this threat are implying that a racist woman losing a job is overkill while POC are actually being killed.[/quote]
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.
</QUOTE>
Wait. That was exactly the opposite of your point, in opposition to your point....
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
:| [quote="harrisonreed"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115108" time="1591054249" user_id="3494">
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.[/quote]
Wait. That was exactly the opposite of your point, in opposition to your point....
</QUOTE>
Maybe I didn't say it the best way but I meant that it's overkill to be making a big fuss about this when POCs are being killed.
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.[/quote]
Wait. That was exactly the opposite of your point, in opposition to your point....
</QUOTE>
Maybe I didn't say it the best way but I meant that it's overkill to be making a big fuss about this when POCs are being killed.
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
"The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting (sic) of people with racist views. and wducate (sic) them."
Seriously?
I feel like you need a serious reality check. These people don't want hugs.
"it's overkill to be making a big fuss about this when POCs are being killed."
How about MAKING THOSE RACIST COMMENTS IN THE FIRST PLACE? WAS THAT "OVERKILL?"
Are you a troll, or do you actually have your head that far up your own ass?
Seriously?
I feel like you need a serious reality check. These people don't want hugs.
"it's overkill to be making a big fuss about this when POCs are being killed."
How about MAKING THOSE RACIST COMMENTS IN THE FIRST PLACE? WAS THAT "OVERKILL?"
Are you a troll, or do you actually have your head that far up your own ass?
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
The point is that people are doing all the wrong things to fight racism and I know that as an orchestra manager you gotta do what you gotta do but I don't think doing what were doing now where when someone makes a racist comment we fire them and shun them from our community is really very effective.
Anyway, I see this very unpoular so let's agree to disagree.
Anyway, I see this very unpoular so let's agree to disagree.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="paulyg"]"The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting (sic) of people with racist views. and wducate (sic) them."
Seriously?
I feel like you need a serious reality check. These people don't want hugs.
"it's overkill to be making a big fuss about this when POCs are being killed."
How about MAKING THOSE RACIST COMMENTS IN THE FIRST PLACE? WAS THAT "OVERKILL?"
Are you a troll, or do you actually have your head that far up your own ass?[/quote]
That's really uncalled for. People are trying to have a civil discussion about a very emotional issue and have been doing quite well until this moment. There's always room to disagree but not to be disrespectful.
Seriously?
I feel like you need a serious reality check. These people don't want hugs.
"it's overkill to be making a big fuss about this when POCs are being killed."
How about MAKING THOSE RACIST COMMENTS IN THE FIRST PLACE? WAS THAT "OVERKILL?"
Are you a troll, or do you actually have your head that far up your own ass?[/quote]
That's really uncalled for. People are trying to have a civil discussion about a very emotional issue and have been doing quite well until this moment. There's always room to disagree but not to be disrespectful.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Mv2541" post_id="115099" time="1591052583" user_id="247">
I really don't understand how some people in this threat are implying that a racist woman losing a job is overkill while POC are actually being killed.[/quote]
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.
</QUOTE>
To your point <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
I really don't understand how some people in this threat are implying that a racist woman losing a job is overkill while POC are actually being killed.[/quote]
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.
</QUOTE>
To your point <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]That's really uncalled for. People are trying to have a civil discussion about a very emotional issue and have been doing quite well until this moment. There's always room to disagree but not to be disrespectful.[/quote]
Respect is earned.
Respect is earned.
- Doug_Elliott
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]The point is that people are doing all the wrong things to fight racism and I know that as an orchestra manager you gotta do what you gotta do but I don't think doing what were doing now where when someone makes a racist comment we fire them and shun them from our community is really very effective.
Anyway, I see this very unpoular so let's agree to disagree.[/quote]
Nothing is going to change until it is made clear that the behavior is unacceptable.
If they are NOT fired and shunned, it shows we are accepting that as normal and acceptable behavior.
Unless you think it IS completely acceptable. And it's not.
Edit added:
"The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again."
Actually I do hear you on that, and on the 14 year old level, I agree with you. That is the time (or maybe well past the time) to educate - that it's wrong and NOT acceptable.
Anyway, I see this very unpoular so let's agree to disagree.[/quote]
Nothing is going to change until it is made clear that the behavior is unacceptable.
If they are NOT fired and shunned, it shows we are accepting that as normal and acceptable behavior.
Unless you think it IS completely acceptable. And it's not.
Edit added:
"The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again."
Actually I do hear you on that, and on the 14 year old level, I agree with you. That is the time (or maybe well past the time) to educate - that it's wrong and NOT acceptable.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115108" time="1591054249" user_id="3494">
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.[/quote]
To your point <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
</QUOTE>
Yes, that is an amazing story and that man is exceptionally brave and charismatic. I saw his story on "the story of us" I believe, on Netflix. We need more people like him, and each demographic and culture needs more people like him coming from their own group. What a great world we could have.
Putting that onus on a group like an orchestra might be wishful thinking.
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.[/quote]
To your point <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
</QUOTE>
Yes, that is an amazing story and that man is exceptionally brave and charismatic. I saw his story on "the story of us" I believe, on Netflix. We need more people like him, and each demographic and culture needs more people like him coming from their own group. What a great world we could have.
Putting that onus on a group like an orchestra might be wishful thinking.
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115108" time="1591054249" user_id="3494">
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.[/quote]
To your point <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
</QUOTE>
I think that story highlights how racism stems from ignorance. People have views from what the media and culture around them tell them; perhaps they hate the idea of X fed from those sources without actually hating X itself. When they get to meet and know X, they realize that their preconceived notions may not be based on truth.
This is exactly my point.
Do you think that this is the proper way to deal with racism? Do you think that going around and looting stores, destroying the country, and attacking cops is going to solve racism? No. There is a reason why were in the 21 century and racism is still a thing. It's because nobody is actually putting and effort into making a sustainable solution. Everybody only thinks short term. Pusing the racist down. Then they come back up and we push tgem down again. The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again.[/quote]
To your point <LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
</QUOTE>
I think that story highlights how racism stems from ignorance. People have views from what the media and culture around them tell them; perhaps they hate the idea of X fed from those sources without actually hating X itself. When they get to meet and know X, they realize that their preconceived notions may not be based on truth.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Doug Elliott"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115114" time="1591055940" user_id="3494">
The point is that people are doing all the wrong things to fight racism and I know that as an orchestra manager you gotta do what you gotta do but I don't think doing what were doing now where when someone makes a racist comment we fire them and shun them from our community is really very effective.
Anyway, I see this very unpoular so let's agree to disagree.[/quote]
Nothing is going to change until it is made clear that the behavior is unacceptable.
If they are NOT fired and shunned, it shows we are accepting that as normal and acceptable behavior.
Unless you think it IS completely acceptable. And it's not.
Edit added:
"The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again."
Actually I do hear you on that, and on the 14 year old level, I agree with you. That is the time (or maybe well past the time) to educate - that it's wrong and NOT acceptable.
</QUOTE>
That's a good point.
The thing about racism though is it's a natural human instinct which probably explains why it's so hard to cure and it's also clear that it's very hard to educate adults to think differently. Maybe a good way to deal with it to first understand where the racism stems from since of course it doesn't come out of nowhere and then maybe use more gradual punishmemts like a temporary suspension or something.
But I think a big part of this is teaching people if we want to cure racism we will have to be a bit more patient towards racist individuals.
The point is that people are doing all the wrong things to fight racism and I know that as an orchestra manager you gotta do what you gotta do but I don't think doing what were doing now where when someone makes a racist comment we fire them and shun them from our community is really very effective.
Anyway, I see this very unpoular so let's agree to disagree.[/quote]
Nothing is going to change until it is made clear that the behavior is unacceptable.
If they are NOT fired and shunned, it shows we are accepting that as normal and acceptable behavior.
Unless you think it IS completely acceptable. And it's not.
Edit added:
"The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again."
Actually I do hear you on that, and on the 14 year old level, I agree with you. That is the time (or maybe well past the time) to educate - that it's wrong and NOT acceptable.
</QUOTE>
That's a good point.
The thing about racism though is it's a natural human instinct which probably explains why it's so hard to cure and it's also clear that it's very hard to educate adults to think differently. Maybe a good way to deal with it to first understand where the racism stems from since of course it doesn't come out of nowhere and then maybe use more gradual punishmemts like a temporary suspension or something.
But I think a big part of this is teaching people if we want to cure racism we will have to be a bit more patient towards racist individuals.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
What do you say to the people in her orchestra made uncomfortable or unsafe by her comments? To be more patient?
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Burgerbob"]What do you say to the people in her orchestra made uncomfortable or unsafe by her comments? To be more patient?[/quote]
Yes
I never said that what she did was ok and she should be condemned but I think if we were more accepting of racists then it will help solve the problem. You can disagree if you want. But for sure what were doing now is not good enough
Yes
I never said that what she did was ok and she should be condemned but I think if we were more accepting of racists then it will help solve the problem. You can disagree if you want. But for sure what were doing now is not good enough
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Doug Elliott" post_id="115123" time="1591060392" user_id="51">
Nothing is going to change until it is made clear that the behavior is unacceptable.
If they are NOT fired and shunned, it shows we are accepting that as normal and acceptable behavior.
Unless you think it IS completely acceptable. And it's not.
Edit added:
"The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again."
Actually I do hear you on that, and on the 14 year old level, I agree with you. That is the time (or maybe well past the time) to educate - that it's wrong and NOT acceptable.[/quote]
That's a good point.
The thing about racism though is it's a natural human instinct which probably explains why it's so hard to cure and it's also clear that it's very hard to educate adults to think differently. Maybe a good way to deal with it to first understand where the racism stems from since of course it doesn't come out of nowhere and then maybe use more gradual punishmemts like a temporary suspension or something.
But I think a big part of this is teaching people if we want to cure racism we will have to be a bit more patient towards racist individuals.
</QUOTE>
Since when is racism human instinct. I grew up in the middle of georgia with not a person of color in sight and yet me nor my friends are disrespectful or hateful. I don’t know what happens overseas to make you think everyone is born racist. Do you think a husky is going to treat a german shepherd any different than another dog? I hope not
Nothing is going to change until it is made clear that the behavior is unacceptable.
If they are NOT fired and shunned, it shows we are accepting that as normal and acceptable behavior.
Unless you think it IS completely acceptable. And it's not.
Edit added:
"The only way to fix racism is to be more acccepting of people with racist views. and wducate them. Not push then down again."
Actually I do hear you on that, and on the 14 year old level, I agree with you. That is the time (or maybe well past the time) to educate - that it's wrong and NOT acceptable.[/quote]
That's a good point.
The thing about racism though is it's a natural human instinct which probably explains why it's so hard to cure and it's also clear that it's very hard to educate adults to think differently. Maybe a good way to deal with it to first understand where the racism stems from since of course it doesn't come out of nowhere and then maybe use more gradual punishmemts like a temporary suspension or something.
But I think a big part of this is teaching people if we want to cure racism we will have to be a bit more patient towards racist individuals.
</QUOTE>
Since when is racism human instinct. I grew up in the middle of georgia with not a person of color in sight and yet me nor my friends are disrespectful or hateful. I don’t know what happens overseas to make you think everyone is born racist. Do you think a husky is going to treat a german shepherd any different than another dog? I hope not
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="115146" time="1591075497" user_id="3131">
What do you say to the people in her orchestra made uncomfortable or unsafe by her comments? To be more patient?[/quote]
Yes
I never said that what she did was ok and she should be condemned but I think if we were more accepting of racists then it will help solve the problem. You can disagree if you want. But for sure what were doing now is not good enough
</QUOTE>
I feel as though you're not putting yourself in the shoes (empathizing) with the players in her former orchestra that she was referring to.
What do you say to the people in her orchestra made uncomfortable or unsafe by her comments? To be more patient?[/quote]
Yes
I never said that what she did was ok and she should be condemned but I think if we were more accepting of racists then it will help solve the problem. You can disagree if you want. But for sure what were doing now is not good enough
</QUOTE>
I feel as though you're not putting yourself in the shoes (empathizing) with the players in her former orchestra that she was referring to.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="115146" time="1591075497" user_id="3131">
What do you say to the people in her orchestra made uncomfortable or unsafe by her comments? To be more patient?[/quote]
Yes
I never said that what she did was ok and she should be condemned but I think if we were more accepting of racists then it will help solve the problem. You can disagree if you want. But for sure what were doing now is not good enough
</QUOTE>
That is why racism has been an issue for literal centuries. It’s just accepted as the norm. That’s why these situation arise, we all know it’s bad but we’ve been doing it for so long it’s just being accepted. Nothing changes if we don’t, and i think it’s about damn time to change.
What do you say to the people in her orchestra made uncomfortable or unsafe by her comments? To be more patient?[/quote]
Yes
I never said that what she did was ok and she should be condemned but I think if we were more accepting of racists then it will help solve the problem. You can disagree if you want. But for sure what were doing now is not good enough
</QUOTE>
That is why racism has been an issue for literal centuries. It’s just accepted as the norm. That’s why these situation arise, we all know it’s bad but we’ve been doing it for so long it’s just being accepted. Nothing changes if we don’t, and i think it’s about damn time to change.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Burgerbob"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115148" time="1591076344" user_id="3494">
Yes
I never said that what she did was ok and she should be condemned but I think if we were more accepting of racists then it will help solve the problem. You can disagree if you want. But for sure what were doing now is not good enough[/quote]
I feel as though you're not putting yourself in the shoes (empathizing) with the players in her former orchestra that she was referring to.
</QUOTE>
I just said that I think she should be condemned and put on temporary leave or is that not good enough.
Yes
I never said that what she did was ok and she should be condemned but I think if we were more accepting of racists then it will help solve the problem. You can disagree if you want. But for sure what were doing now is not good enough[/quote]
I feel as though you're not putting yourself in the shoes (empathizing) with the players in her former orchestra that she was referring to.
</QUOTE>
I just said that I think she should be condemned and put on temporary leave or is that not good enough.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Elow"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115148" time="1591076344" user_id="3494">
Yes
I never said that what she did was ok and she should be condemned but I think if we were more accepting of racists then it will help solve the problem. You can disagree if you want. But for sure what were doing now is not good enough[/quote]
That is why racism has been an issue for literal centuries. It’s just accepted as the norm. That’s why these situation arise, we all know it’s bad but we’ve been doing it for so long it’s just being accepted. Nothing changes if we don’t, and i think it’s about damn time to change.
</QUOTE>
I agree but we have to be very wise on how we deal with it.
Yes
I never said that what she did was ok and she should be condemned but I think if we were more accepting of racists then it will help solve the problem. You can disagree if you want. But for sure what were doing now is not good enough[/quote]
That is why racism has been an issue for literal centuries. It’s just accepted as the norm. That’s why these situation arise, we all know it’s bad but we’ve been doing it for so long it’s just being accepted. Nothing changes if we don’t, and i think it’s about damn time to change.
</QUOTE>
I agree but we have to be very wise on how we deal with it.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Elow"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115142" time="1591072735" user_id="3494">
That's a good point.
The thing about racism though is it's a natural human instinct which probably explains why it's so hard to cure and it's also clear that it's very hard to educate adults to think differently. Maybe a good way to deal with it to first understand where the racism stems from since of course it doesn't come out of nowhere and then maybe use more gradual punishmemts like a temporary suspension or something.
But I think a big part of this is teaching people if we want to cure racism we will have to be a bit more patient towards racist individuals.[/quote]
Since when is racism human instinct. I grew up in the middle of georgia with not a person of color in sight and yet me nor my friends are disrespectful or hateful. I don’t know what happens overseas to make you think everyone is born racist. Do you think a husky is going to treat a german shepherd any different than another dog? I hope not
</QUOTE>
It's called Implicit bias.
I don't know if you're a dog owner but my dog is often hostile towards other breeds and often isn't to his own.
That's a good point.
The thing about racism though is it's a natural human instinct which probably explains why it's so hard to cure and it's also clear that it's very hard to educate adults to think differently. Maybe a good way to deal with it to first understand where the racism stems from since of course it doesn't come out of nowhere and then maybe use more gradual punishmemts like a temporary suspension or something.
But I think a big part of this is teaching people if we want to cure racism we will have to be a bit more patient towards racist individuals.[/quote]
Since when is racism human instinct. I grew up in the middle of georgia with not a person of color in sight and yet me nor my friends are disrespectful or hateful. I don’t know what happens overseas to make you think everyone is born racist. Do you think a husky is going to treat a german shepherd any different than another dog? I hope not
</QUOTE>
It's called Implicit bias.
I don't know if you're a dog owner but my dog is often hostile towards other breeds and often isn't to his own.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="115150" time="1591077390" user_id="3131">
I feel as though you're not putting yourself in the shoes (empathizing) with the players in her former orchestra that she was referring to.[/quote]
I just said that I think she should be condemned and put on temporary leave or is that not good enough.
</QUOTE>
In the current climate? No. The orchestra is a highly visible, public facing organization.
In normal times? I think it's warranted as well, especially as this wasn't a new phenomenon from this person.
I feel as though you're not putting yourself in the shoes (empathizing) with the players in her former orchestra that she was referring to.[/quote]
I just said that I think she should be condemned and put on temporary leave or is that not good enough.
</QUOTE>
In the current climate? No. The orchestra is a highly visible, public facing organization.
In normal times? I think it's warranted as well, especially as this wasn't a new phenomenon from this person.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Burgerbob"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115153" time="1591078738" user_id="3494">
I just said that I think she should be condemned and put on temporary leave or is that not good enough.[/quote]
In the current climate? No. The orchestra is a highly visible, public facing organization.
In normal times? I think it's warranted as well, especially as this wasn't a new phenomenon from this person.
</QUOTE>
I already said that I understand the orchestra's management's decisions and I think that what they did was valid. But in an ideal world, I don't think it would be right to do such a thing.
I just said that I think she should be condemned and put on temporary leave or is that not good enough.[/quote]
In the current climate? No. The orchestra is a highly visible, public facing organization.
In normal times? I think it's warranted as well, especially as this wasn't a new phenomenon from this person.
</QUOTE>
I already said that I understand the orchestra's management's decisions and I think that what they did was valid. But in an ideal world, I don't think it would be right to do such a thing.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="115156" time="1591080108" user_id="3131">
In the current climate? No. The orchestra is a highly visible, public facing organization.
In normal times? I think it's warranted as well, especially as this wasn't a new phenomenon from this person.[/quote]
I already said that I understand the orchestra's management's decisions and I think that what they did was valid. But in an ideal world, I don't think it would be right to do such a thing.
</QUOTE>
In an ideal world, someone wouldn't have those views, much less express them in a public place.
In the current climate? No. The orchestra is a highly visible, public facing organization.
In normal times? I think it's warranted as well, especially as this wasn't a new phenomenon from this person.[/quote]
I already said that I understand the orchestra's management's decisions and I think that what they did was valid. But in an ideal world, I don't think it would be right to do such a thing.
</QUOTE>
In an ideal world, someone wouldn't have those views, much less express them in a public place.
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="115156" time="1591080108" user_id="3131">
In the current climate? No. The orchestra is a highly visible, public facing organization.
In normal times? I think it's warranted as well, especially as this wasn't a new phenomenon from this person.[/quote]
I already said that I understand the orchestra's management's decisions and I think that what they did was valid. But in an ideal world, I don't think it would be right to do such a thing.
</QUOTE>
Ideal world? You mean... one without racism in the first place?
That world does not exist, but I'll be damned if we don't fight every single day for progress inch by inch. Plenty of people more important than you and I have laid down their lives just to move the line another inch, and most of us are just not willing to disrespect their sacrifice toward equality by letting the line move even a single hair backwards. By the time you and me are gone this system won't be fixed, but I'd rather die knowing I helped it move it in the right direction even the slightest bit.
In the current climate? No. The orchestra is a highly visible, public facing organization.
In normal times? I think it's warranted as well, especially as this wasn't a new phenomenon from this person.[/quote]
I already said that I understand the orchestra's management's decisions and I think that what they did was valid. But in an ideal world, I don't think it would be right to do such a thing.
</QUOTE>
Ideal world? You mean... one without racism in the first place?
That world does not exist, but I'll be damned if we don't fight every single day for progress inch by inch. Plenty of people more important than you and I have laid down their lives just to move the line another inch, and most of us are just not willing to disrespect their sacrifice toward equality by letting the line move even a single hair backwards. By the time you and me are gone this system won't be fixed, but I'd rather die knowing I helped it move it in the right direction even the slightest bit.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Mv2541"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115157" time="1591080283" user_id="3494">
I already said that I understand the orchestra's management's decisions and I think that what they did was valid. But in an ideal world, I don't think it would be right to do such a thing.[/quote]
Ideal world? You mean... one without racism in the first place?
That world does not exist, but I'll be damned if we don't fight every single day for progress inch by inch. Plenty of people more important than you and I have laid down their lives just to move the line another inch, and most of us are just not willing to disrespect their sacrifice toward equality by letting the line move even a single hair backwards. By the time you and me are gone this system won't be fixed, but I'd rather die knowing I helped it move it in the right direction even the slightest bit.
</QUOTE>
You're acting like I don't support fighting racism.
Just because I have a different perspective than most people doesn't mean I'm racist or don't support the fight for it.
I already said that I understand the orchestra's management's decisions and I think that what they did was valid. But in an ideal world, I don't think it would be right to do such a thing.[/quote]
Ideal world? You mean... one without racism in the first place?
That world does not exist, but I'll be damned if we don't fight every single day for progress inch by inch. Plenty of people more important than you and I have laid down their lives just to move the line another inch, and most of us are just not willing to disrespect their sacrifice toward equality by letting the line move even a single hair backwards. By the time you and me are gone this system won't be fixed, but I'd rather die knowing I helped it move it in the right direction even the slightest bit.
</QUOTE>
You're acting like I don't support fighting racism.
Just because I have a different perspective than most people doesn't mean I'm racist or don't support the fight for it.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Mv2541" post_id="115159" time="1591081071" user_id="247">
Ideal world? You mean... one without racism in the first place?
That world does not exist, but I'll be damned if we don't fight every single day for progress inch by inch. Plenty of people more important than you and I have laid down their lives just to move the line another inch, and most of us are just not willing to disrespect their sacrifice toward equality by letting the line move even a single hair backwards. By the time you and me are gone this system won't be fixed, but I'd rather die knowing I helped it move it in the right direction even the slightest bit.[/quote]
You're acting like I don't support fighting racism.
Just because I have a different perspective than most people doesn't mean I'm racist or don't support the fight for it.
</QUOTE>
Then this is an odd hill to die on.
Ideal world? You mean... one without racism in the first place?
