Holton bass trombone

B
Beanboy128
Posts: 10
Joined: Oct 07, 2020

by Beanboy128 »

What is up trombone people. I'm doubling from trumpet and accidentally bought a new holton bass bone. Are the newer ones make in elkhart anything to write home about? I know some people really like the old ones but my director (a trumpet player) is convinced the one I got sucks. What do y'all think.
E
Elow
Posts: 1924
Joined: Mar 02, 2020

by Elow »

I think the general consensus is that theyre nothing compared to the older models.
B
BGuttman
Posts: 7368
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by BGuttman »

Do you know which model it is?

169, 183, and 185 are single trigger basses. The 169 is highly prized (and rare).

180 is a dual dependent workhorse and there are some players here. Older ones have the Glantz Bar to activate the valves which takes a lot of getting used to.

181 is a dual independent and some have said it is not as good as the 180. Still, it's better than many of the cheap Chinese horns out there.

680 is large tenor size and is considered a "training bass".

Of course any of these in lousy condition can be dogs. Also, there are no new Holtons being made.
B
Beanboy128
Posts: 10
Joined: Oct 07, 2020

by Beanboy128 »

[quote="BGuttman"]Do you know which model it is?[/quote]
It's a TR 183 in pretty good condition. It's a wee bit stuffy in the lower registers but for light doubling I figured it would work.

Also by new I just meant after conn bought them. I got it used.
B
BGuttman
Posts: 7368
Joined: Mar 22, 2018

by BGuttman »

Stuffiness in the lower register could be due to a misaligned rotor. Easy fix for a good tech; easy to ruin by the Gee-Tar Doctor.
B
Beanboy128
Posts: 10
Joined: Oct 07, 2020

by Beanboy128 »

[quote="BGuttman"]Stuffiness in the lower register could be due to a misaligned rotor. Easy fix for a good tech; easy to ruin by the Gee-Tar Doctor.[/quote]
I checked the witness marks and the rotor mark when I got it. It looked fine to me. I think it just is like that. It isn't stuffy enough to hinder playing in low register though.
E
elmsandr
Posts: 1373
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by elmsandr »

[quote="BGuttman"]... Also, there are no new Holtons being made.[/quote]
I am not sure that is true. It was a little while ago, but I saw some in the Elkhart Bach plant a couple of years ago. Did they drop them over the last year or two?

Cheers,

Andy
W
WGWTR180
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sep 04, 2019

by WGWTR180 »

Holton 183 bass bones are not that good. The older good Holtons are good-but some are not. Try before you buy. ALSO Not all 185 and 169 basses are single valve instruments-I wish people would quit saying this. Many people who play them have the additional plug-in valve making it a double/dependent instrument. TR 181's can be okay but they're terribly over braced. Also older Holton bass lead pipes are consistently bad.
B
Basbasun
Posts: 496
Joined: Mar 26, 2018

by Basbasun »

I had several Holtons over the years. Some are good, some are not so good. Like Bach. I have a very good 183, a friend of mine also have a good one. Actually I have seen some pretty bad Holtons, but never a bad 183. How come?

Just have a decent trombone (bass) player test the horn.
M
Mikebmiller
Posts: 961
Joined: Mar 27, 2018

by Mikebmiller »

How does one accidentally buy a bass trombone?
E
Elow
Posts: 1924
Joined: Mar 02, 2020

by Elow »

[quote="Mikebmiller"]How does one accidentally buy a bass trombone?[/quote]

It happens
W
WGWTR180
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sep 04, 2019

by WGWTR180 »

[quote="Basbasun"]I had several Holtons over the years. Some are good, some are not so good. Like Bach. I have a very good 183, a friend of mine also have a good one. Actually I have seen some pretty bad Holtons, but never a bad 183. How come?

