Holton TR100

H
hyperbolica
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by hyperbolica »

I know this is a 500 bore 8" rose brass bell, nickel slide, some had mini-48hish gussets, some didn't. Don't know much other than that. I've seen them with the round counterweights and the D shape counterweight. Do they play well? Is it similar to another model? When were they produced? A TC search doesn't turn up much.
M
modelerdc
Posts: 352
Joined: May 03, 2018

by modelerdc »

I had one once, in very good shape. It played well but I sold it as I felt the sound was rather bright for my tastes. Perhaps a little more like a Conn than anything else, but it got brighter faster than a 6H. The one I had was not of a very old vintage, and I can't say if they all are like that.
B
BGuttman
Posts: 7368
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by BGuttman »

It was later than the 65, 66, 67, 68, and 69 models. Probably 1980s.
V
Vegasbound
Posts: 1328
Joined: Jul 06, 2019

by Vegasbound »

Great playing horns, under appreciated I know Chip Hoeler used one for years
J
JerryY
Posts: 60
Joined: May 08, 2018

by JerryY »

I played one up until last year when I had Roy Lawler make me a horn. Mine is a great horn that I've had since 1979.

Nice sound, solid throughout. Mine is still in great shape. The horn needs to "be driven", in other words its not to be finessed. It will take whatever you give it. It is not quite as nimble at low volumes as a lighter horn, but is great all around instrument. The Lawler trombone I replaced it with is a Model 3, Bronze Stem, 7 1/2" and 8" bronze lightweight flares matched to a .500 bore all nickel slide with a #15 leadpipe. It has everything I loved about the TR100,the nimbleness and more!
S
spangy
Posts: 54
Joined: Apr 11, 2018

by spangy »

I have one that I used to play fairly regularly. Mine has the heavy D shaped weight which is removable. Pretty horn, nice player. JerryY is spot on in saying it has to be "driven". I think the heavy counter weight, at least on mine, really stabilizes the sound. If I take it off the horn gets a little too bright, but a little more nimble. But it becomes so nose heavy its almost unplayable. I also have its predecessor, a Holton 69 that I tend to play more often. The 69 has no weight and is fairly light. Fantastic horn.

Small bore Holtons seem to be over looked. Great horns that you can often get a great deal on.
J
jorymil
Posts: 304
Joined: Oct 26, 2019

by jorymil »

One just popped up on Reverb for $150. Don't need another small-bore horn right now: already have a 63 and a Yamaha 352 I like, so somebody snap this one up!
C
Crazy4Tbone86
Posts: 1654
Joined: Jan 14, 2020

by Crazy4Tbone86 »

I’m not convinced that the horn on Reverb is really a TR-100. The bell appears to be yellow brass. Did Holton offer a pro .500 bore horn with a yellow brass bell?
B
biggiesmalls
Posts: 764
Joined: Jan 22, 2019

by biggiesmalls »

[quote="Crazy4Tbone86"]I’m not convinced that the horn on Reverb is really a TR-100. The bell appears to be yellow brass. Did Holton offer a pro .500 bore horn with a yellow brass bell?[/quote]

One thing I've learned from buying and selling vintage Holtons is to expect the unexpected regarding variations in the alloys they used for various parts. This was especially the case with the Stratodynes, where I've seen just about every combination of materials you could imagine. So I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a TR-100 with a yellow brass bell.

Variability is one of the things that makes buying and trying vintage Holtons so fun and interesting.
C
Crazy4Tbone86
Posts: 1654
Joined: Jan 14, 2020

by Crazy4Tbone86 »

Hmm? Biggiesmalls, you make this particular instrument sound more intriguing. Possibly a TR-100 with a yellow brass bell would be more “nimble” than the regular bell with higher copper content? It might also prevent the horn from getting brighter on the higher volumes.
C
chromebone
Posts: 454
Joined: Apr 08, 2018

by chromebone »

The old saying about Holtons is that they were consistently inconsistent. The existence of any number of variations for any model is possible.