That world does not exist, but I'll be damned if we don't fight every single day for progress inch by inch. Plenty of people more important than you and I have laid down their lives just to move the line another inch, and most of us are just not willing to disrespect their sacrifice toward equality by letting the line move even a single hair backwards. By the time you and me are gone this system won't be fixed, but I'd rather die knowing I helped it move it in the right direction even the slightest bit.[/quote]
You're acting like I don't support fighting racism.
Just because I have a different perspective than most people doesn't mean I'm racist or don't support the fight for it.
</QUOTE>
Then this is an odd hill to die on.
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Apr 11, 2018
With regards to that trombonist's situation. There is no private life on Facebook, particularly when you are a public figure. When you have people sponsoring your employment, even less so (you can bet the sponsors of the principal trombone chair whose names were listed right next to hers on concert programmes and on the website are among the "other key members" referred to in the ASO statement). When you are the public face of an organisation, which orchestra members very much are, you don't get to decide when you speak in your own name or what part of what you say can reflect on your organisation.
People need to stop it with the free speech and "mob tribunal"/accused, tried and sentenced hypocrisy. There is no 100% free speech anywhere in the world, not even in the US. (And by the way there are many countries that have more restrictions on free speech than the US and are still better functioning democracies where people are effectively more free. Americans don't have a monopoly on defining what freedom means.) In any case, free speech protects you from prosecution and punishment by the state, not from being fired or humiliated or shunned by your peers or losing a platform you are not inherently entitled to. Was she arrested? No? Executed or put in jail? No? Then there is no breach of her free speech rights. This isn't a mob tribunal, people who find her statements disgusting are also exercising their free speech rights when they denounce her.
With regards to police reaction to the current protests: yes of course there are countless law enforcement officers who do their job out of a sense of duty and a need to selflessly serve their community, and nobody is disputing that. But it is incredibly naive to not acknowledge that, given the nature of the job, many, many are attracted to it at least in part because of the power it can give them over other people. It's also very naive not to realise that it is much to the advantage of police forces to employ such people, even if it's highly problematic in some regards.
Permanent anti-riot squads in particular are notorious, at least where I'm from, for prizing such qualities as agressivity, lack of discernment and empathy, and not so covert intolerance towards otherness (POC, LGBTQ, students, intellectuals, etc.) in their members. Ad hoc anti-riot forces (usually street cops pitching in overtime) are usually not as bad, but what kind of cops you think are more likely to sign up for that overtime, nice cops who just want to serve their community (and are maybe sympathetic, or enclined to be, to the protester's cause) or cops who enjoy the opportunity to blow off some steam and play GI Joe? Again not saying that's all of them, but it's either really naive or disingenuous to refuse to see that there is a huge problem there, especially in the current, very explosive situation.
Last thing I want to say. After centuries of domination, of racism, appropriation, after slavery and countless crimes against humanity perpetrated all in the interest of white people (it doesn't matter that some of these are over and we didn't ourselves take part in, we still benefit from them as a group), it really isn't our place as whites to decide the terms of how racism should be dealt with and what the appropriate response from POC to their people being lynched should be.
People need to stop it with the free speech and "mob tribunal"/accused, tried and sentenced hypocrisy. There is no 100% free speech anywhere in the world, not even in the US. (And by the way there are many countries that have more restrictions on free speech than the US and are still better functioning democracies where people are effectively more free. Americans don't have a monopoly on defining what freedom means.) In any case, free speech protects you from prosecution and punishment by the state, not from being fired or humiliated or shunned by your peers or losing a platform you are not inherently entitled to. Was she arrested? No? Executed or put in jail? No? Then there is no breach of her free speech rights. This isn't a mob tribunal, people who find her statements disgusting are also exercising their free speech rights when they denounce her.
With regards to police reaction to the current protests: yes of course there are countless law enforcement officers who do their job out of a sense of duty and a need to selflessly serve their community, and nobody is disputing that. But it is incredibly naive to not acknowledge that, given the nature of the job, many, many are attracted to it at least in part because of the power it can give them over other people. It's also very naive not to realise that it is much to the advantage of police forces to employ such people, even if it's highly problematic in some regards.
Permanent anti-riot squads in particular are notorious, at least where I'm from, for prizing such qualities as agressivity, lack of discernment and empathy, and not so covert intolerance towards otherness (POC, LGBTQ, students, intellectuals, etc.) in their members. Ad hoc anti-riot forces (usually street cops pitching in overtime) are usually not as bad, but what kind of cops you think are more likely to sign up for that overtime, nice cops who just want to serve their community (and are maybe sympathetic, or enclined to be, to the protester's cause) or cops who enjoy the opportunity to blow off some steam and play GI Joe? Again not saying that's all of them, but it's either really naive or disingenuous to refuse to see that there is a huge problem there, especially in the current, very explosive situation.
Last thing I want to say. After centuries of domination, of racism, appropriation, after slavery and countless crimes against humanity perpetrated all in the interest of white people (it doesn't matter that some of these are over and we didn't ourselves take part in, we still benefit from them as a group), it really isn't our place as whites to decide the terms of how racism should be dealt with and what the appropriate response from POC to their people being lynched should be.
- timothy42b
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Mar 27, 2018
[quote="LeTromboniste"]With regards to that trombonist's situation. There is no private life on Facebook, particularly when you are a public figure.[/quote]
Rabbit hole, totally (or at least mostly) off topic and irrelevant,
but, seriously? An orchestra player is a public figure? Maybe in our own minds - but the importance of classical music to the rest of the population is perhaps not as large as we think.
Ask the average American, who can probably name every player on the Washington Redskins squad, to come up with a single classical player on any instrument, and you can safely bet they won't know any.
Anyway, that idea caught my attention, now you can all return to the argument/discussion.
Rabbit hole, totally (or at least mostly) off topic and irrelevant,
but, seriously? An orchestra player is a public figure? Maybe in our own minds - but the importance of classical music to the rest of the population is perhaps not as large as we think.
Ask the average American, who can probably name every player on the Washington Redskins squad, to come up with a single classical player on any instrument, and you can safely bet they won't know any.
Anyway, that idea caught my attention, now you can all return to the argument/discussion.
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: Apr 11, 2018
[quote="timothy42b"]<QUOTE author="LeTromboniste" post_id="115178" time="1591101790" user_id="3038">
With regards to that trombonist's situation. There is no private life on Facebook, particularly when you are a public figure.[/quote]
Rabbit hole, totally (or at least mostly) off topic and irrelevant,
but, seriously? An orchestra player is a public figure? Maybe in our own minds - but the importance of classical music to the rest of the population is perhaps not as large as we think.
Ask the average American, who can probably name every player on the Washington Redskins squad, to come up with a single classical player on any instrument, and you can safely bet they won't know any.
Anyway, that idea caught my attention, now you can all return to the argument/discussion.
</QUOTE>
Fame is not necessary for a figure to be public. No matter how small its audience is, the musicians are public faces of an orchestra. It doesn't matter that the average American doesn't know them. The patrons of the organisation do, so do the donors and the local music community. Local aspiring musicians know them and look up to them. And they are known by these people *because* of the position they hold. So yes, holding that job makes you a public figure, however big or small or whether local or state-wide or national or international.
With regards to that trombonist's situation. There is no private life on Facebook, particularly when you are a public figure.[/quote]
Rabbit hole, totally (or at least mostly) off topic and irrelevant,
but, seriously? An orchestra player is a public figure? Maybe in our own minds - but the importance of classical music to the rest of the population is perhaps not as large as we think.
Ask the average American, who can probably name every player on the Washington Redskins squad, to come up with a single classical player on any instrument, and you can safely bet they won't know any.
Anyway, that idea caught my attention, now you can all return to the argument/discussion.
</QUOTE>
Fame is not necessary for a figure to be public. No matter how small its audience is, the musicians are public faces of an orchestra. It doesn't matter that the average American doesn't know them. The patrons of the organisation do, so do the donors and the local music community. Local aspiring musicians know them and look up to them. And they are known by these people *because* of the position they hold. So yes, holding that job makes you a public figure, however big or small or whether local or state-wide or national or international.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
The trombonist in question was listed (online) by school systems as a private lesson instructor. That makes them a public figure within their community.
- timothy42b
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Mar 27, 2018
[quote="slipperyjoe"]The trombonist in question was listed (online) by school systems as a private lesson instructor. That makes them a public figure within their community.[/quote]
That's a stretch, to put it mildly. Nobody cares what a trombone player thinks.
The lesson here especially for the younger viewers is that social media WILL get you in trouble. You may or may not disagree with the consequences that ensue, but careless use of social media IS likely to result in consequences.
You don't need to be a public figure for that to be true. I know a Walmart employee who was fired for a Facebook comment about management. What you type is there, somewhere, forever.
That's a stretch, to put it mildly. Nobody cares what a trombone player thinks.
The lesson here especially for the younger viewers is that social media WILL get you in trouble. You may or may not disagree with the consequences that ensue, but careless use of social media IS likely to result in consequences.
You don't need to be a public figure for that to be true. I know a Walmart employee who was fired for a Facebook comment about management. What you type is there, somewhere, forever.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="timothy42b"]<QUOTE author="slipperyjoe" post_id="115186" time="1591107250" user_id="9188">
The trombonist in question was listed (online) by school systems as a private lesson instructor. That makes them a public figure within their community.[/quote]
That's a stretch, to put it mildly. Nobody cares what a trombone player thinks.
The lesson here especially for the younger viewers is that social media WILL get you in trouble. You may or may not disagree with the consequences that ensue, but careless use of social media IS likely to result in consequences.
You don't need to be a public figure for that to be true. I know a Walmart employee who was fired for a Facebook comment about management. What you type is there, somewhere, forever.
</QUOTE>
Sigh.
The trombonist in question works (or worked) directly with children via school system referrals. That makes them a public figure within their community. Any teacher, myself included, will attest to this.
The trombonist in question was listed (online) by school systems as a private lesson instructor. That makes them a public figure within their community.[/quote]
That's a stretch, to put it mildly. Nobody cares what a trombone player thinks.
The lesson here especially for the younger viewers is that social media WILL get you in trouble. You may or may not disagree with the consequences that ensue, but careless use of social media IS likely to result in consequences.
You don't need to be a public figure for that to be true. I know a Walmart employee who was fired for a Facebook comment about management. What you type is there, somewhere, forever.
</QUOTE>
Sigh.
The trombonist in question works (or worked) directly with children via school system referrals. That makes them a public figure within their community. Any teacher, myself included, will attest to this.
- FOSSIL
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Jul 09, 2019
Orchestras in GB usually have clauses about not discussing the orchestra on public forums. Also clauses about bringing the orchestra into disrepute by posts on public forums.
That makes it breach of contract to do what she did. She probably had that kind of contract.
Chris
That makes it breach of contract to do what she did. She probably had that kind of contract.
Chris
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
The First Amendment was intended to permit individuals to disagree with Government policy and express that disagreement.
It does not shield from slander, lies, hate speech, or incitement to riot.
It does not shield you from civil consequences of your actions. For example if you were to post a comment that your boss is an idiot, you can be fired for that.
There is another special carveout for whistleblowers (people who expose illegal or unethical activities in Government or Private Industry). In fact, Trump's firing of all the Inspectors General because he disagrees with their investigations should be considered abuse of power.
It does not shield from slander, lies, hate speech, or incitement to riot.
It does not shield you from civil consequences of your actions. For example if you were to post a comment that your boss is an idiot, you can be fired for that.
There is another special carveout for whistleblowers (people who expose illegal or unethical activities in Government or Private Industry). In fact, Trump's firing of all the Inspectors General because he disagrees with their investigations should be considered abuse of power.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Mv2541" post_id="115159" time="1591081071" user_id="247">
Ideal world? You mean... one without racism in the first place?
That world does not exist, but I'll be damned if we don't fight every single day for progress inch by inch. Plenty of people more important than you and I have laid down their lives just to move the line another inch, and most of us are just not willing to disrespect their sacrifice toward equality by letting the line move even a single hair backwards. By the time you and me are gone this system won't be fixed, but I'd rather die knowing I helped it move it in the right direction even the slightest bit.[/quote]
You're acting like I don't support fighting racism.
Just because I have a different perspective than most people doesn't mean I'm racist or don't support the fight for it.
</QUOTE>
But you are saying that we need to accept more racists and that the all ending cure for racism it to just wait until people want to change their mind. I don’t know, but to me, sounds a little suspicious
Ideal world? You mean... one without racism in the first place?
That world does not exist, but I'll be damned if we don't fight every single day for progress inch by inch. Plenty of people more important than you and I have laid down their lives just to move the line another inch, and most of us are just not willing to disrespect their sacrifice toward equality by letting the line move even a single hair backwards. By the time you and me are gone this system won't be fixed, but I'd rather die knowing I helped it move it in the right direction even the slightest bit.[/quote]
You're acting like I don't support fighting racism.
Just because I have a different perspective than most people doesn't mean I'm racist or don't support the fight for it.
</QUOTE>
But you are saying that we need to accept more racists and that the all ending cure for racism it to just wait until people want to change their mind. I don’t know, but to me, sounds a little suspicious
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
I never said accept racism. You can see what I mean by reading the article about The guy who converts people from the KKK.
Anyway, I don't think that shunning people from society id the solution.
Anyway, I don't think that shunning people from society id the solution.
- brumpone
- Posts: 54
- Joined: May 09, 2019
[quote="timothy42b"]The lesson here especially for the younger viewers is that social media WILL get you in trouble. You may or may not disagree with the consequences that ensue, but careless use of social media IS likely to result in consequences.
You don't need to be a public figure for that to be true. I know a Walmart employee who was fired for a Facebook comment about management. What you type is there, somewhere, forever.[/quote]
Yes. I cannot think of any job I've had where someone making similar remarks on FB or any like platform would not be instantly dismissed for gross misconduct on the grounds of bringing the organisation into disrepute.
You don't need to be a public figure for that to be true. I know a Walmart employee who was fired for a Facebook comment about management. What you type is there, somewhere, forever.[/quote]
Yes. I cannot think of any job I've had where someone making similar remarks on FB or any like platform would not be instantly dismissed for gross misconduct on the grounds of bringing the organisation into disrepute.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]I never said accept racism. You can see what I mean by reading the article about The guy who converts people from the KKK.
Anyway, I don't think that shunning people from society id the solution.[/quote]
When you try to advocate for someone who espouses racism, you can't convince anybody you don't agree with them.
If you want to be an apologist for racists you become like the 3 cops who stood by while one of their comrades choked a person to death.
Anyway, I don't think that shunning people from society id the solution.[/quote]
When you try to advocate for someone who espouses racism, you can't convince anybody you don't agree with them.
If you want to be an apologist for racists you become like the 3 cops who stood by while one of their comrades choked a person to death.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
My final employer (I'm retired) made it abundantly clear in the employee handbook that any social media posts or other public behavior reasonably considered offensive (typically with respect to protected classes) would be grounds for disciplinary action, including termination.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="BGuttman"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115201" time="1591115463" user_id="3494">
I never said accept racism. You can see what I mean by reading the article about The guy who converts people from the KKK.
Anyway, I don't think that shunning people from society id the solution.[/quote]
When you try to advocate for someone who espouses racism, you can't convince anybody you don't agree with them.
If you want to be an apologist for racists you become like the 3 cops who stood by while one of their comrades choked a person to death.
</QUOTE>
I never said to stand by and do nothing. I already said multiple times that she should be condemned. I just think we need to change our approach on how we deal with it.
I never said accept racism. You can see what I mean by reading the article about The guy who converts people from the KKK.
Anyway, I don't think that shunning people from society id the solution.[/quote]
When you try to advocate for someone who espouses racism, you can't convince anybody you don't agree with them.
If you want to be an apologist for racists you become like the 3 cops who stood by while one of their comrades choked a person to death.
</QUOTE>
I never said to stand by and do nothing. I already said multiple times that she should be condemned. I just think we need to change our approach on how we deal with it.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="BGuttman" post_id="115205" time="1591117236" user_id="53">
When you try to advocate for someone who espouses racism, you can't convince anybody you don't agree with them.
If you want to be an apologist for racists you become like the 3 cops who stood by while one of their comrades choked a person to death.[/quote]
I never said to stand by and do nothing. I already said multiple times that she should be condemned. I just think we need to change our approach on how we deal with it.
</QUOTE>
I am with you - you need to talk to people from the other side, find common ground, if you ever expect to convert them to your side. You cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that is precisely what many do nowadays. I find that sad and disappointing; those so quick to judge are not willing to just as quickly forgive. These are human beings we are dealing with, having inherent worth. I wrote already about redemption and I'll stand by that premise because I have experienced it and know how it has positively effected me and my family and countless others whose lives I have effected.
When you try to advocate for someone who espouses racism, you can't convince anybody you don't agree with them.
If you want to be an apologist for racists you become like the 3 cops who stood by while one of their comrades choked a person to death.[/quote]
I never said to stand by and do nothing. I already said multiple times that she should be condemned. I just think we need to change our approach on how we deal with it.
</QUOTE>
I am with you - you need to talk to people from the other side, find common ground, if you ever expect to convert them to your side. You cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that is precisely what many do nowadays. I find that sad and disappointing; those so quick to judge are not willing to just as quickly forgive. These are human beings we are dealing with, having inherent worth. I wrote already about redemption and I'll stand by that premise because I have experienced it and know how it has positively effected me and my family and countless others whose lives I have effected.
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
But the second chance may not mean she keeps her job, but rather, finds another one with a forgiving employer.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115207" time="1591117721" user_id="3494">
I never said to stand by and do nothing. I already said multiple times that she should be condemned. I just think we need to change our approach on how we deal with it.[/quote]
I am with you - you need to talk to people from the other side, find common ground, if you ever expect to convert them to your side. You cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that is precisely what many do nowadays. I find that sad and disappointing; those so quick to judge are not willing to just as quickly forgive. These are human beings we are dealing with, having inherent worth. I wrote already about redemption and I'll stand by that premise because I have experienced it and know how it has positively effected me and my family and countless others whose lives I have effected.
</QUOTE>
Again... what do you say to the members of her former orchestra that she was referring to? To forgive and forget?
I never said to stand by and do nothing. I already said multiple times that she should be condemned. I just think we need to change our approach on how we deal with it.[/quote]
I am with you - you need to talk to people from the other side, find common ground, if you ever expect to convert them to your side. You cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that is precisely what many do nowadays. I find that sad and disappointing; those so quick to judge are not willing to just as quickly forgive. These are human beings we are dealing with, having inherent worth. I wrote already about redemption and I'll stand by that premise because I have experienced it and know how it has positively effected me and my family and countless others whose lives I have effected.
</QUOTE>
Again... what do you say to the members of her former orchestra that she was referring to? To forgive and forget?
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What you propose?[/quote]
Of course, if it happened more than once it's a different story
Of course, if it happened more than once it's a different story
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
It would be interesting to learn how many orchestra members would have flat-out refused to rehearse or perform with that particular musician if she hadn't been fired.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?[/quote]
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
:idea: [quote="Burgerbob"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115212" time="1591119134" user_id="2978">
Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?[/quote]
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.
</QUOTE>
I understand how they might feel but also in life sometimes you have to forgive or at least learn to deal with it.
Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?[/quote]
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.
</QUOTE>
I understand how they might feel but also in life sometimes you have to forgive or at least learn to deal with it.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Burgerbob"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115212" time="1591119134" user_id="2978">
Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?[/quote]
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.
</QUOTE>
It's also pretty naive to go around thinking that people need to do everything for you so that you'll feel comfortable.
Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?[/quote]
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.
</QUOTE>
It's also pretty naive to go around thinking that people need to do everything for you so that you'll feel comfortable.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="Burgerbob"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115212" time="1591119134" user_id="2978">
Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?[/quote]
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.
</QUOTE>
I can't help but feel you are pretty sheltered yourself. My attitude is born out of suffering, the suffering I have caused myself and others, and the forgiveness I have received for my sins from my God, from others, and myself.
I take it you've never studied major religions or the premises laid out by them? One can want justice, demand it, receive it, and still have the need, maybe the longing to forgive the other person for their harm. The forgiveness is as much for yourself as it is for the offender, maybe more so.
BTW, you never answered my questions.
Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?[/quote]
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.
</QUOTE>
I can't help but feel you are pretty sheltered yourself. My attitude is born out of suffering, the suffering I have caused myself and others, and the forgiveness I have received for my sins from my God, from others, and myself.
I take it you've never studied major religions or the premises laid out by them? One can want justice, demand it, receive it, and still have the need, maybe the longing to forgive the other person for their harm. The forgiveness is as much for yourself as it is for the offender, maybe more so.
BTW, you never answered my questions.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="115217" time="1591120033" user_id="3131">
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.[/quote]
I can't help but feel you are pretty sheltered yourself. My attitude is born out of suffering, the suffering I have caused myself and others, and the forgiveness I have received for my sins from my God, from others, and myself.
I take it you've never studied major religions or the premises laid out by them? One can want justice, demand it, receive it, and still have the need, maybe the longing to forgive the other person for their harm. The forgiveness is as much for yourself as it is for the offender, maybe more so.
BTW, you never answered my questions.
</QUOTE>
exactly
You'll be going around with the no forgiveness attitude until you mess up and want forgiveness.
Personally, I have messed up many times and gotten forgiven each time. When you're in a situation like this it makes you understand how important it is to forgive people.
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.[/quote]
I can't help but feel you are pretty sheltered yourself. My attitude is born out of suffering, the suffering I have caused myself and others, and the forgiveness I have received for my sins from my God, from others, and myself.
I take it you've never studied major religions or the premises laid out by them? One can want justice, demand it, receive it, and still have the need, maybe the longing to forgive the other person for their harm. The forgiveness is as much for yourself as it is for the offender, maybe more so.
BTW, you never answered my questions.
</QUOTE>
exactly
You'll be going around with the no forgiveness attitude until you mess up and want forgiveness.
Personally, I have messed up many times and gotten forgiven each time. When you're in a situation like this it makes you understand how important it is to forgive people.
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?[/quote]
If it makes you feel better, then go ahead. It’s not like you’re affecting the outcome in this particular instance. However, forgiveness isn’t cheap. I think you don’t understand what it means to actually forgive someone- they have to want it, and show that they are ready for it. Otherwise, you are just sticking your head in the sand.
If it makes you feel better, then go ahead. It’s not like you’re affecting the outcome in this particular instance. However, forgiveness isn’t cheap. I think you don’t understand what it means to actually forgive someone- they have to want it, and show that they are ready for it. Otherwise, you are just sticking your head in the sand.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="paulyg"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115212" time="1591119134" user_id="2978">
Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?[/quote]
If it makes you feel better, then go ahead. It’s not like you’re affecting the outcome in this particular instance. However, forgiveness isn’t cheap. I think you don’t understand what it means to actually forgive someone- they have to want it, and show that they are ready for it. Otherwise, you are just sticking your head in the sand.