Just have a decent trombone (bass) player test the horn.[/quote]
Interesting. All 183s I've played have been horrid.
M
mrdeacon
Posts: 1225
Joined: May 08, 2018

by mrdeacon »

[quote="WGWTR180"]<QUOTE author="Basbasun" post_id="134106" time="1608117401" user_id="196">
I had several Holtons over the years. Some are good, some are not so good. Like Bach. I have a very good 183, a friend of mine also have a good one. Actually I have seen some pretty bad Holtons, but never a bad 183. How come?

Just have a decent trombone (bass) player test the horn.[/quote]
Interesting. All 183s I've played have been horrid.
</QUOTE>
Same. At least in comparison to a half-decent Bach 50B or Holton TR185.

I have yet to try an actual early one with the GR pipe, different tuning slide, and long handslide. I've just tried medallion and later models that are basically just chopped up TR181's.
W
WGWTR180
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sep 04, 2019

by WGWTR180 »

[quote="mrdeacon"]<QUOTE author="WGWTR180" post_id="134240" time="1608223026" user_id="7573">

Interesting. All 183s I've played have been horrid.[/quote]
Same. At least in comparison to a half-decent Bach 50B or Holton TR185.

I have yet to try an actual early one with the GR pipe, different tuning slide, and long handslide. I've just tried medallion and later models that are basically just chopped up TR181's.
</QUOTE>

Do you like the GR pipes with the Holtons? Do you mean the M&K one?
M
mrdeacon
Posts: 1225
Joined: May 08, 2018

by mrdeacon »

[quote="WGWTR180"]<QUOTE author="mrdeacon" post_id="134248" time="1608226948" user_id="3239">

Same. At least in comparison to a half-decent Bach 50B or Holton TR185.

I have yet to try an actual early one with the GR pipe, different tuning slide, and long handslide. I've just tried medallion and later models that are basically just chopped up TR181's.[/quote]

Do you like the GR pipes with the Holtons? Do you mean the M&K one?
</QUOTE>
You know I haven't been the biggest fan of the GR pipes in Holtons now that I think of it... I seem to really prefer either a 169 pipe (Kanstul or original) or the BrassArk's or Chuck's version of the Minick/Schatz TR185 pipe.
J
JoeStanko
Posts: 135
Joined: Apr 11, 2018

by JoeStanko »

I have a Kanstul 169 pipe in one of my 169 slides - good choice.
M
Mikebmiller
Posts: 961
Joined: Mar 27, 2018

by Mikebmiller »

[quote="Mikebmiller"]How does one accidentally buy a bass trombone?[/quote]

I pocket dial people all the time. I guess I could pocket buy a horn.
J
JohnL
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by JohnL »

[quote="Mikebmiller"]How does one accidentally buy a bass trombone?[/quote]
An intent to buy a symphonic tenor with an f-attachment, a vague description with blurry pictures, and a price that's too good to pass up.
W
whitbey
Posts: 654
Joined: Mar 23, 2018

by whitbey »

[quote="Mikebmiller"]How does one accidentally buy a bass trombone?[/quote]

They hit bottom.

:biggrin:
V
Vegastokc
Posts: 211
Joined: Jun 15, 2018

by Vegastokc »

[quote="whitbey"]<QUOTE author="Mikebmiller" post_id="134232" time="1608215945" user_id="213">
How does one accidentally buy a bass trombone?[/quote]

They hit bottom.

:biggrin:
</QUOTE>

*rimshot*

#dadmusicjoke

Well played.
W
WGWTR180
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sep 04, 2019

by WGWTR180 »

[quote="JoeStanko"]I have a Kanstul 169 pipe in one of my 169 slides - good choice.[/quote]
Joe I have one of those pipes as well. It's pretty darn good! Does your mouthpiece fit in far enough? I had to do some work on mine.

Mr. deacon I have several of those Schatz pipes as well. One very good-one so so.
J
JoeStanko
Posts: 135
Joined: Apr 11, 2018

by JoeStanko »

[quote="WGWTR180"]<QUOTE author="JoeStanko" post_id="134276" time="1608241061" user_id="3042">
I have a Kanstul 169 pipe in one of my 169 slides - good choice.[/quote]
Joe I have one of those pipes as well. It's pretty darn good! Does your mouthpiece fit in far enough? I had to do some work on mine.