</QUOTE>
No, forgiveness is not cheap but what's the other option? Resentment and bitterness and hatred, just some of the things this woman has spouted off. I don't want that in my life. As I wrote, "The forgiveness is as much for yourself as it is for the offender, maybe more so."
Yes, see the goodness in her, forgive and move on with your life. What do you propose? Are you willing to cast the first stone?[/quote]
If it makes you feel better, then go ahead. It’s not like you’re affecting the outcome in this particular instance. However, forgiveness isn’t cheap. I think you don’t understand what it means to actually forgive someone- they have to want it, and show that they are ready for it. Otherwise, you are just sticking your head in the sand.
</QUOTE>
No, forgiveness is not cheap but what's the other option? Resentment and bitterness and hatred, just some of the things this woman has spouted off. I don't want that in my life. As I wrote, "The forgiveness is as much for yourself as it is for the offender, maybe more so."
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
Then you're being selfish by dismissing her actions, or calling for the consequences to be tempered, in the name of forgiveness. The other option is the only path forward. Those with the power to meet actions like this with justice, must.
In our capacity, we should put forgiveness on the shelf for a while. I think that we should demand that our colleagues, students, and teachers hold themselves to a high standard of conduct, especially when it comes to eliminating injustice and racism.
In our capacity, we should put forgiveness on the shelf for a while. I think that we should demand that our colleagues, students, and teachers hold themselves to a high standard of conduct, especially when it comes to eliminating injustice and racism.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="paulyg"]Then you're being selfish by dismissing her actions, or calling for the consequences to be tempered, in the name of forgiveness. The other option is the only path forward. Those with the power to meet actions like this with justice, must.
In our capacity, we should put forgiveness on the shelf for a while. I think that we should demand that our colleagues, students, and teachers hold themselves to a high standard of conduct, especially when it comes to eliminating injustice and racism.[/quote]
I never once posted that her actions should be dismissed, nor that she should not be held accountable for her actions, nor did I ever mean to imply that, because that would be wrong.
You didn't read my previous post:
"One can want justice, demand it, receive it, and still have the need, maybe the longing to forgive the other person for their harm. The forgiveness is as much for yourself as it is for the offender, maybe more so.
In our capacity, we should put forgiveness on the shelf for a while. I think that we should demand that our colleagues, students, and teachers hold themselves to a high standard of conduct, especially when it comes to eliminating injustice and racism.[/quote]
I never once posted that her actions should be dismissed, nor that she should not be held accountable for her actions, nor did I ever mean to imply that, because that would be wrong.
You didn't read my previous post:
"One can want justice, demand it, receive it, and still have the need, maybe the longing to forgive the other person for their harm. The forgiveness is as much for yourself as it is for the offender, maybe more so.
- Gary
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Jan 11, 2019
At the risk of repeating myself, one better be careful that what you want muzzled in someone else today doesn't translate to someone wanting to muzzle you tomorrow. Also, some of you are confusing the disliking what was said with the right to say it.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
It seems like a lot of people here are using a very black and white mentality.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]I never said accept racism. You can see what I mean by reading the article about The guy who converts people from the KKK.
Anyway, I don't think that shunning people from society id the solution.[/quote]
You said “if we were more accepting of racists then it would help solve the problem”. Please tell me how that is different from “we should accept racists”
Anyway, I don't think that shunning people from society id the solution.[/quote]
You said “if we were more accepting of racists then it would help solve the problem”. Please tell me how that is different from “we should accept racists”
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115207" time="1591117721" user_id="3494">
I never said to stand by and do nothing. I already said multiple times that she should be condemned. I just think we need to change our approach on how we deal with it.[/quote]
I am with you - you need to talk to people from the other side, find common ground, if you ever expect to convert them to your side. You cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that is precisely what many do nowadays. I find that sad and disappointing; those so quick to judge are not willing to just as quickly forgive. These are human beings we are dealing with, having inherent worth. I wrote already about redemption and I'll stand by that premise because I have experienced it and know how it has positively effected me and my family and countless others whose lives I have effected.
</QUOTE>
Why shouldn’t i be so quick to judge when they judge someone based on skin color. I don’t care who they are, if they are racists i will treat them only with disrespect
I never said to stand by and do nothing. I already said multiple times that she should be condemned. I just think we need to change our approach on how we deal with it.[/quote]
I am with you - you need to talk to people from the other side, find common ground, if you ever expect to convert them to your side. You cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that is precisely what many do nowadays. I find that sad and disappointing; those so quick to judge are not willing to just as quickly forgive. These are human beings we are dealing with, having inherent worth. I wrote already about redemption and I'll stand by that premise because I have experienced it and know how it has positively effected me and my family and countless others whose lives I have effected.
</QUOTE>
Why shouldn’t i be so quick to judge when they judge someone based on skin color. I don’t care who they are, if they are racists i will treat them only with disrespect
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115221" time="1591121213" user_id="2978">
I can't help but feel you are pretty sheltered yourself. My attitude is born out of suffering, the suffering I have caused myself and others, and the forgiveness I have received for my sins from my God, from others, and myself.
I take it you've never studied major religions or the premises laid out by them? One can want justice, demand it, receive it, and still have the need, maybe the longing to forgive the other person for their harm. The forgiveness is as much for yourself as it is for the offender, maybe more so.
BTW, you never answered my questions.[/quote]
exactly
You'll be going around with the no forgiveness attitude until you mess up and want forgiveness.
Personally, I have messed up many times and gotten forgiven each time. When you're in a situation like this it makes you understand how important it is to forgive people.
</QUOTE>
If it’s an accident, then they will be forgiven. But if someone goes out of their way 3 times to make a hateful post, then she should be dealt with accordingly. What did she think was going to happen when she posted 3 seperate racist comments. How idiotic do you have to be to think posting racist comments won’t backfire on you. She knew what she was doing
I can't help but feel you are pretty sheltered yourself. My attitude is born out of suffering, the suffering I have caused myself and others, and the forgiveness I have received for my sins from my God, from others, and myself.
I take it you've never studied major religions or the premises laid out by them? One can want justice, demand it, receive it, and still have the need, maybe the longing to forgive the other person for their harm. The forgiveness is as much for yourself as it is for the offender, maybe more so.
BTW, you never answered my questions.[/quote]
exactly
You'll be going around with the no forgiveness attitude until you mess up and want forgiveness.
Personally, I have messed up many times and gotten forgiven each time. When you're in a situation like this it makes you understand how important it is to forgive people.
</QUOTE>
If it’s an accident, then they will be forgiven. But if someone goes out of their way 3 times to make a hateful post, then she should be dealt with accordingly. What did she think was going to happen when she posted 3 seperate racist comments. How idiotic do you have to be to think posting racist comments won’t backfire on you. She knew what she was doing
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Elow"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115209" time="1591118489" user_id="2978">
I am with you - you need to talk to people from the other side, find common ground, if you ever expect to convert them to your side. You cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that is precisely what many do nowadays. I find that sad and disappointing; those so quick to judge are not willing to just as quickly forgive. These are human beings we are dealing with, having inherent worth. I wrote already about redemption and I'll stand by that premise because I have experienced it and know how it has positively effected me and my family and countless others whose lives I have effected.[/quote]
Why shouldn’t i be so quick to judge when they judge someone based on skin color. I don’t care who they are, if they are racists i will treat them only with disrespect
</QUOTE>
This is a perfect example of black and white thinking. I for the 100th time will say that somebody who does such a thing should be punished but not leave it at that and to also try and educate them.
I hope you realize that it's possible to do both
I am with you - you need to talk to people from the other side, find common ground, if you ever expect to convert them to your side. You cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that is precisely what many do nowadays. I find that sad and disappointing; those so quick to judge are not willing to just as quickly forgive. These are human beings we are dealing with, having inherent worth. I wrote already about redemption and I'll stand by that premise because I have experienced it and know how it has positively effected me and my family and countless others whose lives I have effected.[/quote]
Why shouldn’t i be so quick to judge when they judge someone based on skin color. I don’t care who they are, if they are racists i will treat them only with disrespect
</QUOTE>
This is a perfect example of black and white thinking. I for the 100th time will say that somebody who does such a thing should be punished but not leave it at that and to also try and educate them.
I hope you realize that it's possible to do both
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Elow" post_id="115236" time="1591126432" user_id="8680">
Why shouldn’t i be so quick to judge when they judge someone based on skin color. I don’t care who they are, if they are racists i will treat them only with disrespect[/quote]
This is a perfect example of black and white thinking. I for the 100th time will say that somebody who does such a thing should be punished but not leave it at that and to also try and educate them.
I hope you realize that it's possible to do both
</QUOTE>
So you would like her to be educated to treat everyone equal? How do you suppose someone does that
Why shouldn’t i be so quick to judge when they judge someone based on skin color. I don’t care who they are, if they are racists i will treat them only with disrespect[/quote]
This is a perfect example of black and white thinking. I for the 100th time will say that somebody who does such a thing should be punished but not leave it at that and to also try and educate them.
I hope you realize that it's possible to do both
</QUOTE>
So you would like her to be educated to treat everyone equal? How do you suppose someone does that
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
I pointed out above that according to one professor sensitivity studies in fact reinforce existing beliefs. What seemed to work was people of various races working together and getting to know one another.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
For one, maybe a bit of a more leniant punishment and not firing her completely. It would give her the opportunity to understand that what she did wan't ok and have a chance at redeeming herself.
But anyway silencing racism is not the same as ending racism.
But anyway silencing racism is not the same as ending racism.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="Elow"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115209" time="1591118489" user_id="2978">
I am with you - you need to talk to people from the other side, find common ground, if you ever expect to convert them to your side. You cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that is precisely what many do nowadays. I find that sad and disappointing; those so quick to judge are not willing to just as quickly forgive. These are human beings we are dealing with, having inherent worth. I wrote already about redemption and I'll stand by that premise because I have experienced it and know how it has positively effected me and my family and countless others whose lives I have effected.[/quote]
Why shouldn’t i be so quick to judge when they judge someone based on skin color. I don’t care who they are, if they are racists i will treat them only with disrespect
</QUOTE>
The other person has inherent worth and their sin does not define them as a person. The only way you can get the other person to change their way of thinking is to find common ground and build a relationship based on that. It is a choice: do we want to ostracize a person for the rest of their lives based on their wrong or accept them back into the fold?
I am with you - you need to talk to people from the other side, find common ground, if you ever expect to convert them to your side. You cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that is precisely what many do nowadays. I find that sad and disappointing; those so quick to judge are not willing to just as quickly forgive. These are human beings we are dealing with, having inherent worth. I wrote already about redemption and I'll stand by that premise because I have experienced it and know how it has positively effected me and my family and countless others whose lives I have effected.[/quote]
Why shouldn’t i be so quick to judge when they judge someone based on skin color. I don’t care who they are, if they are racists i will treat them only with disrespect
</QUOTE>
The other person has inherent worth and their sin does not define them as a person. The only way you can get the other person to change their way of thinking is to find common ground and build a relationship based on that. It is a choice: do we want to ostracize a person for the rest of their lives based on their wrong or accept them back into the fold?
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="Elow"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115239" time="1591127199" user_id="3494">
This is a perfect example of black and white thinking. I for the 100th time will say that somebody who does such a thing should be punished but not leave it at that and to also try and educate them.
I hope you realize that it's possible to do both[/quote]
So you would like her to be educated to treat everyone equal? How do you suppose someone does that
</QUOTE>
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
This is a perfect example of black and white thinking. I for the 100th time will say that somebody who does such a thing should be punished but not leave it at that and to also try and educate them.
I hope you realize that it's possible to do both[/quote]
So you would like her to be educated to treat everyone equal? How do you suppose someone does that
</QUOTE>
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
[quote="Burgerbob"]I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.[/quote]
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="BurckhardtS"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="115217" time="1591120033" user_id="3131">
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.[/quote]
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.
</QUOTE>
If there is a severe punishment like a year of unpayed leave then I don't see how she wouldn't learn something from that
And on the second part, you realize that it's pretty much impossible to recover from this.
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.[/quote]
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.
</QUOTE>
If there is a severe punishment like a year of unpayed leave then I don't see how she wouldn't learn something from that
And on the second part, you realize that it's pretty much impossible to recover from this.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="BurckhardtS"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="115217" time="1591120033" user_id="3131">
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.[/quote]
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.
</QUOTE>
The concept of forgiving someone for their actions is contained in many world religions and has been practiced by mature adults for many centuries. One should expect justice, but then one must forgive, mostly for their own sake, otherwise hatred and resentment will take hold. If a person allows themselves to be filled with resentment and hate, how does that help them heal? Who is that hurting?
What I just presented sounds like rather a mature way of thinking to me.
I can't help but feel that this is a pretty naive attitude.[/quote]
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.
</QUOTE>
The concept of forgiving someone for their actions is contained in many world religions and has been practiced by mature adults for many centuries. One should expect justice, but then one must forgive, mostly for their own sake, otherwise hatred and resentment will take hold. If a person allows themselves to be filled with resentment and hate, how does that help them heal? Who is that hurting?
What I just presented sounds like rather a mature way of thinking to me.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="BurckhardtS" post_id="115258" time="1591128828" user_id="190">
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.[/quote]
The concept of forgiving someone for their actions is contained in many world religions and has been practiced by mature adults for many centuries. One should expect justice, but then one must forgive, mostly for their own sake, otherwise hatred and resentment will take hold. If a person allows themselves to be filled with resentment and hate, how does that help them heal? Who is that hurting?
What I just presented sounds like rather a mature way of thinking to me.
</QUOTE>
As I mentioned. People will hold on to this mentality until they need to be forgiven. I don't mean to attack anybody but this mentality is very common among young naive people. Of course it might be hypocritical for me to say that but I think it's safe to say I've had some experiances a lot of people will never have.
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.[/quote]
The concept of forgiving someone for their actions is contained in many world religions and has been practiced by mature adults for many centuries. One should expect justice, but then one must forgive, mostly for their own sake, otherwise hatred and resentment will take hold. If a person allows themselves to be filled with resentment and hate, how does that help them heal? Who is that hurting?
What I just presented sounds like rather a mature way of thinking to me.
</QUOTE>
As I mentioned. People will hold on to this mentality until they need to be forgiven. I don't mean to attack anybody but this mentality is very common among young naive people. Of course it might be hypocritical for me to say that but I think it's safe to say I've had some experiances a lot of people will never have.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="Elow" post_id="115243" time="1591127945" user_id="8680">
So you would like her to be educated to treat everyone equal? How do you suppose someone does that[/quote]
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
</QUOTE>
Not exactly educating, just befriending. If anyone wants to try and be her friend, please do.
So you would like her to be educated to treat everyone equal? How do you suppose someone does that[/quote]
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>
</QUOTE>
Not exactly educating, just befriending. If anyone wants to try and be her friend, please do.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="BurckhardtS" post_id="115258" time="1591128828" user_id="190">
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.[/quote]
If there is a severe punishment like a year of unpayed leave then I don't see how she wouldn't learn something from that
And on the second part, you realize that it's pretty much impossible to recover from this.
</QUOTE>
I will say once again, there is a world of opportunities outside the music realm. Whether or not the employer wants a racist is a different problem for her.
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.[/quote]
If there is a severe punishment like a year of unpayed leave then I don't see how she wouldn't learn something from that
And on the second part, you realize that it's pretty much impossible to recover from this.
</QUOTE>
I will say once again, there is a world of opportunities outside the music realm. Whether or not the employer wants a racist is a different problem for her.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="BurckhardtS" post_id="115258" time="1591128828" user_id="190">
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.[/quote]
If there is a severe punishment like a year of unpayed leave then I don't see how she wouldn't learn something from that
And on the second part, you realize that it's pretty much impossible to recover from this.
</QUOTE>
Again, she posted 3 separate times. What did she think that would accomplish. She should’ve known that this would affect her negatively.
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.[/quote]
If there is a severe punishment like a year of unpayed leave then I don't see how she wouldn't learn something from that
And on the second part, you realize that it's pretty much impossible to recover from this.
</QUOTE>
Again, she posted 3 separate times. What did she think that would accomplish. She should’ve known that this would affect her negatively.
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]For one, maybe a bit of a more leniant punishment and not firing her completely. It would give her the opportunity to understand that what she did wan't ok and have a chance at redeeming herself.
But anyway silencing racism is not the same as ending racism.[/quote]
This country has a long history of racism.
During the 1960s, the South was controlled by vocal, avowed racists. They had been elected, and did things that make the reaction's to this week's protests look like a summer camp capture-the-flag game.
You know what changed things? The Civil Rights Act. All of the sudden, it became easier for Black people to vote. Most of those people were voted out. They were "fired." THAT is when things started to change.
A few did change their views later in life (some rather famously). A few didn't. The point is, though, that "silencing" racism is not the issue here- it's having racists in positions of power and responsibility, where they damage the fabric of our society. Someone earlier pointed out that this trombone player was an instructor at local schools. A huge part of the job of anyone in the performing arts is outreach and education. I'd say her ability to do that that is directly compromised by her views and actions.
If she chooses to reform her views, then great. However, she made her bed with those comments. I wouldn't be surprised if she can never find a job playing trombone again, and honestly, I think that's fair. She abused the power and responsibility that came with her job in the first place. There is no way that I'd let her on stage with me. If word got out, there would be a protest in the audience.
This should be a reminder to everyone that your employer does not owe you anything, beyond a paycheck and safe working conditions, free from discrimination. She should have no expectation of ever working in this field again, let alone in Austin.
But anyway silencing racism is not the same as ending racism.[/quote]
This country has a long history of racism.
During the 1960s, the South was controlled by vocal, avowed racists. They had been elected, and did things that make the reaction's to this week's protests look like a summer camp capture-the-flag game.
You know what changed things? The Civil Rights Act. All of the sudden, it became easier for Black people to vote. Most of those people were voted out. They were "fired." THAT is when things started to change.
A few did change their views later in life (some rather famously). A few didn't. The point is, though, that "silencing" racism is not the issue here- it's having racists in positions of power and responsibility, where they damage the fabric of our society. Someone earlier pointed out that this trombone player was an instructor at local schools. A huge part of the job of anyone in the performing arts is outreach and education. I'd say her ability to do that that is directly compromised by her views and actions.
If she chooses to reform her views, then great. However, she made her bed with those comments. I wouldn't be surprised if she can never find a job playing trombone again, and honestly, I think that's fair. She abused the power and responsibility that came with her job in the first place. There is no way that I'd let her on stage with me. If word got out, there would be a protest in the audience.
This should be a reminder to everyone that your employer does not owe you anything, beyond a paycheck and safe working conditions, free from discrimination. She should have no expectation of ever working in this field again, let alone in Austin.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
[quote="paulyg"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115248" time="1591128203" user_id="3494">
For one, maybe a bit of a more leniant punishment and not firing her completely. It would give her the opportunity to understand that what she did wan't ok and have a chance at redeeming herself.
But anyway silencing racism is not the same as ending racism.[/quote]
This country has a long history of racism.
During the 1960s, the South was controlled by vocal, avowed racists. They had been elected, and did things that make the reaction's to this week's protests look like a summer camp capture-the-flag game.
You know what changed things? The Civil Rights Act. All of the sudden, it became easier for Black people to vote. Most of those people were voted out. They were "fired." THAT is when things started to change.
A few did change their views later in life (some rather famously). A few didn't. The point is, though, that "silencing" racism is not the issue here- it's having racists in positions of power and responsibility, where they damage the fabric of our society. Someone earlier pointed out that this trombone player was an instructor at local schools. A huge part of the job of anyone in the performing arts is outreach and education. I'd say her ability to do that that is directly compromised by her views and actions.
If she chooses to reform her views, then great. However, she made her bed with those comments. I wouldn't be surprised if she can never find a job playing trombone again, and honestly, I think that's fair. She abused the power and responsibility that came with her job in the first place. There is no way that I'd let her on stage with me. If word got out, there would be a protest in the audience.
This should be a reminder to everyone that your employer does not owe you anything, beyond a paycheck and safe working conditions, free from discrimination. She should have no expectation of ever working in this field again, let alone in Austin.
</QUOTE>
This
For one, maybe a bit of a more leniant punishment and not firing her completely. It would give her the opportunity to understand that what she did wan't ok and have a chance at redeeming herself.
But anyway silencing racism is not the same as ending racism.[/quote]
This country has a long history of racism.
During the 1960s, the South was controlled by vocal, avowed racists. They had been elected, and did things that make the reaction's to this week's protests look like a summer camp capture-the-flag game.
You know what changed things? The Civil Rights Act. All of the sudden, it became easier for Black people to vote. Most of those people were voted out. They were "fired." THAT is when things started to change.
A few did change their views later in life (some rather famously). A few didn't. The point is, though, that "silencing" racism is not the issue here- it's having racists in positions of power and responsibility, where they damage the fabric of our society. Someone earlier pointed out that this trombone player was an instructor at local schools. A huge part of the job of anyone in the performing arts is outreach and education. I'd say her ability to do that that is directly compromised by her views and actions.
If she chooses to reform her views, then great. However, she made her bed with those comments. I wouldn't be surprised if she can never find a job playing trombone again, and honestly, I think that's fair. She abused the power and responsibility that came with her job in the first place. There is no way that I'd let her on stage with me. If word got out, there would be a protest in the audience.
This should be a reminder to everyone that your employer does not owe you anything, beyond a paycheck and safe working conditions, free from discrimination. She should have no expectation of ever working in this field again, let alone in Austin.
</QUOTE>
This
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="Elow"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115254" time="1591128585" user_id="2978">
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>[/quote]
Not exactly educating, just befriending. If anyone wants to try and be her friend, please do.
</QUOTE>
Educating or befriending, call it what you want, but this black man through a personal relationship with a KKK member was able to make him change his mind. He put a little bit more love in the world. Can you not see how that's worthwhile?
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/54486193 ... heir-robes">https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes</LINK_TEXT>[/quote]
Not exactly educating, just befriending. If anyone wants to try and be her friend, please do.
</QUOTE>
Educating or befriending, call it what you want, but this black man through a personal relationship with a KKK member was able to make him change his mind. He put a little bit more love in the world. Can you not see how that's worthwhile?
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="Elow" post_id="115268" time="1591134657" user_id="8680">
Not exactly educating, just befriending. If anyone wants to try and be her friend, please do.[/quote]
Educating or befriending, call it what you want, but this black man through a personal relationship with a KKK member was able to make him change his mind. He put a little bit more love in the world. Can you not see how that's worthwhile?
</QUOTE>
Go ahead and start a mass reeducation program. I'm not totally kidding.
In the meantime, she's going to get fired.
Not exactly educating, just befriending. If anyone wants to try and be her friend, please do.[/quote]
Educating or befriending, call it what you want, but this black man through a personal relationship with a KKK member was able to make him change his mind. He put a little bit more love in the world. Can you not see how that's worthwhile?
</QUOTE>
Go ahead and start a mass reeducation program. I'm not totally kidding.
In the meantime, she's going to get fired.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="Elow" post_id="115268" time="1591134657" user_id="8680">
Not exactly educating, just befriending. If anyone wants to try and be her friend, please do.[/quote]
Educating or befriending, call it what you want, but this black man through a personal relationship with a KKK member was able to make him change his mind. He put a little bit more love in the world. Can you not see how that's worthwhile?
</QUOTE>
We know about this guy because he's a rarity. Rest assured, the KKK does not invite Black or Jewish members.
About the best we can hope for is to clean our own houses.
Not exactly educating, just befriending. If anyone wants to try and be her friend, please do.[/quote]
Educating or befriending, call it what you want, but this black man through a personal relationship with a KKK member was able to make him change his mind. He put a little bit more love in the world. Can you not see how that's worthwhile?
</QUOTE>
We know about this guy because he's a rarity. Rest assured, the KKK does not invite Black or Jewish members.
About the best we can hope for is to clean our own houses.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
Something I take away from his story is that change happens when one person works with another person. I agree with you that we should clean our own houses but in doing so we can have a profound influence on those around us.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="BurckhardtS" post_id="115258" time="1591128828" user_id="190">
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.[/quote]
The concept of forgiving someone for their actions is contained in many world religions and has been practiced by mature adults for many centuries. One should expect justice, but then one must forgive, mostly for their own sake, otherwise hatred and resentment will take hold. If a person allows themselves to be filled with resentment and hate, how does that help them heal? Who is that hurting?
What I just presented sounds like rather a mature way of thinking to me.
</QUOTE>
"You posted racist comments publicly, in violation of the terms of your employment. You're fired. We forgive you"
Seems OK to me. Do you expect to be forgiven for being fired from a job from any of the myriad of other legitimate reasons to be fired from a job?
"You caused bodily injury to others for operating a mill improperly. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You tried selling drugs to children at a local park. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You failed to report for work on a critical day of the cycle. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You violated sexual harassment policy at the company, which includes behavior on and off the clock in accordance with our contract. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You suck at your job. You're fired. We forgive you"
It is. It's extremely childish. She's a grown ass adult- with children mind you- and she has to learn that what she does is wrong and affects many people. Letting her keep her job will only give her a slight wrist slap and reinforce that being a racist is OK, as long as you don't tell anyone about it. Being potentially forced out of a career will force you to learn, whether you like it or not.
She still has an opportunity to clean up her act and learn that racism is not tolerated and move on, no one is keeping that from her. Anyone who makes their living solely on playing should consider themselves extremely lucky in the first place. Absolutely no one is entitled to that.[/quote]
The concept of forgiving someone for their actions is contained in many world religions and has been practiced by mature adults for many centuries. One should expect justice, but then one must forgive, mostly for their own sake, otherwise hatred and resentment will take hold. If a person allows themselves to be filled with resentment and hate, how does that help them heal? Who is that hurting?
What I just presented sounds like rather a mature way of thinking to me.
</QUOTE>
"You posted racist comments publicly, in violation of the terms of your employment. You're fired. We forgive you"
Seems OK to me. Do you expect to be forgiven for being fired from a job from any of the myriad of other legitimate reasons to be fired from a job?
"You caused bodily injury to others for operating a mill improperly. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You tried selling drugs to children at a local park. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You failed to report for work on a critical day of the cycle. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You violated sexual harassment policy at the company, which includes behavior on and off the clock in accordance with our contract. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You suck at your job. You're fired. We forgive you"
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="harrisonreed"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115260" time="1591129476" user_id="2978">
The concept of forgiving someone for their actions is contained in many world religions and has been practiced by mature adults for many centuries. One should expect justice, but then one must forgive, mostly for their own sake, otherwise hatred and resentment will take hold. If a person allows themselves to be filled with resentment and hate, how does that help them heal? Who is that hurting?
What I just presented sounds like rather a mature way of thinking to me.[/quote]
"You posted racist comments publicly, in violation of the terms of your employment. You're fired. We forgive you"
Seems OK to me. Do you expect to be forgiven for being fired from a job from any of the myriad of other legitimate reasons to be fired from a job?
"You caused bodily injury to others for operating a mill improperly. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You tried selling drugs to children at a local park. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You failed to report for work on a critical day of the cycle. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You violated sexual harassment policy at the company, which includes behavior on and off the clock in accordance with our contract. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You suck at your job. You're fired. We forgive you"
</QUOTE>
It gets tiring to repeat the same Concepts over and over again, but I will for your sake. I never said that a person shouldn't be judged and have an appropriate punishment for their actions. What I'm stating, and have stated several times so far, is that a person needs a opportunity for Redemption.
You can poke fun at the concept all you want but someday at some point you're going to be in the position to want the Forgiveness of another human being. I hope you're not so smug if you don't get it.
The concept of forgiving someone for their actions is contained in many world religions and has been practiced by mature adults for many centuries. One should expect justice, but then one must forgive, mostly for their own sake, otherwise hatred and resentment will take hold. If a person allows themselves to be filled with resentment and hate, how does that help them heal? Who is that hurting?
What I just presented sounds like rather a mature way of thinking to me.[/quote]
"You posted racist comments publicly, in violation of the terms of your employment. You're fired. We forgive you"
Seems OK to me. Do you expect to be forgiven for being fired from a job from any of the myriad of other legitimate reasons to be fired from a job?
"You caused bodily injury to others for operating a mill improperly. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You tried selling drugs to children at a local park. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You failed to report for work on a critical day of the cycle. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You violated sexual harassment policy at the company, which includes behavior on and off the clock in accordance with our contract. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You suck at your job. You're fired. We forgive you"
</QUOTE>
It gets tiring to repeat the same Concepts over and over again, but I will for your sake. I never said that a person shouldn't be judged and have an appropriate punishment for their actions. What I'm stating, and have stated several times so far, is that a person needs a opportunity for Redemption.
You can poke fun at the concept all you want but someday at some point you're going to be in the position to want the Forgiveness of another human being. I hope you're not so smug if you don't get it.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
I'd say she's the one with the onus of redemption, not us.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]<QUOTE author="harrisonreed" post_id="115284" time="1591138753" user_id="3642">
"You posted racist comments publicly, in violation of the terms of your employment. You're fired. We forgive you"
Seems OK to me. Do you expect to be forgiven for being fired from a job from any of the myriad of other legitimate reasons to be fired from a job?
"You caused bodily injury to others for operating a mill improperly. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You tried selling drugs to children at a local park. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You failed to report for work on a critical day of the cycle. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You violated sexual harassment policy at the company, which includes behavior on and off the clock in accordance with our contract. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You suck at your job. You're fired. We forgive you"[/quote]
You can poke fun at the concept all you want but someday at some point you're going to be in the position to want the Forgiveness of another human being. I hope you're not so smug if you don't get it.
</QUOTE>
My response was not tongue in cheek. It was deadly serious, from someone who is gainfully employed and happy to be so.
What world do you live in that you expect neighborly, idealistic behavior from an employer? Certainly not in capitalistic America. Businesses are not usually "in the business" of rehabilitating people, especially their employees. It is a noble pursuit to try to save the people around you, but come on man. An employer? When there are literally a thousand trombonists who would kill for that job? Or thousands of machinists on the dole right now, who would want that machinist job? You're in lala land.
I get the feeling that this is all hitting to close to home for some people, forcing them to take a look on the mirror. Just the feeling I get from some of these reactions.
"You posted racist comments publicly, in violation of the terms of your employment. You're fired. We forgive you"
Seems OK to me. Do you expect to be forgiven for being fired from a job from any of the myriad of other legitimate reasons to be fired from a job?
"You caused bodily injury to others for operating a mill improperly. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You tried selling drugs to children at a local park. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You failed to report for work on a critical day of the cycle. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You violated sexual harassment policy at the company, which includes behavior on and off the clock in accordance with our contract. You're fired. We forgive you"
"You suck at your job. You're fired. We forgive you"[/quote]
You can poke fun at the concept all you want but someday at some point you're going to be in the position to want the Forgiveness of another human being. I hope you're not so smug if you don't get it.
</QUOTE>
My response was not tongue in cheek. It was deadly serious, from someone who is gainfully employed and happy to be so.
What world do you live in that you expect neighborly, idealistic behavior from an employer? Certainly not in capitalistic America. Businesses are not usually "in the business" of rehabilitating people, especially their employees. It is a noble pursuit to try to save the people around you, but come on man. An employer? When there are literally a thousand trombonists who would kill for that job? Or thousands of machinists on the dole right now, who would want that machinist job? You're in lala land.
I get the feeling that this is all hitting to close to home for some people, forcing them to take a look on the mirror. Just the feeling I get from some of these reactions.
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]
It gets tiring to repeat the same Concepts over and over again, but I will for your sake. I never said that a person shouldn't be judged and have an appropriate punishment for their actions. What I'm stating, and have stated several times so far, is that a person needs a opportunity for Redemption.
You can poke fun at the concept all you want but someday at some point you're going to be in the position to want the Forgiveness of another human being. I hope you're not so smug if you don't get it.[/quote]
I'm getting tired of repeating the same concepts over and over again too, but I will for your sake.
I don't think any of us would disagree or would not want to have a second shot at things if we've screwed up. I could give you a few very personal examples of things I've screwed up and wish I would have had a second shot at (and I'm only 24!). However, I never felt entitled to be given a second chance, and I have moved on if I wasn't. I've gotten lucky, and I've been burned.
You seem to be in some kind of airy fairy religion land with your choice of terminology. I'm not saying it's wrong but it's clear that those terms are not lining up with what we are talking about here. Care to explain?
It gets tiring to repeat the same Concepts over and over again, but I will for your sake. I never said that a person shouldn't be judged and have an appropriate punishment for their actions. What I'm stating, and have stated several times so far, is that a person needs a opportunity for Redemption.
You can poke fun at the concept all you want but someday at some point you're going to be in the position to want the Forgiveness of another human being. I hope you're not so smug if you don't get it.[/quote]
I'm getting tired of repeating the same concepts over and over again too, but I will for your sake.
I don't think any of us would disagree or would not want to have a second shot at things if we've screwed up. I could give you a few very personal examples of things I've screwed up and wish I would have had a second shot at (and I'm only 24!). However, I never felt entitled to be given a second chance, and I have moved on if I wasn't. I've gotten lucky, and I've been burned.
You seem to be in some kind of airy fairy religion land with your choice of terminology. I'm not saying it's wrong but it's clear that those terms are not lining up with what we are talking about here. Care to explain?
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
If you were serious I do apologize.
I think you're painting too broad a stroke when it comes to employer-employee relations. There are unions out there that have policies in place to force employers to give an employee a second chance. But even in non-union shops you have employers that are willing to give a person a second chance, depending on severity of the infraction. Naturally, there are some infractions that demand firing and in light of this trombonist situation, her employers had no choice.
I think you're painting too broad a stroke when it comes to employer-employee relations. There are unions out there that have policies in place to force employers to give an employee a second chance. But even in non-union shops you have employers that are willing to give a person a second chance, depending on severity of the infraction. Naturally, there are some infractions that demand firing and in light of this trombonist situation, her employers had no choice.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
I don't think second chances ever apply to racism or sexual harassment.... At least not so immediately after the infraction.
In this case, the chance at redemption is that some other employer will hire her later on down the line. Redemption and punishment usually happen at different times.
In this case, the chance at redemption is that some other employer will hire her later on down the line. Redemption and punishment usually happen at different times.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
[quote="BurckhardtS"]<QUOTE author="norbie2018" post_id="115285" time="1591139015" user_id="2978">
It gets tiring to repeat the same Concepts over and over again, but I will for your sake. I never said that a person shouldn't be judged and have an appropriate punishment for their actions. What I'm stating, and have stated several times so far, is that a person needs a opportunity for Redemption.
You can poke fun at the concept all you want but someday at some point you're going to be in the position to want the Forgiveness of another human being. I hope you're not so smug if you don't get it.[/quote]
I'm getting tired of repeating the same concepts over and over again too, but I will for your sake.
I don't think any of us would disagree or would not want to have a second shot at things if we've screwed up. I could give you a few very personal examples of things I've screwed up and wish I would have had a second shot at (and I'm only 24!). However, I never felt entitled to be given a second chance, and I have moved on if I wasn't. I've gotten lucky, and I've been burned.
You seem to be in some kind of airy fairy religion land with your choice of terminology. I'm not saying it's wrong but it's clear that those terms are not lining up with what we are talking about here. Care to explain?
</QUOTE>
Care to site exactly what airy fairy religion land concepts you're talkin about? I can then explain.
It gets tiring to repeat the same Concepts over and over again, but I will for your sake. I never said that a person shouldn't be judged and have an appropriate punishment for their actions. What I'm stating, and have stated several times so far, is that a person needs a opportunity for Redemption.
You can poke fun at the concept all you want but someday at some point you're going to be in the position to want the Forgiveness of another human being. I hope you're not so smug if you don't get it.[/quote]
I'm getting tired of repeating the same concepts over and over again too, but I will for your sake.
I don't think any of us would disagree or would not want to have a second shot at things if we've screwed up. I could give you a few very personal examples of things I've screwed up and wish I would have had a second shot at (and I'm only 24!). However, I never felt entitled to be given a second chance, and I have moved on if I wasn't. I've gotten lucky, and I've been burned.
You seem to be in some kind of airy fairy religion land with your choice of terminology. I'm not saying it's wrong but it's clear that those terms are not lining up with what we are talking about here. Care to explain?
</QUOTE>
Care to site exactly what airy fairy religion land concepts you're talkin about? I can then explain.
- Elow
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Mar 02, 2020
I give up, most of us are either too stubborn or stupid to change our mind. What’s done is done, and i’m happy. All this post has done is spread even more hate. I’m sorry if i was rude, but i think they took the right action.
- norbie2018
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Apr 05, 2018
There's been post upon post upon post about forgiveness and Redemption and wanting to see the other person eye to eye. How can that spread more hate?
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="Elow"]I give up, most of us are either too stubborn or stupid to change our mind. What’s done is done, and i’m happy. All this post has done is spread even more hate. I’m sorry if i was rude, but i think they took the right action.[/quote]
You haven't been rude at all.
You haven't been rude at all.
- mwpfoot
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
We must root out racism in America and the institutions that uphold it. Smirk all you want that the path to justice and equality for all requires, yes, intolerance of racism. What incredible irony! chuckle the racists and their enablers.
If your hateful posts on social media come back to bite you in the ass professionally, there is exactly one person to blame: you. Plead your case with your employer. Get like-minded individuals to write letters. Hire an attorney. Good luck with that.
What about due process?! This orchestra appears to be following it.
What about freedom of speech?! The apparently dismissed person remains free to say whatever they want.
If future accountability for your past posts is potentially a problem, check yourself: Ya just might be a racist. Best thing for you to do is delete that stuff and never post it again. Many of us who have quietly suffered through your hateful rants and "jokes" aren't having it anymore.
If your hateful posts on social media come back to bite you in the ass professionally, there is exactly one person to blame: you. Plead your case with your employer. Get like-minded individuals to write letters. Hire an attorney. Good luck with that.
What about due process?! This orchestra appears to be following it.
What about freedom of speech?! The apparently dismissed person remains free to say whatever they want.
If future accountability for your past posts is potentially a problem, check yourself: Ya just might be a racist. Best thing for you to do is delete that stuff and never post it again. Many of us who have quietly suffered through your hateful rants and "jokes" aren't having it anymore.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="mwpfoot"]We must root out racism in America and the institutions that uphold it. Smirk all you want that the path to justice and equality for all requires, yes, intolerance of racism. What incredible irony! chuckle the racists and their enablers.
If your hateful posts on social media come back to bite you in the ass professionally, there is exactly one person to blame: you. Plead your case with your employer. Get like-minded individuals to write letters. Hire an attorney. Good luck with that.
What about due process?! This orchestra appears to be following it.
What about freedom of speech?! The apparently dismissed person remains free to say whatever they want.
If future accountability for your past posts is potentially a problem, check yourself: Ya just might be a racist. Best thing for you to do is delete that stuff and never post it again. <U>Many of us who have quietly suffered through your hateful rants and "jokes" aren't having it anymore</U>.[/quote]
You're referring to some hypothetical "you" here, right?
If your hateful posts on social media come back to bite you in the ass professionally, there is exactly one person to blame: you. Plead your case with your employer. Get like-minded individuals to write letters. Hire an attorney. Good luck with that.
What about due process?! This orchestra appears to be following it.
What about freedom of speech?! The apparently dismissed person remains free to say whatever they want.
If future accountability for your past posts is potentially a problem, check yourself: Ya just might be a racist. Best thing for you to do is delete that stuff and never post it again. <U>Many of us who have quietly suffered through your hateful rants and "jokes" aren't having it anymore</U>.[/quote]
You're referring to some hypothetical "you" here, right?
- mwpfoot
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="harrisonreed"]You're referring to some hypothetical "you" here, right?[/quote]
Yes.
Yes.
- Doug_Elliott
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
"The guy who converts people from the KKK" is Daryl Davis, who happens to be a jazz, blues, and R&B piano player here in the DC area. I've worked with him but I don't really know him. His Wikipedia page has this:
"Davis is a Christian and has used his religious beliefs to convince Klansmen to leave and denounce the KKK.
He is the subject of the 2016 documentary Accidental Courtesy: Daryl Davis, Race & America."
His book is "Klan Destine Relation: A Black Man's Odyssey in the Ku Klux Klan".
I have not read it.
"Davis is a Christian and has used his religious beliefs to convince Klansmen to leave and denounce the KKK.
He is the subject of the 2016 documentary Accidental Courtesy: Daryl Davis, Race & America."
His book is "Klan Destine Relation: A Black Man's Odyssey in the Ku Klux Klan".
I have not read it.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
Norbie, Unions will offer protection from unreasonable actions by Management, but there are limits to what they can do. Especially now, where most workers are NOT unionized (and particularly in Texas). Also, altruistic employers are the exception, not the rule; despite what you may want or think.
We can sit and Monday Morning Quarterback the situation ad nauseam, but the fact remains: if you shoot your mouth off there are consequences.
We can sit and Monday Morning Quarterback the situation ad nauseam, but the fact remains: if you shoot your mouth off there are consequences.
- ArbanRubank
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Feb 23, 2019
Great discussion!
We pretty much have assumed that she is devastated, broken and ruined. But I find it difficult to believe that someone could be so "inside a bubble" as to not know that there could be severe professional and social consequences for such actions. It's not like it hasn't been plastered all over the place with celebs, athletes and politicians having to apologize and/or getting tossed out of whatever they are doing. Jimmy Fallon was just in the news from a 20-year ago thing!
So, I am wondering if there was an ulterior motive to her actions. I can think of several scenarios. One might be an ultimate plan to take the Symphony to court for (what her lawyer might argue ) was an unwarranted firing and - if cable TV has it right - settle out of court with an NDA. Under this scenario, the Symphony wins b/c they get the high road and she wins b/c she gets lump-sum cash (which is, I think non-taxable) to start her life over again. No one is ever the wiser, due to the NDA hushing both sides. Maybe she was disgruntled and simply bored to death with her life and this was her way of firing back. I dunno and I wonder if we will ever know the exact truth behind her actions. OTOH, it could be what it appears to be - a classic example of racism on display for the world to see. All we see is what appears to be the train wreck.
We pretty much have assumed that she is devastated, broken and ruined. But I find it difficult to believe that someone could be so "inside a bubble" as to not know that there could be severe professional and social consequences for such actions. It's not like it hasn't been plastered all over the place with celebs, athletes and politicians having to apologize and/or getting tossed out of whatever they are doing. Jimmy Fallon was just in the news from a 20-year ago thing!
So, I am wondering if there was an ulterior motive to her actions. I can think of several scenarios. One might be an ultimate plan to take the Symphony to court for (what her lawyer might argue ) was an unwarranted firing and - if cable TV has it right - settle out of court with an NDA. Under this scenario, the Symphony wins b/c they get the high road and she wins b/c she gets lump-sum cash (which is, I think non-taxable) to start her life over again. No one is ever the wiser, due to the NDA hushing both sides. Maybe she was disgruntled and simply bored to death with her life and this was her way of firing back. I dunno and I wonder if we will ever know the exact truth behind her actions. OTOH, it could be what it appears to be - a classic example of racism on display for the world to see. All we see is what appears to be the train wreck.
- timothy42b
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Mar 27, 2018
[quote="TimBrown"]Great discussion!
We pretty much have assumed that she is devastated, broken and ruined. But I find it difficult to believe that someone could be so "inside a bubble" as to not know that there could be severe professional and social consequences for such actions.[/quote]
I'm not so sure. My experience with a few acquaintances is that the bubble is pretty well hermetically sealed.
I further think there are two types of bubble involved. One is the social media bubble, the idea that once you've entered that zone you're pretty much free to use any language you want without consequence. I cringe at what some of my friends post publicly. This may be partly generational - people my age are less likely to be heavy social media users - but it may be the effect of culture, the more you hang around people who do this the more you think it's reasonable.
The other bubble I have to be a little more careful describing, I don't want to even verge on getting political, but there are some media outlets that feature a lot of nastiness. It is one thing to disagree with someone's position, another to consider it proper to treat them with disrespect, contempt, and abusiveness. If that happens to be the only news you watch, over time again you may come to accept that behavior as reasonable. This has happened with a close friend; we cannot talk about whether an opinion is valid or not because disagreement always justifies abuse.
I've recently read the book iGen:
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.amazon.com/iGen-Super-Conne ... 1501151983">https://www.amazon.com/iGen-Super-Connected-Rebellious-Happy-Adulthood/dp/1501151983</LINK_TEXT>
and it makes some interesting distinctions between the millenials and the younger generation that I had not suspected. It's worth a read. The premise is that while millennials to some extent extended adolescence, iGen has extended childhood, and feels entitled to be protected from difference of opinion. Vastly oversimplified of course, you should read the book. Overdrive is your friend.
We pretty much have assumed that she is devastated, broken and ruined. But I find it difficult to believe that someone could be so "inside a bubble" as to not know that there could be severe professional and social consequences for such actions.[/quote]
I'm not so sure. My experience with a few acquaintances is that the bubble is pretty well hermetically sealed.
I further think there are two types of bubble involved. One is the social media bubble, the idea that once you've entered that zone you're pretty much free to use any language you want without consequence. I cringe at what some of my friends post publicly. This may be partly generational - people my age are less likely to be heavy social media users - but it may be the effect of culture, the more you hang around people who do this the more you think it's reasonable.