Mr. deacon I have several of those Schatz pipes as well. One very good-one so so.
</QUOTE>

Hi Bill, yes, the mouthpiece sits further out of the Kanstul 169 pipe then some other pipes - quire a difference with the Yamaha 613H pipe I have in my Bach slide. I did have a Brasslab Schatz leadpipe in this slide previously - Chris now has this pipe. The Brasslab was more open and the mouthpiece did sit further in.

I think the Kanstul pipe better fits the character of the 169 than the Brasslab - more resistance and it has more clarity. The Brasslab pipe is excellent but this one would probably be a better match in a Bach slide - it had more of an orchestral sound. Let's see if Chris offers his opinion as he's tried it with different instruments.

My other 169 is stock - I think I'll try that slide on my preferred bell section to compare the leadpipes. Any other suggestions for pipes that you found to work well in a Holton?

Joe
M
MBeal
Posts: 49
Joined: Nov 30, 2020

by MBeal »

[quote="Elow"]<QUOTE author="Mikebmiller" post_id="134232" time="1608215945" user_id="213">
How does one accidentally buy a bass trombone?[/quote]

It happens
</QUOTE>

Wine + iPhone = how I ended up with my alto trombone
W
WGWTR180
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sep 04, 2019

by WGWTR180 »

[quote="JoeStanko"]<QUOTE author="WGWTR180" post_id="134347" time="1608300299" user_id="7573">

Joe I have one of those pipes as well. It's pretty darn good! Does your mouthpiece fit in far enough? I had to do some work on mine.

Mr. deacon I have several of those Schatz pipes as well. One very good-one so so.[/quote]

Hi Bill, yes, the mouthpiece sits further out of the Kanstul 169 pipe then some other pipes - quire a difference with the Yamaha 613H pipe I have in my Bach slide. I did have a Brasslab Schatz leadpipe in this slide previously - Chris now has this pipe. The Brasslab was more open and the mouthpiece did sit further in.

I think the Kanstul pipe better fits the character of the 169 than the Brasslab - more resistance and it has more clarity. The Brasslab pipe is excellent but this one would probably be a better match in a Bach slide - it had more of an orchestral sound. Let's see if Chris offers his opinion as he's tried it with different instruments.

My other 169 is stock - I think I'll try that slide on my preferred bell section to compare the leadpipes. Any other suggestions for pipes that you found to work well in a Holton?

Joe
</QUOTE>

Joe in one of my 180's the Brasslab pipe works the best. In another one a Bach 50 pipe works well-actually able to use the horn in certain orchestral situations. As you know the way Chuck made his pipes led to many inconsistencies. But then again some of the new pipes offered today are also inconsistent. I have a Schatz #3 pipe sitting here where the mouthpiece sits way too deep-horn sounds spread with matched with one of my trusty 1 and 1/2 pieces. With a bigger piece maybe it would work.
F
FOSSIL
Posts: 688
Joined: Jul 09, 2019

by FOSSIL »

Hi Bill and Joe, It happens that I have been checking through my pipes after a mouthpiece change, I am talking about this in relation to a 60H Conn which will, of course change how the pipes work. The Brasslab pipe I got from Joe is nice, but not as good as my old 70H pipe, as is the Minick L I got from Bill. The Herrick pipe I got from Jack is also nice, but the 70H pipe still out performs them. After reading this I dug out my Kanstul 169 and it was way better than I remembered... in fact I'd put it second to the 70H pipe and I suspect that fitted in a Holton it would be the winner.

Chris
S
spencercarran
Posts: 689
Joined: Oct 17, 2020

by spencercarran »

Now you all have got me wondering if I should tinker with leadpipe options in my 180. I'm fairly sure Gary Dafler pulled the original (it was probably trashed) but no clue what he might have replaced it with. Where are good places to source some from, especially with Kanstul closed down now?