The other bubble I have to be a little more careful describing, I don't want to even verge on getting political, but there are some media outlets that feature a lot of nastiness. It is one thing to disagree with someone's position, another to consider it proper to treat them with disrespect, contempt, and abusiveness. If that happens to be the only news you watch, over time again you may come to accept that behavior as reasonable. This has happened with a close friend; we cannot talk about whether an opinion is valid or not because disagreement always justifies abuse.
I've recently read the book iGen:
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.amazon.com/iGen-Super-Conne ... 1501151983">https://www.amazon.com/iGen-Super-Connected-Rebellious-Happy-Adulthood/dp/1501151983</LINK_TEXT>
and it makes some interesting distinctions between the millenials and the younger generation that I had not suspected. It's worth a read. The premise is that while millennials to some extent extended adolescence, iGen has extended childhood, and feels entitled to be protected from difference of opinion. Vastly oversimplified of course, you should read the book. Overdrive is your friend.
- ArbanRubank
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Feb 23, 2019
Great point! We are probably all inside some kind of bubble. And if the contents of that bubble - or personal belief system - is all we know and all we are exposed to, then it's not us who is inside the bubble, it's everyone else!
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/a ... t-remarks/">https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/arts/2020-06-02/aso-fires-player-over-racist-remarks/</LINK_TEXT>
She did lose some of her pre-college teaching jobs.
Good. She has no business working with kids.
She did lose some of her pre-college teaching jobs.
Good. She has no business working with kids.
- BurckhardtS
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mar 25, 2018
[quote="norbie2018"]Care to site exactly what airy fairy religion land concepts you're talkin about? I can then explain.[/quote]
You keep using terms like "sin" and "redemption". There's no inherent issue, but these terms can mean wildly different things depending on who you ask.
You keep using terms like "sin" and "redemption". There's no inherent issue, but these terms can mean wildly different things depending on who you ask.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="paulyg"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115248" time="1591128203" user_id="3494">
For one, maybe a bit of a more leniant punishment and not firing her completely. It would give her the opportunity to understand that what she did wan't ok and have a chance at redeeming herself.
But anyway silencing racism is not the same as ending racism.[/quote]
This country has a long history of racism.
During the 1960s, the South was controlled by vocal, avowed racists. They had been elected, and did things that make the reaction's to this week's protests look like a summer camp capture-the-flag game.
You know what changed things? The Civil Rights Act. All of the sudden, it became easier for Black people to vote. Most of those people were voted out. They were "fired." THAT is when things started to change.
A few did change their views later in life (some rather famously). A few didn't. The point is, though, that "silencing" racism is not the issue here- it's having racists in positions of power and responsibility, where they damage the fabric of our society. Someone earlier pointed out that this trombone player was an instructor at local schools. A huge part of the job of anyone in the performing arts is outreach and education. I'd say her ability to do that that is directly compromised by her views and actions.
If she chooses to reform her views, then great. However, she made her bed with those comments. I wouldn't be surprised if she can never find a job playing trombone again, and honestly, I think that's fair. She abused the power and responsibility that came with her job in the first place. There is no way that I'd let her on stage with me. If word got out, there would be a protest in the audience.
This should be a reminder to everyone that your employer does not owe you anything, beyond a paycheck and safe working conditions, free from discrimination. She should have no expectation of ever working in this field again, let alone in Austin.
</QUOTE>
I see where you're coming from but I think you're exagerating a bit. Trombonist really don't have very much power and you're talking as if she's a corrupt politician. Also, how exactlyis she abusing her powers?
For one, maybe a bit of a more leniant punishment and not firing her completely. It would give her the opportunity to understand that what she did wan't ok and have a chance at redeeming herself.
But anyway silencing racism is not the same as ending racism.[/quote]
This country has a long history of racism.
During the 1960s, the South was controlled by vocal, avowed racists. They had been elected, and did things that make the reaction's to this week's protests look like a summer camp capture-the-flag game.
You know what changed things? The Civil Rights Act. All of the sudden, it became easier for Black people to vote. Most of those people were voted out. They were "fired." THAT is when things started to change.
A few did change their views later in life (some rather famously). A few didn't. The point is, though, that "silencing" racism is not the issue here- it's having racists in positions of power and responsibility, where they damage the fabric of our society. Someone earlier pointed out that this trombone player was an instructor at local schools. A huge part of the job of anyone in the performing arts is outreach and education. I'd say her ability to do that that is directly compromised by her views and actions.
If she chooses to reform her views, then great. However, she made her bed with those comments. I wouldn't be surprised if she can never find a job playing trombone again, and honestly, I think that's fair. She abused the power and responsibility that came with her job in the first place. There is no way that I'd let her on stage with me. If word got out, there would be a protest in the audience.
This should be a reminder to everyone that your employer does not owe you anything, beyond a paycheck and safe working conditions, free from discrimination. She should have no expectation of ever working in this field again, let alone in Austin.
</QUOTE>
I see where you're coming from but I think you're exagerating a bit. Trombonist really don't have very much power and you're talking as if she's a corrupt politician. Also, how exactlyis she abusing her powers?
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
Pretty thorough explanation in the Austin Chronicle story.
But, is Ms. B an anomaly? Trump has the support of 43% of respondents to a recent poll. That number has been pretty solid over his term of office. His support might be even higher in red state Texas. The story says Ms B’s political views were known to her colleagues. She initially posted the remarks that got her canned on someone else’s FB page.
But, is Ms. B an anomaly? Trump has the support of 43% of respondents to a recent poll. That number has been pretty solid over his term of office. His support might be even higher in red state Texas. The story says Ms B’s political views were known to her colleagues. She initially posted the remarks that got her canned on someone else’s FB page.
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]I see where you're coming from but I think you're exagerating a bit. Trombonist really don't have very much power and you're talking as if she's a corrupt politician. Also, how exactlyis she abusing her powers?[/quote]
It depends on how you define power. If you're thinking along the lines of "mobilizing the state police to fire water cannons at peaceful protestors," then yes, trombonists rarely find themselves with that power.
However, I consider my trombone teachers some of the most influential figures in my life. This goes to what you were talking about earlier- nurturing young people the right way can prevent someone from developing these racist, abhorrent views. On the other side, imagine being Black, and showing up to a lesson with a person like this, or an audition where they are on the committee. That is the power and responsibility that comes with a position like hers. Sure, you may not make the national nightly news (although I think there's a good chance that she did here), but you have the power to destroy lives.
It depends on how you define power. If you're thinking along the lines of "mobilizing the state police to fire water cannons at peaceful protestors," then yes, trombonists rarely find themselves with that power.
However, I consider my trombone teachers some of the most influential figures in my life. This goes to what you were talking about earlier- nurturing young people the right way can prevent someone from developing these racist, abhorrent views. On the other side, imagine being Black, and showing up to a lesson with a person like this, or an audition where they are on the committee. That is the power and responsibility that comes with a position like hers. Sure, you may not make the national nightly news (although I think there's a good chance that she did here), but you have the power to destroy lives.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="paulyg"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115414" time="1591205274" user_id="3494">
I see where you're coming from but I think you're exagerating a bit. Trombonist really don't have very much power and you're talking as if she's a corrupt politician. Also, how exactlyis she abusing her powers?[/quote]
It depends on how you define power. If you're thinking along the lines of "mobilizing the state police to fire water cannons at peaceful protestors," then yes, trombonists rarely find themselves with that power.
However, I consider my trombone teachers some of the most influential figures in my life. This goes to what you were talking about earlier- nurturing young people the right way can prevent someone from developing these racist, abhorrent views. On the other side, imagine being Black, and showing up to a lesson with a person like this, or an audition where they are on the committee. That is the power and responsibility that comes with a position like hers. Sure, you may not make the national nightly news (although I think there's a good chance that she did here), but you have the power to destroy lives.
</QUOTE>
I understand.
I still think that the consequences were bit too harsh and maybe she should have been given another chance befor e termination but were going to have to agree to disagree on that.
I see where you're coming from but I think you're exagerating a bit. Trombonist really don't have very much power and you're talking as if she's a corrupt politician. Also, how exactlyis she abusing her powers?[/quote]
It depends on how you define power. If you're thinking along the lines of "mobilizing the state police to fire water cannons at peaceful protestors," then yes, trombonists rarely find themselves with that power.
However, I consider my trombone teachers some of the most influential figures in my life. This goes to what you were talking about earlier- nurturing young people the right way can prevent someone from developing these racist, abhorrent views. On the other side, imagine being Black, and showing up to a lesson with a person like this, or an audition where they are on the committee. That is the power and responsibility that comes with a position like hers. Sure, you may not make the national nightly news (although I think there's a good chance that she did here), but you have the power to destroy lives.
</QUOTE>
I understand.
I still think that the consequences were bit too harsh and maybe she should have been given another chance befor e termination but were going to have to agree to disagree on that.
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]
I understand.
I still think that the consequences were bit too harsh and maybe she should have been given another chance befor e termination but were going to have to agree to disagree on that.[/quote]
I don't think I'm going to agree with you on anything, not even on disagreeing with you. I see that you fail to grasp the magnitude of the situation, because you're continually advocating for a less severe consequence. I think it illustrates the point I'm making about how difficult it is to educate people about these issues, because you certainly seem intent on downplaying how unacceptable these actions really were.
I understand.
I still think that the consequences were bit too harsh and maybe she should have been given another chance befor e termination but were going to have to agree to disagree on that.[/quote]
I don't think I'm going to agree with you on anything, not even on disagreeing with you. I see that you fail to grasp the magnitude of the situation, because you're continually advocating for a less severe consequence. I think it illustrates the point I'm making about how difficult it is to educate people about these issues, because you certainly seem intent on downplaying how unacceptable these actions really were.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="paulyg"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="115433" time="1591211047" user_id="3494">
I understand.
I still think that the consequences were bit too harsh and maybe she should have been given another chance befor e termination but were going to have to agree to disagree on that.[/quote]
I don't think I'm going to agree with you on anything, not even on disagreeing with you. I see that you fail to grasp the magnitude of the situation, because you're continually advocating for a less severe consequence. I think it illustrates the point I'm making about how difficult it is to educate people about these issues, because you certainly seem intent on downplaying how unacceptable these actions really were.
</QUOTE>
Well then you're going to be yelling into the wind if you want to try to keep arguing with me. I see that we are both very stubborn about our opinions and I think further arguing would be useless since honestly, I don't really care if you agree with me or not.
I understand.
I still think that the consequences were bit too harsh and maybe she should have been given another chance befor e termination but were going to have to agree to disagree on that.[/quote]
I don't think I'm going to agree with you on anything, not even on disagreeing with you. I see that you fail to grasp the magnitude of the situation, because you're continually advocating for a less severe consequence. I think it illustrates the point I'm making about how difficult it is to educate people about these issues, because you certainly seem intent on downplaying how unacceptable these actions really were.
</QUOTE>
Well then you're going to be yelling into the wind if you want to try to keep arguing with me. I see that we are both very stubborn about our opinions and I think further arguing would be useless since honestly, I don't really care if you agree with me or not.
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
Drummer Hilary Jones has also made similar, if not worse, statements online. It’s odd to me that people would not act more in their own interest and keep such thoughts to themselves. In Ms. Jones’ case, it appears she has lost some endorsement deals.
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]Well then you're going to be yelling into the wind if you want to try to keep arguing with me. I see that we are both very stubborn about our opinions and I think further arguing would be useless since honestly, I don't really care if you agree with me or not.[/quote]
You talk the talk, but you aren't walking the walk. How can you feel that giving people a second chance so they can be re-educated is effective, while you yourself are so stubborn and cavalier about this issue?
You talk the talk, but you aren't walking the walk. How can you feel that giving people a second chance so they can be re-educated is effective, while you yourself are so stubborn and cavalier about this issue?
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
Simply because I disagree. I also don't think they should be given infinite chances. If they don't learn by the first time then yes, something like this should happen.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="Bach5G"]Drummer Hilary Jones has also made similar, if not worse, statements online. It’s odd to me that people would not act more in their own interest and keep such thoughts to themselves. In Ms. Jones’ case, it appears she has lost some endorsement deals.[/quote]
Pretty awful stuff from Ms. Jones.
It's like some weird sort of self-aggrandizement. They must know that they're going to burn every bridge they have and yet decide to go down in flames as if it's a badge of honor. I guess. I'm not really sure. :shuffle:
Pretty awful stuff from Ms. Jones.
It's like some weird sort of self-aggrandizement. They must know that they're going to burn every bridge they have and yet decide to go down in flames as if it's a badge of honor. I guess. I'm not really sure. :shuffle:
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]Simply because I disagree. I also don't think they should be given infinite chances. If they don't learn by the first time then yes, something like this should happen.[/quote]
I think we can be sure that our middle-aged, trombone-playing bigot had unleashed her vitriol elsewhere. The career-ending episode wasn't the first time and it probably won't be the last. Good riddance.
At any rate, she made the NY Daily News:
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.nydailynews.com/news/nation ... story.html">https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-austin-symphony-trombone-player-fired-20200603-iyybhlcy6vb4pcrgqkpntdrxhy-story.html</LINK_TEXT>
That's the big time in my neighborhood. :?
I think we can be sure that our middle-aged, trombone-playing bigot had unleashed her vitriol elsewhere. The career-ending episode wasn't the first time and it probably won't be the last. Good riddance.
At any rate, she made the NY Daily News:
<LINK_TEXT text="https://www.nydailynews.com/news/nation ... story.html">https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-austin-symphony-trombone-player-fired-20200603-iyybhlcy6vb4pcrgqkpntdrxhy-story.html</LINK_TEXT>
That's the big time in my neighborhood. :?
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]Simply because I disagree. I also don't think they should be given infinite chances. If they don't learn by the first time then yes, something like this should happen.[/quote]
You are inventing hypotheticals to lessen the impact of what really happened. Are we taking for granted that this WAS the first time something like this happened? Some of the comments over on Slippedisc seem to suggest otherwise.
In a world of hypotheticals, it is possible to justify any course of action. At this point we've discussed this so much that I'm forced to conclude that you're simply refusing to confront reality. Sometimes giving people the benefit of the doubt can be a positive thing- here, it is positively stupid.
You are inventing hypotheticals to lessen the impact of what really happened. Are we taking for granted that this WAS the first time something like this happened? Some of the comments over on Slippedisc seem to suggest otherwise.
In a world of hypotheticals, it is possible to justify any course of action. At this point we've discussed this so much that I'm forced to conclude that you're simply refusing to confront reality. Sometimes giving people the benefit of the doubt can be a positive thing- here, it is positively stupid.
- jthomas105
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Apr 08, 2018
Let's give this some more perspective, the person's Facebook page she posted this on is a Black/African-American band director in the Austin area. How do you think he felt having this person raving like this on his page? She knew who he was when she started this. Someone tried to get to back off and she continued. It wasn't something she started on her page or another person's page that she was having a dialogue with. She started this on black man's Facebook page. That made it not just racist, but personal to Mr. Wilson. She knew what she was doing and who she was saying it to. If she is willing to do this to an adult educator, how do we know how she might treat a minority student she might come in contact with? Even worse she would be in the position to spread these types of toxic thoughts to the minds of impressionable young students. That's why not only was she dismissed from the symphony and opera but has been removed from her position as an approved free-lance trombone instructor in the schools she has taught in. She will never teach in another school in Texas. Does this person deserve a second chance? No. She is not a young person with a developing mind and character. She is a 30-something adult that is who she is and let people know her thoughts and beliefs.
How about some more perspective from my pov? I have a couple dog’s in this hunt. I live in Texas where this took place and I am a band/music teacher in Texas. I am a white guy, like most of you. How many of you fear how your kid's or you may be treated if stopped/approached by cops or people like the Cooper woman in NYC? We all worry about our teenage and young adult children when they are out on their own. You don't worry like I do though. My kids are black. They are adopted from ages 13 months, 11 weeks and 13 months. I have had the talk with my kids that every black parent has with their kids. Yes, I know white parents have the talk too, but is not the same. Driving and walking while black is a thing.
My oldest son has told me about white people where he went to college sending their dogs after him when was walking through a neighborhood to get to a rec center to work out unless he was with white friends.
He was given a piece of crap citation in high school by the school resource officer. You should have seen the officer's reaction when I met them in the parking lot of his school to discuss the issue. His eyes got big and he stammered a moment that "oh, I didn't know you are his dad". See, I taught at another school in the district where he was usually was on duty but had been called to the high school because the regular officer had an appointment. I know by his reaction that had he known that I was his dad or that he had been white he would not have written the citation. What he did was wrong but if it had been a white kid it would have been dealt with differently.
How about the time not long after our first son came to us that my wife went into a boutique type store with our son to shop that she had been to many times and the clerk refused to take a check for the purchase. I got home and my wife told me about it, I went to the store to get the items. When I went to pay, I pulled out my checkbook and the lady was ready to accept it. Then I questioned her about why she wouldn't take from my wife when she was in with my son. She didn't have an answer. We know why though, racism, "I can't sell to this white (insert derogatory term) that has some black man's baby with her. She can't be trusted. Her check is no good. She's no good because she's with a black man." Any or all of those thoughts went through that woman's mind.
I am a teacher, I tell my students all the time, "Just because you think it doesn't mean you have to say it." I also tell them, “you don't have to like everyone, but you do have to get along"
The events of the last week have made me angry, disgusted and sad. This is the first place I have responded or said anything about any of these events. I am angry and disgusted at our leaders that place the blame anywhere but with themselves. I am sad for our children, all of them, because left to their own devices without input from the adults around them they would get along just fine.
I’m sorry this is so long. It’s really been difficult to put my thoughts together and wrap my head around all that has happened in the week and a half. I still don’t think I have done a very good job of it but I had to try.
How about some more perspective from my pov? I have a couple dog’s in this hunt. I live in Texas where this took place and I am a band/music teacher in Texas. I am a white guy, like most of you. How many of you fear how your kid's or you may be treated if stopped/approached by cops or people like the Cooper woman in NYC? We all worry about our teenage and young adult children when they are out on their own. You don't worry like I do though. My kids are black. They are adopted from ages 13 months, 11 weeks and 13 months. I have had the talk with my kids that every black parent has with their kids. Yes, I know white parents have the talk too, but is not the same. Driving and walking while black is a thing.
My oldest son has told me about white people where he went to college sending their dogs after him when was walking through a neighborhood to get to a rec center to work out unless he was with white friends.
He was given a piece of crap citation in high school by the school resource officer. You should have seen the officer's reaction when I met them in the parking lot of his school to discuss the issue. His eyes got big and he stammered a moment that "oh, I didn't know you are his dad". See, I taught at another school in the district where he was usually was on duty but had been called to the high school because the regular officer had an appointment. I know by his reaction that had he known that I was his dad or that he had been white he would not have written the citation. What he did was wrong but if it had been a white kid it would have been dealt with differently.
How about the time not long after our first son came to us that my wife went into a boutique type store with our son to shop that she had been to many times and the clerk refused to take a check for the purchase. I got home and my wife told me about it, I went to the store to get the items. When I went to pay, I pulled out my checkbook and the lady was ready to accept it. Then I questioned her about why she wouldn't take from my wife when she was in with my son. She didn't have an answer. We know why though, racism, "I can't sell to this white (insert derogatory term) that has some black man's baby with her. She can't be trusted. Her check is no good. She's no good because she's with a black man." Any or all of those thoughts went through that woman's mind.
I am a teacher, I tell my students all the time, "Just because you think it doesn't mean you have to say it." I also tell them, “you don't have to like everyone, but you do have to get along"
The events of the last week have made me angry, disgusted and sad. This is the first place I have responded or said anything about any of these events. I am angry and disgusted at our leaders that place the blame anywhere but with themselves. I am sad for our children, all of them, because left to their own devices without input from the adults around them they would get along just fine.
I’m sorry this is so long. It’s really been difficult to put my thoughts together and wrap my head around all that has happened in the week and a half. I still don’t think I have done a very good job of it but I had to try.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="jthomas105"]I still don’t think I have done a very good job of it but I had to try.[/quote]
I think you did a great job. Your kids and students are lucky to have you.
I think you did a great job. Your kids and students are lucky to have you.
- paulyg
- Posts: 689
- Joined: May 17, 2018
Thank you for sharing. It helps to put this in perspective for the ignorant people here.
- CalgaryTbone
- Posts: 1460
- Joined: May 10, 2018
:good: :good: [quote="jthomas105"]Let's give this some more perspective, the person's Facebook page she posted this on is a Black/African-American band director in the Austin area. How do you think he felt having this person raving like this on his page? She knew who he was when she started this. Someone tried to get to back off and she continued. It wasn't something she started on her page or another person's page that she was having a dialogue with. She started this on black man's Facebook page. That made it not just racist, but personal to Mr. Wilson. She knew what she was doing and who she was saying it to. If she is willing to do this to an adult educator, how do we know how she might treat a minority student she might come in contact with? Even worse she would be in the position to spread these types of toxic thoughts to the minds of impressionable young students. That's why not only was she dismissed from the symphony and opera but has been removed from her position as an approved free-lance trombone instructor in the schools she has taught in. She will never teach in another school in Texas. Does this person deserve a second chance? No. She is not a young person with a developing mind and character. She is a 30-something adult that is who she is and let people know her thoughts and beliefs.
How about some more perspective from my pov? I have a couple dog’s in this hunt. I live in Texas where this took place and I am a band/music teacher in Texas. I am a white guy, like most of you. How many of you fear how your kid's or you may be treated if stopped/approached by cops or people like the Cooper woman in NYC? We all worry about our teenage and young adult children when they are out on their own. You don't worry like I do though. My kids are black. They are adopted from ages 13 months, 11 weeks and 13 months. I have had the talk with my kids that every black parent has with their kids. Yes, I know white parents have the talk too, but is not the same. Driving and walking while black is a thing.
My oldest son has told me about white people where he went to college sending their dogs after him when was walking through a neighborhood to get to a rec center to work out unless he was with white friends.
He was given a piece of crap citation in high school by the school resource officer. You should have seen the officer's reaction when I met them in the parking lot of his school to discuss the issue. His eyes got big and he stammered a moment that "oh, I didn't know you are his dad". See, I taught at another school in the district where he was usually was on duty but had been called to the high school because the regular officer had an appointment. I know by his reaction that had he known that I was his dad or that he had been white he would not have written the citation. What he did was wrong but if it had been a white kid it would have been dealt with differently.
How about the time not long after our first son came to us that my wife went into a boutique type store with our son to shop that she had been to many times and the clerk refused to take a check for the purchase. I got home and my wife told me about it, I went to the store to get the items. When I went to pay, I pulled out my checkbook and the lady was ready to accept it. Then I questioned her about why she wouldn't take from my wife when she was in with my son. She didn't have an answer. We know why though, racism, "I can't sell to this white (insert derogatory term) that has some black man's baby with her. She can't be trusted. Her check is no good. She's no good because she's with a black man." Any or all of those thoughts went through that woman's mind.
I am a teacher, I tell my students all the time, "Just because you think it doesn't mean you have to say it." I also tell them, “you don't have to like everyone, but you do have to get along"
The events of the last week have made me angry, disgusted and sad. This is the first place I have responded or said anything about any of these events. I am angry and disgusted at our leaders that place the blame anywhere but with themselves. I am sad for our children, all of them, because left to their own devices without input from the adults around them they would get along just fine.
I’m sorry this is so long. It’s really been difficult to put my thoughts together and wrap my head around all that has happened in the week and a half. I still don’t think I have done a very good job of it but I had to try.[/quote]
:good: :good: :good:
Thank you!
How about some more perspective from my pov? I have a couple dog’s in this hunt. I live in Texas where this took place and I am a band/music teacher in Texas. I am a white guy, like most of you. How many of you fear how your kid's or you may be treated if stopped/approached by cops or people like the Cooper woman in NYC? We all worry about our teenage and young adult children when they are out on their own. You don't worry like I do though. My kids are black. They are adopted from ages 13 months, 11 weeks and 13 months. I have had the talk with my kids that every black parent has with their kids. Yes, I know white parents have the talk too, but is not the same. Driving and walking while black is a thing.
My oldest son has told me about white people where he went to college sending their dogs after him when was walking through a neighborhood to get to a rec center to work out unless he was with white friends.
He was given a piece of crap citation in high school by the school resource officer. You should have seen the officer's reaction when I met them in the parking lot of his school to discuss the issue. His eyes got big and he stammered a moment that "oh, I didn't know you are his dad". See, I taught at another school in the district where he was usually was on duty but had been called to the high school because the regular officer had an appointment. I know by his reaction that had he known that I was his dad or that he had been white he would not have written the citation. What he did was wrong but if it had been a white kid it would have been dealt with differently.
How about the time not long after our first son came to us that my wife went into a boutique type store with our son to shop that she had been to many times and the clerk refused to take a check for the purchase. I got home and my wife told me about it, I went to the store to get the items. When I went to pay, I pulled out my checkbook and the lady was ready to accept it. Then I questioned her about why she wouldn't take from my wife when she was in with my son. She didn't have an answer. We know why though, racism, "I can't sell to this white (insert derogatory term) that has some black man's baby with her. She can't be trusted. Her check is no good. She's no good because she's with a black man." Any or all of those thoughts went through that woman's mind.
I am a teacher, I tell my students all the time, "Just because you think it doesn't mean you have to say it." I also tell them, “you don't have to like everyone, but you do have to get along"
The events of the last week have made me angry, disgusted and sad. This is the first place I have responded or said anything about any of these events. I am angry and disgusted at our leaders that place the blame anywhere but with themselves. I am sad for our children, all of them, because left to their own devices without input from the adults around them they would get along just fine.
I’m sorry this is so long. It’s really been difficult to put my thoughts together and wrap my head around all that has happened in the week and a half. I still don’t think I have done a very good job of it but I had to try.[/quote]
:good: :good: :good:
Thank you!
- brtnats
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Apr 26, 2018
TLDR....sorry if this popped up after page 3.
Some of you guys are missing the forest for the trees.
1. There’s no “due process” for anything other than legal proceedings. If the union was on board with this, then everybody who matters got a voice. And yes, I’m saying the individual in question did *not* matter. She used her voice already.
2. There is no way this orchestra is financially solvent at the moment. The pandemic, that we are still very much in, has killed their ticket sales. They *cannot* risk the future of the whole organization by sheltering an avowed racist in their ranks.
3. It’s not one comment. Read the transcripts. It’s a bunch of racist claptrap spewed with the perception of immunity. If you’re willing to say those things, out loud in public on Twitter, then you’re saying worse in private. Go back to point #2 if you have any question why this happened so fast.
4. Redemption is a choice. She’s got to make it now. If I did anything that publicly threatened the reputation and solvency of my workplace, and I did it numerous time, I’d be terminated without hesitation. I’m betting you would too.
Some of you guys are missing the forest for the trees.
1. There’s no “due process” for anything other than legal proceedings. If the union was on board with this, then everybody who matters got a voice. And yes, I’m saying the individual in question did *not* matter. She used her voice already.
2. There is no way this orchestra is financially solvent at the moment. The pandemic, that we are still very much in, has killed their ticket sales. They *cannot* risk the future of the whole organization by sheltering an avowed racist in their ranks.
3. It’s not one comment. Read the transcripts. It’s a bunch of racist claptrap spewed with the perception of immunity. If you’re willing to say those things, out loud in public on Twitter, then you’re saying worse in private. Go back to point #2 if you have any question why this happened so fast.
4. Redemption is a choice. She’s got to make it now. If I did anything that publicly threatened the reputation and solvency of my workplace, and I did it numerous time, I’d be terminated without hesitation. I’m betting you would too.
- brtnats
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Apr 26, 2018
[quote="jthomas105"]I am a teacher, I tell my students all the time, "Just because you think it doesn't mean you have to say it." I also tell them, “you don't have to like everyone, but you do have to get along"
[/quote]
Absolutely nailed it. Privilege protects racism. Having a racist thought does not mean you must engage in a racist act. There is a moment of choice where you either commit the act, or you challenge the thought.
We don’t have room for people that refuse to challenge the thought.
[/quote]
Absolutely nailed it. Privilege protects racism. Having a racist thought does not mean you must engage in a racist act. There is a moment of choice where you either commit the act, or you challenge the thought.
We don’t have room for people that refuse to challenge the thought.
- brtnats
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Apr 26, 2018
[quote="harrisonreed"]I don't think second chances ever apply to racism or sexual harassment.... At least not so immediately after the infraction.
[/quote]
BOOM. Another winner.
Employers CANNOT TAKE THE CHANCE on employees who commit racial or sexual violations of their TOE. Just, full stop. You two guys arguing that she needs a less severe consequence have clearly never sat on the other side of an HR desk. If an employee demonstrates that they are a danger to their colleagues, you, as the employer, have a responsibility to terminate that employee. As mentioned earlier, employers owe you two things: A paycheck and safe working conditions. You cannot have safe working conditions by protecting racists or sexual predators. There is nothing the employer can do do remedy that situation short of termination, because if anything further happens, the employer is liable for creating unsafe working conditions.
You people need to stop on this second-chance stuff and get off your high horse. Some things, notably things that threaten other people, do not get second chances.
[/quote]
BOOM. Another winner.
Employers CANNOT TAKE THE CHANCE on employees who commit racial or sexual violations of their TOE. Just, full stop. You two guys arguing that she needs a less severe consequence have clearly never sat on the other side of an HR desk. If an employee demonstrates that they are a danger to their colleagues, you, as the employer, have a responsibility to terminate that employee. As mentioned earlier, employers owe you two things: A paycheck and safe working conditions. You cannot have safe working conditions by protecting racists or sexual predators. There is nothing the employer can do do remedy that situation short of termination, because if anything further happens, the employer is liable for creating unsafe working conditions.
You people need to stop on this second-chance stuff and get off your high horse. Some things, notably things that threaten other people, do not get second chances.
- ArbanRubank
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Feb 23, 2019
Exactly!
But we ought to at least give some credit to those on this thread who are trying to be sensitive. Trouble is, when someone tries to be sensitive to everyone, they often end up being ineffective. I had to deal with an HR person once who was - in my opinion - overly compassionate to the point where the "problem" employees were running the asylum.
For the well-being of society, not everyone should come out. Sometimes a person should stay in the closet b/c what they say and/or do is so consummately wrong and patently offensive as to derail society's progress.
There is a difference between someone, who maybe 20 years ago - said, did or wrote something that we now judge under a different social standard to have been very wrong, but has been a good boy or girl since then; vs a present, willfully active and vicious participant.
But we ought to at least give some credit to those on this thread who are trying to be sensitive. Trouble is, when someone tries to be sensitive to everyone, they often end up being ineffective. I had to deal with an HR person once who was - in my opinion - overly compassionate to the point where the "problem" employees were running the asylum.
For the well-being of society, not everyone should come out. Sometimes a person should stay in the closet b/c what they say and/or do is so consummately wrong and patently offensive as to derail society's progress.
There is a difference between someone, who maybe 20 years ago - said, did or wrote something that we now judge under a different social standard to have been very wrong, but has been a good boy or girl since then; vs a present, willfully active and vicious participant.
- VJOFan
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Apr 06, 2018
[quote="hyperbolica"]Wow. Accused. Tried. Convicted. Executed. By a mob. In an afternoon. Congratulations.
The mob mentality is exactly what we are reacting against, but we are doing it by perpetuating the mob mentality.
There has to be a better way than public lynchings. Haven't we learned anything from the mistakes of the past?[/quote]
I cant agree that the present protests are arguing against a “mob” mentality. They are protesting many specific acts of police violence and harassment over time that, taken together, are a pattern of behaviour of those with power against a specific group (POC but mostly black men) that don’t have power. That is not mob mentality; that is systemic racism. An organization (The Austin Symphony) pressed into action by public outrage is not the same as decades/centuries of unfair policing practices.
The fairness of the firing is a point that could be explored, but I don’t agree that it is in any way appropriate to equate the injustices presently being protested in the streets of the United States with an arguably too quick firing.
(In any case, this player is a member of the AFofM. In that case, she should then have avenues of appeal if she wishes. The union then will be obliged to mount a defence. Again not mob rule- the situation is possibly recoverable.)
The mob mentality is exactly what we are reacting against, but we are doing it by perpetuating the mob mentality.
There has to be a better way than public lynchings. Haven't we learned anything from the mistakes of the past?[/quote]
I cant agree that the present protests are arguing against a “mob” mentality. They are protesting many specific acts of police violence and harassment over time that, taken together, are a pattern of behaviour of those with power against a specific group (POC but mostly black men) that don’t have power. That is not mob mentality; that is systemic racism. An organization (The Austin Symphony) pressed into action by public outrage is not the same as decades/centuries of unfair policing practices.
The fairness of the firing is a point that could be explored, but I don’t agree that it is in any way appropriate to equate the injustices presently being protested in the streets of the United States with an arguably too quick firing.
(In any case, this player is a member of the AFofM. In that case, she should then have avenues of appeal if she wishes. The union then will be obliged to mount a defence. Again not mob rule- the situation is possibly recoverable.)
- robcat2075
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Sep 03, 2018
I haven't followed trombone stuff much lately, I've barely skimmed the details, but this story sounds very interesting,
So... there's a female trombone player in the news? That's great to hear! The boys club was getting stale!
And.. she's not just a professional, she's a PRINCIPAL in a symphony orchestra? It's about time a woman got the chance to show what she would do in such a visible role.
I'm sure that after her many years of struggle against lies, stupidity and cowardice she will set an example for inclusiveness, fairness and equal opportunity. I can only imagine the insights her students will pick up from her!
And she's internet savvy? On Facebook even? She will show those stodgy fossils who run the classical music world a thing or two about how to leverage the reach of social media!
I won't comment on her obvious good looks because, of course, we should never judge someone by their appearance, but I have no doubt that the Austin Symphony will long remember the day they hired Brenda Sansig Salas!
EDIT: Oh. Whoops. Never mind.
So... there's a female trombone player in the news? That's great to hear! The boys club was getting stale!
And.. she's not just a professional, she's a PRINCIPAL in a symphony orchestra? It's about time a woman got the chance to show what she would do in such a visible role.
I'm sure that after her many years of struggle against lies, stupidity and cowardice she will set an example for inclusiveness, fairness and equal opportunity. I can only imagine the insights her students will pick up from her!
And she's internet savvy? On Facebook even? She will show those stodgy fossils who run the classical music world a thing or two about how to leverage the reach of social media!
I won't comment on her obvious good looks because, of course, we should never judge someone by their appearance, but I have no doubt that the Austin Symphony will long remember the day they hired Brenda Sansig Salas!
EDIT: Oh. Whoops. Never mind.
- Doug_Elliott
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
Best post of the day.
- timothy42b
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Mar 27, 2018
[quote="Doug Elliott"]Best post of the day.[/quote]
Yes, the only phrase he missed was "and then they said hold my beer."
Yes, the only phrase he missed was "and then they said hold my beer."
- JohnL
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="robcat2075"]...I have no doubt that the Austin Symphony will long remember the day they hired Brenda Sansig Salas![/quote]
They will absolutely remember it...
I suppose someone should ask if she had been posting stuff of this sort before they hired her. If so, someone didn't just drop the ball, they let it bounce into a tree chipper.
Checking a potential hire's social media should pretty much be mandatory - particularly for fields like education and law enforcement.
They will absolutely remember it...
I suppose someone should ask if she had been posting stuff of this sort before they hired her. If so, someone didn't just drop the ball, they let it bounce into a tree chipper.
Checking a potential hire's social media should pretty much be mandatory - particularly for fields like education and law enforcement.
- SwissTbone
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="JohnL"]
Checking a potential hire's social media should pretty much be mandatory - particularly for fields like education and law enforcement.[/quote]
Don't know how it is in the US. But doing that here in Switzerland would be absolutely illegal. I don't say it isn't done though...
Checking a potential hire's social media should pretty much be mandatory - particularly for fields like education and law enforcement.[/quote]
Don't know how it is in the US. But doing that here in Switzerland would be absolutely illegal. I don't say it isn't done though...
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
I can’t imagine hiring someone without looking at their social media accounts. The problem is, what do you do with what you find there?
- brtnats
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Apr 26, 2018
@Rob: Pretty much verbatim what my wife said last night. Great minds...
- sungfw
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Jul 17, 2018
[quote="SwissTbone"]<QUOTE author="JohnL" post_id="115771" time="1591455348" user_id="119">
Checking a potential hire's social media should pretty much be mandatory - particularly for fields like education and law enforcement.[/quote]
Don't know how it is in the US. But doing that here in Switzerland would be absolutely illegal. I don't say it isn't done though...
</QUOTE>
There is no federal legislation that[url=https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/can-employers-ask-passwords-my-social-media-accounts.html]prohibits employers or prospective employers from requiring employees or applicants from providing access to social media accounts.
While roughly half of the states have passed legislation that bans employers from requiring employees or applicants to provide their social media credentials, none of those statutes prohibit employees from searching for such accounts or viewing content posted publicly in them.
Checking a potential hire's social media should pretty much be mandatory - particularly for fields like education and law enforcement.[/quote]
Don't know how it is in the US. But doing that here in Switzerland would be absolutely illegal. I don't say it isn't done though...
</QUOTE>
There is no federal legislation that
While roughly half of the states have passed legislation that bans employers from requiring employees or applicants to provide their social media credentials, none of those statutes prohibit employees from searching for such accounts or viewing content posted publicly in them.
- JohnL
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="SwissTbone"]Don't know how it is in the US. But doing that here in Switzerland would be absolutely illegal. I don't say it isn't done though...[/quote]
They aren't allowed to look at a prospective employee's public posts?
They aren't allowed to look at a prospective employee's public posts?
- SwissTbone
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="JohnL"]<QUOTE author="SwissTbone" post_id="115774" time="1591458954" user_id="62">Don't know how it is in the US. But doing that here in Switzerland would be absolutely illegal. I don't say it isn't done though...[/quote]
They aren't allowed to look at a prospective employee's public posts?
</QUOTE>
There are exceptions where it probably would be allowed. But in theory, an employer that refuses to hire someone because of his writings on social media can be legally blamed.
They aren't allowed to look at a prospective employee's public posts?
</QUOTE>
There are exceptions where it probably would be allowed. But in theory, an employer that refuses to hire someone because of his writings on social media can be legally blamed.
- sungfw
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Jul 17, 2018
[quote="SwissTbone"]<QUOTE author="JohnL" post_id="115781" time="1591462108" user_id="119">
They aren't allowed to look at a prospective employee's public posts?[/quote]
There are exceptions where it probably would be allowed. But in theory, an employer that refuses to hire someone because of his writings on social media can be legally blamed.
</QUOTE>
That may be the case in Switzerland, but it's not in the US.
Employment in the US is, with a few exceptions (such as a clause in the employment contract stipulating that an employee can only be fired "for cause"),[url=https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/employment-at-will-definition-30022.html]at will," meaning that an employee may be fired at any time and for any reason or for no reason at all, provided that the reason for firing is not illegal, i.e., the grounds for firing is not discriminatory, as defined by the Civil Rights and Equal Employment Opportunity Acts.
Employers are not obligated to extend an offer to an applicant, even if they satisfy all the formal, stated qualifications for a position, again provided that the grounds for the refusal is likewise not illegal.
Social media screening, both during the application process and the course of employment, is a fact of life. As long as an employer does not use legally protected information (age, gender, color, race, religion, national origin, disability, sexual orientation) gleaned from social media to arrive at an employment decision, social media screening is not, in and of itself, a justicable issue. (There may be other justicable issues but those must be adjudicated case-by-case based on the specific circumstance giving rise to the complaint.)
They aren't allowed to look at a prospective employee's public posts?[/quote]
There are exceptions where it probably would be allowed. But in theory, an employer that refuses to hire someone because of his writings on social media can be legally blamed.
</QUOTE>
That may be the case in Switzerland, but it's not in the US.
Employment in the US is, with a few exceptions (such as a clause in the employment contract stipulating that an employee can only be fired "for cause"),
Employers are not obligated to extend an offer to an applicant, even if they satisfy all the formal, stated qualifications for a position, again provided that the grounds for the refusal is likewise not illegal.
Social media screening, both during the application process and the course of employment, is a fact of life. As long as an employer does not use legally protected information (age, gender, color, race, religion, national origin, disability, sexual orientation) gleaned from social media to arrive at an employment decision, social media screening is not, in and of itself, a justicable issue. (There may be other justicable issues but those must be adjudicated case-by-case based on the specific circumstance giving rise to the complaint.)
- timothy42b
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Mar 27, 2018
I make a lot of hiring decisions and have never looked at social media from a candidate, nor do I know any of my peers who do.
That may be a mistake. I'm sure it's technically against the rules, you are supposed to make judgments only from resumes, interviews, and references. But I don't know how anyone would know.
I think the reasons for not doing so at my work are two-fold: we're of an older generation that doesn't reach for social media as quickly ourselves, and most of us like me are strict about separating our own social media from anything work related. I never friend anyone connected with work (until after retirement) and most of my colleagues feel the same way. Then again, most of my colleagues are in my age bracket. And a good share of our job applicants seem to be close to our age bracket too for some unintended reasons.
That may be a mistake. I'm sure it's technically against the rules, you are supposed to make judgments only from resumes, interviews, and references. But I don't know how anyone would know.
I think the reasons for not doing so at my work are two-fold: we're of an older generation that doesn't reach for social media as quickly ourselves, and most of us like me are strict about separating our own social media from anything work related. I never friend anyone connected with work (until after retirement) and most of my colleagues feel the same way. Then again, most of my colleagues are in my age bracket. And a good share of our job applicants seem to be close to our age bracket too for some unintended reasons.
- ArbanRubank
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Feb 23, 2019
I don't think very many employers check references. I once faked an educational record (well past any statute of limitations now) for a single mom. She got hired for a position that she could do very well but wasn't technically qualified for on paper. They never checked to see if she actually had the "required" education. She worked out just fine for them.
I would look at social media if I was still in a position of hiring, but I wouldn't tell the applicant, especially if I ended up not hiring them for what I saw on their social media.
I told stories and outright lied to prospective employers during interviews to get jobs I wanted. After getting hired, I had one heck of a learning curve! But I always figured that during the hiring process, my selection was a function of HR. After getting hired, my keeping the job was a function of operations. I bet on the fact that the two disciplines never shook hands much.
Anyway, point is - it's a big game! The trick is to ether have the hand to play or bluff it and it's up to the employer to play the roll of the house. When I got to be the house, I kinda knew the game, so I tried to stack the deck as much as I could and only let the "cream of the crop" though. If someone got through the process far enough to interview with me, I based hiring them on whether I liked them, b/c I knew everything else had already been checked and double-checked (vetted, by today's word).
OBTW, there was a certain code among employers in my area. If someone called me to ask about a present employee of whom I actually would have liked getting rid of, I didn't give them a glowing recommendation just to hopefully get rid of them. That would have violated the code. But if asked if I would hire them again, the code wording was, "It depends upon the availability of other candidates". We all knew what that meant.
If an employer doesn't use every means possible to "vet" a prospective employee, then they pretty much deserve whatever bad thing might subsequently happen.
I would look at social media if I was still in a position of hiring, but I wouldn't tell the applicant, especially if I ended up not hiring them for what I saw on their social media.
I told stories and outright lied to prospective employers during interviews to get jobs I wanted. After getting hired, I had one heck of a learning curve! But I always figured that during the hiring process, my selection was a function of HR. After getting hired, my keeping the job was a function of operations. I bet on the fact that the two disciplines never shook hands much.
Anyway, point is - it's a big game! The trick is to ether have the hand to play or bluff it and it's up to the employer to play the roll of the house. When I got to be the house, I kinda knew the game, so I tried to stack the deck as much as I could and only let the "cream of the crop" though. If someone got through the process far enough to interview with me, I based hiring them on whether I liked them, b/c I knew everything else had already been checked and double-checked (vetted, by today's word).
OBTW, there was a certain code among employers in my area. If someone called me to ask about a present employee of whom I actually would have liked getting rid of, I didn't give them a glowing recommendation just to hopefully get rid of them. That would have violated the code. But if asked if I would hire them again, the code wording was, "It depends upon the availability of other candidates". We all knew what that meant.
If an employer doesn't use every means possible to "vet" a prospective employee, then they pretty much deserve whatever bad thing might subsequently happen.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
In independent K-12 education (mostly without unions or tenure), schools commonly give better than deserved recommendations to teachers whose contracts have not been renewed. Ineffective teachers circulate among schools for years. Administrators too.
- Gary
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Jan 11, 2019
[quote="mwpfoot"]What about due process?! This orchestra appears to be following it.[/quote]
Do you consider summarily firing someone preceding any hearing or any other legal defense, due process? Guilty until proven innocent?
Do you consider summarily firing someone preceding any hearing or any other legal defense, due process? Guilty until proven innocent?
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
"Once alerted, we were appalled by the comments as they are clearly not reflective of who we are as an organization. We began to work quickly and closely with the American Federation of Musicians, our Orchestra Committee, staff and other key members. At this time we can state that the musician is no longer employed by the ASO for there is no place for hate within our organization."
It may have been an open and shut case. Or the orchestra made the call, the musician will hire an attorney and it's not over. We don't know which terms of the contract may have been violated. There's a lot we don't know.
It may have been an open and shut case. Or the orchestra made the call, the musician will hire an attorney and it's not over. We don't know which terms of the contract may have been violated. There's a lot we don't know.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
[quote="Gary"]<QUOTE author="mwpfoot" post_id="115300" time="1591142936" user_id="142">What about due process?! This orchestra appears to be following it.[/quote]
Do you consider summarily firing someone preceding any hearing or any other legal defense, due process? Guilty until proven innocent?
</QUOTE>
In At Will employment there is no formal process for terminating somebody. The Boss just says "You're fired" and you can collect your personal things in a box and go out the door. Sometimes there is a method using bad performance reviews, but that takes time and given the precipitous nature of the offense there might not have been time to establish a formal correction.
Cases like these can be litigated if the person fired feels that it was unjust. The AFM will also intervene in cases of unjustified separation. I don't think the AFM felt that this one deserved intervention.
Do you consider summarily firing someone preceding any hearing or any other legal defense, due process? Guilty until proven innocent?
</QUOTE>
In At Will employment there is no formal process for terminating somebody. The Boss just says "You're fired" and you can collect your personal things in a box and go out the door. Sometimes there is a method using bad performance reviews, but that takes time and given the precipitous nature of the offense there might not have been time to establish a formal correction.
Cases like these can be litigated if the person fired feels that it was unjust. The AFM will also intervene in cases of unjustified separation. I don't think the AFM felt that this one deserved intervention.
- ArbanRubank
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Feb 23, 2019
There will be due process. Management tends to win more court cases than unions do b/c management can pick their battles. If an employee is a part of a union, then the union has the obligation to their whole membership to fight the good fight, whether they know they have a good case or not.
- sungfw
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Jul 17, 2018
[quote="Gary"]Do you consider summarily firing someone preceding any hearing or any other legal defense, due process? Guilty until proven innocent?[/quote]
Have you bothered Googling[url=https://theviolinchannel.com/austin-symphony-orchestra-trombonist-brenda-sansig-salas-fired-racist-comments/]screenshots of Ms Salas' posts? [NB: posts, plural, not singular.]
Quite apart from the fact that the presumption of innocence is a principle of criminal jurisprudence, and therefore not applicable to the current case, Ms Salas has neither denied posting those statements or proffered any sort of extenuating explanation (my account was hacked, I was drunk/high/OD'ed on prescription meds, etc.) for the posts originating from her Facebook account under her name, and has deleted her Facebook account, i.e., attempting to destroy the evidence: actions which disintereted {NB: free from selfish motive or interest, unbiased] observers might reasonably construe as a tacit admission of guilt.
Furthermore, as the announcement on the[url=https://www.facebook.com/pg/austinsymphonyorchestra/posts/?ref=page_internal]ASO Facebook Page makes clear, she was not fired summarily or precipitately:
Given that employers have a positive LEGAL duty to create and maintain a healthy workplace environment. Given Salas' history of racially charged rants, and given that a least six, and as many as eleven, ASO musicians are "BLACK" [Salas' term], "1/2 black" [Salas' term], Hispanic, or Asian, her continued employment by the ASO would unquestionably contribute to a hostile workplace environment.
Have you bothered Googling
Quite apart from the fact that the presumption of innocence is a principle of criminal jurisprudence, and therefore not applicable to the current case, Ms Salas has neither denied posting those statements or proffered any sort of extenuating explanation (my account was hacked, I was drunk/high/OD'ed on prescription meds, etc.) for the posts originating from her Facebook account under her name, and has deleted her Facebook account, i.e., attempting to destroy the evidence: actions which disintereted {NB: free from selfish motive or interest, unbiased] observers might reasonably construe as a tacit admission of guilt.
Furthermore, as the announcement on the
We would like to thank the community and let you know that your voice was heard. Once alerted, we were appalled by the comments as they are clearly not reflective of who we are as an organization. We began to work quickly and closely with the American Federation of Musicians, our orchestra committee, staff and other key members. At this time we can state that the musician is no longer employed by the ASO for there is no place for hate within our organization. At this time we can state that the musician is no longer employed by the ASO for there is no place for hate within our organization. Thank you for your patience while we navigated through the necessary channels.
Given that employers have a positive LEGAL duty to create and maintain a healthy workplace environment. Given Salas' history of racially charged rants, and given that a least six, and as many as eleven, ASO musicians are "BLACK" [Salas' term], "1/2 black" [Salas' term], Hispanic, or Asian, her continued employment by the ASO would unquestionably contribute to a hostile workplace environment.
- timothy42b
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Mar 27, 2018
[quote="TimBrown"]I don't think very many employers check references. I once faked an educational record (well past any statute of limitations now) for a single mom. She got hired for a position that she could do very well but wasn't technically qualified for on paper. They never checked to see if she actually had the "required" education. She worked out just fine for them.
[/quote]
Long ago and far away, I worked for a large state hospital.
The medical director of the whole place by all accounts was a good administrator and manager and did a good job, as he had done at a couple of previous stepping stone hospital positions.
Then one day he committed a crime, and they ran his prints. Surprise, that wasn't his name. He'd flunked out of college, never went to med school (think of the debt he avoided!), but used his roommate's name to get jobs. And he'd apparently been quite good at his work.
They terminated him and removed his portrait from the executive conference room.
[/quote]
Long ago and far away, I worked for a large state hospital.
The medical director of the whole place by all accounts was a good administrator and manager and did a good job, as he had done at a couple of previous stepping stone hospital positions.
Then one day he committed a crime, and they ran his prints. Surprise, that wasn't his name. He'd flunked out of college, never went to med school (think of the debt he avoided!), but used his roommate's name to get jobs. And he'd apparently been quite good at his work.
They terminated him and removed his portrait from the executive conference room.
- ArbanRubank
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Feb 23, 2019
That's what happens in the cases we hear about. It makes we wonder how many aren't caught! And it goes to prove that once you get past HR, you're in - provided you keep your nose clean and not wave any red flags in front of law enforcement, or as is the case these days - in front of social media.
So, I wonder how many Principle trombone players have been in symphonies who are self-taught and how many trombone teachers there are who have no sheepskin. That's different. We are allowed to not have "official" creds in our field. It's a can-do field and those who can do are good, regardless of education. It's all about performance - and as we now know - BEHAVIOR!
So, I wonder how many Principle trombone players have been in symphonies who are self-taught and how many trombone teachers there are who have no sheepskin. That's different. We are allowed to not have "official" creds in our field. It's a can-do field and those who can do are good, regardless of education. It's all about performance - and as we now know - BEHAVIOR!
- Gary
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Jan 11, 2019
That she posted something abhorrent, but LEGAL, does not mean due process may be waived.
- Posaunus
- Posts: 5018
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="Gary"]That she posted something abhorrent, but LEGAL, does not mean due process may be waived.[/quote]
Gary,
This is not a criminal case, where "due process" would be required. The employee did nothing "illegal." As we all do, she has the legal right (within certain limitations) to speak and write freely.
This was not a prosecution; it was instead simply the dismissal, after thoughtful consideration, of an At Will employee whose behavior was detrimental to the organization. I expect the (now-former) employee has little recourse to protest from a legal standpoint.
What would you have done if you were part of the symphony management?
Gary,
This is not a criminal case, where "due process" would be required. The employee did nothing "illegal." As we all do, she has the legal right (within certain limitations) to speak and write freely.
This was not a prosecution; it was instead simply the dismissal, after thoughtful consideration, of an At Will employee whose behavior was detrimental to the organization. I expect the (now-former) employee has little recourse to protest from a legal standpoint.
What would you have done if you were part of the symphony management?
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
Due process is a criminal law issue governing the relationship between the individual and the state.
In an employment law scenario HR probably likes to bandy about terms like procedural fairness and natural justice. Reading between the lines, it sounds like Austin went some way down this path eg discussions with the AFoM.
In an employment law scenario HR probably likes to bandy about terms like procedural fairness and natural justice. Reading between the lines, it sounds like Austin went some way down this path eg discussions with the AFoM.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
I wonder how at-will employment co-exists (if it does) with a union contract. Since the ASO acted so quickly, apparently in consultation with the union, I'd be curious to learn about the termination process. Is it indeed final? Is it subject to future arbitration? Does the trombonist have any other recourse?
I know from public school experience that a union contract can outline procedures for handling a potential termination case, including arbitration. An attorney relative of mine served as an arbitrator between public schools and teachers or administrators and cases could take months.
I know from public school experience that a union contract can outline procedures for handling a potential termination case, including arbitration. An attorney relative of mine served as an arbitrator between public schools and teachers or administrators and cases could take months.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
During arbitration the person affected is no longer an employee. If the arbitration case is found in favor of the employee they are then rehired.
This is intended to prevent a fired employee from exacting further damage to the employer during the process.
This is intended to prevent a fired employee from exacting further damage to the employer during the process.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Systems must vary. In NYC, public school teachers accused of misconduct retain employment, continue to draw salaries and accrue pension benefits while a case is in progress. A lot has been written about reassignment centers, a.k.a. 'rubber rooms,' for teachers awaiting the outcome of arbitration.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
Rubber Rooms were created because teachers accused of child abuse have to be kept apart from children. It would probably behoove the NYC School System to lay them off pending resolution of the cases.
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="BGuttman"]Rubber Rooms were created because teachers accused of child abuse have to be kept apart from children. It would probably behoove the NYC School System to lay them off pending resolution of the cases.[/quote]
Agreed.
Agreed.
- brassmedic
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Dec 14, 2018
A symphony musician is normally a tenured position. Termination is typically only allowed for playing deficiencies, misconduct, or failure to meet minimum attendance requirements. It's possible they will have to pay her to get rid of her. I apologize if this was already discussed; it's a very long thread.
- CalgaryTbone
- Posts: 1460
- Joined: May 10, 2018
Most symphony contracts have a clause that allows for "firing for cause" - behaviour that is wildly anti-social, or dangerous in some way. If she had shouted these comments during a rehearsal or concert, that would have been the end. Likewise, posting them on social media fits that definition, at least as far as her employer is concerned. This is N. America, so I would guess that she will find a lawyer, and this will be challenged in court. I doubt she'll win (who knows?) but she may get a severance payment, just to make the matter go away. In the contracts that I'm aware of, there is much more likely to be some sort of a payment attached to a dismissal for playing deficiencies than for "cause".
In an earlier post someone referred to her as a Principle Trombone - she was actually a Principal Trombone, but ironically was fired for her lack of principles.
Jim Scott
In an earlier post someone referred to her as a Principle Trombone - she was actually a Principal Trombone, but ironically was fired for her lack of principles.
Jim Scott
- brassmedic
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Dec 14, 2018
[quote="CalgaryTbone"]Most symphony contracts have a clause that allows for "firing for cause" - behaviour that is wildly anti-social, or dangerous in some way.[/quote]
I'm not sure that's true. Maybe Austin Symphony does, maybe they don't. Here's an example of language from an orchestra CBA:
The only causes for non-renewal of tenured members of the orchestra shall be: (1) two or more unexcused absences from Services in any one season; (2) two or more instances of tardiness (including tardiness following Intermission Time)without reasonable cause; (3) continued severe breaches of professional decorum after a Musician has received a warning; (4) persistent and marked inability to continue to maintain the artistic standards
There is nothing about "anti-social behavior". If the language is similar to this, there could be a dispute as to whether posting on social media in your spare time is a breach of professional decorum, and it doesn't appear that any written warning was issued. Their CBA might be different; I'm just speculating here. I think what frequently happens is that some sort of monetary settlement is reached to avoid a legal battle. I support what the Austin Symphony did and even if they do have to pay out it is worth it to take a stand against racism.
I'm not sure that's true. Maybe Austin Symphony does, maybe they don't. Here's an example of language from an orchestra CBA:
The only causes for non-renewal of tenured members of the orchestra shall be: (1) two or more unexcused absences from Services in any one season; (2) two or more instances of tardiness (including tardiness following Intermission Time)without reasonable cause; (3) continued severe breaches of professional decorum after a Musician has received a warning; (4) persistent and marked inability to continue to maintain the artistic standards
There is nothing about "anti-social behavior". If the language is similar to this, there could be a dispute as to whether posting on social media in your spare time is a breach of professional decorum, and it doesn't appear that any written warning was issued. Their CBA might be different; I'm just speculating here. I think what frequently happens is that some sort of monetary settlement is reached to avoid a legal battle. I support what the Austin Symphony did and even if they do have to pay out it is worth it to take a stand against racism.
- Bach5G
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Apr 07, 2018
You can almost always fire someone for “cause” but what might constitute “cause” could be difficult to pin down. Austin might very well be writing Ms B a cheque.
An argument might be: I’ve been exercising my first amendment rights on social media for years. You knew or ought to have known I was a racist when you hired me.
An argument might be: I’ve been exercising my first amendment rights on social media for years. You knew or ought to have known I was a racist when you hired me.
- brassmedic
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Dec 14, 2018
[quote="Bach5G"]You can almost always fire someone for “cause” but what might constitute “cause” could be difficult to pin down. Austin might very well be writing Ms B a cheque.
An argument might be: I’ve been exercising my first amendment rights on social media for years. You knew or ought to have known I was a racist when you hired me.[/quote]
Yep. Or might not even need such an erudite defense. It could be as simple as, "You didn't follow the specified procedure in the CBA that is required to terminate someone", like warning letters by certified mail, hearings, or whatever. Procedures are usually pretty specific in CBAs.
An argument might be: I’ve been exercising my first amendment rights on social media for years. You knew or ought to have known I was a racist when you hired me.[/quote]
Yep. Or might not even need such an erudite defense. It could be as simple as, "You didn't follow the specified procedure in the CBA that is required to terminate someone", like warning letters by certified mail, hearings, or whatever. Procedures are usually pretty specific in CBAs.
- Gary
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Jan 11, 2019
[quote="Posaunus"]What would you have done if you were part of the symphony management?[/quote]
I would put her on administrative leave until a thorough investigation is completed.
I would put her on administrative leave until a thorough investigation is completed.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
My wife, who works in orchestra management, says that they wouldn't release a statement saying she was let go at all unless they had consulted the union first. The union is always the first call when dealing with terminations or changes to employment anyway.
- CalgaryTbone
- Posts: 1460
- Joined: May 10, 2018
[quote="Bach5G"]You can almost always fire someone for “cause” but what might constitute “cause” could be difficult to pin down. Austin might very well be writing Ms B a cheque.
An argument might be: I’ve been exercising my first amendment rights on social media for years. You knew or ought to have known I was a racist when you hired me.[/quote]
Yes, I didn't mean to imply that contractual language for "firing for cause" would have specific examples - the words I used in my previous post were mine and not from any specific contract. I know that my orchestra's contract has a clause on this topic that is not all that specific. I'm pretty sure that would be the case most of the time - nothing to gain from trying to describe specifically what behaviour is unacceptable.
I've negotiated several contracts, and am familiar (or at least was familiar) with some other contracts from the preparation work that's involved in negotiating. I will say, however, that this particular kind of clause has never come up in any negotiations that I've been involved in - it's just a given.
It is quite possible that there was a payout involved in her termination, or that there will be if there's a lawsuit. Very often a settlement that avoids court is the best decision for all concerned. Some posts have mentioned the union's role in this, but in addition to representing the player involved, they also represent all of her colleagues - many who could feel injured by her words. The union's role in these matters is one that involves some careful balancing of the needs/rights of many people.
Jim Scott
An argument might be: I’ve been exercising my first amendment rights on social media for years. You knew or ought to have known I was a racist when you hired me.[/quote]
Yes, I didn't mean to imply that contractual language for "firing for cause" would have specific examples - the words I used in my previous post were mine and not from any specific contract. I know that my orchestra's contract has a clause on this topic that is not all that specific. I'm pretty sure that would be the case most of the time - nothing to gain from trying to describe specifically what behaviour is unacceptable.
I've negotiated several contracts, and am familiar (or at least was familiar) with some other contracts from the preparation work that's involved in negotiating. I will say, however, that this particular kind of clause has never come up in any negotiations that I've been involved in - it's just a given.
It is quite possible that there was a payout involved in her termination, or that there will be if there's a lawsuit. Very often a settlement that avoids court is the best decision for all concerned. Some posts have mentioned the union's role in this, but in addition to representing the player involved, they also represent all of her colleagues - many who could feel injured by her words. The union's role in these matters is one that involves some careful balancing of the needs/rights of many people.
Jim Scott
- brassmedic
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Dec 14, 2018
[quote="Gary"]<QUOTE author="Posaunus" post_id="115952" time="1591630734" user_id="158">What would you have done if you were part of the symphony management?[/quote]
I would put her on administrative leave until a thorough investigation is completed.
</QUOTE>
I don't think "administrative leave" is a thing in most orchestra CBAs. I think you are either a probational member, a tenured member, or you are terminated. You can take a leave, but I don't believe you can be PUT on leave. At least not in any CBA I've ever seen.
I would put her on administrative leave until a thorough investigation is completed.
</QUOTE>
I don't think "administrative leave" is a thing in most orchestra CBAs. I think you are either a probational member, a tenured member, or you are terminated. You can take a leave, but I don't believe you can be PUT on leave. At least not in any CBA I've ever seen.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
I guess it all boils down to be careful what you say.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]I guess it all boils down to be careful what you say.[/quote]
Also don't be racist, though. I'd rather people either out themselves or change their ways in that case.
Also don't be racist, though. I'd rather people either out themselves or change their ways in that case.
- Doug_Elliott
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
Have you actually known someone to "change their ways?" All I see is people digging in deeper.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="Doug Elliott"]Have you actually known someone to "change their ways?" All I see is people digging in deeper.[/quote]
It's the rosy view, for sure. Those that won't change? I'd rather they just say it, so we know who they are.
It's the rosy view, for sure. Those that won't change? I'd rather they just say it, so we know who they are.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Burgerbob"]<QUOTE author="Doug Elliott" post_id="116774" time="1592357517" user_id="51">
Have you actually known someone to "change their ways?" All I see is people digging in deeper.[/quote]
It's the rosy view, for sure. Those that won't change? I'd rather they just say it, so we know who they are.
</QUOTE>
People should allowed to have an opinion without being forced to admit it so you can shun them. And anyways, why does it matter if they don't talk about it?
I personally don't care if someone is racist. As long as it doesn't affect how they treat people and they don't harm
anybody because of it.
Have you actually known someone to "change their ways?" All I see is people digging in deeper.[/quote]
It's the rosy view, for sure. Those that won't change? I'd rather they just say it, so we know who they are.
</QUOTE>
People should allowed to have an opinion without being forced to admit it so you can shun them. And anyways, why does it matter if they don't talk about it?
I personally don't care if someone is racist. As long as it doesn't affect how they treat people and they don't harm
anybody because of it.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="116775" time="1592358476" user_id="3131">
It's the rosy view, for sure. Those that won't change? I'd rather they just say it, so we know who they are.[/quote]
People should allowed to have an opinion without being forced to admit it so you can shun them. And anyways, why does it matter if they don't talk about it?
I personally don't care <I><U>if someone is racist</U></I>. As long as <U><B> it doesn't affect how they treat people and they don't harm
anybody because of it</B></U>.
</QUOTE>
If someone is a racist, it affects how they treat people, and they do harm EVERYBODY because of it.
Otherwise they aren't a racist.
It's the rosy view, for sure. Those that won't change? I'd rather they just say it, so we know who they are.[/quote]
People should allowed to have an opinion without being forced to admit it so you can shun them. And anyways, why does it matter if they don't talk about it?
I personally don't care <I><U>if someone is racist</U></I>. As long as <U><B> it doesn't affect how they treat people and they don't harm
anybody because of it</B></U>.
</QUOTE>
If someone is a racist, it affects how they treat people, and they do harm EVERYBODY because of it.
Otherwise they aren't a racist.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
It is possible to be racist and not let it affect how you treat people. It just takes some effort. But regardless, limiting how people think is called facism and it's just as bad as racism and in my opinion, much worse.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]It is possible to be racist and not let it affect how you treat people. It just takes some effort. But regardless, limiting how people think is called facism and it's just as bad as racism and in my opinion, much worse.[/quote]
You're digging a deep hole man. I didn't advocate that anyone be limited on how they think. I'll put what I said a different way:
We know that asparagus is a very healthy vegetable. If someone truly hates it, even if they never tell anyone, how often they choose to eat it will be affected, and even if they try to eat it to be polite, it will be obvious that they don't like it and don't want to eat it to everyone at the table eating with them. They may even begin to question if they should be eating asparagus, too.
Luckily people are not vegetables. You can't say, that person looks like asparagus, so they must also taste like asparagus, too. But there are people who treat others like they are vegetables. Even when they are being polite. They're called closet racists.
You're digging a deep hole man. I didn't advocate that anyone be limited on how they think. I'll put what I said a different way:
We know that asparagus is a very healthy vegetable. If someone truly hates it, even if they never tell anyone, how often they choose to eat it will be affected, and even if they try to eat it to be polite, it will be obvious that they don't like it and don't want to eat it to everyone at the table eating with them. They may even begin to question if they should be eating asparagus, too.
Luckily people are not vegetables. You can't say, that person looks like asparagus, so they must also taste like asparagus, too. But there are people who treat others like they are vegetables. Even when they are being polite. They're called closet racists.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
So if you are polite then what's the problem. If a racist choses to minimilize interactions then it seems like a win win situation to me. They don't have to deal with a racist and the racist doesn't have to deal with people he doesn't like. Just like how I chose not to interact with specific people I don't like being around. I can still be polite and respectful. I just don't like them.
So if your point us that thoughts affect actions, then yes but it doesn't have to be in a bad way.
So if your point us that thoughts affect actions, then yes but it doesn't have to be in a bad way.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
And about the facism bit. I was more talking to burgerbob
Sorry I didn't make that clear.
Sorry I didn't make that clear.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
Again... This feels like a pretty hopelessly naive view of things. I applaud you for thinking positively, at least.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]So if you are polite then what's the problem. If a racist choses to minimilize interactions then it seems like a win win situation to me. They don't have to deal with a racist and the racist doesn't have to deal with people he doesn't like. Just like how I chose not to interact with specific people I don't like being around. I can still be polite and respectful. I just don't like them.
So if your point us that thoughts affect actions, then yes but it doesn't have to be in a bad way.[/quote]
And their children? And family? And friends? I'm not talking about individuals who are people you don't want to hang around with. I'm talking about dismissing or avoiding thousands of people for no legitimate reason
So if your point us that thoughts affect actions, then yes but it doesn't have to be in a bad way.[/quote]
And their children? And family? And friends? I'm not talking about individuals who are people you don't want to hang around with. I'm talking about dismissing or avoiding thousands of people for no legitimate reason
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="harrisonreed"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="116808" time="1592379476" user_id="3494">
So if you are polite then what's the problem. If a racist choses to minimilize interactions then it seems like a win win situation to me. They don't have to deal with a racist and the racist doesn't have to deal with people he doesn't like. Just like how I chose not to interact with specific people I don't like being around. I can still be polite and respectful. I just don't like them.
So if your point us that thoughts affect actions, then yes but it doesn't have to be in a bad way.[/quote]
And their children? And family? And friends? I'm not talking about individuals who are people you don't want to hang around with. I'm talking about dismissing or avoiding thousands of people for no legitimate reason
</QUOTE>
If that is what you have to do to avoid toxic interaction, then yes. Of course it's better to learn to work with different people even if you still think you're better than them. But again the best thing to do is not be racist but as long as it doesn't harm anyone, I'm happy.
So if you are polite then what's the problem. If a racist choses to minimilize interactions then it seems like a win win situation to me. They don't have to deal with a racist and the racist doesn't have to deal with people he doesn't like. Just like how I chose not to interact with specific people I don't like being around. I can still be polite and respectful. I just don't like them.
So if your point us that thoughts affect actions, then yes but it doesn't have to be in a bad way.[/quote]
And their children? And family? And friends? I'm not talking about individuals who are people you don't want to hang around with. I'm talking about dismissing or avoiding thousands of people for no legitimate reason
</QUOTE>
If that is what you have to do to avoid toxic interaction, then yes. Of course it's better to learn to work with different people even if you still think you're better than them. But again the best thing to do is not be racist but as long as it doesn't harm anyone, I'm happy.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
The point is you can be racist but not behave in a racist fashion. As long as you don't harm anybody then I see no problem. It really isn't that hard to do. In fact we do i all the time.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]The point is you can be racist but not behave in a racist fashion. As long as you don't harm anybody then I see no problem. It really isn't that hard to do. In fact we do i all the time.[/quote]
I'm sorry for you that you think that that is actually possible.
I'm sorry for you that you think that that is actually possible.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="harrisonreed"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="116814" time="1592385549" user_id="3494">
The point is you can be racist but not behave in a racist fashion. As long as you don't harm anybody then I see no problem. It really isn't that hard to do. In fact we do i all the time.[/quote]
I'm sorry for you that you think that that is actually possible.
</QUOTE>
Oc course you can't rid all racism from all of your actions but again, everybody has biases.
The point is you can be racist but not behave in a racist fashion. As long as you don't harm anybody then I see no problem. It really isn't that hard to do. In fact we do i all the time.[/quote]
I'm sorry for you that you think that that is actually possible.
</QUOTE>
Oc course you can't rid all racism from all of your actions but again, everybody has biases.
- Mv2541
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mar 29, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]People should allowed to have an opinion without being forced to admit it so you can shun them. And anyways, why does it matter if they don't talk about it?
I personally don't care if someone is racist. As long as it doesn't affect how they treat people and they don't harm
anybody because of it.[/quote]
You're clearly not interested in (the collective) our fight. A lot of us here in this thread are pushing towards an end to prejudice and a world where everyone can feel equal. Fundamentally speaking, how can some people feel equal knowing there are those who view them as lesser? Even if they do not 'harm people' physically, it can cause them emotional, economic, and social harm.
Stating you do not care if someone is racist means you are okay with the continued existence of a racist subpopulation. You also mention that people should be free to have an opinion without being outed and thus shunned. The problem is that this is what keeps oppressive systems in place. Maybe a person is an employer and closeted racist who just happens to bin the resumes of any applicants of color. He can pretend to be cool and treat everyone nicely to their faces, but behind the scenes he is a cog in the machine we're trying to dismantle.
I personally don't care if someone is racist. As long as it doesn't affect how they treat people and they don't harm
anybody because of it.[/quote]
You're clearly not interested in (the collective) our fight. A lot of us here in this thread are pushing towards an end to prejudice and a world where everyone can feel equal. Fundamentally speaking, how can some people feel equal knowing there are those who view them as lesser? Even if they do not 'harm people' physically, it can cause them emotional, economic, and social harm.
Stating you do not care if someone is racist means you are okay with the continued existence of a racist subpopulation. You also mention that people should be free to have an opinion without being outed and thus shunned. The problem is that this is what keeps oppressive systems in place. Maybe a person is an employer and closeted racist who just happens to bin the resumes of any applicants of color. He can pretend to be cool and treat everyone nicely to their faces, but behind the scenes he is a cog in the machine we're trying to dismantle.
- timothy42b
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Mar 27, 2018
[quote="Mv2541"]Fundamentally speaking, how can some people feel equal knowing there are those who view them as lesser? Even if they do not 'harm people' physically, it can cause them emotional, economic, and social harm.[/quote]
That doesn't seem right to me.
Of course a person can be unaware of their biases and end up doing harm through their actions, I don't disagree with that.
I do disagree that we are entitled to not having anyone have opinions or attitudes that they are aware of and carefully keep to theirselves, just as I disagree that college students of the current generation are entitled to safe spaces where they are protected from any contrary positions. (not quite a parallel, but it came up in something I just read.)
If someone is harmed by either knowing or just mistakenly thinking that someone thought them lesser, didn't they actually harm themselves?
That doesn't seem right to me.
Of course a person can be unaware of their biases and end up doing harm through their actions, I don't disagree with that.
I do disagree that we are entitled to not having anyone have opinions or attitudes that they are aware of and carefully keep to theirselves, just as I disagree that college students of the current generation are entitled to safe spaces where they are protected from any contrary positions. (not quite a parallel, but it came up in something I just read.)
If someone is harmed by either knowing or just mistakenly thinking that someone thought them lesser, didn't they actually harm themselves?
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
In the end it's kind of a problem with no solution. It's impossible to rid the world of racism because since people will see that their views aren't accepted by society they will keep them to themselves. If you think that we need to somehow find every racist, even those that are keeping to themselves and aren't harming anybody then that is just plain fascism.
There is also something to be said about just ignoring what people think about you and moving on with your life. I now for a fact that there are a lot of people who look down on me for both legitimate and non- legitimate reason. But instead of getting all caught up in what they might be thinking I just move on.
There is also something to be said about just ignoring what people think about you and moving on with your life. I now for a fact that there are a lot of people who look down on me for both legitimate and non- legitimate reason. But instead of getting all caught up in what they might be thinking I just move on.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]There is also something to be said about just ignoring what people think about you and moving on with your life. I now for a fact that there are a lot of people who look down on me for both legitimate and non- legitimate reason. But instead of getting all caught up in what they might be thinking I just move on.[/quote]
Oof.
Oof.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
[quote="Burgerbob"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="116855" time="1592422067" user_id="3494">
There is also something to be said about just ignoring what people think about you and moving on with your life. I now for a fact that there are a lot of people who look down on me for both legitimate and non- legitimate reason. But instead of getting all caught up in what they might be thinking I just move on.[/quote]
Oof.
</QUOTE>
I'm not sure that I know what you are trying to say here.
There is also something to be said about just ignoring what people think about you and moving on with your life. I now for a fact that there are a lot of people who look down on me for both legitimate and non- legitimate reason. But instead of getting all caught up in what they might be thinking I just move on.[/quote]
Oof.
</QUOTE>
I'm not sure that I know what you are trying to say here.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="Burgerbob" post_id="116856" time="1592422891" user_id="3131">
Oof.[/quote]
I'm not sure that I know what you are trying to say here.
</QUOTE>
Let's put it this way. The people we are referring to (Black people in the United States) do not get the privilege of "ignoring" what others say about them. You are missing the point entirely.
Oof.[/quote]
I'm not sure that I know what you are trying to say here.
</QUOTE>
Let's put it this way. The people we are referring to (Black people in the United States) do not get the privilege of "ignoring" what others say about them. You are missing the point entirely.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
I'm not even taking about people saying things. I'm talking about getting upset over the fact that some people might not like you. Nobody deserves to get abused about such petty things but nobody is entitled to think that everybody must like them or they will get all upset and start calling it racism.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]I'm not even taking about people saying things. I'm talking about getting upset over the fact that some people might not like you. Nobody deserves to get abused about such petty things but nobody is entitled to think that everybody must like them or they will get all upset and start calling it racism.[/quote]
Not everyone needs to like everyone. But people need to not think others are subhuman because of their skin color. That's a pretty large distinction that I think you're not quite grasping.
Not everyone needs to like everyone. But people need to not think others are subhuman because of their skin color. That's a pretty large distinction that I think you're not quite grasping.
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
You can try to educate on racism but you can't force somebody to not be racist. I'm responding to Mv2541
where he said that people might not feel equal just because there are people that think that they are better. There really isn't anything to do about that unless you support a fascist government so why spend so much energy focusing on that when you can use it to actually do something productive.
where he said that people might not feel equal just because there are people that think that they are better. There really isn't anything to do about that unless you support a fascist government so why spend so much energy focusing on that when you can use it to actually do something productive.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Apr 23, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]You can try to educate on racism but you can't force somebody to not be racist. I'm responding to Mv2541
where he said that people might not feel equal just because there are people that think that they are better. There really isn't anything to do about that unless you support a fascist government so why spend so much energy focusing on that when you can use it to actually do something productive.[/quote]
So, do nothing?
where he said that people might not feel equal just because there are people that think that they are better. There really isn't anything to do about that unless you support a fascist government so why spend so much energy focusing on that when you can use it to actually do something productive.[/quote]
So, do nothing?
- u_8parktoollover
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Jul 06, 2018
First of all, to be clear, we are talking about closeted racists. As I said, You can try to educate but if that fails, there really isn't anything you can do but ignore it.
What's your suggestion?
What's your suggestion?
- slipperyjoe
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
[quote="8parktoollover"]First of all, to be clear, we are talking about closeted racists. As I said, You can try to educate but if that fails, there really isn't anything you can do but ignore it.
What's your suggestion?[/quote]
You (and everyone else) would benefit from reading:
So You Want to Talk About Race by Ijeoma Oluo
https://tinyurl.com/yd3fcfgm
One might argue that ignoring racism is indeed perpetuating racism.
What's your suggestion?[/quote]
You (and everyone else) would benefit from reading:
So You Want to Talk About Race by Ijeoma Oluo
https://tinyurl.com/yd3fcfgm
One might argue that ignoring racism is indeed perpetuating racism.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]<QUOTE author="harrisonreed" post_id="116815" time="1592387217" user_id="3642">
I'm sorry for you that you think that that is actually possible.[/quote]
Oc course you can't rid all racism from all of your actions but again, everybody has biases.
</QUOTE>
I will say that your statement here 100% contradicts what you were talking about. Yes! A racist person cannot rid that bias from their actions. It is a detriment to a modern society.
Maybe if you are living with Wilson the volleyball on a deserted island, you won't hurt anyone with this kind of behavior. But say this person's job was to teach trombone at a university and they didn't out themselves like the person from the symphony in this topic. YES! They will act based on this bias! How many fantastic black trombonists (or women, or middle eastern, or anyone you can have a bias against) might get turned away from being accepted to the program because of this? And they won't have a concrete reason. There is no room for it in ANY society.
I used to be, not biased, but shy around people who were different from me when I was your age. As much as for the fact that I didn't know how they might be, as how I wondered what they might think of me. Not just people from different backgrounds, but different ages and genders too. I think this is normal for any young person. Starting with college and moving through to my job now, I can say that I am coming from a different perspective than you have. I have trained with black Soldiers, and struggled through grueling ruck marches with them. I was trained to be a soldier by Puerto Rican and Black drill sergeants. I was trained to shoot by a black sniper in the Army, and one of the most stellar people I've ever met. I deployed with him, and his leg was destroyed by an anti aircraft shell, and he no longer is in the Army. I have broken bread with Afghans, and talked to them about what they hope for for their futures. I've patrolled the streets of Gardez with Afghan police, fighting to save their city from the same non-sensical fear of the "other" that this topic is about. I've done the same with Poles. I've broken bread with Kuwaitis and people in Kazakhstan, and talked to them about the same things. I've shared meals and played concerts with Korean people. I've played many gigs and had many conversations with Japanese people about what is going on, and the relationship between the US and their country. Everywhere I go, there are good people, and we have the same hopes and dreams around the world. And we NEED to accept and work with each other. In fact, having people with different backgrounds involved in any project makes that project better informed, and better overall in the end. It IS harmful to say, oh, I just need to avoid XYZ and everyone will be better off. No. The more involved in society, your company, or your school you are, the more you will see that it just isn't so. You don't know where someone is actually coming from unless you talk to them and work with them. Asparagus looks like asparagus and tastes like it too. People look like all sorts, bur none of them think or act the same. There is no room for racism, period, in a functioning society.
I'm sorry for you that you think that that is actually possible.[/quote]
Oc course you can't rid all racism from all of your actions but again, everybody has biases.
</QUOTE>
I will say that your statement here 100% contradicts what you were talking about. Yes! A racist person cannot rid that bias from their actions. It is a detriment to a modern society.
Maybe if you are living with Wilson the volleyball on a deserted island, you won't hurt anyone with this kind of behavior. But say this person's job was to teach trombone at a university and they didn't out themselves like the person from the symphony in this topic. YES! They will act based on this bias! How many fantastic black trombonists (or women, or middle eastern, or anyone you can have a bias against) might get turned away from being accepted to the program because of this? And they won't have a concrete reason. There is no room for it in ANY society.
I used to be, not biased, but shy around people who were different from me when I was your age. As much as for the fact that I didn't know how they might be, as how I wondered what they might think of me. Not just people from different backgrounds, but different ages and genders too. I think this is normal for any young person. Starting with college and moving through to my job now, I can say that I am coming from a different perspective than you have. I have trained with black Soldiers, and struggled through grueling ruck marches with them. I was trained to be a soldier by Puerto Rican and Black drill sergeants. I was trained to shoot by a black sniper in the Army, and one of the most stellar people I've ever met. I deployed with him, and his leg was destroyed by an anti aircraft shell, and he no longer is in the Army. I have broken bread with Afghans, and talked to them about what they hope for for their futures. I've patrolled the streets of Gardez with Afghan police, fighting to save their city from the same non-sensical fear of the "other" that this topic is about. I've done the same with Poles. I've broken bread with Kuwaitis and people in Kazakhstan, and talked to them about the same things. I've shared meals and played concerts with Korean people. I've played many gigs and had many conversations with Japanese people about what is going on, and the relationship between the US and their country. Everywhere I go, there are good people, and we have the same hopes and dreams around the world. And we NEED to accept and work with each other. In fact, having people with different backgrounds involved in any project makes that project better informed, and better overall in the end. It IS harmful to say, oh, I just need to avoid XYZ and everyone will be better off. No. The more involved in society, your company, or your school you are, the more you will see that it just isn't so. You don't know where someone is actually coming from unless you talk to them and work with them. Asparagus looks like asparagus and tastes like it too. People look like all sorts, bur none of them think or act the same. There is no room for racism, period, in a functioning society.
- brtnats
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Apr 26, 2018
[quote="8parktoollover"]The point is you can be racist but not behave in a racist fashion. As long as you don't harm anybody then I see no problem. It really isn't that hard to do. In fact we do i all the time.[/quote]
No you can’t. Racism is defined as consistently committing racist ACTS. When you do/say/think something racist, in that moment, you are committing a racist act. Doing that consistently, over time, IS racism. You cannot be racist and not behave in a non-racist way. That would mean you have racist thoughts and impulses, actively engage with them, and suppress them. That’s literally the opposite of what we’re talking about.
No you can’t. Racism is defined as consistently committing racist ACTS. When you do/say/think something racist, in that moment, you are committing a racist act. Doing that consistently, over time, IS racism. You cannot be racist and not behave in a non-racist way. That would mean you have racist thoughts and impulses, actively engage with them, and suppress them. That’s literally the opposite of what we’re talking about.
- Posaunus
- Posts: 5018
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
[quote="harrisonreed"]<QUOTE author="8parktoollover" post_id="116816" time="1592387625" user_id="3494">
Oc course you can't rid all racism from all of your actions but again, everybody has biases.[/quote]
I will say that your statement here 100% contradicts what you were talking about. Yes! A racist person cannot rid that bias from their actions. It is a detriment to a modern society.
People look like all sorts, bur none of them think or act the same. There is no room for racism, period, in a functioning society.
</QUOTE>
Thank you Harrison! We're with you. :good:
Oc course you can't rid all racism from all of your actions but again, everybody has biases.[/quote]
I will say that your statement here 100% contradicts what you were talking about. Yes! A racist person cannot rid that bias from their actions. It is a detriment to a modern society.
People look like all sorts, bur none of them think or act the same. There is no room for racism, period, in a functioning society.
</QUOTE>
Thank you Harrison! We're with you. :good:
- Julie555
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mar 28, 2021
I went to school with this person. She was a good friend of mine for many years.
I can honestly tell you that I have never heard her say a single racist thing in over 20 years of friendship about anybody. She had several pet peeves all around laziness, being financial irresponsible and using poor grammar. Never race, gender or sexual orientation. She even ended her relationship with her mother after her mother made a racist comment about her then latino boyfriend (now husband).
In the last few years i have watched my friend slowly become emotionally unhinged. It seemed to start around the time her son was born. She started becoming kind of angry and obsessive. She blocked her husband from her facebook page and started posting frequent angry rants about him and his adult son. She created a facebook page for her infant son and spent years posting as if it were him speaking in the first person. Her facebook postings became progressively more bizarre until someone called CPS concerned for her young son - who was actually completely fine and well cared for. I dont think she is well.
This is not the story of a racist finally being outed and cancelled. It is the very sad case of a woman going off the deep end. I’m very sad about this and i hope she gets help not further punishment.
I can honestly tell you that I have never heard her say a single racist thing in over 20 years of friendship about anybody. She had several pet peeves all around laziness, being financial irresponsible and using poor grammar. Never race, gender or sexual orientation. She even ended her relationship with her mother after her mother made a racist comment about her then latino boyfriend (now husband).
In the last few years i have watched my friend slowly become emotionally unhinged. It seemed to start around the time her son was born. She started becoming kind of angry and obsessive. She blocked her husband from her facebook page and started posting frequent angry rants about him and his adult son. She created a facebook page for her infant son and spent years posting as if it were him speaking in the first person. Her facebook postings became progressively more bizarre until someone called CPS concerned for her young son - who was actually completely fine and well cared for. I dont think she is well.
This is not the story of a racist finally being outed and cancelled. It is the very sad case of a woman going off the deep end. I’m very sad about this and i hope she gets help not further punishment.
- robcat2075
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Sep 03, 2018
[quote="Julie555"]It seemed to start around the time her son was born.[/quote]
.
Next time someone says, "My kids are driving me crazy"... I'll believe it!
.
Next time someone says, "My kids are driving me crazy"... I'll believe it!
- quiethorn
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mar 24, 2018
I wasn't aware of this thread last year. I'm curious what this lady said. Where can I find it? Someone can PM me if you have it.
- Doug_Elliott
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Mar 22, 2018
I think near the top of this thread there's a link to a screenshot of facebook posts, but everything else has been taken down.
- greenbean
- Posts: 1958
- Joined: Mar 23, 2018
I have to say... reading of her troubles above does change my view of this somewhat...
- quiethorn
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mar 24, 2018
[quote="Doug Elliott"]I think near the top of this thread there's a link to a screenshot of facebook posts, but everything else has been taken down.[/quote]
Thanks, found 'em.
Thanks, found 'em.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Aug 17, 2018
[quote="Julie555"]I went to school with this person. She was a good friend of mine for many years.
I can honestly tell you that I have never heard her say a single racist thing in over 20 years of friendship about anybody. She had several pet peeves all around laziness, being financial irresponsible and using poor grammar. Never race, gender or sexual orientation. She even ended her relationship with her mother after her mother made a racist comment about her then latino boyfriend (now husband).
In the last few years i have watched my friend slowly become emotionally unhinged. It seemed to start around the time her son was born. She started becoming kind of angry and obsessive. She blocked her husband from her facebook page and started posting frequent angry rants about him and his adult son. She created a facebook page for her infant son and spent years posting as if it were him speaking in the first person. Her facebook postings became progressively more bizarre until someone called CPS concerned for her young son - who was actually completely fine and well cared for. I dont think she is well.
This is not the story of a racist finally being outed and cancelled. It is the very sad case of a woman going off the deep end. I’m very sad about this and i hope she gets help not further punishment.[/quote]
But surely you read the racist comments that she wrote during your 20 year friendship?
People going crazy and slipping of into the deep end is anyways sad. If it affects their behavior, the behavior is really all you can go off of. Hopefully her friends who knew her tried to help her out. Her employer definitely helped her see where they stood on her public opinions.
I can honestly tell you that I have never heard her say a single racist thing in over 20 years of friendship about anybody. She had several pet peeves all around laziness, being financial irresponsible and using poor grammar. Never race, gender or sexual orientation. She even ended her relationship with her mother after her mother made a racist comment about her then latino boyfriend (now husband).
In the last few years i have watched my friend slowly become emotionally unhinged. It seemed to start around the time her son was born. She started becoming kind of angry and obsessive. She blocked her husband from her facebook page and started posting frequent angry rants about him and his adult son. She created a facebook page for her infant son and spent years posting as if it were him speaking in the first person. Her facebook postings became progressively more bizarre until someone called CPS concerned for her young son - who was actually completely fine and well cared for. I dont think she is well.
This is not the story of a racist finally being outed and cancelled. It is the very sad case of a woman going off the deep end. I’m very sad about this and i hope she gets help not further punishment.[/quote]
But surely you read the racist comments that she wrote during your 20 year friendship?
People going crazy and slipping of into the deep end is anyways sad. If it affects their behavior, the behavior is really all you can go off of. Hopefully her friends who knew her tried to help her out. Her employer definitely helped her see where they stood on her public opinions.
- robcat2075
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Sep 03, 2018
I had read this as someone who took one too many muscle relaxers and then sat down for some internet commenting with the discretion and common sense filter turned off. Perhaps on more than one occasion.
But the postpartum angle is interesting. There have been many stories like that in the news, with outcomes way worse than losing a job as an orchestral trombone player.
I've been in workplaces with "anger issue" people. There isn't much a co-worker can realistically do. If simply telling them they have a problem was enough to change anything, they probably wouldn't have a problem anyway.
But the postpartum angle is interesting. There have been many stories like that in the news, with outcomes way worse than losing a job as an orchestral trombone player.
I've been in workplaces with "anger issue" people. There isn't much a co-worker can realistically do. If simply telling them they have a problem was enough to change anything, they probably wouldn't have a problem anyway.